US Joe Biden News Megathread - The Other Biden Derangement Syndrome Thread (with a side order of Fauci Derangement Syndrome)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Let's pretend for one moment that he does die before the election, just for the funsies. What happens then? Will the nomination revert to option number 2, aka Bernie Sanders? Or will his running mate automatically replace him just the way Vice-President is supposted to step in after the Big Man in the White House chokes on a piece of matzo? Does he even have a running mate yet?
 
I know it's about disarming. But in some cases, if you take away one method of killing your enemies, some will just move to another one if they're dedicated enough. Have you ever seen what a Minecraft player can do?
They really don't think that there's anything that compares to firearms.

Dumbest-ever.jpg


Even if it was a Poe, I've heard the same arguments that someone will get tired before they kill too many people with a knife and that it's really hard, almost impossible due to modern medical technology, to kill someone with a knife.

Wanna know why they want to seize guns?

Kamala told you why.

ezgif-3-fb1bd9d48b0c.jpg

Turns out the above is from a satire site according to all the Fact Checking sites.
 
Last edited:
They really don't think that there's anything that compares to firearms.

View attachment 1989718

Even if it was a Poe, I've heard the same arguments that someone will get tired before they kill too many people with a knife and that it's really hard, almost impossible due to modern medical technology, to kill someone with a knife.

Wanna know why they want to seize guns?

Kamala told you why.

View attachment 1989722
Well, their road to utopia isn't happening as fast as they want.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Vyse Inglebard
They really don't think that there's anything that compares to firearms.

View attachment 1989718

Even if it was a Poe, I've heard the same arguments that someone will get tired before they kill too many people with a knife and that it's really hard, almost impossible due to modern medical technology, to kill someone with a knife.

Wanna know why they want to seize guns?

Kamala told you why.

View attachment 1989722
The Fact Checkers™️ deny she ever said that, but we all know she is thinking it. I'm the last person to defend Cameltoe, but live not by lies.
 
She literally said this. I remember her saying it on TV.
Sauce? Not saying it isn't true, I just want proof that deboonks the deboonkers.
If anything, she probably realizes the environment isn't right to go public about that aspect yet.
If she had said this on record, I don't think Dems and all the Lugenpresse spin-doctoring could not have ever lived it down.
 
@The High Prophet of Truth what the actual fuck.

I'm surprised we haven't had another 9/11 style event yet.
I'm intimately familiar with how domestic US military bases are secured. The reason we haven't had another 9/11 event is because nobody is trying to 9/11 us. The door is wide open when someone eventually does.

For your consideration...
-Depending on the size of the base, there's only a small number of armed military police on duty with an equally small back up force. About 1/4 of them aren't trained as military police, but temporarily pulled in from other military jobs to help bolster their presence.
-There's only enough rifles in the base armory to arm about 10% of the base, and that's if you're lucky.
-You're not allowed to have personal weapons on base with very uncommon exceptions. That means people living in the barracks are perpetually unarmed.

How do you think Nadal Hassan did the damage he did? Nobody had the capability to shoot back. This is the result of training people to be killers, then throwing them in an environment where they're treated like 3rd graders.
 
I'm intimately familiar with how domestic US military bases are secured. The reason we haven't had another 9/11 event is because nobody is trying to 9/11 us. The door is wide open when someone eventually does.

For your consideration...
-Depending on the size of the base, there's only a small number of armed military police on duty with an equally small back up force. About 1/4 of them aren't trained as military police, but temporarily pulled in from other military jobs to help bolster their presence.
-There's only enough rifles in the base armory to arm about 10% of the base, and that's if you're lucky.
-You're not allowed to have personal weapons on base with very uncommon exceptions. That means people living in the barracks are perpetually unarmed.

How do you think Nadal Hassan did the damage he did? Nobody had the capability to shoot back. This is the result of training people to be killers, then throwing them in an environment where they're treated like 3rd graders.
God damn it, I need a horrifying sticker.
 
I'm intimately familiar with how domestic US military bases are secured. The reason we haven't had another 9/11 event is because nobody is trying to 9/11 us. The door is wide open when someone eventually does.

For your consideration...
-Depending on the size of the base, there's only a small number of armed military police on duty with an equally small back up force. About 1/4 of them aren't trained as military police, but temporarily pulled in from other military jobs to help bolster their presence.
Unless things have changed majorly, units on base are mobilized after being armed for a major situation.
-There's only enough rifles in the base armory to arm about 10% of the base, and that's if you're lucky.
When did they change that. It used to be each unit had their own arm's room, with enough weapons to fully arm the entire unit +10%. On a military post the units are responsible for their own armories.

My weapon was stored in the unit arm's room, which was only two stories below me and less than 5 minutes, with the CQ having the arm's room keys and at least one armorer at all times in the barracks.

The only place I can think of that had a single armory for the entire 'base' was a NG armory.
-You're not allowed to have personal weapons on base with very uncommon exceptions. That means people living in the barracks are perpetually unarmed.
Yeah, Clinton did that shit in the 1990's. I heard it was rolled back.
How do you think Nadal Hassan did the damage he did? Nobody had the capability to shoot back. This is the result of training people to be killers, then throwing them in an environment where they're treated like 3rd graders.
He attacked them during POM (Preperation for Overseas Movement) where nobody had their weapons issued, everyone was getting medical and paperwork checks, and nobody had ammunition or body armor. They were in uniform only.

That's like being startled nobody has the capability to shoot back when they're being attacked while at HR turning in paperwork.
 
I mean, we had Nadler tweeting about the government owning nukes when a guy said Joe Public has rifles.
Are you thinking of Swalwell? Alas, I could see an arrogant blob like Nadler saying that.

You also had Pelosi, Waters, and Cameltoe herself cheering on the Fiery but Mostly Peaceful Protesters and encouraging them to get belligerent with Trump staffers. And Twatterati who don't get banned when posting "Elect Rand Paul's Neighbor".
 
The US population is more armed than ever, and people aren't rising against the government. The MSM is too strong. If it was going to happen it already would have. People trust their MSM outlets.
Just because I don't punch you for staring at my girl's ass doesn't mean I won't kick your kidneys into a pulp when you try to drag her into the bathroom and rape her. This falls in line with, "we have tanks and nukes so you can't fight us." People have a breaking point, and just because we haven't hit it yet from day to day political and social inconveniences doesn't mean it doesn't exist. You seem a lot less worried about politicians and journalists getting plugged by their constituency than the politicians and journalists subject to the plugging.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back