- Joined
- Mar 4, 2021
You're welcome.
Charles Alexander Berry / Buck Daniel Riley / Toggle the Rat / @onebiggrumpyrat / ExitMouse / Smoochthispooch / huskeyindenial / clunkymunk - Doug Spink's little animal rapist friend
- Thread starter s0mbra
- Start date
- Joined
- Dec 7, 2020
This happens all the time everywhere.
Every fat person thread is permeated by circlejerk over how their heart is going to stop literally tomorrow.
Every retard baby thread is chock full of people repeating same shit about grifting and child abuse.
About quarter of any child rapist thread is always made of people virtue signaling how they would press the button twice.
And the worst part - it's always same.
This thread could be probably 10 pages instead of 65, if all this duplicate shit was never posted.
Also the line about not being autistic illuminati is being repeated so often, it starts getting to me.
- Joined
- Jul 2, 2015
It fucking baffles me if the therapist is really covering for him, especially if he's actually owned up about doing things with animals.
Therapists are generally allowed to break confidentiality contracts with their client if their safety or the safety of others is an issue. Thinking about animals being exempt from that is heartbreaking.
- Joined
- Jul 4, 2019
You know, on one hand, I can sorta understand the thread shitting. Animal fuckers are on the same level as pedophiles for most of humanity and the sight of one makes people want to bash their brains in or at the very least beat the shit out of them.
But on the other hand, shitting up a thread documenting these sick fucks with trying to contact them to just talking about contacting authorities when they've either 1. Already have been contacted and are working on it or 2. Need more evidence to lay the law down on the sick fucks, is on Down Syndrome levels of retardation. Either come with evidence or shut the fuck up because everyone has had enough of the peanut gallery.
But on the other hand, shitting up a thread documenting these sick fucks with trying to contact them to just talking about contacting authorities when they've either 1. Already have been contacted and are working on it or 2. Need more evidence to lay the law down on the sick fucks, is on Down Syndrome levels of retardation. Either come with evidence or shut the fuck up because everyone has had enough of the peanut gallery.
- Joined
- Jul 3, 2019
I very much so doubt that rat boy here decided to tell his counselor about his illegal activities Involving animal rape. You know because despite doctor patient confidentiality they're still required to report any and all illegal and dangerous activity.
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2017
Sadly, you can't really just infer that from regular assault/battery laws.
It's not weening to say: unironically write your senators.
- Joined
- Jan 25, 2020
In past in his own words he did, apparently it was okay with his tard wrangler. Tard wranglers like vets aren't obligated to report abuse.
Plus your average degenerate John Money tier therapists ENCOURAGE
Rest are scared shitless over getting sued for breaking patient confidentiality.
Don't underestimate most liberal profession that is "sexuality counsellors". Same college professor who spreads papers how pedeastry is okay and people should stop being mean
Those "professionals" are ass patters and reaffirm any given delusion be it pedo, zoo or troon. They're basically prostitutes with a mail in diploma.
- Joined
- Nov 19, 2015
- Joined
- Mar 2, 2021
- Joined
- May 21, 2018
Alright, I'm calling bullshit. As someone who works in the field, veterinarians are mandatory reporters and are obligated to call law enforcement if they suspect abuse or neglect. If there's someone harming the pet, there's a good chance they're abusing someone else in the house, too.
The PDF I'm posting is made by the AVMA (American Veterinary Medical Association) and it gives veterinarians the resources on how to find and report suspected abuse and wouldn't you know it, there's a nice little mention of sexual abuse under Section III:
Now why would an accredited association - one that every veterinary clinic and hospital needs approval by to operate, as well as certifying veterinarian and technicians - put that in with regards to reporting abuse (because y'know, to zoofucks, it's not abuse)? Things that make you go hmm.
Anyway, people really need to shut the fuck up about shit they know nothing about because you're spreading misinformation in a thread whose topic survives on ignorance and falsehood. It's already been said before, but if you don't have anything new to contribute, don't fucking spam the thread with your inane thoughts; you want these guys dead, so does 99% of the population.
(Edited to better articulate my thoughts)
Last edited:
- Joined
- May 17, 2020
Zoophiles and animal molesters are terrified of veterinarian and even grooming services finding out what they're doing, and unlike therapists they're required to report any suspected animal sexual grooming or abuse. Much like how zoophiles will almost always fight getting their animal fixed, they fight putting their animal under veterinary care, and it's unfortunately likely that Toby (Chuck and Trevor's dog since half of the thread seems to be unable to read the fucking OP) hasn't seen a vet since he was a puppy, and maybe not even then given the likely state of their finances. Predators don't like having their victim outside of their immediate control, especially in the hands of someone who might be able to figure out what's going on behind closed doors. Toby probably has a myriad of health issues, all untreated because Chucklefuck will want to keep the dog away from animal healthcare professionals, and the fact he's made it almost to 10 is somewhat surprising to me honestly.
- Joined
- Jul 3, 2019
Dont get me wrong that's what social workers and mental health workers are supposed to do. However like you said there are ways around this and or apathetic counselors/ therapist. It's likely rat boy is discussing these actions in a hypothetical manner. And not outright saying yeah I raped a dog to death today. Keep mind He could just be out right lying one should ask themselves what most probable
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2020
I would not believe he is telling a therapist, let alone a vet, that he is dicking a dog. Most likely he is talking in whataboutisms about how he hates the online treatment. Matter of fact, if he is seeing a therapist, i would bet the house that is what it is for, not talking about actual "imma stop dicking my dog but i cant leave the degen behind".
Then again, the only source we have for this its his own word, i wouldnt even dwelve too hard on it unless some document confirming it gets leaked, which i havent seen in the thread yet (tho i did skipped some pages cuz dupe opinions.)
Then again, the only source we have for this its his own word, i wouldnt even dwelve too hard on it unless some document confirming it gets leaked, which i havent seen in the thread yet (tho i did skipped some pages cuz dupe opinions.)
- Joined
- Oct 22, 2020
1st thing, & easiest, is the animal welfare check in, which that supposedly professional dude, is looking into. That begins the law record, & has some good pathways. A log of interactions w/ law enforcement, animal welfare etc, is the start.
There are people who act as watchdogs for animal welfare, especially from (1) rapists ie zoophiles etc. and people who use animals for (2) fighting, or (3) torture/ snuff. Those are the top 3 of the watchdog groups concerns, w/ some overlap between groups..
Professional dude is apparently one of those. Those people are connected w/ the system & sometimes part of it, social workers, lawyers, case managers, etc.
Toggles/ Buck/ Charles has a documented history of bragging about his animal rape. All the other shit aside, he has admitted to the acts, multiple ways & times. Podcast & twitter etc.
Yes, there are hearsay arguments, but those are flimsy, at best. I’d be hard pressed to take on his defense case, as the evidence adds up, too much. It’s so stacked that it becomes less “soft.”
What I mean is, it’s volume & frequency makes it closer to hard, irrefutable, evidence, beyond the scope of hearsay. Once saw a judge convict someone based on a witness giving testimony about how they heard the suspect commit the act in question, over a phone line. They didn’t see it in person, or have a video/ photo, but due to scope & repeat performance, aided in conviction. Hearsay can aid in a process. It’s not simply dismissed.
Some animal rapist can write about it online, gross & bragging, lamenting their psychotic, mental- gymnastics, to try & rationalize their acts. Then they can claim to a judge, “it was just a story, etc” and that’s a form of hearsay. This is not quite the same.
Charles waxes on, many places, many times, about his dog rape, & his gross, misguided/ psychotic, justifications for it, “animals love, too” bullshit, but, it’s well beyond being able to slime out of it as a 1 time short story.
For 1, he bragged about dog rape alongside a notorious, known, dog raper, Spink. That podcast is damning.
Then, he has made little “how to” audios, on his dog rapes, that “blowjob” one, archived up thread, comes to mind immediately.
Add on his sermons about dog rape, all over twitter, when describing his dog, hanging around, next to him for pets. His interpretation & subsequent actions described are damning.
He admitted it, many times, it’s obvious there is more. What we’ve been allowed to see, as simple internet rando’s, is just the tip of the iceberg.
What’s already out there, (& more importantly, archived already) is enough in its own right to warrant an animal welfare check, which can lead to more. Etc.
He, (as most fur inclined people do) reflects his thoughts & feelings onto the animal. There is a word for this behavior, just slipping my mind, but it’s like projecting your wants & ideals on to an animal. Trying to humanize their behavior. Gross shit, when taken this far, especially.
So far, he acts proud, seeks reinforcement & to reinforce others, build fake “community “ to spread the diss ease, dog rape disease. This is not something that should happen. You even see mentally ill zoophiles/ animal rapists, say, “we shouldn’t have a flag ‘cause the ‘zoosadists’ will hide betwixt us!” crap. Deflection of course, as raping isn’t better than snuffing, both are beyond the pale, but the “non-sadists” have to have their scapegoats, too, I guess.
That’s why he needs a record. Like any crime that typically doesn’t get enough time or punishment, step one is to accrue a log or record w/ the law/ authorities.
As I said, I was happy to see “animal welfare check” up thread, as that’s where it starts. That’s recorded.
The circumstantial evidence, possible hard evidence, the process, is begun.
That’s the current best imo, knowing that there is evidence enough for that, & that it’s likely to increase or begin to produce more. Even behavior during the check is noted.
The other shoe always drops, just not always how one would like, or when. What can be gleaned is that due to the knowledge now known, the process has begun, w/ some promise of consequences for behavior.
An animal welfare check may not sound like much, but it’s a decent start.
There are people who act as watchdogs for animal welfare, especially from (1) rapists ie zoophiles etc. and people who use animals for (2) fighting, or (3) torture/ snuff. Those are the top 3 of the watchdog groups concerns, w/ some overlap between groups..
Professional dude is apparently one of those. Those people are connected w/ the system & sometimes part of it, social workers, lawyers, case managers, etc.
Toggles/ Buck/ Charles has a documented history of bragging about his animal rape. All the other shit aside, he has admitted to the acts, multiple ways & times. Podcast & twitter etc.
Yes, there are hearsay arguments, but those are flimsy, at best. I’d be hard pressed to take on his defense case, as the evidence adds up, too much. It’s so stacked that it becomes less “soft.”
What I mean is, it’s volume & frequency makes it closer to hard, irrefutable, evidence, beyond the scope of hearsay. Once saw a judge convict someone based on a witness giving testimony about how they heard the suspect commit the act in question, over a phone line. They didn’t see it in person, or have a video/ photo, but due to scope & repeat performance, aided in conviction. Hearsay can aid in a process. It’s not simply dismissed.
Some animal rapist can write about it online, gross & bragging, lamenting their psychotic, mental- gymnastics, to try & rationalize their acts. Then they can claim to a judge, “it was just a story, etc” and that’s a form of hearsay. This is not quite the same.
Charles waxes on, many places, many times, about his dog rape, & his gross, misguided/ psychotic, justifications for it, “animals love, too” bullshit, but, it’s well beyond being able to slime out of it as a 1 time short story.
For 1, he bragged about dog rape alongside a notorious, known, dog raper, Spink. That podcast is damning.
Then, he has made little “how to” audios, on his dog rapes, that “blowjob” one, archived up thread, comes to mind immediately.
Add on his sermons about dog rape, all over twitter, when describing his dog, hanging around, next to him for pets. His interpretation & subsequent actions described are damning.
He admitted it, many times, it’s obvious there is more. What we’ve been allowed to see, as simple internet rando’s, is just the tip of the iceberg.
What’s already out there, (& more importantly, archived already) is enough in its own right to warrant an animal welfare check, which can lead to more. Etc.
He, (as most fur inclined people do) reflects his thoughts & feelings onto the animal. There is a word for this behavior, just slipping my mind, but it’s like projecting your wants & ideals on to an animal. Trying to humanize their behavior. Gross shit, when taken this far, especially.
So far, he acts proud, seeks reinforcement & to reinforce others, build fake “community “ to spread the diss ease, dog rape disease. This is not something that should happen. You even see mentally ill zoophiles/ animal rapists, say, “we shouldn’t have a flag ‘cause the ‘zoosadists’ will hide betwixt us!” crap. Deflection of course, as raping isn’t better than snuffing, both are beyond the pale, but the “non-sadists” have to have their scapegoats, too, I guess.
That’s why he needs a record. Like any crime that typically doesn’t get enough time or punishment, step one is to accrue a log or record w/ the law/ authorities.
As I said, I was happy to see “animal welfare check” up thread, as that’s where it starts. That’s recorded.
The circumstantial evidence, possible hard evidence, the process, is begun.
That’s the current best imo, knowing that there is evidence enough for that, & that it’s likely to increase or begin to produce more. Even behavior during the check is noted.
The other shoe always drops, just not always how one would like, or when. What can be gleaned is that due to the knowledge now known, the process has begun, w/ some promise of consequences for behavior.
An animal welfare check may not sound like much, but it’s a decent start.
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2020
Any thoughts on this, @MemphisWatchDog ?
- Joined
- Jan 25, 2020
Assuming that he is legit, he's doing paperwork, groundwork and digging himself. He'll be here by end of the month with or without results
- Joined
- Jul 12, 2020
@MemphisWatchDog mentioned that they spoke to someone in order to confirm that they weren’t full of shit. Sombra also noted they spoke to the same person and that it checks out, so who did they speak to? Was it null? Bc if so then yeah I get it but if not then who has that kind of authority to say if someone is legit or not?
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2020
Sombra was involved in this investigation since the beginning and took numerous important decisions in the process of finding Toggle's identity, he even wrote the OP. If he has reasons believe the Watchdog guy is legit, i trust his judgement. I don't think he would have any reasons to lie about it. Other than that, Watchdog sounds pretty convincing even though he hasn't shared his personal identity or any actual proof that he works as a investigator.
- Joined
- Jan 25, 2020
It would be nice to know if he is a PI or does he work with social security, animal welfare for example.
Anyway back to toggle. Nothing unusual outside him sperging about zoophilestruggles Twitter account, crocodile tears and soyboy behavior. He is working to shit out another episode of ZTT.
That is all
- Joined
- May 21, 2018
It's been awhile so apologies if I'm wrong, but I remember somewhere in the zoosadist thread Kero was talking on one of his social media accounts about his dog that passed away and I think the cause was something renal-related (kidney failure)? Whatever it was, I remember not being surprised seeing how it was abused and the trauma from said abuse could have at least been an instigator to that poor dogs decline.
Edit: @scumbus clarified that it was a UTI that killed the dog, which is more messed up since one round of antibiotics could've cleared that all up. Fuck me, man...
And the thing is, there was no mention (that I remember) of the dog being treated, not even a GoFundMe to help pay a vet bill.
Abnormalities almost always show up in blood (low RBC count, high glucose, lyme disease, etc.), so obtaining a blood sample is usually what a veterinarian does first after an external exam. And a lot of the time, it can be treated: there's medicine, food and certain types of therapy that can prolong a pet's life that's dealing with chronic health issues; pets with concerned owners don't just up and die from congestive heart failure or FIV anymore.
If the dog's that old, he should be seeing a veterinarian twice a year along with keeping up-to-date on vaccines. From simply skimming that PDF, there's a lot of things a veterinarian looks for in both the pet and the owner. If Charles was even half as responsible and cared half as much for his geriatric dog, he'd have already been caught.
The AVMA is right, I'm going to stop calling them zoophiles and start calling them animal sex abusers. No more flowery words that water down their actions and ignore the fact that animals are always a victim- they're sex abusers, plain and simple.
Last edited: