Sophie Labelle Verville / Guillaume Labelle / Serious Trans Vibes Comics / Assigned Male / Candycore Comics / Pastel Sexy Times / WafflesArt - Obnoxious webcomics and horrific porn by a crazy fat pedo troon

[Law]

I like how he groups up fat, disabled, black, and trans people into a clique

We all know Guillaume doesn't have black friends in real life.

 

[Jah Hates Kaffirs]

We all know Guillaume doesn't have friends in real life.

FTFY

 

[he who has thus come/gone]

"I'm not saying you have to have sex with trannies, but you also can't not have sex with trannies. Now change my diaper, terf."

 

[AirdropShitposts]

View attachment 2000586

https://www.facebook.com/lasophielabelle/posts/3113811308898986

https://archive.ph/vEjBS

Yikes, this sounds an awful lot like kink shaming. Who am I to judge if somebody's kink is women born with ovaries and without prostates?

 

[Tragi-Chan]

Try me. Even the semi-attractive MTF’s still have an uncanny valley look. Blaire White is the closest thing I’ve seen to a hot MTF and the thought that always springs to mind is “porn whore living blow up doll.” Still unattractive but not for the reasons troons are.

For me personally, I don’t have a policy of not dating trans women. It’s just that as a straight guy, the moment my brain clocks that a woman is male, I’m just not interested. There are all these essays and articles saying, “Well actually lots of trans people are really attractive.” Good for them! Where are they?

I wonder if part of the rage over super straights is down to troon cope. Most, if not all, trooned out under the delusion that they could become a woman indistinguishable from the real thing. You could even, per Labelle’s comics, sleep with them and not know. This movement highlights what they all secretly know, which is that they’ve been lied to.

 

[Hongourable Madisha]

He either doesn't understand how heterosexuality and homosexuality work, or he does and thinks it's possible to change them or to appear so close to the opposite sex as to trick someone's sexuality. Like how some HSTS see straight guys and AGPs see lesbians as a challenge, because if someone who can only be attracted to women is attracted to them, that must mean they're a true and honest woman. It's validation of their identity/fetish rather than attraction to the other person that gets them off. You see it all the time in AGPs' erotica (which is always a hilarious read), they say shit like "so after the aliens turned me into a woman with their sex rays, this one totally hot chick wanted me and she was a real cis lesbian!!!" Either that, or "and then this big muscly black straight man who was so much more manly than I ever was as a man, he put his thingy in my you know what and we totally did it, made me feel like a real laydee" etc.
What I don't get is how nagging people into sex works with that. Surely if you have to badger someone into sleeping with you, they're not really attracted to you, and so you're not really sparking any desire in them, so the fantasy wouldn't be fulfilled. It's very strange.

 

[Tragi-Chan]

He either doesn't understand how heterosexuality and homosexuality work, or he does and thinks it's possible to change them or to appear so close to the opposite sex as to trick someone's sexuality. Like how some HSTS see straight guys and AGPs see lesbians as a challenge, because if someone who can only be attracted to women is attracted to them, that must mean they're a true and honest woman. It's validation of their identity/fetish rather than attraction to the other person that gets them off. You see it all the time in AGPs' erotica (which is always a hilarious read), they say shit like "so after the aliens turned me into a woman with their sex rays, this one totally hot chick wanted me and she was a real cis lesbian!!!" Either that, or "and then this big muscly black straight man who was so much more manly than I ever was as a man, he put his thingy in my you know what and we totally did it, made me feel like a real laydee" etc.
What I don't get is how nagging people into sex works with that. Surely if you have to badger someone into sleeping with you, they're not really attracted to you, and so you're not really sparking any desire in them, so the fantasy wouldn't be fulfilled. It's very strange.

They aren’t interested in their partners’ feelings. You see this a lot in Labelle’s strips. The cis man who bangs a troon is presented as clueless if not verging on antagonistic, and any ethical issues regarding consent are dismissed.

 

[Sexy Senior Citizen]

View attachment 2000586

https://www.facebook.com/lasophielabelle/posts/3113811308898986

https://archive.ph/vEjBS

Spoiler: Larger version

View attachment 2000585

Okay, Labelle. Lemme put it like this:

I do not consent to a date/sex/a romantic relationship with a trans person.

If I do not give my consent, am I going to be forced against my will to do so? Because there's a four letter word for such coercion, and engaging in that four letter word is very illegal.

 

[From The Uncanny Valley]

Okay, Labelle. Lemme put it like this:

I do not consent to a date/sex/a romantic relationship with a trans person.

If I do not give my consent, am I going to be forced against my will to do so? Because there's a four letter word for such coercion, and engaging in that four letter word is very illegal.

Because kids don't understand consent, he assumes grown adults don't either.

 

[ScooterL]

View attachment 2000586

That's a lot of strawmanning to cope with the simple fact that straight men don't want sex with men who are pretending to be women.

Try me. Even the semi-attractive MTF’s still have an uncanny valley look. Blaire White is the closest thing I’ve seen to a hot MTF and the thought that always springs to mind is “porn whore living blow up doll.” Still unattractive but not for the reasons troons are.

I always think "mincing gay man" when I see him.

He speaks and moves like a draggish woman-hating parody of a woman.

 

[AssignedEva]

Okay, Labelle. Lemme put it like this:

I do not consent to a date/sex/a romantic relationship with a trans person.

If I do not give my consent, am I going to be forced against my will to do so? Because there's a four letter word for such coercion, and engaging in that four letter word is very illegal.

I think the idea they try to put across is your reasons for not consenting are rooted in transphobic assumptions. Like "Your brain assumes trans women are men due to growing up in a cissexist society, which blocks you from feeling attracted to them, which is why you don't consent".

I've just not understood what the implied next step from that argument is. If it's a thing baked into our brains, there's not much we can do about that. There's often talk of "unlearning" certain things but that's not going to change what you find attractive, "and nobody is saying you have to have sex with trans people".

Which basically just means... it's transphobic to not be attracted to trans people, but it's not your fault and you can't change it, and you don't have to have sex with people you're transphobicly not attracted to. So it's ok to be transphobic in this context? What's the point of bringing it up then?

 

[Wallace]

He either doesn't understand how heterosexuality and homosexuality work, or he does and thinks it's possible to change them or to appear so close to the opposite sex as to trick someone's sexuality. Like how some HSTS see straight guys and AGPs see lesbians as a challenge, because if someone who can only be attracted to women is attracted to them, that must mean they're a true and honest woman. It's validation of their identity/fetish rather than attraction to the other person that gets them off. You see it all the time in AGPs' erotica (which is always a hilarious read), they say shit like "so after the aliens turned me into a woman with their sex rays, this one totally hot chick wanted me and she was a real cis lesbian!!!" Either that, or "and then this big muscly black straight man who was so much more manly than I ever was as a man, he put his thingy in my you know what and we totally did it, made me feel like a real laydee" etc.
What I don't get is how nagging people into sex works with that. Surely if you have to badger someone into sleeping with you, they're not really attracted to you, and so you're not really sparking any desire in them, so the fantasy wouldn't be fulfilled. It's very strange.

Deep down, I don't think he even sees them as people. Just props that he uses to make him feel important. Other people exist only as sources of validation for him. He screams transphobia to make others not do what he wants to be their fault and not his.

 

[BIG DADDY]

I think the idea they try to put across is your reasons for not consenting are rooted in transphobic assumptions. Like "Your brain assumes trans women are men due to growing up in a cissexist society, which blocks you from feeling attracted to them, which is why you don't consent".

I've just not understood what the implied next step from that argument is. If it's a thing baked into our brains, there's not much we can do about that. There's often talk of "unlearning" certain things but that's not going to change what you find attractive, "and nobody is saying you have to have sex with trans people".

Which basically just means... it's transphobic to not be attracted to trans people, but it's not your fault and you can't change it, and you don't have to have sex with people you're transphobicly not attracted to. So it's ok to be transphobic in this context? What's the point of bringing it up then?

The next step is to watch porn with trans people in it until you re-wire your brain. This is something HAES women will outright say when people tell them they aren’t attracted to fat women.

Also Labelle is wrong, all trans people do have one thing in common, which is untreated mental illness, and it’s fine to not want to get wrapped up in their shit like you’d avoid someone with BPD or a narc.

 

[Baloney Face]

I’ve seen to a hot MTF and the thought that always springs to mind is “porn whore living blow up doll.”

We are talking about people who think porn whore living blow up doll is the ideal female archetype.

He speaks and moves like a draggish woman-hating parody of a woman.

Exactly!

Like the "traditional" female impersonator act but ugly and no singing.

The next step is to watch porn with trans people in it until you re-wire your brain.

I hate to be a conspiracy theorist, but ...

Is it still being a conspiracy theorist when the alleged conspiracy is counter-productive of their aims and the conspirators are dumb-asses?

 

[Sobble]

View attachment 2000586

Okay, Done.

I've 'examined' my 'internal bias' and I would never touch a tranny dick, or interact with a tranny sexually in any way. I don't care if his cock is still intact or inverted. I don't care how he chooses to identify.

Also, it's not a 'preference'. If people could change their sexuality via exposure, everyone would be straight.

 

[Pickle Inspector]

Okay, Labelle. Lemme put it like this:

I do not consent to a date/sex/a romantic relationship with a trans person.

If I do not give my consent, am I going to be forced against my will to do so? Because there's a four letter word for such coercion, and engaging in that four letter word is very illegal.

That's why this came about which made many a troon fume with rage:

 

[AnOminous]

For me personally, I don’t have a policy of not dating trans women. It’s just that as a straight guy, the moment my brain clocks that a woman is male, I’m just not interested.

What if I have a "fetish" for actually having children with my life partner who I plan on being married to for the rest of my life? A dude can't fulfill that "fetish" in any way.

 

[AmazingEagle]

That's why this came about which made many a troon fume with rage:

A little off-topic here but the Super Straight flag kinda look like the Austro-Hungarian Empire flag mixed with the PornHub logo:

 

[artilleryfroth]

I think the idea they try to put across is your reasons for not consenting are rooted in transphobic assumptions. Like "Your brain assumes trans women are men due to growing up in a cissexist society, which blocks you from feeling attracted to them, which is why you don't consent".

I've just not understood what the implied next step from that argument is. If it's a thing baked into our brains, there's not much we can do about that. There's often talk of "unlearning" certain things but that's not going to change what you find attractive, "and nobody is saying you have to have sex with trans people".

Which basically just means... it's transphobic to not be attracted to trans people, but it's not your fault and you can't change it, and you don't have to have sex with people you're transphobicly not attracted to. So it's ok to be transphobic in this context? What's the point of bringing it up then?

They know they won’t convince us adults; they are trying to soak our children in this propaganda. Very Brave New World.

Also, it's not a 'preference'. If people could change their sexuality via exposure, everyone would be straight.

Have you not heard of “political lesbians”? A lot of women would choose homosexuality if it was a choice. I agree with you though, we can’t choose our orientation, and it’s gross for anyone to try to bully us into acting against it. Funny how these people are so against conversion therapy until it involves trying to help trannies get laid.

 

[Sonichu-choo trainwreck]

What if I have a "fetish" for actually having children with my life partner who I plan on being married to for the rest of my life? A dude can't fulfill that "fetish" in any way.

He's tried the "just adopted and freeze your eggs" or other unspecified 'medical technology' means to cover that up.
of course he's also said that the different kinds of pensis might be store bought and strapped on

Since Sophie's whole thing is BEING the child, it's something he doesn't grasp

brings up an interesting point when he's "but transwomen are infinitely different"
in that he conveniently ignore there are some thing that inifite variety won't cover...like a natal woman

think of it like this
between 1 and 3 there is an infinite amt of unique real numbers, 1, 1.1 , e, √2,⅔,... but 5 ain't one of em