Crime NSW Police Commissioner says sexual consent app could play a part in tackling growing crisis - The future is now

One of Australia's top police officers says some sort of app could form part of a possible solution to establishing positive sexual consent and tackling the growing sexual assault crisis.
The app could allow users to digitally record sexual consent before being intimate.
NSW Police Commissioner Mick Fuller said the issue of sexual assault needs to be approached in a new way to fit with modern society.
"Dating has changed," Mr Fuller told Today.
"If you're single the primary way you are dating now is online.
"Technology plays such a big role in our lives, potentially technology could be one of one of many solutions to trying to stop this increase in sexual violence in our state."
Mr Fuller acknowledged an app would not provide a complete solution to the issue but said it could be a more effective way to address the issue of positive consent.

"This app or this concept of consent, whether it's on an app or otherwise, that protects everybody," he said.
"It doesn't protect everybody in every situation and it's not the entire solution, but the reality is consent is by far the biggest issue that we are facing in matters of intimate violence.
"We need to have some pretty confronting conversations in this space because this is not a matter of just saying that this crime is a problem. This crime is increasing every day exponentially."
According to a report released last year from the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, police recorded 18,300 sexual assaults against victims who were aged 15 and over.
The rate of sexual assaults reported to police was seven times as high for female victims as males.
The sexual assault rate was higher for those aged 15–19 than any other age group.
In 2016 it was estimated that perpetrators of sexual assault were four times as likely to be someone known to the victim as they were to be a stranger and in 2018–19, 97 per cent of sexual assault offenders recorded by police were male.
Young males aged 15–19 when police proceedings commenced, had the highest offender rates of any age group.
Similar initiatives have been adopted overseas including in Denmark with the iConsent app which gives users "24-hour consent contract" to perform sexual intercourse their partner.
The new technology was introduced after the Danish government implemented law reforms making positive consent a key factor in determining allegations of rape.
The app has sparked controversy with some groups saying it undermines the concept of consent by characterising it as a contractual relationship.
 
Okay.
Sexual consent is a combination of parenting and maturity.
Parenting in a way of teaching your children on how to make decisions.
Maturity in a way where denying yourself ensures growth.
 
Like hell it will. Are these officials speds, wilfully malicious, or just dumbfucks? Nobody is going to "digitally record" consent, because it means they can't yank it away retroactively to ruin someone's life.
They'll just say the consent was coerced/made under the influence/otherwise invalid.
It will change nothing.
 
Lol what a worthless app, it won't solve anything because we're always told consent can be revoked at any second anyway.

When people say "online dating" aren't they usually referring to hookup apps (or "real" dating apps that essentially serve the same function)? Regardless, anyone who is willing to jump into bed with someone they barely even know and have no reason to believe they can trust with their life and future is an idiot, whether they're male or female. The women who retroactively retract consent and claim to have been assaulted/raped are worthless cunts who deserve to be horse whipped, but the horny men who refuse to make themselves wait any longer than absolutely necessary to sexually engage with them are also complete morons. Most women aren't duplicitous, lying whores just like most men aren't entitled cave beasts who can't take "no" for an answer, but for your own safety you should always assume that the person you're interested in could be exactly that until you really get to know them. If everyone wasn't constantly bouncing around from one person to another, trying to get laid as quickly and easily as possible, this wouldn't be at such a high risk of happening. I guess some people can't help themselves.
 
They'll just say the consent was coerced/made under the influence/otherwise invalid.
It will change nothing.
Follow this reasoning through to the logical conclusion.

Marriage isn't sufficient to prove consent, so what is?

A tick in a consent box isn't sufficient, so what is?

The logical conclusion is that you can only have 'safe sex' when it's the conclusion of a series of recorded events on hookup apps like Tinder, with the results available for review by police at any time.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Devyn
Follow this reasoning through to the logical conclusion.

Marriage isn't sufficient to prove consent, so what is?

A tick in a consent box isn't sufficient, so what is?

The logical conclusion is that you can only have 'safe sex' when it's the conclusion of a series of recorded events on hookup apps like Tinder, with the results available for review by police at any time.
can't revoke consent if you're locked in a dungeon

:cunningpepe:
 
Maybe this would work for autists. But it's a pretty stupid idea for anyone else.

I think the death of romance is the big problem. I know a lot of men are scared as coming off as creepy so they don't try to talk to women in public places, in case she's crazy and will accuse him of verbal rape or something. So now their only option is using an app where most people aren't looking for a long term relationship anyway.

I hear stories about how my dad and other older generation folk approached their future wives/girlfriends or whatever, and it sounds completely different than what it's like now. "Sliding in the dms" will never beat leaving love letters across campus or something like that.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: PeriodicTrouble
They'll just say the consent was coerced/made under the influence/otherwise invalid.
It will change nothing.
That's the first thing I thought. If signed, notarized prenups written up by a lawyer can be erased from history with a wave of a magic wand and the word "duress", what power could a voice recording on an app possibly have?

It's time for people to stop pretending the law is about the law. The law is about power, and there's always a loophole to allow that power to be abused.

The simplest solution in this case is not to hook up with random skanks and to never, under any circumstances, date a feminist.
 
Back