Superstraight Containment Station - No superphobes allowed!

Justtocheck said:
Lol, super straight. SS. That's a good one. I like the word play humor of the radical who created that term.
Click to expand...

download (3).jpeg


wbiaeyfp.jpg


NERF_Super_Soaker_XP100___Lifestyle.jpg


dragon-ball-z-super-saiyan-goku.jpg


All this nazi filth needs to be destroyed.
 
  • Winner
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Lapis Lazuli, Caecia, ASoulMan and 21 others
Resident Christian scholar on loli feet, trad wolf girl anime videogames, nigger genocide and making socks before begging for a mercyban, @Cynical errr I mean @GethN7 released his thoughts on SuperStraight, and it's quite a doozy.

Why certain segments of the Transgender community are losing their minds over Super Straights (and why they need to stop)​

archive.li

The Musings Of The Consensus: Why certain segments of the Transgender…

archived 18 Mar 2021 18:35:04 UTC
archive.li archive.li

Why certain segments of the Transgender community are losing their minds over Super Straights (and why they need to stop)

Recently, a bunch of more.....excitable, for lack of a better term, transgender types are losing their minds over a new thing called "Super...
gethn7.blogspot.com gethn7.blogspot.com
Recently, a bunch of more.....excitable, for lack of a better term, transgender types are losing their minds over a new thing called "Super Straights" or S+ for short.

Basically, a bunch of straight people, gays, lesbians, and the more reflective members of the transgender community are basically saying to the more militant transgender types who deem it cruel to not be attracted to them (for example, a transwoman deeming it hurtful to be rejected by a man, regardless if they pass or not) the following:

"We have nothing against you as human beings. Regardless, we are NOT interested in you sexually if you do not match what we consider sexually desirable. We wish you well with a more receptive person, but we are not interested, it is not up for debate, please leave us be, we'll do the same"

The above is perfectly sensible logic as a matter of legal custom in most places around the world, is generally civil and polite by most societal standards, and there is nothing, on the face of it, that should be offensive.

However, it seems the more excitable transgender types view this as an attack on all transgender people, especially when the S+ crowd expresses the following opinions:

S-Straight: I only prefer people of the opposite sex who are not trans.

S-Gay/Lesbian: I only prefer other people of the same sex who are not trans.

S-Bisexual: I prefer those of both genders who are not trans.

And since this includes some trans people under S+, they are as follow:

S-Trans: I only prefer those who are transgender themselves.

Legally, morally, and ethically, there is nothing wrong with this. No one can be sexually coerced into having sex with another person they have no interest in, it is immoral and unethical by most societal standards to even try, and logic would dictate that those offended being trans is a sexual turnoff should find those who are more accommodating. Given the 7 billion-plus people on the planet, that's not a death sentence for intimacy.

However, certain transgender types view the above as bigotry because it's saying they are not sexually attracted to the parties expressing the above opinions, and they are trying to shame and "cancel" the S+ types because they deem not catering to their desire to be desired to be the height of cheek of arrogance.

In my view and that of anyone else who believes we have the free will to make our own choices, that is madness. I'm a heterosexual person, only interested in women who were born as such, and if a transwoman was sexually interested in me, I would politely decline and wish them well with someone else. I am a devout Christian, but my religious beliefs are secondary to my own personal moral to live and let live for the choices of others, and I would happily call myself S+ because that resonates with my own personal feelings.

As for the transgender types who deem the above rejection of them as sexual partners bigotry, then all I can say, rather bluntly, is to get over it. As explained, there is no legal, moral, or ethical reason for anyone to cater to your sexual desires, and any attempt at coercion would be a moral disgrace and a legal crime for the party who cannot accept the word "no".

That said, I find it disturbing such a need to say "no" is even needing to be done. If it's gotten to the point it's offensive to assert one's own free will to be sexually attracted to whom you please, then those who are so offended need to realize they have no legal, ethical, or moral entitlement to the sexual agency of another human being without their consent, which is the crux of the matter at hand.
Click to expand...
 
  • Dumb
  • Like
  • Autistic
Reactions: Polar Zones, Aunt Carol, secret watcher and 2 others
Arm Pit Cream said:
Resident Christian scholar on loli feet, trad wolf girl anime videogames, nigger genocide and making socks before begging for a mercyban, @Cynical errr I mean @GethN7 released his thoughts on SuperStraight, and it's quite a doozy.

Why certain segments of the Transgender community are losing their minds over Super Straights (and why they need to stop)​

Why certain segments of the Transgender community are losing their minds over Super Straights (and why they need to stop)

Recently, a bunch of more.....excitable, for lack of a better term, transgender types are losing their minds over a new thing called "Super...
gethn7.blogspot.com gethn7.blogspot.com
Click to expand...
God, this take is so fucking lukewarm holy shit. He's only, what, 3 weeks late to the party on making this shitty writeup I could've done in 5 minutes?
 
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Toolbox, From The Uncanny Valley, TVStactic and 1 other person
Arm Pit Cream said:
Why certain segments of the Transgender community are losing their minds over Super Straights (and why they need to stop)
Click to expand...
Don't know who is this guy, but he certainly misses some more reasons that drive the troons batshit crazy:
1. They really care about thing they call "oppression". They believe that SS thing is a real threat to their beloved exclusive oppression and that "superstraights" want to steal that rightfully received position of "oppressed minority" from them.
2. They believe that superstraights want to sneak into priveldged #LGBTQIP+ ranks and that is inconceivable cause they are definitely not oppressed. And only oppressed ones can be a part of the alphabet soup.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Antipathy, Struggle Cakes, Ozone and 5 others
Arm Pit Cream said:
Resident Christian scholar on loli feet, trad wolf girl anime videogames, nigger genocide and making socks before begging for a mercyban, @Cynical errr I mean @GethN7 released his thoughts on SuperStraight, and it's quite a doozy.

Why certain segments of the Transgender community are losing their minds over Super Straights (and why they need to stop)​

Why certain segments of the Transgender community are losing their minds over Super Straights (and why they need to stop)

Recently, a bunch of more.....excitable, for lack of a better term, transgender types are losing their minds over a new thing called "Super...
gethn7.blogspot.com gethn7.blogspot.com
Click to expand...
It's Geth, of course he isn't going to take an stake in the "fun" part of the argument.
 
  • Agree
  • Feels
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: secret watcher, Arm Pit Cream, From The Uncanny Valley and 1 other person
LeeHarveyOslik said:
It has already been declared a r/superstraight ban evasion sub. That is enough to ban em without any evidence of rule breaking

Click to expand...
plus reddit jannies are trannies...

still, from AHS whose niggers have child porn to use to take down any subreddits they don't like? bitches failing at the comedian thing hard.

r/tumblrinaction is still okay.
NerdShamer said:
It's Reddit admins, you aren't going to get any transparency from them, nowadays.

Speaking of which, how many SS subs are left?
Click to expand...
from my search there's none, even r/supermemes were taken down and it was all about memes, they used "previous banned subreddit excuse"

these troons are really coping hard aren't they?
Coccxys said:
Problem is the behaviour of sick troons always gets blamed on men in general by the radfems.
Click to expand...
not quite really, if anything troons hate radfems because they are women too.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: UnsufficentBoobage, From The Uncanny Valley and pot of sneed
Justtocheck said:
White people do need to die tho.
Click to expand...
I don't intend to prove a point, but I have a theory that "white" men in America have very, very deep seated insecurities about their own power and manliness. Perhaps from the economic situation and feminism combined, but they are like the skinner box that just won't tire up. At this point Cat Party could come up with a random title generator and would still get the same outraged reactions.
I know for a fact that among the many good qualities of American men, instrospection isn't one of them, but I think it'd be rather nice to see them think about why they feel so attacked by those radicals; because even after like 5 years, it still seems to have an effect.
 
  • Feels
  • Islamic Content
  • Autistic
Reactions: Extricate Cavitations, blue gopher snakes, Struggle Cakes and 3 others
TungstenCarbide said:
Urgh, troons and their queer theory and their stupid semantics.
"Sex doesn't exist, people are attracted to gender".
"Homosexuals don't exist, there are just bigoted people who feticize genitals ."

But they are the proof that people with an immutable sexual orientation exist, and that the material reality of the differences between male and female is important: trangenders who have no intention (or don't want to force themselves) to change their sexual orientation or their preference for "cisgender" bodies.

If the queer theory worked as they say, the cotton ceiling wouldn't exist: trans people would just have sex with/date eachother, period. It's exactly what us lesbians and gays do, because we could have a crush for our sexy straight colleague, but we know very well that that road goes nowhere.

But troons show that their sexual orientation (they talk about "sexual identity", but it's the same thing) doesn't change even after their transition, and that their attraction toward certain people doesn't depend from those people's gender, but from the biological conformation of their bodies. Blaire White would never fuck Ellenelliott Page and I can empathize with this, 500 million years of evolution made the humankind this way.

But if they can be empathized with, said empathy must be bestowed on everybody, on people who have their immutable orientation too, and they aren't interested in men with vagina and women with penis.

But they keep using this stupid contradiction that applies different definitions and criteria depending on the fact the person they're talking about is "cis" or trans, and that creates a paradox. You can't say that there's only one sexual orientation: the "fluid" one, where everybody is attracted to gender independently of sex ("everybody is squiggly", as that stupid FTM I didn't care to learn the name of said), and at the same time saying that sexual orientation is not unique, because in trans people is not fluid and it's attracted to biological sex and not gender (of course they don't say it out loud, but their outrage about the superstraight thing, or their violent reactions when they are rejected speak volumes).

So, one of the two thesis must be false, because they cancel eachother. But I suppose that troons just need to say "I wanna cis lesbians because muh disphoria", is enough to cancel the most subtle philosophical reasonement.
Click to expand...
I did not understand a single word you just said. Fuck me are people seriously this obsessed with who fucks who?

1616129146024.png
Click to expand...
I'd develop spontaneous Erectile Dysfunction.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: UnsufficentBoobage and blue gopher snakes
Bixnood said:
This lady is alright I guess,
Why she got no boobies thou?
Click to expand...
Can't even appreciate smaller boobs? So picky.
Cyclonus said:
Actually if you're straight or gay and you date a non binary aren't you invalidating them? These idiots will drop the non binary fad when they realise it drops their dating pool down to zero.
Click to expand...
Enbies, by their very nature, cannot be validated. You can't validate that which cannot exist.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Caecia, Putin Bot, Whatsup bud? and 10 others
LeeHarveyOslik said:
Don't know who is this guy, but he certainly misses some more reasons that drive the troons batshit crazy:
1. They really care about thing they call "oppression". They believe that SS thing is a real threat to their beloved exclusive oppression and that "superstraights" want to steal that rightfully received position of "oppressed minority" from them.
2. They believe that superstraights want to sneak into priveldged #LGBTQIP+ ranks and that is inconceivable cause they are definitely not oppressed. And only oppressed ones can be a part of the alphabet soup.
Click to expand...

It took me a while to realize it because the S+ had no interest in claiming oppression nor did it wish to join the alphabet soup fandom, but these were in fact the two weird inventions the crying queers focused on. It was like they were afraid Chad and Stacy had decided to attend the LGBT+ after school club and were enraged because clearly anything Chad and Stacy decide to take on, they take over. Lol.

Meanwhile, nobody having fun with Super+ ever even considered invoking oppression or joining the fandom, because they don’t wish to be oppressed so don’t cultivate it, and definitely don’t want to be in the fandom, this whole thing is about opting out of the fandom, pre-emptively where possible. But because these autists have no theory of Other Minds, they simply ascribe their own motivations onto others.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
Reactions: crimsonmoon, Book Thief and Slap47
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back