Disaster Leaked Document Shows Who the Pentagon Wants to Purge from Military - Christians and "Anti-Feminists" targetted

(Archive) (Article)

The Department of Defense is embarking on one of the widest internal purges in US history.
Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin has made “combating extremism” in the armed forces his number one priority, but Austin and his supporters in the intelligence community have been vague about what exactly they mean.

Screenshot_2021-03-29 Leaked Document Shows Who The Pentagon Wants To Purge From Military.png

A Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) document leaked to Politico titled “Extremism and Insider Threat in the DoD” finally answers the question.
According to DARPA, patriots, white advocates, Christians, and “anti-feminists” all qualify as extremists subject to punishment and expulsion. Anarchists, environmentalists, animal welfare activists — but not Black Lives Matter — are also on the list.

The guidelines describe patriot “domestic extremists” as holding an ideology that states “the US government has become corrupt, has overstepped its constitutional boundaries or is no longer capable of protecting the people against foreign threats.” Oathkeepers, Proud Boys and Boogaloo Bois are put in this category.
DARPA’s “racial and ethnic supremacy” section only includes symbols belonging to white groups, many of them no longer operation, such as Identity Evropa or the Aryan Nations.
Most puzzling and overreaching is the inclusion of Christians who oppose abortion, gay marriage or transgenderism. Almost half of all US military recruits are from the South, where there are many Christians with socially conservative beliefs.

Almost amusing is the “anti-feminist” designation, which describes involuntary celibates (“incels”) as a national security threat. The fixation on incels is not based on any legitimate data or intelligence assessment. It is included thanks to lobbying from the Anti-Defamation League, which reveals a lack of seriousness at the Pentagon.
It’s safe to say that under these rules, the majority of Americans — and thus servicemen — are domestic extremists. How it is possible to boot every soldier who doesn’t approve of transgenderism or has posted Pepe the Frog on their social media without basically destroying the military has not been specified by Austin or the Pentagon, but he apparently is deferring to unit commanders to enforce the new rules however they see fit.

Many conservatives are complaining about the military becoming “woke,” but this is just a symptom of a broader problem: every institution in American life has become woke.
Because the US armed forces are utilized by the Zionist lobby to protect Israel in the narrow sense and the Jewish liberal order in the broader sense, the military has for years been allowed to engage in “problematic” practices — such as placing enlistees based on the results of their IQ tests — that would lead to Civil Rights lawsuits in other areas of American life.

Now it appears that the Pentagon, forced to pull back from foreign military adventures in Asia and Africa, is transforming the military into a weapon to conscript for their culture war against the American people.
 
It's nice to know the Pentagon is basically stocking the military with the worst possible recruits so that nobody competent will be able to actually take our guns and put us into the camps when Copmala takes over.
It's worse, since the age of dieversity began Military recruiters have had specific quotas to meet along racial lines. The majority of applicants are White, but many qualified are delayed or turned away because the military is forced to keep a 50/50 White to Shitum ratio. Keeps the military from organizing a coup based on racial ties (King Nigger Reaaaally Blacked it up).
 
It's worse, since the age of dieversity began Military recruiters have had specific quotas to meet along racial lines. The majority of applicants are White, but many qualified are delayed or turned away because the military is forced to keep a 50/50 White to Shitum ratio. Keeps the military from organizing a coup based on racial ties (King Nigger Reaaaally Blacked it up for obvious reasons).

Now I'm no politician or leader or anything, but if you were afraid of a group forming a coup wouldn't you want to be more in control of them by putting them into your military and monitoring them?

Or is it actually easier to just monitor militias they push these guys into?
 
It's nice to know the Pentagon is basically stocking the military with the worst possible recruits so that nobody competent will be able to actually take our guns and put us into the camps when Copmala takes over.
As much as people are blustering over "muh notsees are gunna get dey guhnz takin oh wae" shit like this proves that they basically are incapable of doing so much as constructing a functioning website most of the time.
 
I'm not as historically literate as some of you people but what I do know is creating a huge demographic of veterans is a recipe for diaster. The one example I remember is all the privateers didn't have employment after a war. So they ended up becoming pirates and maaaaaaaan oh maaaan piracy became a plague.
 
Last edited:
I'm not as historically literate as some of you people but what I do know is creating a huge demographic of veterans is a recipe for diaster. The one example I remember is all the privateers didn't have employment after a war. So they ended up becoming pirates and maaaaaaaan oh maaaan piracy become a plague.
Think of it like this, if you're trying to avoid a armed resistance, is it a good idea to seriously potentially drive your competent soldiers, and more importantly, your best trainers, out of your military and into the waiting arms of the population you're planning on oppressing? A population that actually respects them and that's local to them? That already has all the guns they need but would benefit from a bit of operational training. Does that strike you as a good idea if you plan to go full oppressive police state?
 
Think of it like this, if you're trying to avoid a armed resistance, is it a good idea to seriously potentially drive your competent soldiers, and more importantly, your best trainers, out of your military and into the waiting arms of the population you're planning on oppressing? A population that actually respects them and that's local to them? That already has all the guns they need but would benefit from a bit of operational training. Does that strike you as a good idea if you plan to go full oppressive police state?
Nobody ever said the Democrats were skilled at using power, merely seizing it.
 
I can't wait for the glorious day when the military in Biden's America is nothing but blacks and trannies, and it's fast approaching. Isn't this what we've all been working so hard towards?
i can't wait for the day for someone to say "i fought for your freedom to say XZY" and i get to say "so what" without getting knocked around by another combat vet.
 
Think of it like this, if you're trying to avoid a armed resistance, is it a good idea to seriously potentially drive your competent soldiers, and more importantly, your best trainers, out of your military and into the waiting arms of the population you're planning on oppressing? A population that actually respects them and that's local to them? That already has all the guns they need but would benefit from a bit of operational training. Does that strike you as a good idea if you plan to go full oppressive police state?
I'm already thinking that. Why do you think there was so many programs to help vets after world war two? What would have happened if the vets got jack shit in terms of help or re integration into society? A fucking revolt that's what would've happened.

The other thing many of these vets they're driving out are part of families who are vets themselves. Right there you got a bunch of cells and networks as result of kin ship which can form the basis for an uprising.
 
Back