- Joined
- Feb 3, 2016
Interesting that he didn't mention once that he's already talked about this song in "Worst of 1976". Guess when you're a lazyass you just pretend you aren't blatantly recycling.Funny you mention Todd.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Interesting that he didn't mention once that he's already talked about this song in "Worst of 1976". Guess when you're a lazyass you just pretend you aren't blatantly recycling.Funny you mention Todd.
He sort of hinted at it? I could've sworn he said "Let's revisit" or something like that. But yeah, he totally neglected to mention the Worst of '76 video.Interesting that he didn't mention once that he's already talked about this song in "Worst of 1976". Guess when you're a lazyass you just pretend you aren't blatantly recycling.
I guess one could probably assume she does not feel for the death of her child in the slightest.Hmm, now I wonder why oh why this would ever be a problem for her. Also, fun to note, if she'd gone through with her pregnancy, her child (She said it was a girl in the documentary but I don't know if she actually knew and was just guessing) would be twelve this year.
View attachment 2030199
I think the question is more..."did she ever"?I guess one could probably assume she does not feel for the death of her child in the slightest.
It's amusing to me that only Contrapoints out of the Breadtube circle has even attempted to defend Lindsay, whilst the rest of her so-called friend group like hbomberguy are happy to not mention it, lest they risk their own PR.
Though granted if the roles were reversed, Lindsay would definitely leave Brewis for the jackals.
Most people rejected her message.Here's the tweet that murdered the Asians:
View attachment 2032391
So what you're saying is, cancel culture doesn't exist and is a myth appropriated by the alt right?As amusing as all of this is, do you sincerely believe that this will, in any way, be her grand cancellation? It would be nice, of course, but I can't see this having any lasting effects whatsoever. Her clique of fellow intersectionalists and champagne socialists are probably already preparing to tacitly help propel her into the spotlight of being an authority of breadtube sperging once again. She's too big among the contemporary weaklings of her kind to cancel over something this trivial.
I don't know about grand cancellation, but it's certainly a chink in her armor (as Rinsey Erris would say).As amusing as all of this is, do you sincerely believe that this will, in any way, be her grand cancellation? It would be nice, of course, but I can't see this having any lasting effects whatsoever. Her clique of fellow intersectionalists and champagne socialists are probably already preparing to tacitly help propel her into the spotlight of being an authority of breadtube sperging once again. She's too big among the contemporary weaklings of her kind to cancel over something this trivial.
While the doubling down in her 'apology' did not do her any favors, I think the whole ditching her twitter account temporarily will undo most of the damage since people will forget. Also, her fellow breadtubers are doing their best to ignore it so you're probably right, in a month or so she'll be back and it'll be like nothing ever happened.As amusing as all of this is, do you sincerely believe that this will, in any way, be her grand cancellation? It would be nice, of course, but I can't see this having any lasting effects whatsoever. Her clique of fellow intersectionalists and champagne socialists are probably already preparing to tacitly help propel her into the spotlight of being an authority of breadtube sperging once again. She's too big among the contemporary weaklings of her kind to cancel over something this trivial.
I mean, she seems like part of the crowd that runs on Internet drama, which is known for being rather short and flaming out rather easily after the peak. I mean, how long did it take for things like fallout from Doug's The Wall review or all the phases of the #ChangeTheChannel saga to go from breaking to gawking to speculating of what'll happen next to just everyone moving onto the next thing?While the doubling down in her 'apology' did not do her any favors, I think the whole ditching her twitter account temporarily will undo most of the damage since people will forget. Also, her fellow breadtubers are doing their best to ignore it so you're probably right, in a month or so she'll be back and it'll be like nothing ever happened.
NahAs amusing as all of this is, do you sincerely believe that this will, in any way, be her grand cancellation? It would be nice, of course, but I can't see this having any lasting effects whatsoever. Her clique of fellow intersectionalists and champagne socialists are probably already preparing to tacitly help propel her into the spotlight of being an authority of breadtube sperging once again. She's too big among the contemporary weaklings of her kind to cancel over something this trivial.
As amusing as all of this is, do you sincerely believe that this will, in any way, be her grand cancellation? It would be nice, of course, but I can't see this having any lasting effects whatsoever. Her clique of fellow intersectionalists and champagne socialists are probably already preparing to tacitly help propel her into the spotlight of being an authority of breadtube sperging once again. She's too big among the contemporary weaklings of her kind to cancel over something this trivial.
Brewis...I wouldn't pick my nose to save his reputation.It's amusing to me that only Contrapoints out of the Breadtube circle has even attempted to defend Lindsay, whilst the rest of her so-called friend group like hbomberguy are happy to not mention it, lest they risk their own PR.
Though granted if the roles were reversed, Lindsay would definitely leave Brewis for the jackals.
Vaush did, even though Breadtube at large cannot decide if he is a representative.It's amusing to me that only Contrapoints out of the Breadtube circle has even attempted to defend Lindsay, whilst the rest of her so-called friend group like hbomberguy are happy to not mention it, lest they risk their own PR.
Though granted if the roles were reversed, Lindsay would definitely leave Brewis for the jackals.
What did he do?Lindsay is just another in a long line of nihilistic/virtue signaling, overall grifting media/liberal darlings that self destructed. Louis CK, Ricky Gervais, and the like get in trouble, or pushed into the background for the politics they baked into their work that they wish people were dumb enough to forget about.
This is cathartic for me only because I really want to get that smirking schmuck Seth Meyer, eventually, very badly... he knows what he did....
Edit: in reality though, Lindsay has enough cronies in her stable to manufacture another Hugo, I’m sure. Awards ceremonies are circle jerks for jerks in their circles. No one watches the Oscars, what is a Hugo worth?
What Ellis said is no dumber than any of her other awful takes, it’s just they found a chink in the armor and dove right in.
I'd pick my nose to flick boogers at him.Brewis...I wouldn't pick my nose to save his reputation.