streamlabs, although knowing youtube they'll probably find a way to force you to use the superchat function. When it works, it work wonders though. Case in point:
Coco already tried to get Hololive to adopt Streamlabs, even going as far as to make a commercial featuring a few Hololive members.
I can't imagine the hell of trying to convince a japanese company that no, youtube does not build any bridges unless you are a Big Corporation With Money (think Procter&Gamble, Disney or Walmart) and they'll fuck you over in the ass within a fraction of a heartbeat if they saw the profit from it.
To add insult to injury her Bday stream was fucked over by Youtube.
Watame is probably top 3 when it comes to cuteness.
A-chan is great. I think she has called others but probably like once or twice.
Your ears just got blessed by the underworld shrieks.
Its the clip that got her on my radar. Before that I only knew her by name and what her model looked like.
I feel ya.
And if you think of the sheer amount of money they're losing it's even more depressing. Their two top earners alone are shitting over 600k to YouTube a year. Imagine if they were able to spend even some of that on speeding up L2D iterations for members or just improving H3D in general.
Honestly, Cover and YouTube can both suck my dick on the monetization topic. I'm not working for free when the fucking Yootoob AI decides my model's cleavage is haram. And i don't care if they think I'm burning a bridge-- i'd rather think of it like playing Chicken. Either Susan gives me my fucking monetization back, or i'm gaming the system, cuz fuck her.
I think the conclusion that was alluded to is that whatever algorithm advantage they get from having so many top superchat earners is worth more to them than the extra cut they'd get from having a bigger piece of the pie from Streamlabs.
Wow, how many companies would wish for half of a "pilot program" such as EN gen1.
Sadly she skipped over the debut day's content. It would be pretty cool if she did something for it, but it's probably hard to arrange something without coming across as insensitive. Plus the cooperation from other members that such a crossover would need.
Imagine being an interstellar colonist in the far future and finding out that your entire solar system was named after a weeaboo wigger rapper 3 millennia ago.
The funny thing is, I was considering posting this the other day myself, but I wasn't sure if it was really worth mentioning since the most exceptional part about it is everyone giving the guy asspats for buying a fucking star.
Is legit but not the discovery part (that was a brain fart on my part), you pay to name a star and is registered under that name in the books so if we get any astral charts in the 40k millenium the name of Calli will appear when someone fly near the Aries constellation is not that expensive like 50 bucks
Named it, not buy it
No value, basically as legit as buying an "English Title of Nobility". Not technically illegal (they make no mention of official recognition on their website), but all the names are only recognized by the company that sells them, not any international agencies like the International Astronomical Union, scientists or governments. If anything interesting ever happens with that star, the bought name is not going to be in the news. It still has a nice factor of being able to search out the star that you "bought" on the night sky with the maps they provide, but you could do that with any other datasource for free, just without a nice-looking certificate.
The guy was to much of a cheapskate and could not buy a Supernova
