Ethan Ralph illegally files DMCA takedown notice

So he made a network to DMCA Mad at the Internet?
He is not mad at the Internet, he is just chronically online.
MatI.status() = offline;
Another HUGE win from Ethan Oliver Ralph.
How can Broke Dick Karen Farms recover from this !?
 
Definitely saw this one coming. I mean c'mon, Ralph's pride? We all know he and his boyfriend Gator want to act like it's untouchable.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MeltyTW
While I would prefer this not to go legal, because I'm sure Dear Leader Josh has better things to spend his time and money on, I must admit I would enjoy the shitshow of a lolsuit that would be Gunt vs Null.

Gunt will probably pussy out and retract his claim, but if not... get your plows ready lads & ladies, this year's Corn Harvest nears!

🌽:gunt:🌽
 
Its Saturday night the Gunt is down half a bottle off bottom shelf whisky (only drinks Makers on stream to show he is high class). Contemplating his dwindling money. The plan for Gunt v Riley fell through and that was Ralph's whole plan for cash for the next six months. He even already bought an overpriced lawn mower to celebrate his hustle. Now he is out $280 its almost Easter. If he had family he could keep trying to milk the trad Pantsu thing but it isn't trad to buy a premade Easter brunch. So he keep drinking, gets mad, and goes on a flagging spree to calm his nerves. Now he wakes up sees everyone laughing at him and has not choice but to pretend this was his plan all along and not just a 2am drunken mistake.

View attachment 2058362
Any bets on his bottom shelf of choice? I’d bet he’s not smart enough to do his research for something that’s actually a steal for the price like Old Grand Dad or any bottled in bond and just gets proper rotgut like Old Crow.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: RichardRApe
what are the full legal ramifications of ethan ralph allowing null to fuck him up the ass like this? if someone else were to make ralph clips with perhaps less justifiable transformation of that content could one cite this incident as precedent for ralph agreeing his content being used in this manner isnt legally contestable? did ralphs short term fucked piggy retard brain help to ruin any defense of future copyright issues?
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Keranu
Im so fucking glad i got out of the whole IBS stuff after jim left. Nothing but backstabbing pricks all over the place. Atleast there is some good shit to laugh at. Also gunt.
IBS was a lot more fun because everyone stabbed each other in the face instead of in the back.
Rekieta only commented on the fight. That doesn't belong to Ralph, or his appearance on the dick show. The only thing he can try to claim is the killstream patreon audio.
It would be extremely out of character for Ralph to snake Rekieta without first receiving some sort of perceived slight, and Rekieta always offers those "I have nothing against ralph" caveats that soothe Ralph's southern honor.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Keranu
At which point does a notorious false flagger like Ralph lose any protection the "do not false flag/flag in general" ethos bestows on most people in "this" corner of the internet ? The only valid reason I see for not starting to flag Ethan is that I prefer a Ethan who can barely stay above the abject poverty line and thus can create more prime wigger content.
Ethan should be aware that it takes just minimal effort from a few dedicated autists to get him kicked off Patreon and any remaining streaming website he has and that nobody would be outraged about it but the people who want to continue to laugh at his descent.

tldr : If you are made of 65% greasy body fat don't play with fire and don't be a fat nigger faggot, Ralph. Also, you are poor.
 
Jesus if you're taking prayers I want a Ralph lolsuit arc so bad.
I worry though. Copyright lawsuits are notoriously expensive. Jersh is slowly transitioning into a Europoor. I hope he has the finances to maintain a defense long enough to get a return on all the money spent.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: Snappy Jappy
At which point does a notorious false flagger like Ralph lose any protection the "do not false flag/flag in general" ethos bestows on most people in "this" corner of the internet ? The only valid reason I see for not starting to flag Ethan is that I prefer a Ethan who can barely stay above the abject poverty line and thus can create more prime wigger content.
Ethan should be aware that it takes just minimal effort from a few dedicated autists to get him kicked off Patreon and any remaining streaming website he has and that nobody would be outraged about it but the people who want to continue to laugh at his descent.

tldr : If you are made of 65% greasy body fat don't play with fire and don't be a fat nigger faggot, Ralph. Also, you are poor.
his show makes literally sub minimum wage so it wouldnt even be worth it on any level really

We really be calling anybody that we don’t like trans eh?
no its because he called himself pretty and got angry enough at null to try and sweep up any troon speculation among other things like ralphachan and his lusting after trans people, along with many other things i forget because ralph has an arc a month

edit i think it one point it became visible faith was applying make up to him so theres another speculation point
 
It sounds like Rackets is referring to the "effect on the market" test when determining fair use. There's a faint argument that can be made that by showing segments of a paywalled stream, that content's market value is impacted. However, a couple issues come into play, in my mind. (warning: IANAL)

  • Criticism and ridicule are in fact transformative uses, which is why movie reviews that show bits and pieces of a movie and shit are allowed to exist. This use is given a lot of leeway, in fact. Nick says that the transformative use of Ralph's paywalled content would likely be given a lot more consideration than any possible negative impact to the revenue from Ralph's paywalled stream, and I get the suspicion that the courts would agree.
  • Hughes vs. Benjamin, the lawsuit that Sargon of Akkad won and got attorney fees for, introduced some particularly interesting case law: The judge held that Sargon's use of Akilah's video did not negatively impact Akilah's video's market value because Sargon and Akilah have very different audiences. I get the suspicion that the same could be argued in this instance, since Ralph and Null's audiences are at each other's throats.
Maybe this is just me being a retard but doesnt Ralph need to show that the content has some inherit value?
Lets face it Patreon is an ewelfare plattform and paypigges arent there to hear extra shows where ralphs eating or gators views on anime, they are there to support Ralph the person and the killstream. I would argue that 12 minutes of audio that was the copyrighted kantent has no actually monetary value.
 
Back