Trump Derangement Syndrome - Orange man bad. Read the OP! (ᴛʜɪs ᴛʜʀᴇᴀᴅ ɪs ʟɪᴋᴇ ᴋɪᴡɪ ғᴀʀᴍs ʀᴇᴠɪᴇᴡs ɴᴏᴡ) 🗿🗿🗿🗿

[Chuck Mason]

Funny you mention this guy. He's a CCP plant.

Elijah Schaffer has the whole thread and not to get too off-topic but TL;DR he was on twatter for less than a month, got verified despite having 80 followers and the long wait time it takes to prove you exist, tweeted chink propaganda about the coof shots and wiped his profile pics when he got everyone looking at him for ASSuming the car terrorist from today was a white Trump supporter. Funny part is if he didn't have that checkmark(of the beast), nobody would've cared what another opinionated normie had to say.

And look who's on his following list, @Chuck Mason and @Josterman!
View attachment 2053887
him along with biden admin staffers and twitter verified themselves!

To quote Schaffer, "So Twitter deplatformed our president but will verify fake agents of the CCP." Every paid shill for the democRats is by extension a paid shill for the chink commies. What a nightmare.

What a fucking tool

Well for what it's worth the Invasion of Iraq was a giant success. The decade trying to rebuild with an incompetent new government, army, and suicide bombers who wanted to make everyone's life hell, however, was a failure.

Makes me wonder what we did in Japan that was so different and yet so much more successful. During the war people were so fearful of the US in Okinawa that tens of thousands committed mass suicide. Maybe it's because Japan isn't filled with a bunch of groups that hate each other, but at the same time we stopped the Euros from killing each other every 5 minutes. So nation building has worked before. If the military leaders were more competent on a plan to fix things post-war then getting involved wouldn't be such a big deal. But they're not.

guess she has double think what a cunt this kek is

She is why middle aged women should never do comedy

More like faces of capital are not funny

 

[haurchefant]

Well for what it's worth the Invasion of Iraq was a giant success. The decade trying to rebuild with an incompetent new government, army, and suicide bombers who wanted to make everyone's life hell, however, was a failure.

Makes me wonder what we did in Japan that was so different and yet so much more successful. During the war people were so fearful of the US in Okinawa that tens of thousands committed mass suicide. Maybe it's because Japan isn't filled with a bunch of groups that hate each other, but at the same time we stopped the Euros from killing each other every 5 minutes. So nation building has worked before. If the military leaders were more competent on a plan to fix things post-war then getting involved wouldn't be such a big deal. But they're not.

For starters Arabs and Muslims in general are racially inferior. I have to point this out because of how much of a difference these things make. Their populations are so inbred that they are in slow motion genetic collapse. This generally lowers IQ and poisons the ability to create a civil society.

The other part of it is that Japan settled most of their tribal disputes a long time ago by the time World War 2 came around. Not completely but most of them. They're racially homogenous and they have a lot of cultural reverence for having that civil society. IDK what their motives were for working with the US in the aftermath of the bombs but they ended up loving MacArthur and he was an ideal fit for shaping what their society would become, I think he understood them incredibly well and he was able to have a semi-functional relationship with them at the time. That, along with the fact that they had a desire to rebuild for the sake of the survivors, put them on track to doing well after World War 2.

The thing about the Middle East is that they never settled those tribal conflicts. Even the royal house of Saudi Arabia is on shakier legs then anyone wants to admit because those of tribal rivalries. When you put that in the mix along with the dysfunctional nature of Islam, how it splits people apart, creates societies where there's only tyranny, and their best successes are only achieved after desperately aping better races and nations, then you get the failure of the Iraq War. A lot of people thought that the Iraq War would be like World War 2, that there would be a dedicated chunk of Iraqis that wanted to build a nation as Westerners understand it. But they don't want that, they are inbred pedophiles and wanna-be warlords with iphones. They don't understand what a nation-state is or how to build a working country that can have things like running water or working supply lines.

Nation building works when the people of that nation understand what a state actually is and when they want a civil society. Japan wanted that. Arabs and Muslims are incapable of it without having a warlord sitting on them with a gun pointed at the back of their heads at all times, knowing that if they break the law then they will be tortured and murdered. That's the only thing that keeps them in line. With Japan, no one had to do that.

 

[Pokemonquistador2]

For starters Arabs and Muslims in general are racially inferior. I have to point this out because of how much of a difference these things make. Their populations are so inbred that they are in slow motion genetic collapse. This generally lowers IQ and poisons the ability to create a civil society.

The other part of it is that Japan settled most of their tribal disputes a long time ago by the time World War 2 came around. Not completely but most of them. They're racially homogenous and they have a lot of cultural reverence for having that civil society. IDK what their motives were for working with the US in the aftermath of the bombs but they ended up loving MacArthur and he was an ideal fit for shaping what their society would become, I think he understood them incredibly well and he was able to have a semi-functional relationship with them at the time. That, along with the fact that they had a desire to rebuild for the sake of the survivors, put them on track to doing well after World War 2.

The thing about the Middle East is that they never settled those tribal conflicts. Even the royal house of Saudi Arabia is on shakier legs then anyone wants to admit because those of tribal rivalries. When you put that in the mix along with the dysfunctional nature of Islam, how it splits people apart, creates societies where there's only tyranny, and their best successes are only achieved after desperately aping better races and nations, then you get the failure of the Iraq War. A lot of people thought that the Iraq War would be like World War 2, that there would be a dedicated chunk of Iraqis that wanted to build a nation as Westerners understand it. But they don't want that, they are inbred pedophiles and wanna-be warlords with iphones. They don't understand what a nation-state is or how to build a working country that can have things like running water or working supply lines.

Nation building works when the people of that nation understand what a state actually is and when they want a civil society. Japan wanted that. Arabs and Muslims are incapable of it without having a warlord sitting on them with a gun pointed at the back of their heads at all times, knowing that if they break the law then they will be tortured and murdered. That's the only thing that keeps them in line. With Japan, no one had to do that.

Both Japan and the Middle East are shame based cultures, where external standards are placed on the individual. In Japan, everyone has a huge stick up their ass about maintaining cultural and group harmony. The nail that sticks out gets pounded down. In the Middle East, everyone is trying to screw anybody that isn't in their little group while also trying not getting caught and punished for it. The cousin-fucking is somewhat responsible for this, not just because of the terrible genetics it creates, but because families become so insular and protective of their own interests, that they have no reason to cooperate with anyone outside of the family. In Europe, where the Pope banned cousin marriage (for everyone but royal families,) , you had to co-operate with outgroups because that's where you were sourcing your new family members from.

 

[JustSomeDong]

Well for what it's worth the Invasion of Iraq was a giant success. The decade trying to rebuild with an incompetent new government, army, and suicide bombers who wanted to make everyone's life hell, however, was a failure.

Makes me wonder what we did in Japan that was so different and yet so much more successful. During the war people were so fearful of the US in Okinawa that tens of thousands committed mass suicide. Maybe it's because Japan isn't filled with a bunch of groups that hate each other, but at the same time we stopped the Euros from killing each other every 5 minutes. So nation building has worked before. If the military leaders were more competent on a plan to fix things post-war then getting involved wouldn't be such a big deal. But they're not.

Blackjack Pershing wasn't around to show em how it's done.

 

[HumanHive]

Both Japan and the Middle East are shame based cultures, where external standards are placed on the individual. In Japan, everyone has a huge stick up their ass about maintaining cultural and group harmony. The nail that sticks out gets pounded down. In the Middle East, everyone is trying to screw anybody that isn't in their little group while also trying not getting caught and punished for it. The cousin-fucking is somewhat responsible for this, not just because of the terrible genetics it creates, but because families become so insular and protective of their own interests, that they have no reason to cooperate with anyone outside of the family. In Europe, where the Pope banned cousin marriage (for everyone but royal families,) , you had to co-operate with outgroups because that's where you were sourcing your new family members from.

Cousin fucking is more common in cultures with high dowry requirements. Keeps wealth in-family.

 

[Ghostse]

Well for what it's worth the Invasion of Iraq was a giant success. The decade trying to rebuild with an incompetent new government, army, and suicide bombers who wanted to make everyone's life hell, however, was a failure.

Makes me wonder what we did in Japan that was so different and yet so much more successful. During the war people were so fearful of the US in Okinawa that tens of thousands committed mass suicide. Maybe it's because Japan isn't filled with a bunch of groups that hate each other, but at the same time we stopped the Euros from killing each other every 5 minutes. So nation building has worked before. If the military leaders were more competent on a plan to fix things post-war then getting involved wouldn't be such a big deal. But they're not.

The difference was that Japan was united mostly homogeneous people - the Ainu aside - with an intact leadership structure/figure head that could be coopted even as the "noble class" was disinfranchised and replaced. The Japanese also had a "collective spirit" beat into them by a millenia+ of shoguns, where any individualists who weren't members of the nobility either managed to leave or got darwined out one way or another. The Japanes also had functioning bureaucracy and....when I say it was "technical based" I don't mean so much in terms of skill but in that while you could pick and chose your favorites in the bureaucracy and move them around, you couldn't just have your cousin promoted to province administration.

And Germany was populated by Germans.

Contrasted with Iraq, which was an artifical entity created by the british & french in the engineered collapse of the Ottoman Empirein 1918. Iraq should have been three countries, but the planers wanted to create one country that had the possibility of wealth instead of three tribal backwaters. What ended up happening was the Sunni minority took control and brutally suppressed the Shia majority and the Kurdish minority. When leadership collapsed, conflict was inevitable. You can even look at the map of unrest: for some unknown reason, the Kurdish areas didn't see much in the way of terrorism despite the area being a famously violent area for Saddam's troops. (Because "Being left alone" is what the Kurds want and they finally got it). And the South - initial demonstrations aside - was pretty calm until Iran was able to work its magic, and even then you see most of the danger being close the Iran border and/or border with the Sunni areas.
The Iraqis didn't mind the US, they minded that the US was stopping them from ethnically purging those other, bad arabs.

The violence was all Sunnis fearful of the Shia doing to them what they'd been doing to the Shia for the past half century.

Iraq was corrupt & tribal as hell with no functioning Bureaucracy, just a group of family & patronage appointments.

It was a no-win situation where if Dubya had done the sensible thing and divided the country, you'd basically be handing the southern port of the country to Iran. Instead he allowed Obama to hand the middle of the country over to ISIS


Also Iraqis have a long history of being unrealiable and utter pieces of shit. They got their chief pedo's grandson killed by promising to help him overthrow the Caliph Yazid, but then turned little chicken shit bitches when it was time to actually go through with it, resulting in Husayn dying outnumbered and dehydrated in the desert.

For starters Arabs and Muslims in general are racially inferior.

QFT.

IDK what their motives were for working with the US in the aftermath of the bombs but they ended up loving MacArthur and he was an ideal fit for shaping what their society would become, I think he understood them incredibly well and he was able to have a semi-functional relationship with them at the time. That, along with the fact that they had a desire to rebuild for the sake of the survivors, put them on track to doing well after World War 2.

They loved MacArthur for mainly two reasons:
Firstly, he didn't do anything disgraceful to the Emperor, other than making him subordinate to Gaijin and speak with them directly.
Secondly, he over threw the slant jews the Zaibatsu- the family owned business/industrial conglomerates that the wealthy elite used to lock up the country's wealth - and distributed the power and wealth to the common folk.
Other than making them give women some rights, he didn't really mandate many changes in Japanese society and fixed most of the things that were "wrong" with it.

The closest I can come to trying to explain this is imagine if Martians invaded the US and instead of the genocide Topps tried to tell us was coming, instead they kept the president and the Supreme Court, but cleared out congress & threw half of them in jail for all the scummy shit they got up to. Immediately after that, they went and shut down wallstreet, forcing every CEO to forfeit 80% of salary while raiding the bank accounts of the New England 'old money' and did the same to Hollywood next, using the money to rebuild the country & its industrial base with Martian Super Technology.

In addition, because the Martians were afraid the Venusians might try to over throw the country, they brought in weird martian future tech to give us all jobs. And once the whole deal was said and done, the only thing we it cost us was we had to let them a section of Florida for a rocket base - which is a boom town because of all the money the Martians stationed there keep spending.

Plus MacArthur had charisma for a pump stat, and if he hadn't been in Korea at the time and gotten before congress in time, The Korea war would have resulted in China being de-commied and russia getting an over due tactical nuking.

Its the same reasons while Iraqis who were old enough during the Invasion still fondly remember Paul Bremer even if they hated American Troops. Because he actually did things that were good for the country and its people, and not just the elite. Bremer could have run for President of Iraq and won.

The thing about the Middle East is that they never settled those tribal conflicts. Even the royal house of Saudi Arabia is on shakier legs then anyone wants to admit because those of tribal rivalries. When you put that in the mix along with the dysfunctional nature of Islam, how it splits people apart, creates societies where there's only tyranny, and their best successes are only achieved after desperately aping better races and nations, then you get the failure of the Iraq War. A lot of people thought that the Iraq War would be like World War 2, that there would be a dedicated chunk of Iraqis that wanted to build a nation as Westerners understand it. But they don't want that, they are inbred pedophiles and wanna-be warlords with iphones. They don't understand what a nation-state is or how to build a working country that can have things like running water or working supply lines.

Nation building works when the people of that nation understand what a state actually is and when they want a civil society. Japan wanted that. Arabs and Muslims are incapable of it without having a warlord sitting on them with a gun pointed at the back of their heads at all times, knowing that if they break the law then they will be tortured and murdered. That's the only thing that keeps them in line. With Japan, no one had to do that.

You can blame the Ottomans & The Pedophile Muhammed (pbuh) for the Arab attitude. See, everyone knew Arabs were worhtless and shiftless. That is why the Pedophile Muhammed (pbuh) left cities intact in exchange for tribute - why rule a place when you can just get the taxes? Muhammed just had the perfect timing where he let stronger, better-run empires beat the shit of each other, and then swooped in to take their shit and coopt their administrators.

The Ottomans came to the horrible realization that they were Turks but Turks are also Arabs and therefore worthless. So they demanded their Eastern European and Caucus territories provide them with slaves; prepubescent boys they took from their families, converted to Islam, brainwashed, and then turned over the running of the Empire over to them.

But yes, the Iraqis are members of tribes, not nations, and that is why the only way there is world peace is if we glass the middle east.[/quote][/QUOTE]

 

[Sekirodiealot]

If this isn't skeward priorities, idk what is.

At this i hope these trump supporters at least get vindicated at some point given the clear double standards they're held to.

 

[jje100010001]

For starters Arabs and Muslims in general are racially inferior. I have to point this out because of how much of a difference these things make. Their populations are so inbred that they are in slow motion genetic collapse. This generally lowers IQ and poisons the ability to create a civil society.

[...]

The thing about the Middle East is that they never settled those tribal conflicts. Even the royal house of Saudi Arabia is on shakier legs then anyone wants to admit because those of tribal rivalries. When you put that in the mix along with the dysfunctional nature of Islam, how it splits people apart, creates societies where there's only tyranny, and their best successes are only achieved after desperately aping better races and nations, then you get the failure of the Iraq War. A lot of people thought that the Iraq War would be like World War 2, that there would be a dedicated chunk of Iraqis that wanted to build a nation as Westerners understand it. But they don't want that, they are inbred pedophiles and wanna-be warlords with iphones. They don't understand what a nation-state is or how to build a working country that can have things like running water or working supply lines.

Nation building works when the people of that nation understand what a state actually is and when they want a civil society. Japan wanted that. Arabs and Muslims are incapable of it without having a warlord sitting on them with a gun pointed at the back of their heads at all times, knowing that if they break the law then they will be tortured and murdered. That's the only thing that keeps them in line. With Japan, no one had to do that.

On an aside, I do wonder if there's been any study into whether or not inbreeding and dysgenics was one of the causes of the long decline of the 'Arab' nations- the only other explanation I've seen is that the interpretation of the Quran became far more restrictive (no more Neoplatonism syncretism), and that this new puritan culture finally subsumed the remnant Sassanian and Greco-Roman-Syrian cultures with the unconverted dhimmi being pushed to the margins of society.

That, and the uncertain order of succession leading to unstable leadership + the Mongols arriving at the right time.

Beyond their first Caliphates, they've been consecutively ruled by Iranic, slave (Mamluk), Turkic and finally European empires. And even the Arab nations of the 50s and 60s seemed far more sophisticated than many are today, though I might say that this has happened around the developing world with large-scale rural migration to the cities overwhelming the old urbanite classses.

 

[Ghostse]

On an aside, I do wonder if there's been any study into whether or not inbreeding and dysgenics was one of the causes of the long decline of the 'Arab' nations- the only other explanation I've seen is that the interpretation of the Quran became far more restrictive (no more Neoplatonism syncretism), and that this new puritan culture finally subsumed the remnant Sassanian and Greco-Roman-Syrian cultures with the unconverted dhimmi being pushed to the margins of society.

That, and the uncertain order of succession leading to unstable leadership + the Mongols arriving at the right time.

Beyond their first Caliphates, they've been consecutively ruled by Iranic, slave (Mamluk), Turkic and finally European empires. And even the Arab nations of the 50s and 60s seemed far more sophisticated than many are today, though I might say that this has happened around the developing world with large-scale rural migration to the cities overwhelming the old urbanite classses.

I will once again put my 1488 niggerdeath street cred on the line and break Kayfab.

There is a genetic component to cousin fucking, but it is a secondary consideration. The Egyptian Pharohs were brother and sister fucking and they held power for centuries with no issues that came from the Royalty (mostly the Clergy), but that was because they pumped out out the creepy incest babies at rapid pace and essentially due to a mixture of "Pre-Hippocrates State of Medicine" and throwing them into court intrigue pool made it so the downsy ones were swiftly eliminated so that only the ones not all hills-have-eyes rose to the top and got power. The fact the mendel square says 75% of your kids are going to be cross-eyed simpleton hunchbacks is less of a problem when you pump out 50-60 of them, especially when you consider the siblings you are boning are ALSO the cream-of-the-trailer-park who had likewise survived the culling.
(full disclaimer: The Ancient Egyptians loved to marry off daughters to other regional royalty and some of those kids came back to bring at least few genes back into the pool, but those were drops in the bucket.*)

What really downward spirals a culture based on cousin fucking is not genetic inbreeding but cultural inbreeding. Basically when the only people you need to be on good terms are your genetic relatives, you tend to limit your world view, are less open to new ideas, and react violently to outsiders. None of this is a positive trait for collaboration and communication, exchange of ideas, and results in stagnation and the likelyhood you are going to curbed by someone who is innovating.
If on the other hand you actually have to be good terms with other people who aren't related to, at least good enough they'll agree your kids should start fucking, that tends to mean you're open the idea of people who aren't immediate family existing in the same world, and that makes diplomacy, negotiation, and trade much more likely to result.

So in a very real sense, yes, sadly to a degree diversity is a strength.
OF course the immediate counter to that is when everyone in the room has the same thoughts and same stance, that's not diversity.

To make this post much less 888, I'm going to summarize that most islamic empires collapsed due to a simple fact: they ran out of people they could conquer and steal from. Arabs being a sdesert people lived mainly by raiding during the seasons farming wasn't an option. They didn't have a cultural basis for understanding how to manage resources except for hoarding because of the desert, so no real basis for innovation, since innovators were a threat to the entrenched power structure.
That last part is not a uniquely Arab trait, but it is very pronounced in the Arab world.

And the increased 'Islamicization' of the Arab world stems from a failure of democracy. Most Arab nations exist because a French bureaucrat drew a line on the map with absolutely no shits given about the various Arab subspecies that lived in that line. When that happens, there is only one common factor that unites the population: Islam. So to win votes from people who are not your tribe, you have to bribe them (or intimidate them. Or just kill them) or simply be more Islamic than any competition.

This is coupled with the increased general rot of world government due to the Late-stage Cold War and following/current Pax Americana. To get this down as quickly as possible: In Medieval Europe, unless you were England, if you were a complete failure of a ruler, you were replaced, either internally or externally. This was true the world over, but post-Roman Europe was uniquely swift and brutal on non-hackers.
Now, everyone is so invested in maintaining the status quo, the only non-civil war that resulted in uncontested territorial gains for a belligerent since the 6-days war was Russia's action in Crimea**. That means terrible, inefficient governments are able to persist because there is no threat from the outside - unless you share a border with Putin.

tl;dr Just start at the eastern shore of the Mediterranean and just glass everything east until you hit the pacific, and you'll have done more good for humanity except for maybe whoever figured out you shouldn't shit upstream of your water source. And actually of you want to keep going over the pacific and trend upward a bit and just glass California & Vangroovy while you're at it, you'll probably have them beat.

* Historical asside: There were a significant population of Celtic - you know, those emerald niggers the Irish - peoples in Turkey in this weird isolated area away from the rest of the Celtic world. One speculation is that Rameses II had red-head genes are Celtic in origin from this population. Regard wherever they were from, whoever they selected as the donor was a solid fucking draft pick because several generations of pharohs seem to have had red hair.
In summary, Egyptians likely have Irish ancestor DNA so while they are not black they sure as shit are not white.

** The next most recent example was all Russia taking nearly all control of Ossetia from Georgia, but they did not officially move the border or claim the terrority, just an "ethnic enclave under russian protection" with a russian military base in it.

 

[Pokemonquistador2]

If this isn't skeward priorities, idk what is.
View attachment 2054798
View attachment 2054799
View attachment 2054800
At this i hope these trump supporters at least get vindicated at some point given the clear double standards they're held to.

J. Edgar Hoover twerking in a red dress couldn't bring more embarrassment to this organization than it has brought to itself by acting as a Mafia for the corrupt Uniparty. It needs to be disbanded at once.

 

[Super-Chevy454]

J. Edgar Hoover twerking in a red dress couldn't bring more embarrassment to this organization than it has brought to itself by acting as a Mafia for the corrupt Uniparty. It needs to be disbanded at once.

The same could be said about the C.I.A. but it's easier said than done.

 

[Chuck Mason]

The same could be said about the C.I.A. but it's easier said than done.

They probably glow in the dark don’t forget that

 

[The High Prophet of Truth]

https://twitter.com/Breaking911/status/1378778766248398858

 

[Super-Chevy454]

View attachment 2058444

https://twitter.com/Breaking911/status/1378778766248398858

They'll never admit then they wanted someone else other than the bland "Creepy Uncle Joe".

 

[The Last Stand]

View attachment 2058444

https://twitter.com/Breaking911/status/1378778766248398858

The person they never shut up about is gone, now they're at a loss of words.

They COULD report about the increasing urban Asian attacks...

 

[DeadFish]

The person they never shut up about is gone, now they're at a loss of words.

View attachment 2058650

They COULD report about the increasing urban Asian attacks...

Just balkanize into race based regions already. Whites can have super cold north. Blacks can have carolinas and the south and Asians can have Cali and hawaii.

Those who want to rumble can do so at the border.

 

[Chuck Mason]

View attachment 2058444

https://twitter.com/Breaking911/status/1378778766248398858

They are seriously lack self awareness and are out of touch
7:22 Update the new broad is live

 

[Bad_Guys_are_Good4EVER]

I hope people will come to their senses regarding the new Georgia voting law. All it does is that it prevents voter fraud from happening in future elections.

 

[Dark Edea]

I hope people will come to their senses regarding the new Georgia voting law. All it does is that it prevents voter fraud from happening in future elections.

It also prevents black people from voting and forces dehydration upon children.

 

[RumblyTumbly]

You'd think this thread would slow down to the point of being closed after Trump was out of office but, um, yeah no.

Actually, are they getting worse?

They'll never admit then they wanted someone else other than the bland "Creepy Uncle Joe".

The sad thing is that Biden is a gold mine of gaffes and hilarious mistakes that they will never take advantage of because they think they can't.

They're loss. I'll make all the jokes I want.