- Joined
- Jul 9, 2015
@1d4 thanks for your efforts, man!
Also, I love the new name for the thread and I hope it shows up on Google soon.
"How daaaare you people usefactual evidence MADE-UP STORIES to badmouth PK! You're so horrible!! PK can do no wrong! LALALALALA IM NOT LISTENING TO WHAT YOU HAVE TO SAY"

Rofl. Even if this anon is bait, they give us a very good summary of the prominent mentality within PK's fandumb. They will endorse whatever it is that PK says, even if it, deep inside, goes against their own personal views (that is, if they stop to think about it, which they don't) because PK has that power. Her art draws attention and she's very opinionated, and that mixture of talent and outspokenness draws people in. Also because PK has reached the point where she's worshipped (being "popular" for so many years), so if you're a lucky bastard who has been graced to be on her good books or became part of her "circle of friends", you'll do everything you can to stay in that position.
It really feels like a cult, haha.
I might get some negative votes here, but, to be quite honest with you, my only problem with that chat was Marl handled the situation poorly. Dude's got a sexual drive and a libido and he wants to use them. He makes it perfectly clear he likes sex and likes to talk about it. Some people have sex for the sake of the fun of sex itself and disregard "feelings", and there's nothing really wrong with that as long as the parties involved are all in agreement. He doesn't like dicks, so I really don't see a problem with him going for people who have vaginas, regardless of how they identify themselves, because, to me, human sexuality is a bit of a complicated subject and often uses a case-by-case basis. Yes, that may seem like he's dehumanizing people and seeing them merely as sexual objects, but, if he makes it clear that he's only in it for the sex, and the other party knows and AGREES to those conditions, there is nothing wrong going on, at least from my perspective.
It WOULD be a problem, however, if he went around preaching "SEX DOESN'T MATTER" and then suddenly drop this bomb, but I don't think he's ever done that, or ever publically and specifically agreed with PK's personal views on sex/relationships/gender. I might be wrong, though, it's just that I honestly can't remember.
Unrelated, but something I noticed. I don't really see a problem with him being open enough to talk about his kinks and fetishes, although I myself (and I assume most of us) would probably not do that with people that I just met or in a chatroom that might have minors around. The channel the conversation was being held on was not the pmdexplorers, but pmdSexplorers, so, yeah, one should assume that people would be talking about sex (and related subjects) in there. That doesn't really stop minors from getting in, but even if you put a hugeass "18+ ONLY - IF WE FIND OUT YOU'RE UNDERAGE YOU WILL BE BANNED" sign at the top, there's a very big chance some kids will ignore it.
Thing is, you have to do your part and be a responsible adult. The least you can do is warn and ban, but if that doesn't work, it's not really the chat owners' fault if there are kids lurking around some place they shouldn't. Of course, if you purposefully ATTRACT minors to those places, then, yeah, you're very much on the wrong.
The problem with Marl is that it really feels like he's out on a hunt, preying on underage vagina-bearers, and, based on people's reports, he insists on shoving his kinks down their throats, and that's what's truly disturbing. People who don't have the mental fortitude to dismiss a predator will be intimidated and pushed into a corner. Not everyone is strong enough to push a deviant away with a simple "dude gtfo you're making me uncomfortable", especially when you're young and inexperienced. Even if you turn off the screen and not interact with that person again, it's just not something that goes away easily, especially if you got wrapped up on the whole thing too deeply.
Also, I love the new name for the thread and I hope it shows up on Google soon.
you are all so rude and mean and you make up stories about pk. You are all horrible people
"How daaaare you people use
Rofl. Even if this anon is bait, they give us a very good summary of the prominent mentality within PK's fandumb. They will endorse whatever it is that PK says, even if it, deep inside, goes against their own personal views (that is, if they stop to think about it, which they don't) because PK has that power. Her art draws attention and she's very opinionated, and that mixture of talent and outspokenness draws people in. Also because PK has reached the point where she's worshipped (being "popular" for so many years), so if you're a lucky bastard who has been graced to be on her good books or became part of her "circle of friends", you'll do everything you can to stay in that position.
It really feels like a cult, haha.
That was the point, it's not that he has a preference for vagina, that's fine. I have friends like that (who can't date transwomen but still see them as women, some are even apologetic for it, and I've told them that's not their fault.).
No one was complaining about that, at all. That wasn't the point of the post. (It wasn't stated, even once. I want to be 100% clear, I don't believe that.)
The point was that he doesn't care who the vagina is attached to. He doesn't care if the individual is trans, because he doesn't see gender, he just sees something he wants to use. That's the problem, he is defining trans individuals on their genitalia, while having a super anti-transphobia (supposedly, though their behavior contrasts that, too) wife (who uses it as a cop out no less). You should never date a trans individual for their genitalia, ever (Unless it's a post-op transman for their penis, or something. (but that's its own can of worms)). That's not right, and that's the issue.
If he doesn't want to date transwomen because they don't have the genitals he wants? That's fine. That's fine, but seeing transmen as viable while not liking men because he sees them as walking vaginas, is bad. And especially hypocritical on both his and PK's part (who also seems to focus on people's genitals).
I might get some negative votes here, but, to be quite honest with you, my only problem with that chat was Marl handled the situation poorly. Dude's got a sexual drive and a libido and he wants to use them. He makes it perfectly clear he likes sex and likes to talk about it. Some people have sex for the sake of the fun of sex itself and disregard "feelings", and there's nothing really wrong with that as long as the parties involved are all in agreement. He doesn't like dicks, so I really don't see a problem with him going for people who have vaginas, regardless of how they identify themselves, because, to me, human sexuality is a bit of a complicated subject and often uses a case-by-case basis. Yes, that may seem like he's dehumanizing people and seeing them merely as sexual objects, but, if he makes it clear that he's only in it for the sex, and the other party knows and AGREES to those conditions, there is nothing wrong going on, at least from my perspective.
It WOULD be a problem, however, if he went around preaching "SEX DOESN'T MATTER" and then suddenly drop this bomb, but I don't think he's ever done that, or ever publically and specifically agreed with PK's personal views on sex/relationships/gender. I might be wrong, though, it's just that I honestly can't remember.
Unrelated, but something I noticed. I don't really see a problem with him being open enough to talk about his kinks and fetishes, although I myself (and I assume most of us) would probably not do that with people that I just met or in a chatroom that might have minors around. The channel the conversation was being held on was not the pmdexplorers, but pmdSexplorers, so, yeah, one should assume that people would be talking about sex (and related subjects) in there. That doesn't really stop minors from getting in, but even if you put a hugeass "18+ ONLY - IF WE FIND OUT YOU'RE UNDERAGE YOU WILL BE BANNED" sign at the top, there's a very big chance some kids will ignore it.
Thing is, you have to do your part and be a responsible adult. The least you can do is warn and ban, but if that doesn't work, it's not really the chat owners' fault if there are kids lurking around some place they shouldn't. Of course, if you purposefully ATTRACT minors to those places, then, yeah, you're very much on the wrong.
The problem with Marl is that it really feels like he's out on a hunt, preying on underage vagina-bearers, and, based on people's reports, he insists on shoving his kinks down their throats, and that's what's truly disturbing. People who don't have the mental fortitude to dismiss a predator will be intimidated and pushed into a corner. Not everyone is strong enough to push a deviant away with a simple "dude gtfo you're making me uncomfortable", especially when you're young and inexperienced. Even if you turn off the screen and not interact with that person again, it's just not something that goes away easily, especially if you got wrapped up on the whole thing too deeply.
Last edited: