Megathread TERFs / Trans-Exclusionary Radical Feminists / Gender Critical Feminists - ft. r/GenderCritical & related reddits, Mancheeze, Cathy Brennan, GCDad, RadFHarva, Jamie Shupe, etc; "Gender Critical Feminism is Homophobic" - Cathy Brennan, 2019.

What do they have a stick up their ass some much so for porn?
Never ever have radfems been able to settle on one position in re: porn. Rather than sticking with one unified argument of "porn exploits women and is bad, the patriarchal capital class enables this exploitation" or "porn empowers women to have bodily agency in the face of puritanical social mores and should be celebrated as a Woman's Choice" or, god forbid, somehow finding some nuance they could agree on, they've instead formed ideology gangs and constantly snipe and tear each other down. Sex work exclusives and inclusives continually reopen each other's wounded egos and have been for almost 50 years. That is why they have a stick up their ass about porn.
 
Never ever have radfems been able to settle on one position in re: porn. Rather than sticking with one unified argument of "porn exploits women and is bad, the patriarchal capital class enables this exploitation" or "porn empowers women to have bodily agency in the face of puritanical social mores and should be celebrated as a Woman's Choice" or, god forbid, somehow finding some nuance they could agree on, they've instead formed ideology gangs and constantly snipe and tear each other down. Sex work exclusives and inclusives continually reopen each other's wounded egos and have been for almost 50 years. That is why they have a stick up their ass about porn.
This is because they are actually human beings who do not universally have the same opinion. They aren't Daleks or something. They have different views about things. It's very easy to pick out some caricature (like Andrea Dworkin) and act like every single feminist is this person. It isn't true, though.
 
This is because they are actually human beings who do not universally have the same opinion. They aren't Daleks or something. They have different views about things. It's very easy to pick out some caricature (like Andrea Dworkin) and act like every single feminist is this person. It isn't true, though.
Yeah, human beings in a movement with one singular goal which is to achieve equity with men but have spent every day since the inception of porn totally undecided on whether Porn Good or Porn Bad, and instead of putting on a united front or even agreeing to disagree you have endless bad blood, name-calling and clique-forming on every level. If literally every feminist was Andrea Dworkin, the movement would actually be better off.
 
What do they have a stick up their ass some much so for porn?
They believe that no women ever willingly participate in porn and every single porno is the result of sex trafficking, coercion, drugging, etc. Women do not have agency and no woman would ever actually want to do something kinky because they're too dainty for that.
 
TERFs always insist they don't threaten violence against their enemies.
That it's only their enemies who threaten violence against them.
Alright TERFs, what do you make of this tweet advocating violence against women participating in a beauty contest?

ItsNotViolenceWhenWomenDoItToWomen.jpg

So if you are a beautiful woman at a beauty contest TERFs will threaten to throw "flour, eggs and rotten fruit and veg" at you, but "that's not violence" according to them.
 
TERFs always insist they don't threaten violence against their enemies.
That it's only their enemies who threaten violence against them.
Alright TERFs, what do you make of this tweet advocating violence against women participating in a beauty contest?

View attachment 2073332

So if you are a beautiful woman at a beauty contest TERFs will threaten to throw "flour, eggs and rotten fruit and veg" at you, but "that's not violence" according to them.
Tranny glitter bombs vs TERF flour bombs. Who would win? Doing this shit is no better than trans activists throwing piss and glitter. And competing in a beauty contest is still an accomplishment, most of them probably work really hard on their body. I think it should be looked at as an individual accomplishment like sports and not like everything bad about the beauty industry embodied.
 
Yeah, human beings in a movement with one singular goal which is to achieve equity with men but have spent every day since the inception of porn totally undecided on whether Porn Good or Porn Bad, and instead of putting on a united front or even agreeing to disagree you have endless bad blood, name-calling and clique-forming on every level. If literally every feminist was Andrea Dworkin, the movement would actually be better off.
I find myself agreeing with radical feminists on a few things relating to prostitution, porn, and surrogacy. For example, I don't really like porn because of the shady nature of the industry and abuse of actors/actresses. It's also really fake and unrealistic for men and women. However, a lot of them are so firmly attached to their beliefs and quite dogmatic towards opposing views to the point where nothing gets done and neither side listens.
Tranny glitter bombs vs TERF flour bombs. Who would win? Doing this shit is no better than trans activists throwing piss and glitter. And competing in a beauty contest is still an accomplishment, most of them probably work really hard on their body. I think it should be looked at as an individual accomplishment like sports and not like everything bad about the beauty industry embodied.
A lot of women in the pageants aren't only accomplished in looks. They're also highly intelligent and hold high earning degrees such as engineering and business management. But that isn't very convenient to mention.
 
Last edited:
Related to "Terfs, just like the trannies they hate do all of their own worst PR," and since r/GC became Ovarit, an overview of the batshit insanity that Ovarit has become. If Mallory Ortberg hadn't been driven mad by Joe and hormones and chubbiness, she'd love to be able to write parody like this.

I joined Ovarit because I loved the idea of a forum where nobody gets in trouble for ‘misgendering.’ I’m firmly on team ‘Pronouns are Rohypnol.’ But I'm also fairly libertarian. As a sane adult not in jail, you have the right to do what you want, including role playing whatever you want. And I have the right to decline to play along.

Ovarit is billed as a RadFem site, but not a lot of women there understand, or have read, any serious texts; lots of references to five minute YouTubes, though. Much splashy denunciation of capitalism while discussions of what things to buy abound. I’m with them on porn and prostitution generally existing to monetize women’s bodies for men. I see abortion as a necessary evil, not “yay, abortion is fun!” but some of them are reasonable on that. So there was a lot I liked about it almost a year ago, when it started.

I also have to say, one of my biggest points of contention with the trans movement is giving children - whom we know are rapidly changing, whose brains aren’t fully formed until into their 20s, and who are famously vulnerable to parental and peer influence - treatments that have lifelong consequences. Unlike most of Ovarit I don’t think all transwomen are evil or perverts; I think they’re nuts, the same way I think people who spend their lives training dogs to run obstacle courses are nuts, but de gustibus non disputandem. But we don’t let kids get their tubes tied because they think they won’t want kids; hell, we don’t let kids get tattoos. So a community that defends children’s right not to have experimental procedures that are irreversible appealed to me. But then the “children are bad for the environment anyway” and “who wants children?” crowd grew, in numbers and noisiness.

This thread is a good example, both of the vituperation and general lowbrow tenor of debate:

It’s also significant that a lot of the newer and weirder posters are, like this one, autistic, sorry, non-neurotypical. It’s not their fault, but when a signature problem of your brain disorder is an inability to reality-test and to understand how humans work … maybe don’t take up quite so much space telling others how the world should be?

FedUp is a foster mom. She’s American, 25 but talks about all the things she used to believe when she was “younger,” and makes feminist art. To give you a sense of her moral serieux, she is boycotting Kraft because of their silly pun.
But also believes George Floyd was evil and deserved what he got, and throws tanties when someone disagrees with her. Or when she thinks someone does: her reading comprehension isn’t great, but to be fair she is the self-described child of alcoholics who is saddled with children she finds repulsive, so I'm guessing she doesn't spend her evenings studying formal logic.

Another “I hate men” (but don’t you stereotype me!) thread. Note that the person who tried to push back - wasn’t me - got kicked. A thread on how men are almost metaphysically evil:

FedUp is also the kind who LOVES Lana del Rey - that, hating children, and embracing body hair seem to be her defining character traits. One of the saner posters tries to push back on hating kids being ok. But that never happens, see, because women don’t have power over children and if they did would never abuse it. (Tell me again how your opposition to kids transing is your abiding concern for children?)

Also, as if the man-hating, baby-killing stereotype weren't sufficiently fleshed out, Good RadFems should abort male babies (most redacted, but only after the posters were embarrassed. It was fair game, to the mods.) Also, in another deleted thread, a woman in an abusive marriage was told her sons were future rapists. That’s some good sisterhood, there. Another poster (also kicked out) started a thread entitled “Children are the most vulnerable people in society and normalizing disgust for them is not ok.” It got deleted too, before I could screen grab/archive.

A thread on how all men, indeed, are awful.

The context a screen cap doesn’t capture is that the women saying “no, men are not uniformly evil, and despite having been abused by one I want a loving relationship” etc are the older posters- both in terms of age and activity on the site. The ones saying “yes all man are awful, and women + cats = awesome!” are younger in both senses. It’s trending in the wrong direction. The older lesbians are also much more sensible, and way less man- and child-hating, than the Gen Z heteros. We are not, as a civilization, looking promising.

In terms of how the Ovarites respond to criticism, a 90 minute long YouTube sperg out to the Atlantic article.
Also, the longest thread in the forum’s existence was a long rant about the Atlantic piece. Scrutiny drives them nuts.

The numbers skyrocketed from the Streisand effect, and I think that’s what led to the influence of angry unshaven girl-children, who think “can you fucking read?” and “fine then, don’t read my posts” is a useful contribution to a discussion of Foucault, Fanon, and the relationship between bodies and carceral power, eg.

So, I’m hoping to draw some of the less crazy ones here, because there is good content here and we can ignore what we dislike, like grownups. I figure KiwiFarms can balance its (incredibly robust, encyclopedic, authoritative) catalogue of tranny craziness with some good old TERF craziness. And frankly I’d like to see you mocking the hell out of them, because sanctimony pisses me off most, and that’s something thick on the ground at Ovarit but not here.
 
Ovarit is billed as a RadFem site, but not a lot of women there understand, or have read, any serious texts; lots of references to five minute YouTubes, though
That's pretty widespread. I think a lot of women are just calling themselves TERF because that's what other people called them. Even from my own miniscule understanding of the ideology, I would say that it's fairly common here as well.
 
Sounds like a carbon copy of the old r/GenderCritical then
Ha, fair. They'll be crushed if this dawns on them, given their fundamental premise is that the wimmins are superior to men in every way. Turns out grrl reddit is just as histrionic and reactive as the old version, with less porn but more moral preening. They're currently fighting about whether women who wear makeup are allowed in the clubhouse.
That's pretty widespread. I think a lot of women are just calling themselves TERF because that's what other people called them. Even from my own miniscule understanding of the ideology, I would say that it's fairly common here as well.
I should know better than to be disappointed. Lots of people who call themselves libertarian don't know a thing about any of the main works and principles, but think it's just "mah gunz." And to be fair there were a fair number of original posters there - typically older, and educated at least judging by their ability to write in multi-clause correct sentences, who did understand the fundamental schools of feminism, the tensions between them, and so on, and taught me a lot. But good lord, the majority ... it's funny, they mock the hell out of blue haired pronoun people for thinking that makes a personality, but don't realize that bushy eyebrows and hairy pits and the refusal to use pronouns is no less a caricature.

If anyone knows where adult second wave feminists hang out, let me know, please.
 
Here we watch the late stages of a Feminist pack. See how they splinter off into new groups?

*points at Rabid cunts circling wounded troons*

The weakest of the pack are rounded up and forced to either fight and escape or perish at the fowl jaws of a rabid white cunt.

*watches the cunts eat their own*

See? this is what happens when the pack unit matures, they eat their own and practice cannibalism. Only the strongest may survive.

And since the Cunts dont normally have stink ditches from a self inflicted wound, they also dont have any of the psychological or physical scars and handicaps that the Troon platoons of the unit normally have, and thus, become easy prey for all but the most incompetent, passive, or not hungry cunts.
 
makeupissexist.png


This shit right here is why a lot of women don't want to be a radical feminist. Imagine telling troons "You can only be a woman because you're born one" then they tell women they aren't a real woman if they dare wear make up, shave, or do anything to try to make themselves look attractive. If anything, they try just as hard as men to police what women may or may not do, which to me sounds the opposite of feminism. Seriously. This is why I haven't sought to join Ovarit, because of shit like this, telling me I'm too stupid to have my own thoughts of how I want to look, and instead am just pressured by evil men to want to look good and take care of myself.
 
View attachment 2081714

This shit right here is why a lot of women don't want to be a radical feminist. Imagine telling troons "You can only be a woman because you're born one" then they tell women they aren't a real woman if they dare wear make up, shave, or do anything to try to make themselves look attractive. If anything, they try just as hard as men to police what women may or may not do, which to me sounds the opposite of feminism. Seriously. This is why I haven't sought to join Ovarit, because of shit like this, telling me I'm too stupid to have my own thoughts of how I want to look, and instead am just pressured by evil men to want to look good and take care of myself.
I thought feminism was supposed to be about women being allowed to choose how they live and present themselves. What's feminist about saying that women can't make personal choices?
 
remember that those were the same cunts bitching about not having the same "rights as men" while doing jack shit besides what they do these days and who were also white feathering the men who were not stupid enough to go get sent off to die in WW1.
I thought feminism was supposed to be about women being allowed to choose how they live and present themselves. What's feminist about saying that women can't make personal choices?
 
This shit right here is why a lot of women don't want to be a radical feminist. [...] This is why I haven't sought to join Ovarit, because of shit like this, telling me I'm too stupid to have my own thoughts of how I want to look, and instead am just pressured by evil men to want to look good and take care of myself.
The other thing is, this is not a fundamental part of second wave/radical feminism, to whatever extent such a belief can be said to exist: it's not a formal church, there's no official dogma and pope/patriarch/chief rabbi to tell you you're a heretic. Second wave feminism decried performative femininity because it was generally enforced by patriarchy. As you say, if you want to wear a skirt or shave your legs or wear lipstick, and you won't be fired or refused a mortgage if you don't ... then it's not really patriarchy, is it? And it's more like a personal aesthetic choice. Those are allowed, right?
But they're not even rooting this in major texts, just asserting something is part of a purity test and why is that bad. I'm interested in vigorous debate about actual ideas, less so in being told I'm a sellout and Bad Woman if I wear makeup to work because it's considered part of looking professional. (How has the OP not had to worry about this, you may ask? She has, in other posts, referenced being quite young and living with a mental disability - coy but sounds like mood disorders plus spectrummy. It's really easy not to dress how The Man wants you to when you live in Mom's house still and only have to shower once a week before your shrink appointment.)
 
A thread on how all men, indeed, are awful.
Screenshot_20210412-025214_Chrome.jpg


This is genuinely funny. "I don't want anything to do with men! But I'm not a separatist, till a bunch of other women my age say they have a Nigel, then I'm pro-seperetism and #yesallmen!"

Lol, this is literally "I can't find someone to put up with me, but I'm holding out hope!"

What exactly is the point of not wanting anything to do with men without being a separatist? Isn't like some government agency is gonna make sure you go live on a woman reservation or something.
 
View attachment 2081714

This shit right here is why a lot of women don't want to be a radical feminist. Imagine telling troons "You can only be a woman because you're born one" then they tell women they aren't a real woman if they dare wear make up, shave, or do anything to try to make themselves look attractive. If anything, they try just as hard as men to police what women may or may not do, which to me sounds the opposite of feminism. Seriously. This is why I haven't sought to join Ovarit, because of shit like this, telling me I'm too stupid to have my own thoughts of how I want to look, and instead am just pressured by evil men to want to look good and take care of myself.
The problem here is that radical feminism wants to be utopian, imagining a world where there are no unethical companies pushing makeup, and they so fiercely believe that world is possible that they do fuck all to actually help women. It's all theory and raging about how their perfect world doesn't already exist. Maybe "choice" feminists don't help each other that much either, but at least they're only focused on the one thing they can control: themselves. Any time someone says, "You can't be a feminist without confronting racism," or some deviation of that, they start tripping over themselves. If feminism just stuck to making the world a little easier for women and addressing their issues, they could actually get things done. But trying to link all the systems to one another and tear them down in one fell swoop (and not even doing THAT but just hoping it tears ITSELF down at some point) is just a way to feel self-righteous about it.
 
That's pretty widespread. I think a lot of women are just calling themselves TERF because that's what other people called them. Even from my own miniscule understanding of the ideology, I would say that it's fairly common here as well.
I view it as a pretty similar phenomenon to white people being continually called racists no matter what they do. Dass wayciss dass wayciss dass wayciss, iss wayciss to have black people in your shows, iss wayciss not to have black people in your shows, okay whatever, I guess I'm racist, kill yourself nigger. At some point people just get utterly sick of being constantly henpecked by neurotic weirdoes and no longer give a shit about their accusations.
 
Back