Opinion Women who 'settled' for partners who weren't 'the one' reveal what it's REALLY like to be in an unfulfilling relationship with a 'good person' - REDDIT MOMENT

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/...d-partners-werent-one-reveal-REALLY-like.html (Archive)

Women who have admittedly 'settled' for partners who weren't 'the one' have opened up about what life is like in an unfulfilled relationship — but some insist they don't have any regrets.

The thought-provoking responses were shared in a now-viral Reddit thread after u/violetshug asked women who ended up with 'good' people they aren't head-over-heels in love with to share how their relationships are going.

The stories range from women who are getting divorced after years of unhappiness to those who are now fully in love with their partners and everything in between.

1618311978847.png

1618311984430.png

1618311990370.png

1618311999805.png



'Twenty years of marriage and three kids later, we are very good partners and make a great team. However, I am somewhat sad about how little we have in common outside of that,' one person wrote.

Another woman who has been married to her partner for five years and with him for a total of 16, admitted that 'it isn't always easy.'

'We’re in a rough spot and it’s easy after every issue to think, "I knew I never should have stayed with him,"' she explained. 'Sometimes I wonder if I’m being a coward...

'My husband adores me and is a good man but does not fulfill me intellectually, is emotionally immature, and we are on different planets of sexual desire. It’s a struggle but it’s not a nightmare.'

Someone else who has been married for 28 years said she couldn't be happier.

1618312080157.png

1618312085413.png

1618312091663.png

1618312099939.png

1618312106811.png

1618312112257.png

1618312118997.png

1618312124507.png

1618312129788.png

1618312135071.png

1618312141113.png



'We have had our ups and downs, but to be honest, he was the one — I just didn't know it at the time,' she said. 'Sometimes "the one" is an ideal based on youthful priorities, but with maturity, you realize some of those qualities aren't as important anymore...

'I might add too, that I ran into "the one" again a few years back. Was not impressed, and I think I made a good escape there!'

However, not everyone has been that lucky in their relationships over the years.

'It's sad and boring, but safe,' one Reddit user shared. 'I do miss "the one" sometimes, but we're just friends and we could never be more than that. It's either this or total solitude so at least I have a companion, sex and someone truly loves me. Or course I would give my right arm to have my true love, but here we are.'

Many of the women who commented in the thread said they love their partners but aren't in love with them.

'It’s going. I know it’s not right, but he is a good person,' one mom wrote. 'Sometimes I want so much more. Right now, it would cost me so much to leave, and I do have love for him. Our children have a great support system between us, and we live a decent life.'

1618312167221.png

1618312174736.png

1618312179867.png

1618312185295.png

1618312190878.png

1618312198310.png

1618312207254.png

1618312212990.png

1618312218210.png


Another explained that she chose her husband because he 'meets a lot' of her needs and she loves him for who he is.

'He’s not a GQ model, he’s not rich, and yes, sometimes he bugs the crap out of me,' she added. 'But I chose him. And I chose to love him for who he is rather than hold out for the idea of "the one."'

Others opened up about their divorces, insisting that life is too short to stay with someone you don't love.

'Finally ended it just under three years ago, after a decade of on and off. Now living a happy life with someone, who is definitely the one,' one person wrote.

Someone else said she and her partner divorced because their values didn't match.

'We married and had kids too young. Been single two years and I've literally fallen in love [with] myself!' she said. 'Better to be happy and alone than lonely and married.'

'I ended my six-year relationship (married for three) last year and it was the best decision I ever made,' another woman agreed. 'I didn’t see how uncolorful it was until I was out of it.'
 
The bitch who's "protecting herself" by keeping their finances separate is a hoot. As if she's not going to try and drink every drop of that poor sap's blood once she decides he's not ticking all the boxes.
 
Redditors cannot love, or feel love. Any divine spark that they may have possessed has been extinguished. A redditor is merely an empty vessel to be filled by cat pictures and globohomo propaganda, a hylic, a NPC, a born slave. The soul of the reddit bugman or bugwoman is twisted, blackened, infinitesimally small. God willing, it will one day be perfectly legal to slay a redditor wherever they may stand, for any reason. The narwhal will never bacon at midnight ever again, inshallah.
 
I mean some of these are wholesome. Others...

You can’t know who the love of your life is until you’ve lived a lot of your life. Because the love of your life is the person with whom you’ve *built* a life.

The excitement is limerence, and the essence of limerence is uncertainty. Does he love me? Does she think I’m attractive? Could they be interested in me? Questions.

But that’s tiring and unproductive in marriage, where you’re trying to build a life, or should be. If you have to always be uncertain of your spouse, that takes too much of your energy that should be spent on kids, career, extended family, community, your home, growing your business - your home and family are a business - so to speak.
 
The bitch who's "protecting herself" by keeping their finances separate is a hoot.
Not to be chauvinistic (okay, maybe a little), but I find that relationships where the woman makes significantly more than the man don't work. It works just fine for the man, most of the time, but for the woman there seems to be some sort of entrenched hang-up that prevents a wife from respecting a husband that makes less than she does, and that lack of respect is a key factor in almost all non-infidelity, woman-initiated divorces.
 
View attachment 2083745
100% this bitch has an OnlyFans
Damn beat me too it bringing up OF. Imagine complaining how terrible it is women have to settle when lots of men are going to be faced with marrying the town bike who's only legacy is an OF, or dying alone. Even then they would complain they are the ones who settled.
 
Didn't the TV shows of the 80s teach us that if we aren't ✨blissfully ✨happy✨ 24/7 we HAVE to get divorced?
Why would that message have been so loud and clear if it wasn't in the public's best interest? Could there have been some ulterior motive to breaking up families as a part of some weird long game? (I need to stock up on tin foil. Weird thoughts keep getting in lately.)
 
Not to be chauvinistic (okay, maybe a little), but I find that relationships where the woman makes significantly more than the man don't work. It works just fine for the man, most of the time, but for the woman there seems to be some sort of entrenched hang-up that prevents a wife from respecting a husband that makes less than she does, and that lack of respect is a key factor in almost all non-infidelity, woman-initiated divorces.
It worked out for Chris's big bro!

But I think you're probally right, traditional things usually just tend to work out better more often than not, like I have never seen an older woman/younger man relationship that wasn't filled with drama.
 
I've spent pretty much my entire life terrified that I'd end up in this kind of relationship (as a dude). Where even if I somehow managed to get a girl, I would be afraid that she was basically just settling for me as "better than nothing, I guess". I had hoped I was just being paranoid.

And yet here we are.
 
Didn't the TV shows of the 80s teach us that if we aren't ✨blissfully ✨happy✨ 24/7 we HAVE to get divorced?
Why would that message have been so loud and clear if it wasn't in the public's best interest? Could there have been some ulterior motive to breaking up families as a part of some weird long game? (I need to stock up on tin foil. Weird thoughts keep getting in lately.)
Because environmentalists worked out that children being born in wealthy countries is bad for the planet due to consumerism. Much more environmentally friendly for them to be born in squalor and the top 1% of those to be scooped up by the West to support the pyramid scheme. Or it's runaway boomer idealism made by people with the luxury of unlimited choice due to their status.
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
Reactions: ilovejews
I'm not sure why I am so confident about this statement, but I have a very strong feeling that FoMO is one of the most destructive factors in the lives of Western women (as well as men, to a lesser degree) these days. Social media has to be causing a lot of this.
What are you talking about? This exact thing has been in the framework of American culture since the 50s. Social media is window dressing.

The rejection here is a fight against the work of a relationship. People's abhorrence of the fact that they are required have to give everything that is true to another person in order to make a long-term relationship work. Nobody will tell you this, but one main reason marriage exists is to discourage cowards and wastrels from getting into long term relationships that they have no ability to sustain. Marriage isn't intended to promise someone your life, that's just the common language used, the intent of the ceremony is to promise someone your death. You commit to them and the relationship to the extent that death alone ends it. That takes work. That takes perseverance. That takes honesty. None of the people above can offer any of those things, even to themselves.
 
Back