Trainwreck Pamela Swain / DocHoliday1977 / MsPhoenix1969 / Observer1977 / danishlace2003 / Writer_thriller - Victim of grand #MeToo conspiracy, litigious wannabe starfucker, off her meds and online

  • Thread starter Thread starter AJ 447
  • Start date Start date

Which member of the Pamspiracy does Pam secretly want to fuck the most?


  • Total voters
    519
No thanks, Mr. President dog and horse fucker
2090368-4342eb9455d8a9569b68bd0e8861e727.jpg
This is the face of an animal rapist. You can tell because you're too ugly to find human sexual partners.
 
  • Like
Reactions: George Floyd Sneed
Your argument is with history books. Direct your ire and wrongness there. I refuse to argue with a wrong idiot.
I'll try to explain it once more so even a baby could understand.
Washington had power.
Washington used power.
In 1807 an act was signed that limited the power of a president to respond to riots and insurrections.
Presidents after 1807 do not have the powers Washington had.
@Illuminati Order Official, @Deadpool, the argument is easy to understand, right? It's just her, right?
No. Not really
Pam, I'm sorry but if you are unable to understand why your Washington argument is meritless then you are in no position to insult the intellegence of others.
Not sentances. It's sentences.
Ad hominem on my grammar.
 
I'll try to explain it once more so even a baby could understand.
Washington had power.
Washington used power.
In 1807 an act was signed that limited the power of a president to respond to riots and insurrections.
Presidents after 1807 do not have the powers Washington had.
@Illuminati Order Official, @Deadpool, the argument is easy to understand, right? It's just her, right?

Pam, I'm sorry but if you are unable to understand why your Washington argument is meritless then you are in no position to insult the intellegence of others.

Ad hominem on my grammar.
Yeah it's very simple. Anyone with an IQ higher than room temperature should understand. Which is exactly why Pam can't quite figure it out. I mean seriously look at her selfies, you can tell there's no intelligence in those dead tard eyes.


She's also growing quite the mustache!
 
I'll try to explain it once more so even a baby could understand.
Washington had power.
Washington used power.
In 1807 an act was signed that limited the power of a president to respond to riots and insurrections.
Presidents after 1807 do not have the powers Washington had.
@Illuminati Order Official, @Deadpool, the argument is easy to understand, right? It's just her, right?
You mean this law:
Whenever the President considers that unlawful obstructions, combinations, or assemblages, or *rebellion* against the authority of the United States, make it impracticable to enforce the laws of the United States in any State by the ordinary course of judicial proceedings, he may call into Federal service such of the militia of any State, and use such of the armed forces, as he considers necessary to enforce those laws or to suppress the rebellion.
(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 15, § 332; Pub. L. 109–163, div. A, title X, § 1057(a)(2), Jan. 6, 2006, 119 Stat. 3440; renumbered § 252, Pub. L. 114–328, div. A, title XII, § 1241(a)(2), Dec. 23, 2016, 130 Stat. 2497.)

I think you are confused.
Pam, I'm sorry but if you are unable to understand why your Washington argument is meritless then you are in no position to insult the intellegence of others.
I think you are a clown.
Ad hominem on my grammar.
Yes, it is.
Yeah it's very simple. Anyone with an IQ higher than room temperature should understand. Which is exactly why Pam can't quite figure it out. I mean seriously look at her selfies, you can tell there's no intelligence in those dead tard eyes.


She's also growing quite the mustache!
Oh, the ultimate bull and horse fucking duo.

There is no mustache, Donald.
 


As I understand it:
Time is linear.
Thing that expired or ceased to exist at one point can't be used at any point later in time.
Correct?
NO I think it's both of you.

In the name of JESUS, may their evil come back on them 100 times over.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
As I understand it:
Time is linear.
Thing that expired or ceased to exist at one point can't be used at any point later in time.
Correct?
Sort of, there are theories that time doesn't exist. The past only happened because of memories of it happening and the future hasn't happened because well, it hasn't. Few physicists refer to this has a series of "Nows". If that were true it would force the human race to rethink science as a whole. Hell, quantum mechanics would need a huge revamp. You couldn't get past fourth dimensional theory if there was no time.
 

Psalm 121

King James Version

121 I will lift up mine eyes unto the hills, from whence cometh my help.
2 My help cometh from the Lord, which made heaven and earth.
3 He will not suffer thy foot to be moved: he that keepeth thee will not slumber.
4 Behold, he that keepeth Israel shall neither slumber nor sleep.
5 The Lord is thy keeper: the Lord is thy shade upon thy right hand.
6 The sun shall not smite thee by day, nor the moon by night.
7 The Lord shall preserve thee from all evil: he shall preserve thy soul.
8 The Lord shall preserve thy going out and thy coming in from this time forth, and even forevermore.
 
Back