- Joined
- Mar 14, 2021
It might also be possible to make the point that the impoverished tend to commit crimes that result in those sort of confrontations with the police whereas those wealthier either get away with their crimes or tend not to get caught in a situation likely to end with a use of force, however much the arresting officers might want to do so after finding the torture dungeon in the creep's basement.That's not what he's saying, though. His argument is that poverty and criminality are correlated, which is true. The poor have a much greater chance of engaging in criminal behaviour, either to survive or because they think they're owed something by the world. Criminal behaviour leads to a greater chance of a hostile police encounter, which in turn leads to a greater chance of being shot by the police. It's not that they "hate poor people", it's that the poor are more likely to engage in behaviours that prompt a use of force.
Or to phrase it differently most confrontation between poor criminals and the police seem to occur in the wider world in contrast to richer sorts who commit crime who tend to be cornered at their own property.