U.S. Riots of April 2021 over Derek Chauvin & Riot Watch General

Status
Not open for further replies.
Apologies if this has already been posted.


A filmmaker goes to Minneapolis last night to speak with some blacks about the Chauvin trial. In the (very short) video they say that they think hundreds of blacks are shot by police a year just in their city. They think Chauvin should not have even received a trial and they believe the majority of whites are white supremacists. Additionally, they talked about civil war and killing all white people.
I can’t archive right now (I’m phone posting).
 
For real. As a shotgunfag, the best gun to use is one you barely have to aim.
Granted, at 5 yards the pattern's going to be, what, the size of your fist? Can still miss with that.

That said that's a lot of metal going downrange, and even if your shot placement isn't perfect they'll drop.

In most other states, he still may have been charged with murder, but the State would have had to prove intent to kill in order to secure a murder conviction. The State most likely would have included "lesser included charges", which is where they charge you with murder, but give the jury the option to convict for manslaughter if intent to kill can't be proven but gross/criminal negligence can. Most states only charge felony/unintentional murder when the felony that predicates the felony murder charge is a separate act from the homicide.

Felony murder is one of those "ancient law" things that originated in England. In every other common law country, including England, the felony murder rule has been found unconstitutional, as it doesn't fulfill the actus reus element of a crime. Personally, I don't mind that we still have it as it allows us to lock up criminal negroes who kill people in packs without actually needing proof that they pulled the trigger.
But for murder 2, isn't intent to kill not a thing anyway since it's an unintentional homicide? I guess I might be conflating intent with premeditation, though.

Also, what would the separate predicated crime look like? The way you're explaining it, if I beat the shit out of a guy, without intent to kill him, but he dies anyway, that's not felony murder. But, if I rob a store, and the clerk panics, slips, and brains himself on the counter, then there's felony murder since the robbery itself isn't directly connected to the death.

I think I'm more confused now. Thanks US law.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dinotard
Ezh6qI-WUAMgyfu.jpg
It looks like they might actually be trying to do a town hall instead of just whipping everyone up into a frenzy
Ezh7pbLXMAEtwXI.jpg
All things considered it seems calm... for now. But never relax around white liberals
Ezh2F8VX0AE8ki_.jpg
Will they riot? Probably. Trannies love to riot
Ezh9GzmWUAMPwtA.jpg
 

Attachments

  • Ezh-PI3XMAErubP.jpg
    Ezh-PI3XMAErubP.jpg
    75.9 KB · Views: 42
Infinite number of promising youths reaching for their college diplomas during routine police encounters = infinite number of race grift martyrs as things just get increasingly violent and radical. I'm not expecting a "race war," but something's gotta give eventually. Some day in the future we're probably gonna see some medieval style caste thing where you just don't confront black people for anything they do. We already see the beginning of it but it's gonna calcify into law/police training eventually.
We'll get a Brahmin caste of race-grifting intellectuals who "solve" the problem that their ideology created.
 
Where's my dumb rating? At any home defense range you're not getting a spread that will matter.
I mean strictly speaking you point a shotgun, not aim it. Even with ghosties on top I've found. This doesn't mean shooting from the hip, but you aren't doing what I'd call "aiming" either outside of some slug specific circumstances where you probably aren't using the bead.

You're right about the spread though.
Granted, at 5 yards the pattern's going to be, what, the size of your first? Can still miss with that...
Smaller iirc. At 5 yards you're barely getting dispersion out of buckshot unless you have a dispersiondiffusion choke (basically a rifled choke which makes shot donut out aggressively, which is bad).
 
Last edited:
Wait, is that who she was trying to kill? Her fucking Doordash Driver?

It was in reference to the two mini-sheboons who killed a Pakistani Door Dash driver following an attempted carjacking with a taser. They are now receiving plea bargains in which they will not be incarcerated.
1619044556298.png

There is a pattern in the (((activist))) class to attempt to immunize joggers from the law.
 
I mean strictly speaking you point a shotgun, not aim it. Even with ghosties on top I've found. This doesn't mean shooting from the hip, but you aren't doing what I'd call "aiming" either outside of some slug specific circumstances where you probably aren't using the bead.

You're right about the spread though.

Smaller iirc. At 5 yards you're barely getting dispersion out of buckshot unless you have a dispersion choke or whatever it's called (basically a rifled choke which makes shot donut out aggressively, which is bad).
I have never liked using rifled slugs in part because of this. If I'm firing slugs I might as well put on the rifled, ported barrel with the blade and valley sights that allow for windage adjustment, or just mount a damned scope anyway. Ballistics are much better on the sabot slugs in general.

As for buck, bird and trap loads, the difference between pointing and aiming is moot as when I'm out shooting skeet/trap/sporting clays, yes I am damn well aiming at a (moving) target and I'm definitely not just pointing it in the general direction of the target. I was going to say "why the fuck would you want to drastically widen patterning on a shot at close range" but I'm sure someone has a (dumb) reason for doing that.
 
Because if there's one thing we've learned over the last few years, it's that young people have the best interests of the country at heart, right?

Fucking retarded take.

Not "young", dude. Just not fucking ancient.

I do believe a party controlled by middle-aged people, who are going to have to live in the world they've created for the next 2-5 decades, would be more likely to avoid, say, unsustainable government spending that could eventually lead to austerity, hyperinflation, etc. because those people would have to live through it.

That's not even getting into the cognitive decline issues, which are clearly also a serious problem. When you have Pelosi rebooting during live interviews and Biden struggling to form coherent sentences, the deleterious effects of having a political system run by people that should really be in assisted living centers are obvious.
 
Not "young", dude. Just not fucking ancient.

I do believe a party controlled by middle-aged people, who are going to have to live in the world they've created for the next 2-5 decades, would be more likely to avoid, say, unsustainable government spending that could eventually lead to austerity, hyperinflation, etc. because those people would have to live through it.

That's not even getting into the cognitive decline issues, which are clearly also a serious problem. When you have Pelosi rebooting during live interviews and Biden struggling to form coherent sentences, the deleterious effects of having a political system run by people that should really be in assisted living centers are obvious.
On paper, definitely. The issues of cognitive decline alone are a very salient point.

In practice... I'm looking at a lot of the people of the age you describe and thinking most of them would absolutely thwart your expectations on all that.
 
It was in reference to the two mini-sheboons who killed a Pakistani Door Dash driver following an attempted carjacking with a taser. They are now receiving plea bargains in which they will not be incarcerated.
View attachment 2107501
There is a pattern in the (((activist))) class to attempt to immunize joggers from the law.
>Working DoorDash in DC
 
People are currently standing in an intersection in Columbus, Ohio chanting for Makiyah Bryant. They are also shouting to abolish the police and that abolition is the only answer.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: AJneedsElocution

The good news is that most protests sound pretty angry and this doesn't seem especially volatile

Elizabeth City
 
People are currently standing in an intersection in Columbus, Ohio chanting for MakiyahBryant. They are also shouting to abolish the police and that abolition is the only answer.
Couldn't they pick a martyr with an easier name to pronounce?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gone Ham
I have never liked using rifled slugs in part because of this. If I'm firing slugs I might as well put on the rifled, ported barrel with the blade and valley sights that allow for windage adjustment, or just mount a damned scope anyway. Ballistics are much better on the sabot slugs in general.

As for buck, bird and trap loads, the difference between pointing and aiming is moot as when I'm out shooting skeet/trap/sporting clays, yes I am damn well aiming at a (moving) target and I'm definitely not just pointing it in the general direction of the target. I was going to say "why the fuck would you want to drastically widen patterning on a shot at close range" but I'm sure someone has a (dumb) reason for doing that.
Allegedly for bird hunting they can work pretty well at closer ranges, and the other people use them to stabilize unrifled slugs, and allegedly this also works. I messed up on the marketing lingo though, "diffusion", not "dispersion" is the keyword.

My experience with rifled anything and trying to get a usable pattern is pretty bad though, I really enjoy seeing 1 single #8 pellet out of two shells fired impact a clay that sails on completely unhindered and unbroken, so that donut pattern must be good for tiny fast birds at very very close range.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back