Culture Over 50% Of Liberal, White Women Under 30 Have A Mental Health Issue. Are We Worried Yet? - Women posting Ls


1619179690170.png


A 2020 Pew Research study reveals that over half of white, liberal women have been diagnosed with a mental health condition at some point. Does this mean there's a correlation between progressive ideas and mental health?


It’s a common tactic of the politically charged on either side (and normally perceived as a cheap one at that) to take the particular adherents of an ideology and equate that diehard worship to mental illness.

Conservatives label younger liberal generations as snowflakes or as having Trump derangement syndrome if they didn't like the past president; liberals and progressives label right-leaning individuals or conservatives as racists, bigots, misogynists, etc. Resorting to this type of lowbrow behavior might once have been seen as an excuse not to address the actual issues or beliefs at hand, but now ad hominem attacks are more common than not.

But what if what was once a cheap shot or a personal insult has actually been found to bear scientific correlation between the individuals who hold progressive ideologies and an increased risk of mental illness? That’s exactly what Pew Research has found — and all politics aside, the shocking diagnosis of over 50% of liberal women with some form of mental health medical diagnosis is a public health concern that no one seems to be discussing, let alone taking seriously.

Women and Mental Illness


For whatever reason, we’re not talking about the risk of mental illness women in general face, especially compared to men.

Women are 40% more likely to develop depression than men. Due to lower levels of serotonin, we’re also more likely to have anxiety and depression because of that deficiency. There are also certain life experiences, like childbirth for example, which can lead to these diagnoses. 1 in 7 women will be diagnosed with postpartum depression in the year following childbirth. Postpartum depression in particular is a condition that leaves its victims feeling powerless and without confidence or assurance in their own abilities as a mom or caregiver — many women with postpartum depression describe feeling like failures.

Women are 40% more likely to develop depression than men.

Conditions like depression and anxiety thrive in silence, but there also seems to be a lack of confidence in women when it comes to knowing our own bodies, and instead our mental problems are written off as being too overly “emotional.” (Think about how many times someone has described you or another woman as emotional.) While hormones do obviously play a role in the development of mental health, for better or for worse, it’s possible to minimize or downplay the risks our mental health is facing if they’re written off as a “hormonal” issue, whether it’s our medical professionals or even ourselves engaging in that mindset.

But biology and hormones aside, what about the choices we actively engage in? The behaviors we indulge, the beliefs and convictions we hold as more important than all the others? The people we spend our time with, the actions we devote our energy to, and the news we consume? Is that negatively impacting our mental health, or even more importantly, leading to medical diagnoses?

Here’s What the Study Found


The study in question — which, by the way, isn’t from a news source or media outlet but Pew Research for heaven’s sake — is, when all’s said and done, pretty damning.

Interestingly enough, the study, which is titled Pew American Trends Panel: Wave 64, was dated March 2020 — over a year ago. Yet it took a Ph.D. candidate in political science posting about the study on Twitter for it to garner even a smidge of attention.

The study, which examined white liberals, moderates, and conservatives, both male and female, found that conservatives were far less likely to be diagnosed with mental health issues than those who identified as either liberal or even “very liberal.” What’s more, white women suffered the worst of all. White women, ages 18-29, who identified as liberal were given a mental health diagnosis from medical professionals at a rate of 56.3%, as compared to 28.4% in moderates and 27.3% in conservatives.

1619179850788.png


Zach Goldberg, the doctoral candidate in question, consolidated the study’s info in a set of visuals and posted them to a thread on Twitter. But it’s important to note that he clarified the following: “I didn't write this thread to mock white liberals or their apparently disproportionate rates of mental illness (and you shouldn't either). Rather, this is a question that's underexplored and which may shed light on attitudinal differences towards various social policies." He’s right.

Dr. Lyle Rossiter, a board-certified psychiatrist who’s treated mental disorders for over 30 years, agrees and adds that white liberalism thrives on supposedly championing “workers,” “minorities,” “the little guy,” “women,” and the “unemployed,” who they continuously see as “wronged, cheated, oppressed, disenfranchised, exploited, and victimized” with little to no agency of their own (A view that often mutates into the infantilizing and patronizing of certain groups within a narrative).

When those raised to think reality is subjective bump up against objective reality, there can be mental health consequences.

The people responsible for these crimes? As Rossiter tells it: “poverty, disease, war, ignorance, unemployment, racial prejudice, ethnic and gender discrimination, modern technology, capitalism, globalization, and imperialism. In the radical liberal mind, this suffering is inflicted on the innocent by various predators and persecutors: ‘Big Business,’ ‘Big Corporations,’ ‘greedy capitalists,’ ‘U.S. Imperialists,’ ‘the oppressors,’ ‘the rich,’ ‘the wealthy,’ ‘the powerful,’ and ‘the selfish’.”

That’s pretty much an exhaustive list of every grievance and every perpetrator that progressives see as responsible for these injustices which plague our disenfranchised communities while moderates and conservatives seemingly sit idly by unconcerned with anything but their own privilege.

But as the study exemplifies, the champions of these causes (white women in particular) aren’t exactly living the liberated utopia they believe we all should be living.

Taking It Seriously


It’s truly unfortunate that so many women are facing these kinds of issues, and that this prevalence of mental illness among progressive women might be being weaponized for political purposes. If there’s one thing this topic deserves, it’s delicacy and empathy. We should feel compassion for these women, especially if we’ve struggled with mental health ourselves.

But at the heart of the matter is this: Progressivism is an ideology that supposedly demands equality for all, and one that keeps score to an exhausting degree. The privilege between social classes, between races, between men and women, between religious and non-religious, and more, all have to be constantly monitored, and “inequality” has to be exposed for the purposes of “accountability.” That kind of behavior isn’t just unrealistic, it’s unsustainable. In all honesty, it’s understandable that anxiety and depression thrive in these kinds of environments when we’re focusing on every minute, problematic issue in our world and not able to take comprehensive, productive action to solve all these problems.

Progressivism demands equality for all and keeps score to an exhausting, unsustainable degree.

There's also the unrelenting focus on oppression, verbal violence, and micro-aggressions. We know that building resiliency against hardship is the best weapon against depression and anxiety, yet progressive ideology forces its followers to wallow in feelings of helplessness and victimhood. Instead of empowering women and minorities with self-knowledge, strength of character, and resilience to hardship, progressivism encourages victims to stay in a place of fear and helplessness.


Closing Thoughts


It’s not just significant that the women suffering from mental health issues are white (though we’ll get to that) but especially that they’re so young. The age range of those most affected was 18-29. These women are students, employees, moms, daughters, wives, and friends. They have goals and ambitions, yet who knows how hampered their day-to-day lives are by the conditions they’ve been diagnosed with.

But it’s also key that white individuals are usually at the forefront of these movements, whether or not they're the group being adversely affected. As most of us know by now, white guilt and savior narratives are pretty much as bad as any genuinely racist agenda because it robs the very group they’re trying to help of their own voice.

We should be having the difficult conversations this topic requires. But if you take a quick look at the state of our political discourse nowadays, we might not be ready for it.



So not only TDS is true, female libtards are certified lunatics compared to their conservative counterparts.

Really makes you think.
 
I'll weigh in as someone who's in the category of female Right-Leaning. The skew probably isn't as large as the data shows. One thing that's kind of bothering me is the fact that in the South, mental health is still something that's more or less ignored unless you were an Active Duty member of the Armed Forces that has deployed into an active combat zone. Otherwise, the topic doesn't really come up and people try to more or less sweep it under the rug. The only places I don't see this happening is if you live closer to the major cities, as the county and surrounding areas of said city tend to be more left-leaning.
 
I wish they would've broken the age range down just a little further. I'd wager that 20-29 range; the majority are in their upper 20's. It's just around the time looks begin to fade, that biological clock is ticking down and a feeling of that looming pressure to "find the one" in 5ish years; but spending most of their 20s hating men has led to no long lasting marriage/relationship potential and a barren womb.
 
This is the only actually horrifying number from this study.
Libtards gonna libtard, but also almost a third of conservative women?
Fuck.
That third is probably tracks with the level of women with conservative beliefs stuck in a wage cage (Career) and are childless.

Gender Special ideology really does not like addressing this issue, but biologically Men achieve their peak reproductive attractiveness to females in their 30's. By this point they are still young (got at least another 50 years in the tank) but have spent a decade amassing wealth and skills that can provide a stable environment to raise children. Women by contrast hit their peak reproductive attractiveness in their teens, and by the time they hit their 30's it falls off a fucking cliff. And by their 40's, its really hard if not impossible.

This creates an inverse biological pressure on the modern career track. Men can delay starting families for 10, even 20 years. Hell, they could delay even longer if they wanted too. A 90 year old man can still potentially knock a lady up. A 90 year old woman with no children will however remain childless. This means men don't have a time limit but women do. A woman trying to "build a career" will discover very fast that you cannot have it all. You can have a Career, or you can have kids. Its very very hard to try and juggle both, and is usually only an option for independently wealthy women who can afford expensive child care and so on. Even then however, if they want to rise to the top ranks they will have to give up time with their children and apply that to their job instead. Something that really cuts against the maternal grain and generates enormous guilt.

I am fine with women wanting careers, but we as a society really need to stop lying to young girls about what that may entail. Facts don't care about your feelings and all that jazz.
 
The skew probably isn't as large as the data shows. One thing that's kind of bothering me is the fact that in the South, mental health is still something that's more or less ignored
Yeah, we're really talking about comparing people who see mental illness as a mark of shame, and others who wear it as a badge of pride. Of course you're going to see a huge difference in the reported mental health numbers.

I'd have been more interested in seeing this broken down by specific mental illnesses. I'm betting that conditions still seen as negative by all (like paranoid schizophrenia) have similar rates across the political spectrum, while "quirky, harmless" conditions make up the bulk of the gap.

Actually, for that matter... is autism one of the "mental health issues" counted in these stats?
 
This creates an inverse biological pressure on the modern career track. Men can delay starting families for 10, even 20 years. Hell, they could delay even longer if they wanted too. A 90 year old man can still potentially knock a lady up.
But would he want to? Should he?

Let's not kid ourselves-- the reason why you don't have kids in old age isn't just because of the increased chance of congenital defects, but also because you've increased the chances of you dying when your children are still young. Men can delay family building for much longer than women can, but not for that long in all practicality.
 
It's basically only anecdotal evidence on my end at this point, but out of all the women I know, the most unhappy and neurotic all have low-wage jobs, no children, and go through boyfriends like a fat bitch through cake. It might be that these particular liberal women have lower-end jobs and try to measure up to others because they feel like they're forced to do so, rather than being in a field that makes them happy, or going home to, or staying home with a family that makes them happy.
 
That third is probably tracks with the level of women with conservative beliefs stuck in a wage cage (Career) and are childless.

Gender Special ideology really does not like addressing this issue, but biologically Men achieve their peak reproductive attractiveness to females in their 30's. By this point they are still young (got at least another 50 years in the tank) but have spent a decade amassing wealth and skills that can provide a stable environment to raise children. Women by contrast hit their peak reproductive attractiveness in their teens, and by the time they hit their 30's it falls off a fucking cliff. And by their 40's, its really hard if not impossible.

This creates an inverse biological pressure on the modern career track. Men can delay starting families for 10, even 20 years. Hell, they could delay even longer if they wanted too. A 90 year old man can still potentially knock a lady up. A 90 year old woman with no children will however remain childless. This means men don't have a time limit but women do. A woman trying to "build a career" will discover very fast that you cannot have it all. You can have a Career, or you can have kids. Its very very hard to try and juggle both, and is usually only an option for independently wealthy women who can afford expensive child care and so on. Even then however, if they want to rise to the top ranks they will have to give up time with their children and apply that to their job instead. Something that really cuts against the maternal grain and generates enormous guilt.

I am fine with women wanting careers, but we as a society really need to stop lying to young girls about what that may entail. Facts don't care about your feelings and all that jazz.
Men can't hold off forever either. A lot of famous autists including our own Chris Chan are the products of geezer sperm.
 
Yeah, we're really talking about comparing people who see mental illness as a mark of shame, and others who wear it as a badge of pride. Of course you're going to see a huge difference in the reported mental health numbers.

Hate to play marx's advocate here but I think this would play into things as well.

Sort of like that old internet adage about lesbians having the highest DV rates, followed by straight couples and butt-pirates dead last. Women call the police more I mean, lower the number of women in a relationship and that's what happens.
 
I'd have been more interested in seeing this broken down by specific mental illnesses. I'm betting that conditions still seen as negative by all (like paranoid schizophrenia) have similar rates across the political spectrum, while "quirky, harmless" conditions make up the bulk of the gap.
They don't. Diagnosed mental illnesses have a more stark divide than self-identified ones, characterized by personality. Neuroticism-Openness is overwhelmingly left-wing, and schizophrenics are overwhelmingly neurotic (schizotypal personality) and open (actual schizophrenia).
An unaddressed factor is that urban conditions may simply create more disaffected and mentally ill people by a variety of mechanisms, this was a major topic of concern as the US urbanized through the 60s and 70s, and it was never really proven wrong. Current views towards mental health did not develop instantly, in a time where healthcare was distributed pretty evenly between the cities and the countryside, and everyone trusted their doctor, urbanization still lead to way higher rates of mental illness.
 
Back