US "The Squad" Megathread - Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Ilhan Omar, Rashida Talib Derangement Syndrome

I honestly only know about American politics from what I read on the Internet but since we all love shitting on leftists I figured we'd get a kick out of this. Also it's trending on Twitter so you know it's important.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...irect=on&noredirect=on&utm_term=.960552c9ba53

NEW YORK — Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, a 28-year-old political novice running on a low budget and an unabashedly liberal platform, upset longtime U.S. Rep. Joseph Crowley on Tuesday in the Democratic congressional primary in New York.

The surprise victory by the community organizer in a district that includes parts of the Bronx and Queens came after an energetic, grassroots campaign that mustered more than enough support in a low-turnout race that many had expected to be an easy win for Crowley, a member of the Democratic House leadership.

“The community is ready for a movement of economic and social justice. That is what we tried to deliver,” said Ocasio-Cortez, who has never held elected office and whose candidacy attracted only modest media attention.

She told The Associated Press after her victory that she didn’t have enough money to do polling in the race, but felt in her gut that her message had a chance to connect.

“I live in this community. I organized in this community. I felt the absence of the incumbent. I knew he didn’t have a strong presence,” she said.

Crowley has been in Congress since 1999 and hadn’t faced an opponent in a primary election since 2004, when Ocasio-Cortez was just a teenager. He was considered a candidate to become the next House speaker if Democrats win the majority.

“It’s not about me,” Crowley, 56, told his supporters at a campaign party following his loss. “It’s about America. I want nothing but the best for Ms. Ocasio-Cortez. I want her to be victorious.”

He later played guitar with a band at the election night gathering, and dedicated the first song, Bruce Springsteen’s “Born to Run,” to Ocasio-Cortez.

Crowley represents New York’s 14th Congressional District, where he is also the leader of the Queens Democratic party.

Ocasio-Cortez was outspent by an 18-1 margin during her race but won the endorsement of some influential groups on the party’s far left, including MoveOn, as well as the actress Cynthia Nixon, who is running for governor. She defeated Crowley by 15 percentage points.

Born in the Bronx to a mother from Puerto Rico and a father who died in 2008, Ocasio-Cortez said she decided to challenge Crowley to push a more progressive stance on economic and other issues.

She attended Boston University, where she earned degrees in economics and international relations, and also spent time working in the office of the late U.S. Sen. Edward Kennedy.

After graduating, she returned to the Bronx where she became a community organizer. In the 2016 presidential campaign she worked for U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders.

Among her issues is expanding the Medicare program to people of all ages and abolishing Immigrations and Customs Enforcement. She recently went to Tornillo, Texas, to protest against policies that have separated parents from their children at the southern U.S. border.

Ocasio-Cortez gained some internet attention for a campaign video called “The Courage to Change,” a two-minute spot for which she wrote the script and featured footage from her own home.

Crowley is chair of the House Democratic Caucus, the fourth-highest ranking position in Democratic leadership in that chamber of Congress.

His loss drew the attention of President Donald Trump.

“Wow! Big Trump Hater Congressman Joe Crowley, who many expected was going to take Nancy Pelosi’s place, just LOST his primary election. In other words, he’s out! That is a big one that nobody saw happening. Perhaps he should have been nicer, and more respectful, to his President!” he tweeted.

The Republican candidate for the office, Anthony Pappas, is running unopposed and had no primary. Pappas teaches economics at St. John’s University.

She was a Bernie campaigner, is supported by BLM, and wants to abolish Immigrations and Customs Enforcement. Also this was in a solid-blue Congressional District so you know she's a shoo-in for next Congress.

But hey, we did get to see Trump laugh at Crowley on Twitter.
 
Can you imagine him fucking her doggie-style? Can you imagine him fucking her in the ass? No, neither can I. Can you imagine her pegging him with a strap-on? Easily. I have ceased giving a flying fuck about just about everything.
I wonder how many times Alexandria has fucked that retarded kike Bernie Sanders
 
54038182-130A-47B6-8B38-0691A8760268.jpeg


Archive - (https://archive.ph/fzMbu)

She added, “We’re looking at ideals and what we think is the actual investment that can create tens of millions of good union jobs in this country that can shore up our health care, our infrastructure, our housing, and doing it in a way that draws down our carbon figures to help us get in line with IPCC standards we’re talking about realistically $10 trillion over ten years. And I know that may be an eye-popping figure for some people, but we need to understand that we are in a devastating economic moment. Millions of people in the United States are unemployed. We have a truly crippled health-care system and a planetary crisis on our hands. We’re the wealthiest nation in the history of the world. So we can do $10 trillion.”

This woman currently still has an economics degree and is another rank-and-file politician telling you to “pay your fair share”.
 
Last edited:
If Biden spends 2 trillion dollars on infrastructure, he'll be one of the better presidents we've had lately just on that quality alone, spending money to help the country.

If he spent 10 trillion... I can't say what I'd do because of top hats and I don't want to @SIGSEGV this thread up.
 
If Biden spends 2 trillion dollars on infrastructure, he'll be one of the better presidents we've had lately just on that quality alone, spending money to help the country.

If he spent 10 trillion... I can't say what I'd do because of top hats and I don't want to @SIGSEGV this thread up.
Odds are that only around a couple million of that will actually be spent on infrastructure.
 
If Biden spends 2 trillion dollars on infrastructure, he'll be one of the better presidents we've had lately just on that quality alone, spending money to help the country.

If he spent 10 trillion... I can't say what I'd do because of top hats and I don't want to @SIGSEGV this thread up.
I think, according to some YouTubers, less than 10% is actually earmarked for infrastructure. Most of it is pork barrel and gifts to other nations.
 
Can you imagine him fucking her doggie-style? Can you imagine him fucking her in the ass? No, neither can I. Can you imagine her pegging him with a strap-on? Easily. I have ceased giving a flying fuck about just about everything.
I wonder how many times Alexandria has fucked that retarded kike Bernie Sanders
Are we discussing Ilhan Omar? No.

So why do you feel the need to post Islamic content?
 
Odds are that only around a couple million of that will actually be spent on infrastructure.
One of the immutable laws of physics is that any Congresscritter who takes an interest in infrastructure spending either wants to redirect as much money as humanly possible to his district or has a friend in the infrastructure business.

In the unlikely event that Biden chooses to listen to AOC instead of Kamala, I'd be incredibly unsurprised if potholes vanish overnight from her district, and even less surprised if she holds an Instagram Live to take credit.
 
View attachment 2049636


Archive - (https://archive.ph/fzMbu)



This woman currently still has an economics degree and is another rank-and-file politician telling you to “pair your fair share”.

Still less than she wanted to spend on the Green New Deal if I recall.

She has no concept of money at all. Its almost impressive.
 
If Biden spends 2 trillion dollars on infrastructure, he'll be one of the better presidents we've had lately just on that quality alone, spending money to help the country.
With current levels of pork barreling and grifting expect most of it to be wasted in shit thats only there to give high wages to the unemployable kids of the elite and divert that money into slushfunds
I think, according to some YouTubers, less than 10% is actually earmarked for infrastructure. Most of it is pork barrel and gifts to other nations.
Yeesh I wonder (((which nation))) will get most of those gifts
 
Reposted from @JosephStalin on the A&H Thread:

‘Cancel Rent’ Champion Ayanna Pressley Raked in Thousands as Landlord, Records Show​

'Squad' member calls rent cancellation 'a matter of life and death,' ignoring her own rental income
GettyImages-1228187930_736x514-736x514.jpg
Rep. Ayanna Pressley (D., Mass.)Collin Anderson• April 19, 2021 5:00 am

The progressive congresswoman Ayanna Pressley (D., Mass.) has called rent cancellation legislation "literally a matter of life and death." At the same time, she has collected cash from her own rental properties.

Pressley and her husband made as much as $15,000 in rental income in 2019 after purchasing a $658,000 Boston home, according to property records and financial disclosures reviewed by the Washington Free Beacon. The income appears to come over the course of four months—the unit was first listed for $2,500 a month in June 2019 and the posting was removed in August.

Screen-Shot-2021-04-16-at-10.14.40-AM.png

Pressley and her husband refinanced the building as a multifamily investment property in August 2020. That requires the couple to maintain rent loss insurance.

Pressley's office did not return multiple requests for comment on whether the Democrat collected rent during the pandemic, and her real estate agent also did not return a request for comment.

Even if Pressley waived rent when the pandemic hit, she could recoup the lost income through a bill she cosponsored with fellow progressive representatives Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D., N.Y.) and Ilhan Omar (D., Minn.). The Squad members introduced the Rent and Mortgage Cancellation Act in both 2020 and 2021, which would require the federal government to reimburse landlords for lost rent for the duration of the pandemic.

The bill also uses taxpayer money to create a "landlord relief fund" that prioritizes landlords with "the fewest available amount of assets," meaning Pressley and other minor lessors would be more likely to receive funds than large real estate firms.

While supporting the bill, Pressley argued that rental payments force American families to "choose between putting food on the table and keeping a roof over their head."

Pressley and her husband earned roughly $400,000 in combined income in 2019, the Democrat's financial disclosure shows.

The lawmaker's building serves as both a primary residence and rental property, with the Democrat living in one unit and renting out the other. The property's deed, mortgage papers, and homestead declaration list her husband's name; Pressley herself is not mentioned on the documents. The Democrat, however, reported the 2019 rental income as her own and also listed the six-figure mortgage as her personal liability—the appropriate move, according to Foundation for Accountability and Civic Trust executive director Kendra Arnold.

"[Pressley] would have an interest in the property regardless. A spousal designation on her financial disclosure wouldn't be especially important for that type of investment," Arnold told the Free Beacon. "Same with the loan—even if she doesn't own the property, she would still be responsible for the mortgage."

The Rent and Mortgage Cancellation Act would effectively force taxpayers to pay for every American's rent or mortgage, as it does not include limits on income or payment size. The provision would also help Pressley's progressive colleagues. Ocasio-Cortez, for example, lives in Washington, D.C.'s swanky Navy Yard neighborhood in a posh apartment building where rent for a small studio exceeds $2,000 a month.

Ocasio-Cortez stayed in the building during the opening weeks of the coronavirus outbreak, enjoying a rooftop pool, rooftop dog park, rooftop tennis court, Peloton cycling studio, yoga studio, private massage rooms with hydromassage beds, golf simulator, basketball court, and racquetball court. The amenities could be subsidized by the federal government should the Rent and Mortgage Cancellation Act pass.


 
One of the immutable laws of physics is that any Congresscritter who takes an interest in infrastructure spending either wants to redirect as much money as humanly possible to his district or has a friend in the infrastructure business.

In the unlikely event that Biden chooses to listen to AOC instead of Kamala, I'd be incredibly unsurprised if potholes vanish overnight from her district, and even less surprised if she holds an Instagram Live to take credit.
If Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez was able to fix the potholes in even a tiny bit of NYC they would carry her around town on their shoulders and name her Queen.
 
If Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez was able to fix the potholes in even a tiny bit of NYC they would carry her around town on their shoulders and name her Queen.
Given that the NYC roads have more pothole in them than road you'd need to re-elect Giuilani if you wanted to see that get fixed.
 
Repost from @Ultima Ratio Regum:


Rep. Rashida Tlaib said Wednesday that Congress had sent a message to Muslims that 'you are welcome here' after the House voted for legislation that would prevent actions like President Trump's Muslim ban.

The House on Wednesday passed the 'No Ban Act,' which would limit the president's ability to to suspend or restrict the entry into the U.S. of a 'class of aliens.'

'I want to really be very loud and very clear and sending a message to every Muslim and African person here and around the world that you are welcome here. And the United States of America,' said Tlaib, who famously called to 'impeach the mother******' in reference to Trump at the start of her term in 2019.

View attachment 2108746

U.S. Representative Rashida Tlaib (D-MI), with House Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler (D-NY) and Rep. Andre Carson (D-IN), speaks to reporters about proposed legislation to make it more difficult for future U.S. presidents to institute immigration bans, at the U.S. Capitol in Washington.

She unloaded on Trump's administrative actions Wednesday, as the House once again passed legislation it also passed under Trump – when the president certainly would have vetoed it if it ever reached his desk.

'The Congress United States of House of Representatives took action to ensure racist and dangerous bans like The Muslim and African ban will be no more,' she said. 'Today the passage of the no ban app or ban as is showing our immigrant neighbors and refugees everywhere. The House Democrats will not tolerate racist immigration policies,' she said.

The bill passed on a 218-208 vote.

Republicans bashed the move. Rep. Tom McClintock of California said it would harm the president's ability to 'protect against threats.'

Rep. Greg Steube (R-Fla.), who also defended Trump when Democrats brought up a resolution to condemn his call for lawmakers to 'go back' to the countries they came from, said the bill would make the U.S. vulnerable.

'The last thing we should be doing as a nation is making it easier for terrorists in Iran, Iraq, Syria and other terrorist harboring nations to travel to the United States,' said Steube.

President Joe Biden reversed the travel restrictions from the Trump administration in one of his first moves in office, easing limits on Iran, Libya, Somalia, Syria and Yemen, as well as North Korea and some government officials from Venezuela. But Democrats say Congress has a responsibility to prevent future administrations from enacting similarly broad restrictions.

The bill passed the House by a vote of 218-208. It is unlikely to advance in the evenly split Senate, with Republicans overwhelmingly opposed.

Rep. Jerrold Nadler, the Democratic chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, said presidents from both parties have used their authority to exclude narrow groups of people from entering the U.S, such as certain North Korean officials. 'But former President Trump abused this authority, twisting it in ways that were never intended.'

The White House announced its support for the measure earlier this week. 'The prior Administration´s haphazard misuse of this authority highlights the need for reasonable constraints,' it said.

Trump had proposed a broad, all-encompassing Muslim ban during the presidential campaign. Within a week of him taking office in early 2017, the first travel ban was announced with little notice, causing chaos at airports and sparking protests across the nation.

The Trump administration was forced to revise its original order twice to resolve legal problems concerning due process, implementation and exclusive targeting of Muslim nations.

In 2018, the Supreme Court upheld the ban in a 5-4 decision. It determined that the ban was within a U.S. president´s considerable authority over immigration and responsibility for keeping the nation safe.

Republicans said Trump´s actions were not a Muslim ban. Rather, he was seeking to secure the United States from terrorists. They said the ban was limited to countries that were previously designated by Congress or prior administrations as posing national security risks.

They also noted that the ban affected only a fraction of Muslim-majority countries.

'Do not listen to repetitions and lies about Muslim bans when it is not true,' said Rep. Chip Roy, R-Texas.

'The president said he was going to impose a Muslim ban, and he did,' Nadler countered.

Under the House bill, sponsored by Rep. Judy Chu, D-Calif., the secretaries of state and homeland security must first determine that the entry of certain aliens would undermine national security or public safety before the president could order a temporary travel restriction.

Republicans called that requirement a 'constitutional absurdity.'

'You know, in this bill, the president may only act if the secretary of state allows him to act, and that is backwards,' said Rep. Andy Biggs, R-Ariz.

The House also passed a bill that requires the Department of Homeland Security to ensure that people with valid travel documents who present themselves at the border, airports or other points of entry can communicate with counsel and other interested parties if they are subjected to prolonged inspection by agents with U.S. Customs and Border Protection.

Republicans took issue with the focus of both bills and sought to highlight a surge of migrants trying to cross into the U.S. at the southern border, blaming Biden for policies they say are responsible.



I just want to take a moment to point out how ugly this sandnog is without her muzzle.

View attachment 2108749

View attachment 2108750

The U.S. Congress looks more and more like a zoo after each election.
 
Back