Sophie Labelle Verville / Guillaume Labelle / Serious Trans Vibes Comics / Assigned Male / Candycore Comics / Pastel Sexy Times / WafflesArt - Obnoxious webcomics and horrific porn by a crazy fat pedo troon

View attachment 2117419

View attachment 2117423
The copies of my novel have just arrived at my home in Europe! Do you know what that means? SIGNED copies are now available !! 😍 And that's not all: as the shipments will no longer have to cross the Atlantic, I can now offer free shipping to EVERYONE in Europe and Canada! Isn't it just a little beautiful ?! (As Facebook hides any post that closely or remotely resembles an advertisement from followers, I count on you to react, comment and share <3) For the autographed novel with free shipping for Europe, it's here: https://www.serioustransvibes.com/listing/993520040/am-stram-gram-roman-illustre-dedicace For the non-autographed novel with free shipping for Quebec and Canada, it's here: https://www.serioustransvibes.com/listing/952860344/am-stram-gram-roman-illustre Stocks are limited, the next boxes will arrive in two months! Consolation prize for people in Quebec and Canada who would like an autographed copy without having to pay the postage: when the borders reopen, I promise I'll take the first flight to Montreal and give you an amazing launch tour during which you can have your copy signed!
View attachment 2117431
have a thought for these poor novels who have spent the last 2 months in a boat
What’s that, Labelle? The plight of these refugees has inspired you to give a percentage of the profits from this book to refugee charities? Oh, sorry, my mistake.


160,000 people living in refugee camp fleeing from genocide & famine
*silence*
300 queers might get bullied by the other refugees
*Billy rage*
*Links to his Patreon*
Billy’s entire business model relies on middle-class trans people being the most oppressed of all. He can’t acknowledge the possibility of non-trans people suffering.
 
New drawing
Screenshot_2021-04-25 Sophie Labelle, cartoonist sur Twitter.png

Ez1DTDgWUAsEqo6.jpg


Screenshot_2021-04-25 Sophie Labelle, bédéiste sur Twitter.png

Ez1DZycXIAY2qMF.jpg

 
I will admit to liking that nice photo of Billy with his husband.

Oh, wait.

(Still don't believe the relationship is real.)
Given how much Labelle likes to show off and boast whenever possible there is either no relationship or there’s something very suspect about the relationship that Labelle doesn’t want people to know about like a huge age gap or something.
 
Why do faggots love frogs so much? Frogs are just annoying little bastards but I suppose this probably makes them relatable to your average tranny
They consider themselves frogs, as frogs can change gender when it becomes beneficial to do so, such as a lack of males or females for reproduction purposes exclusively. But troons are too retarded to understand survival biology and think frogs just do it on a whim because they feel pretty today or some shit.
 
This is a nothingburger. The dismissal was based on procedural grounds and did not really address the merits of the case, but that the proper notice had not been given prior to filing. Additionally, the request for an injunction was mooted by the fact the track season they were suing over was cancelled thanks to the coof.

And the request for monetary relief was denied for technical procedural reasons (lack or insufficiency of required notice to defendants) that are best explained by the ruling itself. They're not really amenable to summary in normal human language.

Here's the ruling if anyone is interested. It's short and sweet.

The one point where I may disagree with the judge is denying the plaintiffs' request to revise records of sporting events to reflect that the plaintiffs would have won had it not been for a troon, finding that they hadn't demonstrated actual harm from the records as they are or that the harm would actually be repaired by revising the records. The plaintiffs alleged that they would be disadvantaged in the future for job prospects, scholarships and other benefits. I'm not sure the judge was wrong here. He didn't really find such a harm couldn't exist, just that the plaintiffs had not sufficiently or specifically pled some actual rather than speculative harm.
 

Attachments

Last edited:
Back