Anthropologists in the year 2225 will find two troons locked in coitus. They died buried under the hoard in their neckbeard nest after an ill attempt at sex. The hair on their genital mutilations had acquired the properties of Velcro, and made it impossible to disengage penetrative sex, and both died of dehydration. Remarkably both were mummified and now displayed in the Mutter’s Museum as grotesque example of the crude, and cruel medical practices of the early 21th century.
So, it would be an Ayden and a stunning & brave Hon? Calling whatever such a duo could engage in "coitus" sounds... optimistic to me. Technically, there is no genital contact involved in shoving a rolled up sausage of thigh skin into a pocket lined with peritoneum or colon tissue, and there sure as hell won't be any orgasms or erotic sensation in such an "act".
So, it would be an Ayden and a stunning & brave Hon? Calling whatever such a duo could engage in "coitus" sounds... optimistic to me. Technically, there is no genital contact involved in shoving a rolled up sausage of thigh skin into a pocket lined with peritoneum or colon tissue, and there sure as hell won't be any orgasms or erotic sensation in such an "act".
Troon sex is beyond human comprehension, a troon on Reddit once talked about how his Aiden penetrated his urethra with her macroclit. Anything is possible if you’re degenerate enough.
I once had a patient in my care who was a tourist from the US and had ended up in a series of mishaps that left his foot mangled.
The surgeon on duty pulled a fucking miracle and saved all 5 toes on the foot. We were drawing up rehab plans and considering writing up a case study on it and shit.
Then his insurer called and told us that because we operated before they gave approval, they were going to deny the claim, and the only provisional approvals they were willing to give was amputation of all toes except the big toe. Their reasoning? Toes are purely cosmetic and do not perforn a function.
The insurance company then got their legal dept to send us this awful letter by fax and probably courier mailed it too, basically chastising us for performing unauthorised, unlawful cosmetic surgery and expecting us to wear the costs of the initial operation, and to perform the amputations posthaste.
The letter further threatened no funny business of leaving the toes be, because if further complications arose on those toes, they would deny all claims in the future for toes that are marked as no longer existing on their file, and they would move to press charges against the patient for insurance fraud.
After a long back and forth, the patient got to keep his 5 toes and was successfully discharged and returned to the US.
I have since been informed that this is a tactic US insurers pull on overseas healthcare providers routinely as a way to negotiate costs down, and that there was (probably?) no intent on the part of the insurer to carry these threats out.
Phalloplasty is the gift that just keeps on giving, isn't it?
I found these pictures on the homepage of a Dr. Chen who practices from a clinic in San Fransisco and supposedly is considered an "expert" on phalloplasty and the numerous procedures that surround this rather... complex frankensteining.
These pictures are of a FTM who wanted a hair bologna crafted out of thigh meat (ALT phalloplasty) and... it looks every bit as hideous and unnatural as you'd expect.
Oh boy. The caption in the second screenshot says that the blood flow source is what pulls it asymmetrically but it looks like the dick is just off-centre naturally. Maybe they mean it makes it worse?
Also that pubic hair does not look real. Maybe it's because of the obviously fake penis and balls, but it looks like she's wearing a merkin.
There is no distinction made in anglophone countries to define and regulate "cosmetic surgery". Any surgery that has an appearance component is cosmetic surgery. Dental surgery is cosmetic surgery, for example.
The American Society of Plastic Surgeons do not proffer a definition of plastic surgery, so here is the Australian definition:
Note the definition requiring the original unaugmented body to be deficient in some way.
As there is no health insurance regulatory body to speak of in the US and afaik every insurance company just makes shit up as they go along, I would suspect that whatever insurer was involved or not involved has the greatest say in deciding whether a surgery was reconstructive or cosmetic.
I once had a patient in my care who was a tourist from the US and had ended up in a series of mishaps that left his foot mangled.
The surgeon on duty pulled a fucking miracle and saved all 5 toes on the foot. We were drawing up rehab plans and considering writing up a case study on it and shit.
Then his insurer called and told us that because we operated before they gave approval, they were going to deny the claim, and the only provisional approvals they were willing to give was amputation of all toes except the big toe. Their reasoning? Toes are purely cosmetic and do not perforn a function.
The insurance company then got their legal dept to send us this awful letter by fax and probably courier mailed it too, basically chastising us for performing unauthorised, unlawful cosmetic surgery and expecting us to wear the costs of the initial operation, and to perform the amputations posthaste.
The letter further threatened no funny business of leaving the toes be, because if further complications arose on those toes, they would deny all claims in the future for toes that are marked as no longer existing on their file, and they would move to press charges against the patient for insurance fraud.
After a long back and forth, the patient got to keep his 5 toes and was successfully discharged and returned to the US.
I have since been informed that this is a tactic US insurers pull on overseas healthcare providers routinely as a way to negotiate costs down, and that there was (probably?) no intent on the part of the insurer to carry these threats out.
I am going to give this way too much thought, hope you all have your puzzle pieces ready.
Bearing in mind that I have not seen one in the flesh (lol) and only am going off on the medical journals, the fleshpoles are fully connected to be supplied blood, and contain harvested nerves to give sensation. Some also have lengthened urethras to allow urination. Those structures in turn have to be hooked up to the rest of the body.
These structures are pretty delicate, and I see no reason why it wouldn't, uh, misalign or come apart after a very hard pull. Since these are girls who never had reason to learn techniques to protect and avoid the groin area in general life, we just might see a case in the future.
I do not think it will literally come away at the seams, I think it will come off a bit before the sutures, like when you stitch up a rip on a pair of old jeans and it gets a new rip just under the stitching.
From the looks of it, it doesn't seem to be particularly affixed to anything in the body. I have attached a picture of a neophallus to illustrate what I mean.
If he went and killed every insurance agent at that office, were I on his jury, I'd have him acquitted.
Yeah, toes don't do anything that important, except grip the ground and help you stand up straight. Actually, a bullet through the skull wouldn't do anything to those fuckers, since there's obviously nothing in there anyway.
ETA: You know what? He shouldn't kill them. He should cut off the four minor toes on all of them and see how they like it, see how "cosmetic" they are then. It also enlightened me as to why government insurance is gung ho about chopping genitals if they consider something so vital as toes to be "cosmetic".
Phalloplasty is the gift that just keeps on giving, isn't it?
I found these pictures on the homepage of a Dr. Chen who practices from a clinic in San Fransisco and supposedly is considered an "expert" on phalloplasty and the numerous procedures that surround this rather... complex frankensteining.
These pictures are of a FTM who wanted a hair bologna crafted out of thigh meat (ALT phalloplasty) and... it looks every bit as hideous and unnatural as you'd
Did we have un_learner's dick (by butcher Dr. Berli) posted here before? The first pic seems familiar.
She's 5'7" (~170 cm), got medical tattooing on the corndog done by Michelle Varga and TBH, I'm quite impressed. What I wonder though is if she got the hair laser removed, or if it's just harder to see the stubble now that it is tattooed – does not mention any hair removal treatment as far as I can tell.
but it's heaps better than the sickly pale color
But as per usual the donor sites cancel every bit of illusion one might have had:
Did we have un_learner's dick (by butcher Dr. Berli) posted here before? The first pic seems familiar.
She's 5'7" (~170 cm), got medical tattooing on the corndog done by Michelle Varga and TBH, I'm quite impressed. What I wonder though is if she got the hair laser removed, or if it's just harder to see the stubble now that it is tattooed – does not mention any hair removal treatment as far as I can tell.
Is the stuff on the paper towel ink or blood?
I will never get over how looking like a goddamn burn victim is supposed to be indicative of "I'm totally not mentally ill".
Is the stuff on the paper towel ink or blood?
I will never get over how looking like a goddamn burn victim is supposed to be indicative of "I'm totally not mentally ill".
No, because as I understand it, "normal" skin grafts for things like actual burns, are only skin deep, and the pepperoni roll basically needs your "donor site" to be skinned to the bone so even if you had a traditional skin graft over it, you're still fucked.
Did we have un_learner's dick (by butcher Dr. Berli) posted here before? The first pic seems familiar.
She's 5'7" (~170 cm), got medical tattooing on the corndog done by Michelle Varga and TBH, I'm quite impressed. What I wonder though is if she got the hair laser removed, or if it's just harder to see the stubble now that it is tattooed – does not mention any hair removal treatment as far as I can tell.
I must admit, this corndong looks pretty realistic after it's tattooed. What's popped up to me, is that the hips are still very feminine and it makes everything just look so ridiculous.
For most people, TIFs might pass very well with clothes (because they haven't learned to spot troons, due to number of them.. was pretty low until last few years) but when they're naked... you can't help but wonder why these people want to get themseves butchered in the first place. They don't look as much as opposite sex as a comical and horrifying mad scientist's experiment.
you can't help but wonder why these people want to get themseves butchered in the first place. They don't look as much as opposite sex as a comical and horrifying mad scientist's experiment.
Its gotta be some kinda sunk cost fallacy (phallacy? hahahah shoot me) in action. It seems like a big jump from injecting hormones to major surgery, but in FtM theyve probably already crossed the surgery line with double mastectomies. Already been willingly mutilated, why not fuck around with the remaining flesh and see what you can make?
In theory, an inflatable implant would have been inserted into the donor site to maximise harvestable skin. Think butt implants but on thighs. This process is called prelamination.
In practice, surgeons make do with whatever is there. Most people who have gone so far as to want surgery tend to want it done yesterday and cannot stand having to wait weeks or months of prelamination. Consider that just to grow enough excess material to make the neourethra take 3 weeks.
No, because as I understand it, "normal" skin grafts for things like actual burns, are only skin deep, and the pepperoni roll basically needs your "donor site" to be skinned to the bone so even if you had a traditional skin graft over it, you're still fucked.
Skin has broadly 3 layers, the epidermis, the dermis (where all your glands and follicles live) and the fatty subcutaneous layer. Skin thickness varies between locations, but broadly skin is never more than 3-4mm thick at most.
Flaying to the bone (osteocutaneous flap) is seen more in arms than legs. I believe in some cases the bone is harvested as well.
The reason donor sites for Aidens look so gross is because 1) it is very easy to destroy the subcutaneous fatty area and 2) T makes the skin more brittle and thins out fat stores in the subcutaneous area.
Had these Aidens been genderblobs, the graft donor site would have healed reasonably well, but we don't let genderblobs on the operating tables because of anaesthesia calculations, indemnity insurance, that sort of thing.
Sometimes there are inevitable hamplanet surgery cases (usully from ER to OR to ICU track), but those aren't pretty.
I think it was a motorcycle accident. Something traumatic, made surgeon cut in and cut off various dead or dying organs, including the pancreas.
The sutures looked like upholstery, and patient oozed opaque, gummy fat which turned into translucent yellowish drips that left puddles in the hospital gown, in the bed, everything the patient touched or someone who touched the patient touched. Even the light switch was covered jn this grease.
Without a pancreas to signal to the body to store fat, the patient was literally dropping a kilo a day in yellow puddles.
Artificial insulin is calculated to process the bare minimum amount of sugars a person needs, and not to maintain fat stores (yes please fat shame any Type 1 diabetics, they are fat).
Without insulin, the diabetic simply evacuates sugars in urine so even if the flesh wasn't weeping fat the weight loss would be through yellow puddles one way or another.
I was so glad the man got discharged. There was a follow up at one stage and it looked like he had a crater taken out of him at the surgery site.
Caption: 9 days post op skin graft (in where the flap was re-stitched due to bigger and uncomfortable wound openings)
Caption: 15 days post op skin graft (OG surgery March 24th)
Caption: 18 days post op skin graft. Xeroform completely gone using Vaseline to keep the skin moist
Caption: 18 days post op skin graft and re-stitching on flap..tip of flap opened trying to repair the skin keeping gauze on it to stop it from leaking through my garments
Caption: 11 days post op skin graft..looked pretty scary..this was after the first shower I took
Caption: 7 days post op skin graft..I spread neosporin with pain relief all over and man what a difference it made..my leg was burning nonstop prior to doing this
Caption: 12 days stuff..my body was in overdrive trying to heal the donor site..
Caption: Current day today 18 days post op skin graft..stitching is disappearing into the skin making the gap from the donor site be more even with the leg..still very swollen
EDIT:
I've got more! A detail of how it is connected to the body – now that is something new for me. Alternative caption: a woman being fingered by a lobster man.
Caption: This was taken April 5th 12 days post op (before pic) showing a little hole coming through. Scrotoplasty was not done during stage I for reasons described in my previous posts.
Caption: (Before) 12 Days post op April 5th
Caption: Current April 10 17 days post op. Clear separation
Something that horrifies me about FTMs getting phalloplasty is that some of them have a massive fixation on pissing standing up. I can sort of understand them wanting a dong to penetrate someone (even if it is numb), but imagine going through all this to meet your goal of pissing like a boy.
There are all sorts of reasons why men can't piss standing up. I know a couple of guys who can't pee at a urinal in a public loo due to a psychological thing. They have use a cubicle and sit down. It's no big deal to them. Noone has asked if they are female.
Exploitation at its finest, considering the growing boom of Transsexuality and being open about it, these hacks can sink there teeth into basically a incredibly young, and underdeveloped medical field that only Nazi Scientists in the past before only ever CONSIDERED it, let alone actually doing it.
Its a combination of the "surgeons" wanting there monopoly, with the skewed and radicalized mostly left leaning trans communities, that create a vacuum of "shut up and say what we tell you to say, or your fucked."
It boils down to Peer pressure and a greedy monopoly that creates this toxic scene, where surgeons will be happy that there patients suffer, as long as there mouth is stitched shut, and there "friends" keep them quiet about it, or else they will be thrown to the curb and left to rot, shamed by those they once thought as friends.
Not even the Nazis sank to such depths. Most of the literature they burned was actually transgender propaganda and research.
We're living in the Weimar period, and I'm afraid of what's going to happen next.
Something that horrifies me about FTMs getting phalloplasty is that some of them have a massive fixation on pissing standing up. I can sort of understand them wanting a dong to penetrate someone (even if it is numb), but imagine going through all this to meet your goal of pissing like a boy.
There are all sorts of reasons why men can't piss standing up. I know a couple of guys who can't pee at a urinal in a public loo due to a psychological thing. They have use a cubicle and sit down. It's no big deal to them. Noone has asked if they are female.
Peak manhood, what they realize deep in their brains and souls enough to stress and break their bodies and cut off pieces of their arms, cut out family members and change relationships, what they will literally kill themselves for not being able to achieve, is pissing standing up. Experiencing all the little things. Those weird urinals that seem way too close together with no partitions, those urinals that look like cattle feed troughs with a drizzling hose at the top. Trying to not see anyone's dick in your peripheral vision. That guy who won't stop fucking talking to you while you both piss. Growing up with that weird kid who pulls his pants all the way down at the urinal. Writing your name in the snow. Just, fucking idealized masculinity right there. I am ashamed I've taken it for granted.
moved this from tranny sideshows, but i just read the (updated 2021! yes, it only became illegal this year!) US law on FGM.
i see no legal difference between it and SRS, as presented there. no exaggeration. any legal experts here? here's the law.
edit: the motives are exactly the same too; painful cultural conformity of female children's organs for no medical benefit.
crossposted from tranny sideshows, but i just read the (updated 2021!) US law on FGM.
i see no legal difference between it and SRS, as presented there. any legal experts here? the law.
Section (b)(1): “you’ve gotta snip off my clit or I’ll kill myself!” Just pull out the suicide card and suddenly any little thing is a medical necessity
crossposted from tranny sideshows, but i just read the (updated 2021!) US law on FGM.
i see no legal difference between it and SRS, as presented there. any legal experts here? the law.
