The question I have for the above screenshots is, how do they think pregnancy will work, if it's ever attempted with transsexuals? Not to mention what the legal logistics would be, considering the different DNA involved.
One of the first troons to get SRS was also the subject of the first uterus transplant because she wanted to have a kid with her new husband.
They did not yet know about blood types.
The result was predictably hilarious and fatal.
I am guessing that would require surgery to fix. Judging by how piercings heal over time, I'm guessing that if Kevin isn't properly dilating he has basically already fucked his whole mess up and will likely need another surgery in the future.
Not a doctor yet, but: Everything I've seen in responsible (non-quacktastic) discussions points to it being a one-and-done thing--the limit is at revisions, and even that can only do so much. For most major surgeries down there, you actually should really check into your surgeon and spend what it takes to get somebody who knows what they're doing in there.
It's interesting how the trans rights activists don't actually care enough about the welfare of trans people to make sure that the
quality of the surgeries meets minimal standards, but a lot of people outside of medicine seem to not consider that as an important issue
until they end up under a quack's knife...
I know this has been said before in the thread, but... Ok I know pregnancy fetishes are a thing even for cis women, but I've only ever seen it taken to the length of obssessing over it with troons. It's disconcerting to watch them talk about it nigh constantly, saying how much they crave getting "knocked up" and giving birth. Do they understand how much a pain in the fucking ass just being pregnant is, much less the actual task of pushing a child out of the goddamn womb? It's never about loving and caring for a child either (ya know, the thing that inevitably comes after pregnancy?), it almost never comes up. It's all about their overly-sexualized, perverted vision of how women work, or perhaps how they should work. Gives me the fucking creeps every time I see it.
And then they have the gall to fantasize about the possibility of uterus transplants. For a cis woman (who for whatever reason may not have/can't use her natural one) it would be another chance at something she may have considered impossible: a chance to carry a child of her own and share that bond with them. For the twitter troons, all they have to say is "wouldn't it be hot tho?" Jesus christ shut the fuck up, I know the medical community has been tailoring to your fetishes up until now but the disgusting degeneracy has to stop somewhere.
Fun fact! The medical community's super-skeptical about uterus transplants. This is because having a transplanted organ is
seriously risky to your health--a couple uterus transplants have been successful, but...merely
having a transplant organ in you compromises your immune system and can kill you. In fact, the troon I mentioned earlier? As far as we can tell, transplant rejection was the cause of death.
You're flat-out not going to
die from a lack of a uterus. (You 41%ing yourself doesn't count. That's a
you problem, here.)
Though, honestly, the troons assuming that cis women all have uteruses is offensive. I'm sure I'm not the only person here who knows
somebody who has had a hysterectomy due to medical issues, and there's quite a few genetic women who never
had one.
Uterine agenesis is a thing. (Also, yeah, sometimes she doesn't get
anything of the internal equipment and occasionally she gets the nursery but not the playroom. First period sends her to the ER. Or kills her. One of these things.)
This is the study :
NIH link (
archive):
This study never stops being funny to me tbh. The fact that a bunch of Belgian researchers decided "If we use penis skin to crudely fashion a hole inside a man, will it magically have similar microflora to that of an actual vajayjay?" was worth researching. The fact that they repeatedly mention that the amholes reek multiple times throughout the paper, despite that not being the point of the study by their own admission. Using words like "malodorous" and "foul" to try to seem more scientific about it. The fact that this amazing scientific finding (i.e., "no, amhole is not actually a vagina") was worthy of publication in an academic journal. Just a shitshow from beginning to end. The human rights cause of our time, ladies and gentlemen.
That said "almost complete obliteration of the vagina" is one of those phrases that teeters dangerously on the tight rope between hilarious and terrifying. Hilarifying.
I strongly suspect that they
actually started out expecting the answer they got. Sometimes you do research entirely because, well, you need to prove in
elaborate, painstaking detail that fire is hot and will burn you.
It just isn't exactly politically acceptable to say outright that this weird fucking troon myth is
painfully stupid.
