Clashes between Jews and Palestinians in Jerusalem. Israel now invading Gaza according to (Questionable) Reports - If your thoughts are "I don't like either" you don't need to fucking post because it's been said 100 times you fucking dullard

Did Israel just jump to "flatten the city" mode or something?
They've been there since the start. Painstaking reminder that the entire point of Lockheed Martin training and arming Israelis with the ability to convert their retard bombs to targeted munitions was so that they could kill whatever terrorist org of the week was waving its sticks without accidentally killing civilians, an asymmetric war against dumbfired rockets. The IDF not only have the capability to target and hit specific floors of buildings, and specific apartments in those floors, with minimal collateral damage, they have done so regularly in the past.
That's why the IDF needs to actually justify decimating entire structures, even if they allegedly have Hamas in them (they won't even prove that), which it has been doing since the start of this round of combat.
The West blew a shitload of money to make sure Israel would be capable of this sort of war, it is cheap and easy to simply murder all the civilians and take Hamas with them, but now they the IDF is pretending it's fair game to bomb entire structures because they just can't help all the dead women and children, obviously.

has this been posted? AP Staffed by morons ..Shocking right?

View attachment 2173894
I'm sure the IDF can provide detailed reports corroborating this, even with redacting, along with heatmaps or signal maps or whatever they're using to detect munitions and communications, and they can explain why there was no secondary explosions despite alleged weapons manufacturing equipment within, and explain why they had to level the entire building instead of only striking the rooms/floors containing the alleged Hamas office.
Even the fucking Syrians provide at least that level of info when taking unilateral action, surely a sane western nation merely defending itself can do so. Listen and believe, etc.
 
1621124776019.png
https://twitter.com/uzmakhanone1/status/1393723195170119680 (archive)
gazachildren1.jpggazachildren2.jpggazachildren3.jpg

1621124792608.png
https://twitter.com/SometimesPooh/status/1393722031242350595 (archive)

1621124807082.png
https://twitter.com/IntelCrab/status/1393722683037257730 (archive)

AP reporter whines about the building being demolished. (archive)
 
can the us come up with large amounts of iron dome interception missiles on the spot, and deliver them to israel within hours or days?

i dont know how many of those they have stockpiled or how fast they are burning through their reserves. maybe their production capabilities are enough to cover this indefinitely, maybe american aid covers it. but if they do run out and the americans take a couple days too long to provide more to them, then it's lights out for a lot of jews over there.

Uncle joe got you covered ;)

1621123789156.jpg
 
"Tergeting Chillun!"

Look, no fucking sniper or snake eater with a laser designator is wandering around putting a red dot on kid's faces so they can have a bullet or missile or ERLIX with their morning goat milk.

It's called "Collateral Damage" and happens when you launch rockets from apartment buildings, strap kids to missile launchers as extra sandbags, and wear babies as body armor.

See, this is why nobody cares you're being obliterated. You do nothing but fire rockets then throw kids at incoming return fire like a retarded version of Iron Dome that uses newborns as ammo.

Everyone with half a brain is tired of your Bronze Age asses.

FIX BAYONETS!
 

Eastern block blocks UN shenanigans, potato niggers buttmad about it.


More butthurt.
 
has this been posted? AP Staffed by morons ..Shocking right?

View attachment 2173894
Reminder that according to the article by a former AP correspondent in Gaza that i posted earlier, the AP regularly deletes things that the Palestinians don't like because they don't want their journos to be in danger and the journos have an idealistic bent:

https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/israel-middle-east/articles/israel-insider-guide

The Hamas charter, for example, calls not just for Israel’s destruction but for the murder of Jews and blames Jews for engineering the French and Russian revolutions and both world wars; the charter was never mentioned in print when I was at the AP, though Hamas won a Palestinian national election and had become one of the region’s most important players. To draw the link with this summer’s events: An observer might think Hamas’ decision in recent years to construct a military infrastructure beneath Gaza’s civilian infrastructure would be deemed newsworthy, if only because of what it meant about the way the next conflict would be fought and the cost to innocent people. But that is not the case. The Hamas emplacements were not important in themselves, and were therefore ignored. What was important was the Israeli decision to attack them.
There has been much discussion recently of Hamas attempts to intimidate reporters. Any veteran of the press corps here knows the intimidation is real, and I saw it in action myself as an editor on the AP news desk. During the 2008-2009 Gaza fighting I personally erased a key detail—that Hamas fighters were dressed as civilians and being counted as civilians in the death toll—because of a threat to our reporter in Gaza. (The policy was then, and remains, not to inform readers that the story is censored unless the censorship is Israeli. Earlier this month, the AP’s Jerusalem news editor reported and submitted a story on Hamas intimidation; the story was shunted into deep freeze by his superiors and has not been published.)
But if critics imagine that journalists are clamoring to cover Hamas and are stymied by thugs and threats, it is generally not so. There are many low-risk ways to report Hamas actions, if the will is there: under bylines from Israel, under no byline, by citing Israeli sources. Reporters are resourceful when they want to be.
The fact is that Hamas intimidation is largely beside the point because the actions of Palestinians are beside the point: Most reporters in Gaza believe their job is to document violence directed by Israel at Palestinian civilians. That is the essence of the Israel story. In addition, reporters are under deadline and often at risk, and many don’t speak the language and have only the most tenuous grip on what is going on. They are dependent on Palestinian colleagues and fixers who either fear Hamas, support Hamas, or both. Reporters don’t need Hamas enforcers to shoo them away from facts that muddy the simple story they have been sent to tell.
It is not coincidence that the few journalists who have documented Hamas fighters and rocket launches in civilian areas this summer were generally not, as you might expect, from the large news organizations with big and permanent Gaza operations. They were mostly scrappy, peripheral, and newly arrived players—a Finn, an Indian crew, a few others. These poor souls didn’t get the memo.
 
Ah yes, targeting children who are being used as human shields, and are indiscriminately getting hurt with airstrikes and indirect fire weapons
The reason they use children is because they're portable and easy to strap on to your chest. This wouldn't be a problem if Palestine had more midgets. Every day a poor Palestinian goes without a midget, please donate to MidgetsForMissles.org and end this crisis.
 
The reason they use children is because they're portable and easy to strap on to your chest. This wouldn't be a problem if Palestine had more midgets. Every day a poor Palestinian goes without a midget, please donate to MidgetsForMissles.org and end this crisis.
Where's my Semper Fi reaction when I need it
 
I'm sure the IDF can provide detailed reports corroborating this, even with redacting, along with heatmaps or signal maps or whatever they're using to detect munitions and communications, and they can explain why there was no secondary explosions despite alleged weapons manufacturing equipment within, and explain why they had to level the entire building instead of only striking the rooms/floors containing the alleged Hamas office.
Even the fucking Syrians provide at least that level of info when taking unilateral action, surely a sane western nation merely defending itself can do so. Listen and believe, etc.
Hold on everyone, we need to run all of our TS-level MASINT, SIGINT, and HUMINT reporting through declassification channels because some faggot on the Internet isn't satisfied with the level of detail provided.

Afterwards we may or may not be able to continue with the mission based on his approval.
 
I feel compelled to bring up the double standard we are seeing in regards to kikes killing kids. I mean, don't get me wrong, I don't give a shit. But people lost their shit over the U.S. killing kids under pretty similar circumstances.

"Obama/Trump killed kids with drones? REEEEEEE."
"Israel killed kids with missile strikes? Hey, cool your anti-semitism. It's part of war."

And then you have stories like this one:

(Source)

Either civilian collateral is ok or it's not. Make up your mind.

EDIT: Archived video segment.
 
Last edited:
They've been there since the start. Painstaking reminder that the entire point of Lockheed Martin training and arming Israelis with the ability to convert their retard bombs to targeted munitions was so that they could kill whatever terrorist org of the week was waving its sticks without accidentally killing civilians, an asymmetric war against dumbfired rockets. The IDF not only have the capability to target and hit specific floors of buildings, and specific apartments in those floors, with minimal collateral damage, they have done so regularly in the past.
That's why the IDF needs to actually justify decimating entire structures, even if they allegedly have Hamas in them (they won't even prove that), which it has been doing since the start of this round of combat.
The West blew a shitload of money to make sure Israel would be capable of this sort of war, it is cheap and easy to simply murder all the civilians and take Hamas with them, but now they the IDF is pretending it's fair game to bomb entire structures because they just can't help all the dead women and children, obviously.


I'm sure the IDF can provide detailed reports corroborating this, even with redacting, along with heatmaps or signal maps or whatever they're using to detect munitions and communications, and they can explain why there was no secondary explosions despite alleged weapons manufacturing equipment within, and explain why they had to level the entire building instead of only striking the rooms/floors containing the alleged Hamas office.
Even the fucking Syrians provide at least that level of info when taking unilateral action, surely a sane western nation merely defending itself can do so. Listen and believe, etc.
the journos themselves admitted that hamas was shooting rockets from under the buildings
 
Back