Clashes between Jews and Palestinians in Jerusalem. Israel now invading Gaza according to (Questionable) Reports - If your thoughts are "I don't like either" you don't need to fucking post because it's been said 100 times you fucking dullard

Jarolleon said:
IMO Islamic military competence didn't decrease, other militaries just developed since then. The main explanation I've read is that Muslims are still extremely hierarchical and authority is invested in people rather than positions, which means that everyone hoards knowledge to be more powerful, everything is done from the highest ranks down, and the leaders are chosen for loyalty rather than competence, which is especially bad for modern war because of how fast-paced it is. But this sounds very much like "They suck because they're not progressive enough" which is a little too convenient.

And here I was about to use a video editing program to splice the two together. Thanks!
Click to expand...
The Arabs still see war as an art, whereas Europe has made it into a science.
 
  • Like
Reactions: zipper, HIVidaBoheme and HOMO FOR LIFE
Internet War Criminal said:
Between Rotterdam and everything else that's happened since, I'm fairly convinced pakistani men raping your daughter is as british as tea, bad teeth or naming your child mohammed.
Click to expand...
They just needed the cultural enrichment, after all.

Except that doesn't really work when the incoming migrants barely even have a culture of their own.
 
  • Like
Reactions: like_shutup_&_drive_scoob, Guido Mista, HIVidaBoheme and 4 others
Lapangan Merdeka said:
Unfortunately it's a part for their religion. That's why i avoid talking about religion to my muslim friends.

"And if they break their oaths after their treaty and defame your religion, then combat the leaders of disbelief, for indeed, there are no oaths [sacred] to them; [fight them that] they might cease.". (At-Tawbah 9:12)
Click to expand...
lol, you´re a pussy. What kind of "friend" can´t you be honest to regarding their maniac ideas. Oh, that´s right, a muslim "friend". You guys are cucked beyond belief.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: like_shutup_&_drive_scoob, zipper, Nazi Catboi and 8 others
Internet War Criminal said:
Muslims were always shit at war, there's a reason why the days of Islamic conquests happened over a thousand years ago and mostly depended on the competency of the people they converted and a huge amount of cannon fodder in the amount of slaves, etc...
Click to expand...
Wrong, Islam has produced some of the greatest military commanders in the History of War. Abu Bakr, Seljuk, Timur, etc;

A lot of the great warriors of Islam were nomadic horsemen, so they didn't exactly have numerous slaves to throw at the enemy.

Even the Sick man of Europe - the Ottoman empire, still had a capable military despite it being economically underfunded. Greece, which was backed by Britain and France, couldn't beat Ataturk's brigades and Turkey hadn't even been formed yet.

The only reason the West ever loses against Islamic army is because we're unwilling to do what needs to be done and kill the civilians they are embedding themselves in even if it's perfectly legal under the Geneva convention because we don't want to have to deal with a bunch of leftist cunts at home crying about them.
Click to expand...
Yeah, the West is guilt stricken, hopefully it will remain that way, until the second rise of Islam.
 
Last edited:
  • Dislike
Reactions: secret watcher, make_it_so, (deleted member) and 1 other person
biozeminadae1 said:
Wrong, Islam has produced some of the greatest military commanders in the History of War. Abu Bakr, Seljuk, Timur, etc;
Click to expand...
They were an empire, they were bound to create a few that weren't fucking terrible, but overall their armies were fucking horrible. Great commanders and subpar troops is definitely a combination that existed throughout history.

A lot of the 'great warriors of Islam were nomadic horsemen' is bullshit and what amounted to mostly bands of raiders and shit.

If you want to see what happened when the Muslims were facing an army that they weren't winning through sheer numerical force, look at what happened when they met the Mongols and how it fucking traumatized them to this day.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Feels
Reactions: MrJokerRager, zipper, Chief Areola and 10 others
gaystoner said:
Former Obama Spokesperson saying they talked to AP reporters and they knew Hamas was doing military operations in the same buildings.

View attachment 2175420

Edit: View attachment 2175421

Toronto Pro-Hamas supporters beat a Pro-Israel man
Click to expand...
:story: :story: :story: the faggot mindset distilled down to its essence. "Yeah sure it's a legitimate military target and yeah sure Hamas is committing le war crimes by surrounding military infrastructure with civilians but so what it's wrong to do anything about it because well I don't have a real reason just because. Just because I'm a retard."
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Feels
Reactions: make_it_so, ScenarioOfTLoU2, madethistocomment and 13 others
Internet War Criminal said:
They were an empire, they were bound to create a few that weren't fucking terrible, but overall their armies were fucking horrible. Great commanders and subpar troops is definitely a combination that existed throughout history.

A lot of the 'great warriors of Islam were nomadic horsemen' is bullshit and what amounted to mostly bands of raiders and shit.

If you want to see what happened when the Muslims were facing an army that they weren't winning through sheer numerical force, look at what happened when they met the Mongols and how it fucking traumatized them to this day.
Click to expand...
Those three people are literally from different countries.... and Timur is a descendant of Genghis Khan.

Here's what happened when Late Medieval crusaders faced the Ottoman turks in 1396:
1621179948893.png

Spoiler, the crusaders lost.
 
  • Dislike
Reactions: secret watcher and Feline Supremacist
biozeminadae1 said:
Those three people are literally from different countries.... and Timur is a descendant of Genghis Khan.

Here's what happened when Late Medieval crusaders faced the Ottoman turks in 1396:
View attachment 2175459
Spoiler, the crusaders lost.
Click to expand...
Spoiler that was just so based Polacks could go for a ride a hundred years later
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Feels
Reactions: MrJokerRager, NIGGO KILLA, make_it_so and 3 others
get_ur_gamon said:
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA SHUT UP ABOUT WW3! IT WON'T BE CAUSED BY FUCKING GAZA.
WW3 won't happen over the middle east. A regional conflict might. Maybe even another proxy war. A MIDDLE EASTERN SHITFEST IS NOT WW3! Russia has no reason to get fully involved over Gaza. China has even fewer reasons. A world war needs more than 1 major power fighting. And at the moment no one is committing anything. Who gives a fuck if America invades another middle eastern nation? Nobody important. A new decade, a new pointless middle eastern war. Life goes on as it always has.
Click to expand...
WW3 will be caused by China fucking with water supplies like they are trying to do to India. Not the sandbox.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: zipper, get_ur_gamon, NIGGO KILLA and 5 others
Internet War Criminal said:
If you want to see what happened when the Muslims were facing an army that they weren't winning through sheer numerical force, look at what happened when they met the Mongols and how it fucking traumatized them to this day.
Click to expand...
I find it most unfortunate that the Mongol Ilkhanate, Chagatai Khanate, and Golden Horde converted to Islam though.

Just think of how many problems the world could have avoided if they hadn't.
 
  • Feels
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: MrJokerRager, zipper, Iceland Heavy and 10 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back