CN I am an Uighur who faced China’s concentration camps. This is my story. - But muh free trade

I am an Uighur who faced China’s concentration camps. This is my story.​


In the first installment of our new series shedding light on current humanitarian crises, Victor Jack sits with Ӧmir Bekali, a Uighur Muslim who recounts his imprisonment, torture and indoctrination at the hands of the Chinese state



CN: contains graphic mention of torture, psychological torment and suicide.

In early 2017, life looked bright for 41-year old Ӧmir Bekali. A proud father of three, he had a Tourism degree, a small business and several managerial positions under his belt. He was set to lead the Kazakh delegation to the upcoming international Astana Trade Exposition, an event which typically draws in millions.

But in March, a seemingly innocuous trip to promote the event in Xinjiang, northwest China, would ensure he would never attend.

“They shackled my hands and put black fabric [over] my eyes ... I feel my body tremble whenever I remember that moment”

During a short post-work visit to his family in nearby Turpan, on the morning of the 26th March, policemen showed up at the door to arrest him - beginning a near eight month journey of unending physical and psychological torment.

“They shackled my hands and put black fabric [over] my eyes,” Ӧmir says. “I feel my body tremble whenever I remember that moment”.

Ӧmir was born to Uighur and Kazakh parents in Xinjiang, or formerly East Turkestan before the Chinese invasion of 1949. It is now a semi-autonomous region, but for centuries has been home to Uighur Muslims, who make up just under half the population and hold a distinctive culture, religion and language to the country’s majority ethnic Han Chinese.

Economic, cultural and religious discrimination against Uighurs had been brewing for decades. But in 2014, Chinese President Xi Jinping announced a new “People’s War on Terror” aimed at fighting regional ‘terrorists’ and ‘separatists’, heralding a new era of mass surveillance, gargantuan police presence and skyrocketing arbitrary imprisonments of Uighurs in Xinjiang.

Following his arrest, Ӧmir was thrown into a small police station cell, where he was kept for a week, still with no explanation. He says the room seemed to be built for 12 people, but contained more than 36 others, who, like him, had their arms and legs constantly shackled.

Soon he was transferred to another police station, where he says the authorities subjected him to four “complete” days of torture.

“My feet and my hands were tied up with iron shackles and they beat my hands, they beat my feet … they beat my back and my stomach”, says Ӧmir.

“They put needles in between my nails and my fingers,” he adds, “then they put iron sticks into my sexual organs”.

Ӧmir says he was put into a ‘Tiger Chair’ for long periods, a metal seat-like contraption which restricts movement. Police also hung him from the roof of the cell by his wrists so his feet could not touch the floor, and later smashed his knuckles with hammer-like instruments.

“[Those] scars are still there … whenever I remember those experiences my body shakes”.

Ӧmir thinks his job, which lent itself to significant regional travel, had both aroused the suspicion of the authorities and provided them with the perfect excuse to accuse him of terrorist activities.

“I did not confess anything because I hadn’t done anything,” he says. “Maybe they thought after torture I would just confess something I [had] never done before”.

Soon Ӧmir was moved to a nearby, highly-fortified prison camp, spending seven months locked up, still with no access to lawyers, phones to contact his family with, nor any real explanations for his arrest.

In November 2017, he was transported to his final destination, arriving at one of what China has termed ‘re-education camps’.

Four metre walls and electrical fences surround the complex, Ӧmir recounts, and armed guards patrol the camp at all times of the day and night.

Inside, there are 40 people to a 16 square-metre room. Prisoners as young as 15 and as old as 80 are placed into these cramped cells, he says. Occasionally they are moved to larger rooms, but no-one is allowed outside.

Twenty-four hours a day, prisoners are shackled. Iron chains are tied around their necks, fixed to loose iron blocks that Ӧmir says weigh around eight to ten kilograms, forcing prisoners to always be hunched down. He believes this is just one of the ways in which the camps are designed to instill a submissive posture in prisoners vis-a-vis their captors.

“I stayed in that room with lots of different people, some of them are businesspeople, historians, school professors, writers, singers,” recounts Ӧmir, “they speak much better Chinese than Chinese [people] themselves, and they have more money than Chinese themselves: they don’t need to be re-educated”.

On a typical day at the camp, he says, inmates are woken up at 5am and given a meagre serving of bread and soup. They are then forced to repeatedly sing songs which praise the Chinese Communist party, stress China’s greatness, and show gratitude towards President Xi Jinping personally.

“We sing from when we wake up in the morning ’til lunch and after lunch … we do nothing else, just eat and praise the Chinese communist party,” says Ӧmir.

Prisoners are constantly warned about 48 characteristics considered hostile to the Chinese state, which include growing beards, praying and religious charity-giving, according to Ӧmir. The aim of these drills is clear, he says: “become Han Chinese … forget your religion, forget your culture”.

“[If] you don’t listen to them, or cannot recite Mandarin songs, or roll your eyes, or show just a little bit of discontent with this process,” he argues, then the guards respond with torture.

As Ӧmir often expressed his discontent with his arrest, he found himself tortured once again. He says he was beaten “half to death” and made to stand facing a wall for twenty-four hours without food or drink on some occasions, put in a Tiger Chair for a day in others, or simply placed into solitary confinement in rooms lined with plastic, intended to avoid suicide risks.

“The Chinese government calls [them] re-education camps. Actually there are no re-education camps - all are concentration camps,” he says.

After 20 days, Ӧmir was finally released. His wife had sent endless letters to the UN and Foreign Ministry of Kazakhstan, where he was previously naturalised. She had also sat for an interview with Free Asia Radio, all of which pressured two Kazakh Ambassadors to finally visit him and soon after the Chinese authorities to free him.

“The Chinese government calls [them] re-education camps. Actually there are no re-education camps - all are concentration camps”

This is a strikingly different picture to the one China has painted, claiming that the camps provide ‘vocational training’, prisoners can leave at any time and operations are scaling down. But a report released last month found China has built almost 400 new camps since 2017, while new testimonies have emerged alleging slave labour, forced sterilisations and organ harvesting taking place inside the camps too.

“Their goal is just to exterminate all Uighurs in one way or another”, says Ӧmir. China’s labelling of his community as terrorists is a “political game”, he stresses, “we are not violent and we are not radical”.

In 2019, the European Parliament and US Congress passed laws and resolutions condemning these imprisonments, while in the UK, a cross-party parliamentary group is said to be planning new legislation aimed at addressing the humanitarian crisis.

But when 23 countries issued statements to the UN last year denouncing China’s actions, they were met with counter-statements from over 50 - mainly Muslim-majority - nations, who defended China’s human rights policies.

Ӧmir says he is heartened to hear about the UK’s new proposed legislation, and is “grateful to Britain” for considering it. But he laments the international response.

“I want to make it clear that this Uighur genocide is not just [about] religion ... it’s a test for humanity, for the whole world,” he says. “I hope the international community takes more drastic actions”.
When asked what Cambridge students can do to help, Ӧmir offers straightforward advice.

“Talk to other people or friends and raise awareness so more people realise the severity of the situation,” he says.

“Their goal is just to exterminate all Uighurs in one way or another ... we are not violent and we are not radical”

Ӧmir stresses that he “hope students can organise more protests, write more news about Uighurs, and raise the awareness of the general public”. He also suggests donating to charities such as the Hira Foundation in Turkey, which support orphaned Uighur children separated from their parents.

Ultimately, he argues, students represent “the future” of the world’s response to China’s policies.

Soon after Ӧmir decided to speak out, he lost all contact with his extended family back in Xinjiang and says he has no idea if they are even alive. After an 18-month legal struggle, he was granted political asylum in the Netherlands, while his wife and children are living safely in Turkey.

“I am not sure in the future if I can get back to a normal life,” he says. But for now, he insists he will continue to “always endeavour to expose China’s brutality and what is happening in the concentration camps”.

Many thanks to Gheni, Ӧmir’s interpreter, without whom the interview would not have been possible, and who is currently raising funds for his political asylum application in the Netherlands.
 
Dear God, the absolute fear and terror the Chinese have at the thought of independent will.
They don't fear it, they view it as a liability. They're aware that if they leave any alternative to the Chinese Communist Party alone people will seek help from those institutions before going to the government, notice how it was mentioned that they also wanted to eliminate the act of charity from their culture? That's because they want it to be that only the Party can be charitable, the sole savior casting pearls before begotten swine living in the mud. That's the dynamic they want to convey to the general populace: you're unworthy of us but we still love you as a benevolent omniscient God would, and you are to know that your suffering is not the absence of the prosperity we extend to you, but a product of it, the absence of which would yield untold suffering the likes of which haven't been known since 1949.
 
If that is widespread or if that were true, you'd think there will be a stepping up of terror attacks orchestrated by Uyghurs in China which took a turn for the worse in the noughties and the first half of 2010.
There has been.

Uighur militants have killed hundreds, if not thousands, in attacks inside China in a decades-long insurgency that initially targeted police and other symbols of Chinese authority but in recent years also included civilians. Extremists with knives killed 33 people at a train station in 2014. Abroad, they bombed the Chinese embassy in Kyrgyzstan in September last year; in 2014, they killed 25 people in an attack on a Thai shrine popular with Chinese tourists.


The Hui Muslims are allowed to practice their faith unmolested. The difference is that the Hui aren't advocating for a separatist state of East Turkestan.
This needs to be restated, the Hui are the largest muslim minority group in China and are mostly left alone cus they didn't riot in the Xiangjing's regional capital where hundreds of people were killed, this was pretty much China's version of 9/11. It's like that old Bill Burr joke, the ass-kicking didn't just fall out of the sky. Also a bunch of terrorist groups like ISIS, Al Quaeda and other turkish terror groups like TIP and ETIM do recruit from the Uyghurs.. and I don't really blame them from from joining. But there is back and forth shit going on, it's not one-sided as people seem to think.

 
I wonder he showed the interviewer the scars on his penis from all of that torture.

If that is widespread or if that were true, you'd think there will be a stepping up of terror attacks orchestrated by Uyghurs in China which took a turn for the worse in the noughties and the first half of 2010.
Only retarded people- and the neocon kikes and their puppets like Adrian Zenz who is trying to invent a Uyghur genocide to bring on the end times- push this nonsense.

They're bringing out these new liars because they were getting embarrassed by people pointing out that the older Uyghur 'victims' they regularly tout never originally talked about any torture or mass imprisonment when they came to the West a decade or so ago and have just been continually ramping up their atrocity stories as it became politically convienient to do so, just like a certain other group of people with an atrocity myth.
There has been.
That wasn't in response to any mistreatment. It's the result of CIA funding through the 'National Endowment for Democracy' and the Zionist puppets in 'Saudi' Arabia to various Uyghur terrorist groups.
 
Last edited:
Why don't the Trump cult call this stuff "fake news" like they do everything else?
Because it fits in with what his masters want:
  • Invent imaginary slurs about China to justify pressure campaigns to move industrial production from China to shitholes like India where they are investing heavily
  • Justify ever increasing military spending
  • Pretend that they are moral and actually care about the suffering of humans (fuck no they don't, the Jews and their Saudi proxies keep bombing Yemeni children)
 
I wonder he showed the interviewer the scars on his penis from all of that torture.

If that is widespread or if that were true, you'd think there will be a stepping up of terror attacks orchestrated by Uyghurs in China which took a turn for the worse in the noughties and the first half of 2010.

And they will be justified in doing so. I don't see this happening.

Furthermore, the article brought up how 50 Muslim majority countries stood by China and how the two dozen odd non-Muslim countries that coincidentally aren't China friendly and led wars in the Muslim dominated Middle East played up the vocational training institutes.

I will just cast doubt on the claims in this article. I also don't think that China bought off Muslim countries like the UAE or Qatar, both of which are very rich.
China has overtaken the US as the largest trade partner in the world, good terms with China is good business.
 
Did you read the first page of the thread?
All it told me is that you're dumb.
I'll give you an easy answer. Turks. The Uighurs are a Turkic people, and have even less in common with the Arab gulf states than Turkey itself does thanks to the geographical separation, furthermore, due to that separation they probably practice a form of Islam those same Gulf States consider just shy of some sort of unforgivable sin. You might as well ask why the US in the 1800's would ever give a damn about what the Ottomans were doing to Orthodox Armenians. Not our faith, not our people, and same thing here.
Lol this is unspeakably dumb. The Saud crime family is one of the primary funnels for money to Uyghur terrorists and has been for decades, they just intend to use them against the Syrian and Iranian governments to further the Zionist agenda rather than in China itself.
 
All it told me is that you're dumb.

Lol this is unspeakably dumb. The Saud crime family is one of the primary funnels for money to Uyghur terrorists and has been for decades, they just intend to use them against the Syrian and Iranian governments to further the Zionist agenda rather than in China itself.
Listen, there’s no shame in admitting that you’re happy that your country is making the transition to a Chinese client state gracefully.
 
CCP once again showing how a non-cucked country handles Arabic cultural incursions, even the Arabs respect it
 
The Hui Muslims are allowed to practice their faith unmolested. The difference is that the Hui aren't advocating for a separatist state of East Turkestan.
The Hui are also ethnic Chinese, as opposed to a Turkic group that never wanted to be part of China to begin with. Kind of a big difference.
I'll give you an easy answer. Turks. The Uighurs are a Turkic people, and have even less in common with the Arab gulf states than Turkey itself does thanks to the geographical separation, furthermore, due to that separation they probably practice a form of Islam those same Gulf States consider just shy of some sort of unforgivable sin. You might as well ask why the US in the 1800's would ever give a damn about what the Ottomans were doing to Orthodox Armenians. Not our faith, not our people, and same thing here.
I think you meant 1900s and they absolutely did, the newspapers were full of of every type of screeching about it you could find. The difference is that politics trumps moral considerations every time. Just look at how so many people worldwide are suddenly shitting on Israel for Palestinians when they previously barely gave a fuck.
 
  • Like
Reactions: m1ddl3m4rch
The cruel reality is that the real world doesnt give a shit to their suffering. In fact, it doesnt give a shit to almost no one's suffering except what those in control of the current world order want you to give a shit. Most people dont know their suffering and, lets face it, they dont want to. They deep down want to remain ignorant and not think about the massacre of innocents and that China is our enemy.

They want to believe everything is fine and if a few nobodies they dont know from across the world have to die, well, thats a small price to pay for them.

This is both due to our self centered nature getting boosted by the narcissistic life style motivated to us and we eat that shit up. Its selfish? Yes. Its sadly human nature/society? Also yes.

Until its in favor of someone's interest, they dont have a reason to care that China is killing some people they barely know anything about.
 
The cruel reality is that the real world doesnt give a shit to their suffering. In fact, it doesnt give a shit to almost no one's suffering except what those in control of the current world order want you to give a shit. Most people dont know their suffering and, lets face it, they dont want to. They deep down want to remain ignorant and not think about the massacre of innocents and that China is our enemy.

They want to believe everything is fine and if a few nobodies they dont know from across the world have to die, well, thats a small price to pay for them.

This is both due to our self centered nature getting boosted by the narcissistic life style motivated to us and we eat that shit up. Its selfish? Yes. Its sadly human nature/society? Also yes.

Until its in favor of someone's interest, they dont have a reason to care that China is killing some people they barely know anything about.
If only the cancel culture people go to the next level
 
"I am *a Uighur." That initial "U" is a consonant.
 
Back