This guy has a head start. except there's actually no such category, but in the US lots of potential contenders.I wonder when will Yaniv reach Guinness World Record for having the most lawsuits against others.
Also, a statement is only defamation if it's absolutely untrue. If there's any truth to it at all, it cannot, by legal definition, be defamation:
Among the six elements required for someone to successfully sue another for defamation is the requirement that the statement be false. If the statement is true, there is no liability and there can be no recovery.
According to common law the burden of proof relative to the truth or falsity of a statement is on the defendant. Truth is an absolute defense, but there are several considerations in determining the truth or falsity of a statement.
- A statement does not have to be truthful down to every detail. A few inaccuracies still can lead to a statement that is true in substance. It also is important to note that while reasonable doubt applies before a jury, simple implication or a preponderance of the evidence is enough when considering a whether a person has been defamed.
- If a statement alleges specific behavior or a specific crime that was committed by the Plaintiff, the statement is true and there is no liability. However, if the allegation is general, wording and implication become significant in determining truth. A person may not truthfully be accused of repetitive bad behavior if that behavior was engaged in only one time. Rutherford v. Paddock, 180 Mass. 289, 62 N.E. 381 (1902).
- A statement is not considered truthful simply because another person said it. While it may be true that the statement was made by another, if the content of that statement is false, the person repeating it is liable, as well as the original publisher. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc. v. Robinson, 233 Ark. 168, 345 S.W.2d 34 (1961).
- It is not enough for the defamer to believe that the content of a statement is true, although an honest mistake may be taken into consideration when determining fault as it relates to reckless disregard or negligence. Mathis v. Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc, 455 F.Supp. 406 (E.D.Pa. 197
.
It seems to be a common troon fantasy that all men suddenly want to violate 'her.' Brianna Wu "complains" about being catcalled all the time, Jake 'gnome' lawrence pretends that people who write about his nonsense are "chasing" him, Laura K Dale pretends that cab drivers want to kidnap her and do unspeakable things (until she escaped like a stuntman).View attachment 2176320
Apart from the "Damsel in Defense/Distress" nonsense just how desirable does he think he is? It looks as though he was arming himself for the dozens upon dozens of rampant fiends lusting after him...his panic alarm wasn't enough.
Jessica Yaniv Simpson Weapons Forfeiture Details | MeowMix
Details from the 490 order finalizing the forfeiture of Jessica Yaniv Simpson's illegal weapons.meowmix.org
I wonder what those constables did. Were they the ones who arrested MY?
Sorry, I'm thick but what is this?...a new filing/claim or just additional yanny waffle tagged on to one he has on the go?
It was filed today. I don't know if it is an addition to the last RCMP suit or of the court informed him he filed in the wrong court (he did) so he filed the big boy court lawsuit. It will be a day or two before it becomes available on CSO. Instead of paying, I will wait for Meowmix to disclose the docs.
Any chance you can archive his tweet(s)? I can't access his tweets otherwise I'd archive them.
With Johny, who knows? Didn't address his fraudulent calls? Showed visible disgust when they saw him?
I'm pretty Archive.today can't capture locked tweets.
based on the 15 second video in thread for it they pulled the old broad's arms behind her back to handcuff her because she was resisting arrest and screaming like a moron after one or both of them assaulted the cops.
Meowmix is good for keeping up on that, but I wish they were a bit less personal about it.
