I went into Preston's discord and looked at John Lamont's posts.
No wonder someone could come to the conclusion that he is attracted to kids.
Looking at this it seems likely it is Lamont's own fault.
This one is pretty tame, but this really adds up over the course of my post.
This character seems to be a petit succubus, who shows child like behavior.
Nothing too incriminating.
But make up your own mind on this one honestly:
Graphite Comics is the free, streaming comics service built by readers and creators, for readers and creators
graphitecomics.com
The next thing that is really interesting is his choice for pre made models.
Looking at the original Aiko models and the edited models made by John Lamont they seem to be aged down.
Especially the faces.
He had spicier ones on his DA page, but curiously he deleted them after Vikki and Dean's video,
feeling guilty?
But I don't have the archive of those, they might be on V&D's video, I will give it a look later.
To be fair he has also older looking models, but the attraction to children
doesn't need to be mutually exclusive.
The next thing I want to talk about is what kind of audience he seems to be pandering to.
Look at this tweet made by John Lamont:
This redhead is Emma his 17 year old OC.
So we can assume her friend is the same age range.
Her likely underage friend has sex with Emma's ugly hairy father who doesn't even resemble her at all.
Emma is wearing panties with cherry pattern and an unicorn top.
In another tweet we learn about another important character named Lolita.
I think we all know at this point who he is advertising to....
Please move forward nothing to see here, right Lamont?
I should point out that the non nude stuff is surrounded by a ton of nudes of similar origin.
Please take a look for yourself if you don't believe me via the link above.
Here's the craziest thing, in an attempt to "own" Vikki and DA_Talks he posted these two pics:
She is 18+ for anyone concerned.
I will add an uncensored version.
Owning the haters by showing his attraction to child-like feature, sure dude.
All in all I think that someone could come to the conclusion that John Lamont is attracted to children
or at least child-like features.
After looking at all of this I would say John Lamont is a pedophile or at least a hebephile.
I should point it out before all these Preston Knights start to cry.
I don't think John Lamont did anything illegal, in my opinion he is just attracted to children.
Btw sorry for not including the archives to these tweets, the archive sites are a mess today on my end.
This is the same retard that got literally cucked by Leroy and sucked poo off a giant black dildo that pillaged his bum. Who was stupid enough to buy anything from preston to get doxed by him?
Preston desperately wants people's attention and he's pandering to troons by taking on their most hated comic artist EVS.
I really hope Ethan wipes the floor with peggers on this one.
Preston was basically an indy comics nobody. At the end of 2018, there was a fight within comicsgate over now-meaningless subjects with @FROG on one side and various parties on the other. Preston organized a stunt where he asked @FROG for time on his show to promote his comic and when @FROG didn't respond fast enough, Preston expressed outrage and pushed his way into the anti-@FROG mob that had formed for other reasons.
Around March 2019, the Comicsgate version of the Cuban Missile Crisis happened. @FROG fell out with a bunch of more well known people and everyone went nuclear on each other. This eventually allowed Preston to raise his profile within the anti @FROG movement. Preston used the movement to promote himself and his comics. He eventually started a clip show on youtube where he summarized the various comicsgate drama on a weekly basis. The clip show raised his profile still further.
Eventually a large group of people united by their dislike of @FROG, @FROG's warcampaign and official comicsgate started communicating with each other. This included Vikki, DA Talks and a great many others. Preston started promoting the idea of creating a "good" version of comicsgate in opposition to @FROG's "bad" version. The idea was to create an ecosystem promote and assist indy comics creators. As part of that, Preston created a "writing contest" where indy comics creators would present their scripts and eventually a winner would be picked & given a cash prize. There was also going to be a "shared universe" Wiki where people could use each others characters in their comics.
But there was a problem. Preston was in bed with a Australian crook and con-man named Jonathan Nolan who uses the alias "ZombieNomicon".
Nolan has been lurking in the background of comicsgate since the beginning in 2017. He often was a source of trouble in comicsgate but left few footprints behind after. But his partnership with preston brought him out into the public light. Nolan was putting up some portion of the money for the writing contest and "helping" with the infrastructure for it.
The relationship between Preston/Vikki/DA Talks blew up when ZombieNomicon's con man history got exposed in various places. Vikki/DA Talks went to Preston looking for a response and what they got from Preston was less than satisfying. ZombieNomicon (Nolan) they activated his sleeper agents within the contest and tried to steal all of the intellectual property plus the wiki. Again the response from Preston wasn't satisfactory. Then things blew up and people started walking away from Preston.
The theory is that the whole "contest" thing was a con game designed to get a bunch of people to create intellectual property for free which would then be packaged up by Nolan (and possibly Preston) to be sold on to parties in the entertainment industry. That there were "funny" things going on with the contest and the money involved with the contest. And that ultimately Preston wasn't a guy that anyone should trust, Nobody but Preston and Nolan really knows what went on between them in all these events or what they had planned.
At that point, there were some people who were still loyal to Preston and Nolan. Then there were people who were exclusively loyal to Nolan (Comic Book Hut and Captain Cummings of Comicsgate are two examples). DA talk and Vikki started out fighting with the Preston/Nolan followers. Then the fighting escalated into open warfare with Preston himself.
The theory is that the contest and everything else being done was basically a con game to get people to create free intellectual property which the individuals running the con game could then package up and sell on to the entertainment industry.
Its basically a story of people doing the enemy-of-my-enemy-is-my-friend thing and suddenly discovering they are involved with a really sleazy guy who was likely conning them and taking advantage of them. Then following comicsgate tradition, they all started feuding with each
I went into Preston's discord and looked at John Lamont's posts.
No wonder someone could come to the conclusion that he is attracted to kids.
Looking at this it seems likely it is Lamont's own fault.
This one is pretty tame, but this really adds up over the course of my post. View attachment 2221206
This character seems to be a petit succubus, who shows child like behavior.
Nothing too incriminating.
But make up your own mind on this one honestly:
Graphite Comics is the free, streaming comics service built by readers and creators, for readers and creators
graphitecomics.com
The next thing that is really interesting is his choice for pre made models. View attachment 2221216
Looking at the original Aiko models and the edited models made by John Lamont they seem to be aged down.
Especially the faces.
He had spicier ones on his DA page, but curiously he deleted them after Vikki and Dean's video,
feeling guilty?
But I don't have the archive of those, they might be on V&D's video, I will give it a look later.
To be fair he has also older looking models, but the attraction to children
doesn't need to be mutually exclusive.
The next thing I want to talk about is what kind of audience he seems to be pandering to.
Look at this tweet made by John Lamont:
View attachment 2221304
This redhead is Emma his 17 year old OC.
So we can assume her friend is the same age range.
Her likely underage friend has sex with Emma's ugly hairy father who doesn't even resemble her at all.
Emma is wearing panties with cherry pattern and an unicorn top.
In another tweet we learn about another important character named Lolita.
I think we all know at this point who he is advertising to....
I should point out that the non nude stuff is surrounded by a ton of nudes of similar origin.
Please take a look for yourself if you don't believe me via the link above. View attachment 2221363
Here's the craziest thing, in an attempt to "own" Vikki and DA_Talks he posted these two pics: View attachment 2221372
She is 18+ for anyone concerned.
I will add an uncensored version. View attachment 2221377
Owning the haters by showing his attraction to child-like feature, sure dude.
All in all I think that someone could come to the conclusion that John Lamont is attracted to children
or at least child-like features.
After looking at all of this I would say John Lamont is a pedophile or at least a hebephile.
I should point it out before all these Preston Knights start to cry.
I don't think John Lamont did anything illegal, in my opinion he is just attracted to children.
Btw sorry for not including the archives to these tweets, the archive sites are a mess today on my end.
There's something not right with any of them. God damn those images are creepy
Funny thing, I know a comic reviewer Zombienomicon tried to convince to write a piece about CG, an entire takedown thing. Mostly claimed it would be the story of the century, and they'd be rich.
He chose not to, just keep doing his comic book reviews and having fun with it. Thank fuck.
I went into Preston's discord and looked at John Lamont's posts.
No wonder someone could come to the conclusion that he is attracted to kids.
Looking at this it seems likely it is Lamont's own fault.
This one is pretty tame, but this really adds up over the course of my post. View attachment 2221206
This character seems to be a petit succubus, who shows child like behavior.
Nothing too incriminating.
But make up your own mind on this one honestly:
Graphite Comics is the free, streaming comics service built by readers and creators, for readers and creators
graphitecomics.com
The next thing that is really interesting is his choice for pre made models. View attachment 2221216
Looking at the original Aiko models and the edited models made by John Lamont they seem to be aged down.
Especially the faces.
He had spicier ones on his DA page, but curiously he deleted them after Vikki and Dean's video,
feeling guilty?
But I don't have the archive of those, they might be on V&D's video, I will give it a look later.
To be fair he has also older looking models, but the attraction to children
doesn't need to be mutually exclusive.
The next thing I want to talk about is what kind of audience he seems to be pandering to.
Look at this tweet made by John Lamont:
View attachment 2221304
This redhead is Emma his 17 year old OC.
So we can assume her friend is the same age range.
Her likely underage friend has sex with Emma's ugly hairy father who doesn't even resemble her at all.
Emma is wearing panties with cherry pattern and an unicorn top.
In another tweet we learn about another important character named Lolita.
I think we all know at this point who he is advertising to....
I should point out that the non nude stuff is surrounded by a ton of nudes of similar origin.
Please take a look for yourself if you don't believe me via the link above. View attachment 2221363
Here's the craziest thing, in an attempt to "own" Vikki and DA_Talks he posted these two pics: View attachment 2221372
She is 18+ for anyone concerned.
I will add an uncensored version. View attachment 2221377
Owning the haters by showing his attraction to child-like feature, sure dude.
All in all I think that someone could come to the conclusion that John Lamont is attracted to children
or at least child-like features.
After looking at all of this I would say John Lamont is a pedophile or at least a hebephile.
I should point it out before all these Preston Knights start to cry.
I don't think John Lamont did anything illegal, in my opinion he is just attracted to children.
Btw sorry for not including the archives to these tweets, the archive sites are a mess today on my end.
Thanks for the info, @TherapyMan . Appreciate it. However...
May 25th fell on a Tuesday, not a Friday. (I'm guessing you were looking at a June calendar? June 25th does fall on a Friday.) Meaning if we start with May 26 as day one of our Cuck Countdown™ and go strictly by calendar days -- basically counting weekends and holidays -- the filing has to be made by June 4th, this Friday.
Assuming the court doesn't routinely accept late filings, assuming pro forma extensions aren't accepted and so on.
BTW, spotted this this morning on Twitter, in a thread @TESTEFY-HD started. Link / Archive .
If he had a quite convincing case wouldn't that have been included in the first place, since it's absolutely required and wouldn't have led to the judge telling him to do it?
If he had a quite convincing case wouldn't that have been included in the first place, since it's absolutely required and wouldn't have led to the judge telling him to do it?
I mean hypothetically it's possible for someone to have a convincing case, but have such a useless waste of space lawyer that they don't plead it properly in the first petition. That being said from what little I've picked up about the events in this case (it's seriously retarded and I don't have enough scotch to make it all readable) it doesn't appear to be the case here. Looks like the plaintiff is a tard, and his shyster is somehow even fucking dumber.
Libel is print, slander spoken provably false statements made maliciously. Assault? I'm going to assume that was others talking about shooting pedophiles. Repeatedly.
Where I run into trouble is after scouring it I never found evidence of Vikki or Dean calling Preston a Pedophile. Rather, they stated an opinion, which is precluded for Libel/Slander purposes.
Open question, are any of the people here public figures?
I would say Preston, Lamont and EVS probably rise to limited public figure, at least in matters related to Comicsgate or Comic Publishing.
I'm not sure what Preston is hoping to accomplish with regards to the Comicsgate trademark? Love ot hate EVS I do believe he coined the term publicly on his show and has used it continuosly since in marketing his product. Which will generally give him the stronger case. At best Preston might get a carve out for the use of the full unredacted title of his show. But I somehow doubt that.
I would say Preston, Lamont and EVS probably rise to limited public figure, at least in matters related to Comicsgate or Comic Publishing.
I'm not sure what Preston is hoping to accomplish with regards to the Comicsgate trademark? Love ot hate EVS I do believe he coined the term publicly on his show and has used it continuosly since in marketing his product. Which will generally give him the stronger case. At best Preston might get a carve out for the use of the full unredacted title of his show. But I somehow doubt that.
Captain Cummings originally coined it. Ethan, however, was first (I'm not sure) to monetize it. Plus he has ties to grifter Cridious' trademark I think.
Either way, over in the CG thread, we uncovered Preston intends to use his CG trademark to strike Comicsgate streams.
Captain Cummings originally coined it. Ethan, however, was first (I'm not sure) to monetize it. Plus he has ties to grifter Cridious' trademark I think.
Either way, over in the CG thread, we uncovered Preston intends to use his CG trademark to strike Comicsgate streams.
After Preston seriously thought that he could get EVS on criminal charges for making fun of his porn vids that Preston himself promoted on fetish forums, you can pretty much assume the opposite of whatever he has to say about law.
DA broke it down brilliantly in video at the five minute mark with actual proof including him describing his strikes on channels using Comicsgate as a 'reign of terror.'
Preston filed his amended complaint. It's a clusterfuck, the chief fuck-up being claiming John Lamont is a writer and illustrated and published "many comics in the past"...
...but claimed earlier this is the first comic John has published.
archive.ph
