Trainwreck Pamela Swain / DocHoliday1977 / MsPhoenix1969 / Observer1977 / danishlace2003 / Writer_thriller - Victim of grand #MeToo conspiracy, litigious wannabe starfucker, off her meds and online

  • Thread starter Thread starter AJ 447
  • Start date Start date

Which member of the Pamspiracy does Pam secretly want to fuck the most?


  • Total voters
    519
No, I think....we're going to confiscate your devices and put you in solitary confinement.
You literally can't do that, Pam.
Pam, Alan just scored a massive legal victory against CNN.

Judge Rejects CNN’s Motion to Dismiss Dershowitz Defamation Lawsuit


The Judge wrote:
"Thus, Dershowitz argues, CNN presented an official proceeding in a misleading manner and the fair report privilege does not apply.
The Court agrees. CNN presented an abridgment of Dershowitz’ answer to
Senator Cruz’ question. The abridgment is not accurate, to the extent that it omitted a crucial qualification: that an illegal motive for a quid pro quo would be corrupt. As a result, the commentators’ statements – that Dershowitz believes a President can do anything, even commit crimes if it would help his re-election – are not based upon a fair and accurate summary of Dershowitz’ statement to the Senate."

"But because the broadcasts did not present a fair and accurate abridgment of Dershowitz’ remarks, CNN cannot avail itself of the fair report privilege."

"By contrast, the CNN broadcast segments set forth in Dershowitz’ Complaint were focused specifically on Dershowitz’ comments to the Senate and, as presented on air, changed the gist of what Dershowitz said. For the fair report privilege to apply a defendant must have “presented a fair and accurate report of the source documents.” The CNN broadcasts do not meet that standard."

"The Court concludes that the
commentators’ statements set forth in the Complaint were not pure opinion but instead were mixed expressions of opinion that could reasonably be construed as defamatory. A mixed expression of opinion is not constitutionally protected."

"The Court concludes that the Complaint plausibly alleges that the comments made on CNN and CNN.com were defamatory statements of mixed opinion."

"These allegations, for purposes of surviving the Motion to Dismiss, plausibly plead a factual basis from which “actual malice” can be inferred."

"The Court does not accept CNN’s
argument that a public figure defamation plaintiff must identify and plead (before discovery) each responsible decision maker within a news organization"

Are you big mad, Pam, at Alan succeeding?

NY Supreme Court concluded that NYT is fake news, and now, so did Florida district court for CNN
Two lawyers speak about it:


Alan wins big, Pam mad big

And your days are numbered, Alan.
>Poynter.org
>Shitty slang
>"Incredible work" including literally googling his court documents
>Story about one of the biggest pedophiles in recent history
> Somehow relates it to one of the most famous and respected Criminal Law Lawyer in US who is found guilty of no crime

Lol, okay. That being said, there are higher powers at work, Pam, powers that let people who faked Epstein's docs after his "suicide" go free.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: Whale Spotter
Alan. Let me make something clear to you.

You and Harvey are the same two people who lie, slander, and photoshop blackmail to control people. You both and the Trumps push the Joe Biden kid sniffing slander like he's a pedo. Alan, there are WRITTEN RECORDS of you with Epstein and underage girls. AND TESTIMONY of you hacking accusers. And why do you think Harvey sits in Wende right now? Witness protection? I don't think so.

People are aware of you both.
 
Alan. Let me make something clear to you.
Alan, very likely, is not here. He's busy fucking over CNN.
People are aware of you both.
No shit, Alan is one of the most respected Criminal Law Lawyer, of course "people are aware" of him.
You and Harvey are the same two people who lie, slander, and photoshop blackmail to control people.
You are gonna back that up, Pam. That's a lot of legal words you are throwing around that you simply do not understand.
You both and the Trumps push the Joe Biden kid sniffing slander like he's a pedo.
It's true though. There are videos of it, and Biden admits it. Here, have some vids!

Also, it's not slander if it's true.

Alan, there are WRITTEN RECORDS of you with Epstein and underage girls.
Post them.
AND TESTIMONY of you hacking accusers.
That's cool and all, but more proof is needed than a mere testimony you do not seem to be willing to post. The standard is beyond a reasonable doubt (Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307). There is much reasonable doubt to be had.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: Whale Spotter
Alan, very likely, is not here. He's busy fucking over CNN.

No shit, Alan is one of the most respected Criminal Law Lawyer, of course "people are aware" of him.

You are gonna back that up, Pam. That's a lot of legal words you are throwing around that you simply do not understand.

It's true though. There are videos of it, and Biden admits it. Here, have some vids!

Also, it's not slander if it's true.


Post them.

That's cool and all, but more proof is needed than a mere testimony you do not seem to be willing to post. The standard is beyond a reasonable doubt (Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307). There is much reasonable doubt to be had.
This is Michael Fassbender.
 
I am not Tony, nor do I see how Fiji relates to what we were speaking pre-japan.

Lol, someone's mad
LOL someone's caught.

Well, Donald Trump, Donald Trump Jr, Tony Robbins, Alan Dershowitz, Harvey Weinstein, and Michael Fassbender. Why don't you contact Joe Biden at the White House and complain about his sniffing habits. Oh and use that photoshopped and fake blackmail too.

I think that would be a better approach than threatening people online.
 
Harvey Weinstein is back online from prison making slanders and threats

Alan Dershowitz is online hacking Weinstein and Trump accusers.


6434ECCE-35EB-43BF-99EF-17D93D75ADB9.jpeg

The baobab flower, Senegal’s National Flower

I am dedicating this post to the massive amount of lost hope, by the recurrent posters on this thread, that Pam was finally medicated and getting help during her hiatus. We will forget, but never stop our efforts in saving those who need it.

For any new posters who may be reading this, please save yourself. For the brave, familiarize yourself with Psychiatric First Aid . Not to save Pam, but to save your own mental health after reading Pam’s posts here.
 
LOL someone's caught.
Caught how? You're not even making any sense.
Why don't you contact Joe Biden at the White House and complain about his sniffing habits
Girl with old men fetish mad that her favourite old man likes to sniff children, and does not like grown up women.
Oh and use that photoshopped and fake blackmail too
What parts of what I sent you about Biden were fake and photoshopped? That said, how do you photoshop a video?
I think that would be a better approach than threatening people online
Learn law. Read Brandenburg v. Ohio, 395 U.S. 444
 
Harvey Weinstein is back online from prison making slanders and threats
Incorrect.

Alan Dershowitz is online hacking Weinstein and Trump accusers.
Incorrect.

Harvey Weinstein is @Cup Noodle who admits to wanting to kidnap me and rape me.
View attachment 2234220
Incorrect.

No, I think....we're going to confiscate your devices and put you in solitary confinement.
Who's we, Pam? Also, Incorrect.

This is Michael Fassbender.
Incorrect.

Nah, I think you took over for Alan on this account, Michael. Different IP.
Incorrect. Also you can't see our IP addresses, Pam.

LOL someone's caught.
Incorrect.
 
Back