- Joined
- Jun 17, 2014
So what happens when the tax credit payments end after December? Do the shackles go back on?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Shekels this year, shackles next year...So what happens when the tax credit payments end after December? Do the shackles go back on?
No she doesn't understand that. I mentioned that last year.Eye for an eye, tooth for a tooth, ass for cash...
But seriously, you know the rule originated in Code of Hammurabi?
I get it how one could not understand it. I get it, people may not know about it but once they are told - it's a simple fact, not a complex mathematical equation.No she doesn't understand that. I mentioned that last year.
This adjustment in the tax system means I can finally leave Marshall and make it on my own
"I am able to support myself on my own, because government is giving me more money"become financially able to support
She's been informed numerous times. It's all okay though, because they stole it from mystical Torah in the sky or something like that, according to her.But seriously, you know the rule originated in Code of Hammurabi?
So all the times you said you left him were a lie?I can finally leave Marshall
You wouldn't have had to worry if you had simply got yourself a job.I have been praying for almost a year and a half for Elohim to help me become financially able to support myself and my 6 children alone. It's almost here, I'm almost free, I just might cry!
39 days and my shackles come off....
Yup. She probably does not understand that this is for 2021 only, according to IRSSo what happens when the tax credit payments end after December? Do the shackles go back on?
Yes, I could have bottle fed my baby with formula to her disadvantage, and put my children in public school against my religious values to obtain a job outside of the home. But then I would be violating my moral principles and religious values.You wouldn't have had to worry if you had simply got yourself a job.
Everyone uses taxes in one way or the other. There's not a single person in the USA who doesn't use a single product or service that doesn't have the government's hand in the process, all thanks to taxpayer money."I am able to support myself on my own, because government is giving me more money"
That's not supporting yourself, that's just leeching of the taxpayer.
Yup. She probably does not understand that this is for 2021 only, according to IRS
So what happens when the tax credit payments end after December? Do the shackles go back on?
LOL she thinks she can survive on $1500 a month with the amount of children she has. I take it they just dollar store brand mac n' cheese every day? I guess anything is better than working for this lazy piece of shit.
LOL she thinks she can survive on $1500 a month with the amount of children she has. I take it they just dollar store brand mac n' cheese every day? I guess anything is better than working for this lazy piece of shit.
Illogical.Poor little mealtickets...
I mentioned already why I financially have to stay.What I don't understand is why you keep him around and why he stays around.
I remember us disproving that bit of your narrative.Yes, I could have bottle fed my baby with formula to her disadvantage
Having a job, and homeschooling your kids isn't mutually exclusive. It's very much possible if you put in the effort. Problem is, you haven't., and put my children in public school against my religious values to obtain a job outside of the home. But then I would be violating my moral principles and religious values.
Literally not true. I know you are allergic to putting in any effort, so that's likely why you never tried.It's impossible to work outside the home and properly breastfeed a baby for 2 years using ecological breastfeeding. It's also impossible to work 40 hours a week outside the home and homeschool. It's also impossible to work outside the home 40 hours a week and also cook healthy proper meals for 6 children.
Yes, yes, "capitalism bad, need big socialist gov, otherwise I don't get my jewish shekels I so rightfully deserve." Have you tried not being a socialist? Needless to say, I don't agree with your view.You're simply unwilling to admit that Corporate Capitalism does not serve the interests of breastfeeding women, homeschooling families and large families.
"You use public roads, and that's the same as me literally living off the tit of the taxpayer"Everyone uses taxes in one way or the other. There's not a single person in the USA who doesn't use a single product or service that doesn't have the government's hand in the process, all thanks to taxpayer money.
Yes, yes, Mel, we know you are a dirty commie.There's nothing wrong with the concept of "the redistribution of wealth".
Work, investments, intelligence, etc, although, I dare say you would know nothing about that.How did their families get that money in the first place?
"The American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) of 2021 expands the Child Tax Credit (CTC) for tax year 2021 only."The child tax credit laws are permanent.
I only hope the next step is Biden forgiving student.
Read about attempts at practical implementation of socialism. US are a global superpower, so focus on global superpowers applying socialism. There are two major examples:You're simply unwilling to admit that Corporate Capitalism does not serve the interests of breastfeeding women, homeschooling families and large families.
That's very progressive of you. I thought goyim have no rights?Elohim gave land, water and resources to all people with equal opportunity. What gives anyone the right to hoard any portion for themselves while making others go without?
OK, still unhealthy in my opinion but I get your reasoning.I mentioned already why I financially have to stay.
This sounds like you may find yourself in another Andrew situation, that is: a guy who believes you have no right to leave him. You sure know how to pick'em.I can't speak for Marshall but based on my observations of his thoughts I think Marshall only stays around me because he thinks marriage is forever. He has this view of marriage where you aren't allowed to leave people except for idolatry or adultery. It's a common interpretation of the Torah/Messiah's teachings.
Ethics aside, that's not very smart of you. If you keep him around only for his resources you don't want him to invest those resources into a new relationship. If you want to be cold and calculating (not that I think Marshall deserves better) at least be efficient about it.In a fight we had yesterday he told me he was miserable with me. "Then find someone else" was what I told him. I told him more than once he was welcome to go on dating sites and look for a new wife because I wasn't planning on staying with him.
It doesn't need to be an evil person to make you feel miserable. I can imagine several types of character that would make me miserable if I had to deal with them 24/7 despite being kind and caring people. It's just a matter of compatibility.If someone is so evil that they are causing you misery, then why the fuck would you stay with them? Why just stand there saying someone makes you feeling miserable? Leave them then if they are evil! Obviously if you haven't left them they aren't evil, the misery is based upon your own inner issues.
You know, there is a simple solution to not being pregnant - natural, healthy and convenient. I'll tell it as subtly as I can:Hopefully someone else will grab Marshall's attention and he will lose sexual interest in me. I'm trying to leave once and for all while not being pregnant.
I'll accept this as your admission that you were wrong, since you're just a broken person that can't admit a single fault anyway. I'm glad we can now move on.So long story short I don't have to worry about indentured servitude.
This is just wrong, completely wrong. Most family built and run dynasties only last 3 generations. There's the first one, who is the builder and the architect, the creator of the empire. Then the next generation are merely the stewards, the ones who keep things going but don't have the same brilliance and resilience as the first. Then comes the 3rd generation that are usually spoiled rotten, weak willed, incompetent. Generally, it all falls apart once the grandchildren are the ones running things.Most millionaires are not self-made, they inherited family farms and family businesses, going all the way back to money brought from Old Europe.
There's a shitload wrong with this concept, an absolute SHITLOAD.There's nothing wrong with the concept of "the redistribution of wealth".
88% of millionaires are self-madeI'll accept this as your admission that you were wrong, since you're just a broken person that can't admit a single fault anyway. I'm glad we can now move on.
This is just wrong, completely wrong. Most family built and run dynasties only last 3 generations. There's the first one, who is the builder and the architect, the creator of the empire. Then the next generation are merely the stewards, the ones who keep things going but don't have the same brilliance and resilience as the first. Then comes the 3rd generation that are usually spoiled rotten, weak willed, incompetent. Generally, it all falls apart once the grandchildren are the ones running things.
That's just a claim the article makes, but not a single actual study with facts is presented.88% of millionaires are self-made
"On July 6,1995, Bezos launched Amazon.com , named after the South American river, with financial [] support from family..."You wanna know the secret of how Bezos got all of that money?
Guess I read wrong somewhere."The American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) of 2021 expands the Child Tax Credit (CTC) for tax year 2021 only."
Just because you disagree with the facts doesn't make it wrong.That's just a claim the article makes, but not a single actual study with facts is presented.
If you read the article closer, you'll see that they claim "investments" made them wealthy. That's not "self made". If your parents and grandparents give you $150,000, and you choose to invest it, that's not a "self made" millionaire. You've inherited money that made you wealthy.
This article you posted is misinformation, straight up.
Exposing the truth and reality is here:
![]()
The 'Self-Made' Hallucination of America's Rich - Institute for Policy Studies
Like Mitt Romney, most Americans who amass grand fortunes have a substantial head start.ips-dc.org
"These high-rollers.... all inherited enough to “earn” their Forbes 400 status."
Like I said, they get the money from their parents to make investments that balloon up.
Try becoming a millionaire when your parents don't give you anything to begin with. It doesn't happen.
"On July 6,1995, Bezos launched Amazon.com , named after the South American river, with financial [] support from family..."
Or in other words, his wealthy parents who sent him to Princeton helped pay for the website to launch and run.
Source: https://www.referenceforbusiness.com/businesses/A-F/Bezos-Jeff.html#ixzz6xALQW9Hz
Guess I read wrong somewhere.
They might become permanent.
![]()
Biden Proposals Would Significantly Expand Benefits Administered Through the Tax Code
The Biden administration will have to balance the desire to increase social spending through the tax code with the need to collect revenue and have a tax system that is transparent and easy to understand.taxfoundation.org
Here are the facts:Just because you disagree with the facts doesn't make it wrong.
There are only a handful of individuals that went from poor/middle class family backgrounds to riches, and those are in 3 sectors: technology, oil industry and television.
"A study by Fidelity Investments found that 88% of millionaires are self-made millionaires."just a claim the article makes, but not a single actual study with facts is presented
It is. Investing your own money, and managing to profit from that, is the very definition of "self-made".If you read the article closer, you'll see that they claim "investments" made them wealthy. That's not "self made".
Sounds bad. Wonder what parts she excluded with her "..."? Oh? Only the fact that disproves her narrative. Taking the article as truth, only 21% got there through inheritence, which still shows that most are self made."These high-rollers.... all inherited enough to “earn” their Forbes 400 status."
The article you linked literally says that happens in 78.75% of cases.Try becoming a millionaire when your parents don't give you anything to begin with. It doesn't happen.
The article does not source anything. Now, even if it's true, he still made the company work on his own. No matter how much money your parents give you, you cannot keep a shitty company working. Hell, look at HuffPost."On July 6,1995, Bezos launched Amazon.com , named after the South American river, with financial [] support from family..."
Or in other words, his wealthy parents who sent him to Princeton helped pay for the website to launch and run.
Source: https://www.referenceforbusiness.com/businesses/A-F/Bezos-Jeff.html#ixzz6xALQW9Hz
Note the "might".They might become permanent.
It seems they got it wrong. IRS would know better about a money plan that they are supposed to fufill.![]()
Biden Proposals Would Significantly Expand Benefits Administered Through the Tax Code
The Biden administration will have to balance the desire to increase social spending through the tax code with the need to collect revenue and have a tax system that is transparent and easy to understand.taxfoundation.org
I'm not going to bother to look at the link, because your understanding of basic things is horrid. Receiving startup money does not mean that you put it no work in making sure your company survives.Most millionaires got start up money from their parents
http://www.faireconomy.org/sites/default/files/BornOnThirdBase_2012.pdf
But one of the links you cited earlier says 79%, not 50 people.There are less than 50 people out of population of 385 million Americans who have come from "rags to riches". It goes to show that it's not a widespread opportunity
Her jewish heritage.so where is this claim coming from?
We all know Melinda is bad with math."A study by Fidelity Investments found that 88% of millionaires are self-made millionaires."
This study is also mentioned by other websites, and supported by Forbes own research. So far, there are two different sources to your none.
It is. Investing your own money, and managing to profit from that, is the very definition of "self-made".
Sounds bad. Wonder what parts she excluded with her "..."? Oh? Only the fact that disproves her narrative. Taking the article as truth, only 21% got there through inheritence, which still shows that most are self made.
View attachment 2242498
The article you linked literally says that happens in 78.75% of cases.
The article does not source anything. Now, even if it's true, he still made the company work on his own. No matter how much money your parents give you, you cannot keep a shitty company working. Hell, look at HuffPost.
Note the "might".
It seems they got it wrong. IRS would know better about a money plan that they are supposed to fufill.
Furthermore, the treasury department summary of Biden's plan confirms that after 2021, things go back to how they were pre-biden plan (doc attached)
I'm not going to bother to look at the link, because your understanding of basic things is horrid. Receiving startup money does not mean that you put it no work in making sure your company survives.
But one of the links you cited earlier says 79%, not 50 people.
Her jewish heritage.