Lolcow Melinda Leigh Scott & Marshall Castersen - Sue-happy couple. Flat earth conspiracists. Pretending to be Jewish. Believe Kiwi Farms is protected by the Masonic Order. 0-6 on lawsuits. Marshall is dead.

LOL she thinks she can survive on $1500 a month with the amount of children she has. I take it they just dollar store brand mac n' cheese every day? I guess anything is better than working for this lazy piece of shit.
Eye for an eye, tooth for a tooth, ass for cash... :)
But seriously, you know the rule originated in Code of Hammurabi?
No she doesn't understand that. I mentioned that last year.
 
This adjustment in the tax system means I can finally leave Marshall and make it on my own
become financially able to support
"I am able to support myself on my own, because government is giving me more money"
That's not supporting yourself, that's just leeching of the taxpayer.
But seriously, you know the rule originated in Code of Hammurabi?
She's been informed numerous times. It's all okay though, because they stole it from mystical Torah in the sky or something like that, according to her.
I can finally leave Marshall
So all the times you said you left him were a lie?
I have been praying for almost a year and a half for Elohim to help me become financially able to support myself and my 6 children alone. It's almost here, I'm almost free, I just might cry!

39 days and my shackles come off....
You wouldn't have had to worry if you had simply got yourself a job.
So what happens when the tax credit payments end after December? Do the shackles go back on?
Yup. She probably does not understand that this is for 2021 only, according to IRS
 
You wouldn't have had to worry if you had simply got yourself a job.
Yes, I could have bottle fed my baby with formula to her disadvantage, and put my children in public school against my religious values to obtain a job outside of the home. But then I would be violating my moral principles and religious values.

It's impossible to work outside the home and properly breastfeed a baby for 2 years using ecological breastfeeding. It's also impossible to work 40 hours a week outside the home and homeschool. It's also impossible to work outside the home 40 hours a week and also cook healthy proper meals for 6 children. I stay home to raise my children at home for their advantage and because of my religious beliefs.

So I've opted to be self employed as a book author in order to practice Ecological Breastfeeding, Homeschool and be available to give my children proper nutrition through cooking 98% of their meals. If their isn't one parent at home cooking for the family on a regular basis the family does not get proper nutrition. Restaurants and fast food cannot provide proper nutrition.

You're simply unwilling to admit that Corporate Capitalism does not serve the interests of breastfeeding women, homeschooling families and large families.

Capitalism as it exists in the USA was made to benefit men. Corporate America was a direct response to women's advancements in education, literacy, voting rights, property rights and in order to obtain money. They purposely structured the system to be difficult for women who don't sterilize themselves with birth control. Corporate America is anti-breastfeeding and anti-family. 6 weeks of maternity leave is a joke. And on top of that you almost never hear of a company giving paternity leave which is very necessary.


"I am able to support myself on my own, because government is giving me more money"
That's not supporting yourself, that's just leeching of the taxpayer.
Everyone uses taxes in one way or the other. There's not a single person in the USA who doesn't use a single product or service that doesn't have the government's hand in the process, all thanks to taxpayer money.

I am an American Taxpayer. It's me getting my own taxes back on some level.

My biological parents both paid into the American Taxpayer system their Social Security money, for years. Because neither of them either collected it (they both died before the age of 60), that's my money as well, by law.

There's nothing wrong with the concept of "the redistribution of wealth". Millionaires and Billionaires and Corporate entities who pay a lot of taxes can share their money with lower income brackets. How did their families get that money in the first place? They came to the North American continent and took land and resources and started charging the poor for rent and factory made goods. Most millionaires are not self-made, they inherited family farms and family businesses, going all the way back to money brought from Old Europe. They took from others and then hoarded it.

Elohim gave land, water and resources to all people with equal opportunity. What gives anyone the right to hoard any portion for themselves while making others go without?



Yup. She probably does not understand that this is for 2021 only, according to IRS
So what happens when the tax credit payments end after December? Do the shackles go back on?

The child tax credit laws are permanent. The payments in 2021 are what they would have paid out in the first place in 2021 if the law had been effective already. The COVID-19 pandemic exposed the weaknesses of American wealth structures. Millions of people couldn't even afford rent because they had no savings.

In 2022 they will give higher child tax credits. All families with children will get more money.

So the redistribution of wealth will be at work here in the USA. It's about time!

LOL she thinks she can survive on $1500 a month with the amount of children she has. I take it they just dollar store brand mac n' cheese every day? I guess anything is better than working for this lazy piece of shit.

I only hope the next step is Biden forgiving student. They give farmers and corporate CEOs bail outs, why not Academics?

LOL she thinks she can survive on $1500 a month with the amount of children she has. I take it they just dollar store brand mac n' cheese every day? I guess anything is better than working for this lazy piece of shit.

"The amount of children she has", followed by, "lazy". Thanks for revealing for everyone here how much of an idiot you Goy men can be.

I live in an area where $1,500/month goes far. I also never said it was my sole source of income.

Mac N Cheese? Comical. I don't buy mac n cheese from the dollar store because it's not Kosher. I've been running my own kitchen for 18 years, I cook everything from homemade biscuits from scratch to beautiful chicken kabobs.

It's your wife that is the incompetent cook. Don't confuse us. I know she's not as experienced, in her 20s, but dang, she can't even make pies? I could make pies by the time I was 23.

How all my meals start. From scratch....

IMG_20210331_135423_4.jpg




Poor little mealtickets...
Illogical.

A college educated woman like myself with a Bachelor's degree could earn much more money by aborting her children in the womb OR using the public education system. I incur a financial loss every year by choosing to homeschool my children as a matter of moral principle.

What I don't understand is why you keep him around and why he stays around.
I mentioned already why I financially have to stay.

I can't speak for Marshall but based on my observations of his thoughts I think Marshall only stays around me because he thinks marriage is forever. He has this view of marriage where you aren't allowed to leave people except for idolatry or adultery. It's a common interpretation of the Torah/Messiah's teachings.

In a fight we had yesterday he told me he was miserable with me. "Then find someone else" was what I told him. I told him more than once he was welcome to go on dating sites and look for a new wife because I wasn't planning on staying with him.

If someone is so evil that they are causing you misery, then why the fuck would you stay with them? Why just stand there saying someone makes you feeling miserable? Leave them then if they are evil! Obviously if you haven't left them they aren't evil, the misery is based upon your own inner issues.

Hopefully someone else will grab Marshall's attention and he will lose sexual interest in me. I'm trying to leave once and for all while not being pregnant.
 
Yes, I could have bottle fed my baby with formula to her disadvantage
I remember us disproving that bit of your narrative.
, and put my children in public school against my religious values to obtain a job outside of the home. But then I would be violating my moral principles and religious values.
Having a job, and homeschooling your kids isn't mutually exclusive. It's very much possible if you put in the effort. Problem is, you haven't.
It's impossible to work outside the home and properly breastfeed a baby for 2 years using ecological breastfeeding. It's also impossible to work 40 hours a week outside the home and homeschool. It's also impossible to work outside the home 40 hours a week and also cook healthy proper meals for 6 children.
Literally not true. I know you are allergic to putting in any effort, so that's likely why you never tried.
You're simply unwilling to admit that Corporate Capitalism does not serve the interests of breastfeeding women, homeschooling families and large families.
Yes, yes, "capitalism bad, need big socialist gov, otherwise I don't get my jewish shekels I so rightfully deserve." Have you tried not being a socialist? Needless to say, I don't agree with your view.
Everyone uses taxes in one way or the other. There's not a single person in the USA who doesn't use a single product or service that doesn't have the government's hand in the process, all thanks to taxpayer money.
"You use public roads, and that's the same as me literally living off the tit of the taxpayer"
Your arguments are both disingenuous and wrong.
There's nothing wrong with the concept of "the redistribution of wealth".
Yes, yes, Mel, we know you are a dirty commie.
How did their families get that money in the first place?
Work, investments, intelligence, etc, although, I dare say you would know nothing about that.
The child tax credit laws are permanent.
"The American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) of 2021 expands the Child Tax Credit (CTC) for tax year 2021 only."
I only hope the next step is Biden forgiving student.

Student debt forgiveness isn’t in Biden’s annual budget

‘I will not make that happen’: Biden says he will not support $50K in student debt forgiveness

 
You're simply unwilling to admit that Corporate Capitalism does not serve the interests of breastfeeding women, homeschooling families and large families.
Read about attempts at practical implementation of socialism. US are a global superpower, so focus on global superpowers applying socialism. There are two major examples:
1. Soviet Union. It wasn't the paradise you may imagine it was. Imagine there were times when you could get arrested for not being employed. Central planning turned out to be less efficient than free economy, leading to food shortages. In the end the system fell under its own weight.
2. People's Republic of China. Imagine they only started implementing social support system in rural areas in 2014, before that people were on their own there (and by social support system I don't mean welfare, I mean education, healthcare and retirement benefits). Not to mention the system evolved into government-controlled de-facto capitalism and the role as "factory of the world" was achieved by severely exploiting working class.
Besides your beliefs and lifestyle would be persecuted in both those systems as radical and unproductive.

Elohim gave land, water and resources to all people with equal opportunity. What gives anyone the right to hoard any portion for themselves while making others go without?
That's very progressive of you. I thought goyim have no rights?

I mentioned already why I financially have to stay.
OK, still unhealthy in my opinion but I get your reasoning.

I can't speak for Marshall but based on my observations of his thoughts I think Marshall only stays around me because he thinks marriage is forever. He has this view of marriage where you aren't allowed to leave people except for idolatry or adultery. It's a common interpretation of the Torah/Messiah's teachings.
This sounds like you may find yourself in another Andrew situation, that is: a guy who believes you have no right to leave him. You sure know how to pick'em.
Keep in mind Marshall is more prone to violence than Andy boy.

In a fight we had yesterday he told me he was miserable with me. "Then find someone else" was what I told him. I told him more than once he was welcome to go on dating sites and look for a new wife because I wasn't planning on staying with him.
Ethics aside, that's not very smart of you. If you keep him around only for his resources you don't want him to invest those resources into a new relationship. If you want to be cold and calculating (not that I think Marshall deserves better) at least be efficient about it.

If someone is so evil that they are causing you misery, then why the fuck would you stay with them? Why just stand there saying someone makes you feeling miserable? Leave them then if they are evil! Obviously if you haven't left them they aren't evil, the misery is based upon your own inner issues.
It doesn't need to be an evil person to make you feel miserable. I can imagine several types of character that would make me miserable if I had to deal with them 24/7 despite being kind and caring people. It's just a matter of compatibility.
So, where did this accusation of being evil comes from?

Hopefully someone else will grab Marshall's attention and he will lose sexual interest in me. I'm trying to leave once and for all while not being pregnant.
You know, there is a simple solution to not being pregnant - natural, healthy and convenient. I'll tell it as subtly as I can:
1623096467303.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: B’Elanna
So long story short I don't have to worry about indentured servitude.
I'll accept this as your admission that you were wrong, since you're just a broken person that can't admit a single fault anyway. I'm glad we can now move on.
Most millionaires are not self-made, they inherited family farms and family businesses, going all the way back to money brought from Old Europe.
This is just wrong, completely wrong. Most family built and run dynasties only last 3 generations. There's the first one, who is the builder and the architect, the creator of the empire. Then the next generation are merely the stewards, the ones who keep things going but don't have the same brilliance and resilience as the first. Then comes the 3rd generation that are usually spoiled rotten, weak willed, incompetent. Generally, it all falls apart once the grandchildren are the ones running things.
There's nothing wrong with the concept of "the redistribution of wealth".
There's a shitload wrong with this concept, an absolute SHITLOAD.
How is it that so many people these days believe that capitalism is unfair or bad? How is it unfair? If you think it's unfair then this tells me you understand nothing. It's the best and most fair economic system ever. Look at yourself, trying to make more money with your book. That's the best thing about you, as far as I can tell.

People like to bitch and complain about how much money Jeff Bezos has, "waaah, wahhh, so unfair, every hour he's been alive from birth until now he's made like $300k per hour, how is that fair? boo hoo hoo, REDISTRIBUTE TEH WEALTH!"

Let me tell you how it's fair. You wanna know the secret of how Bezos got all of that money?

We all gave it to him. WE JUST FUCKING HANDED IT TO HIM! ALL OF US! Everyone who bought the stock, used AWS or shopped on Amazon, literally all of us. That's how capitalism fucking works. You can't get more fair than that. He didn't inherit Amazon, he built it.

There are plenty of other examples but this is getting pretty long already.

If you want to get rich you need to put yourself in a position where strangers fucking pay you. Little bit of money from everybody. Start a business, write a book, add value (rather than subtract it) to the economy.
 
I do know the cost of living in Kingsport Melinda and it's still pretty expensive. A four bedroom alone is going to take about 4/5ths of what you're making from the government. You're also not making anything else other than government handouts. You have no jobs and your book managed to sell one copy so it could be resold on Amazon. It never even left the warehouse. You really need to stop lying to people. It's not going to get you anywhere in life.

I'll accept this as your admission that you were wrong, since you're just a broken person that can't admit a single fault anyway. I'm glad we can now move on.

This is just wrong, completely wrong. Most family built and run dynasties only last 3 generations. There's the first one, who is the builder and the architect, the creator of the empire. Then the next generation are merely the stewards, the ones who keep things going but don't have the same brilliance and resilience as the first. Then comes the 3rd generation that are usually spoiled rotten, weak willed, incompetent. Generally, it all falls apart once the grandchildren are the ones running things.
88% of millionaires are self-made
 
  • Like
Reactions: Useful_Mistake
88% of millionaires are self-made
That's just a claim the article makes, but not a single actual study with facts is presented.

If you read the article closer, you'll see that they claim "investments" made them wealthy. That's not "self made". If your parents and grandparents give you $150,000, and you choose to invest it, that's not a "self made" millionaire. You've inherited money that made you wealthy.

This article you posted is misinformation, straight up.

Exposing the truth and reality is here:


"These high-rollers.... all inherited enough to “earn” their Forbes 400 status."

Like I said, they get the money from their parents to make investments that balloon up.

Try becoming a millionaire when your parents don't give you anything to begin with. It doesn't happen.

You wanna know the secret of how Bezos got all of that money?
"On July 6,1995, Bezos launched Amazon.com , named after the South American river, with financial [] support from family..."

Or in other words, his wealthy parents who sent him to Princeton helped pay for the website to launch and run.

Source: https://www.referenceforbusiness.com/businesses/A-F/Bezos-Jeff.html#ixzz6xALQW9Hz



"The American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) of 2021 expands the Child Tax Credit (CTC) for tax year 2021 only."
Guess I read wrong somewhere.

They might become permanent.

 
That's just a claim the article makes, but not a single actual study with facts is presented.

If you read the article closer, you'll see that they claim "investments" made them wealthy. That's not "self made". If your parents and grandparents give you $150,000, and you choose to invest it, that's not a "self made" millionaire. You've inherited money that made you wealthy.

This article you posted is misinformation, straight up.

Exposing the truth and reality is here:


"These high-rollers.... all inherited enough to “earn” their Forbes 400 status."

Like I said, they get the money from their parents to make investments that balloon up.

Try becoming a millionaire when your parents don't give you anything to begin with. It doesn't happen.


"On July 6,1995, Bezos launched Amazon.com , named after the South American river, with financial [] support from family..."

Or in other words, his wealthy parents who sent him to Princeton helped pay for the website to launch and run.

Source: https://www.referenceforbusiness.com/businesses/A-F/Bezos-Jeff.html#ixzz6xALQW9Hz




Guess I read wrong somewhere.

They might become permanent.

Just because you disagree with the facts doesn't make it wrong.
 
Just because you disagree with the facts doesn't make it wrong.
Here are the facts:

Most millionaires got start up money from their parents


There are only a handful of individuals that went from poor/middle class family backgrounds to riches, and those are in 3 sectors: technology, oil industry and television.

Otherwise, you don't get rich unless your parents give you money to begin with. Period.
 
There are only a handful of individuals that went from poor/middle class family backgrounds to riches, and those are in 3 sectors: technology, oil industry and television.








There are less than 50 people out of population of 385 million Americans who have come from "rags to riches". It goes to show that it's not a widespread opportunity

Only one of them is an author. Fiction author, that is.
 
You should read Zitelmann's The Wealth Elite. 66% factor in their talent as salespeople for helping them get rich. Doesn't matter what field it was in.

Hell the CEO for Netflix went around as a door to door vacuum salesman.

What's the number 2 job for CEO's on Linkedin before they became CEO's? Sales.

I get you wouldn't understand such things Melinda because you refuse to work and have never seen close to 50k a year let alone even six figures. You prefer to sit at home and sit on your ass all day while tax payers have to give you money.
 
There's two things I don't understand here.

  1. Mel claims to be a taxpayer, but pays no taxes. Or at least, has no income with which to pay taxes, thereby making tax contributions (if any) just a pass-through from a handout. That's someone or something else paying them. How is she a taxpayer?

  2. Mel believes she's owed her parents' Social Security funds, but the closest actual example of that I can find is under-18 children of the deceased getting some percentage of those funds upon their parent(s)'s death. It cuts off at 19. Pretty sure Mel is over 19, so where is this claim coming from?
 
just a claim the article makes, but not a single actual study with facts is presented
"A study by Fidelity Investments found that 88% of millionaires are self-made millionaires."
This study is also mentioned by other websites, and supported by Forbes own research. So far, there are two different sources to your none.
If you read the article closer, you'll see that they claim "investments" made them wealthy. That's not "self made".
It is. Investing your own money, and managing to profit from that, is the very definition of "self-made".
"These high-rollers.... all inherited enough to “earn” their Forbes 400 status."
Sounds bad. Wonder what parts she excluded with her "..."? Oh? Only the fact that disproves her narrative. Taking the article as truth, only 21% got there through inheritence, which still shows that most are self made.
Screenshot_20210608-124044_Brave.jpg
Try becoming a millionaire when your parents don't give you anything to begin with. It doesn't happen.
The article you linked literally says that happens in 78.75% of cases.
"On July 6,1995, Bezos launched Amazon.com , named after the South American river, with financial [] support from family..."

Or in other words, his wealthy parents who sent him to Princeton helped pay for the website to launch and run.

Source: https://www.referenceforbusiness.com/businesses/A-F/Bezos-Jeff.html#ixzz6xALQW9Hz
The article does not source anything. Now, even if it's true, he still made the company work on his own. No matter how much money your parents give you, you cannot keep a shitty company working. Hell, look at HuffPost.
They might become permanent.
Note the "might".
It seems they got it wrong. IRS would know better about a money plan that they are supposed to fufill.
Furthermore, the treasury department summary of Biden's plan confirms that after 2021, things go back to how they were pre-biden plan (doc attached)

I'm not going to bother to look at the link, because your understanding of basic things is horrid. Receiving startup money does not mean that you put it no work in making sure your company survives.
There are less than 50 people out of population of 385 million Americans who have come from "rags to riches". It goes to show that it's not a widespread opportunity
But one of the links you cited earlier says 79%, not 50 people.
so where is this claim coming from?
Her jewish heritage.
 

Attachments

"A study by Fidelity Investments found that 88% of millionaires are self-made millionaires."
This study is also mentioned by other websites, and supported by Forbes own research. So far, there are two different sources to your none.

It is. Investing your own money, and managing to profit from that, is the very definition of "self-made".

Sounds bad. Wonder what parts she excluded with her "..."? Oh? Only the fact that disproves her narrative. Taking the article as truth, only 21% got there through inheritence, which still shows that most are self made.
View attachment 2242498

The article you linked literally says that happens in 78.75% of cases.

The article does not source anything. Now, even if it's true, he still made the company work on his own. No matter how much money your parents give you, you cannot keep a shitty company working. Hell, look at HuffPost.

Note the "might".

It seems they got it wrong. IRS would know better about a money plan that they are supposed to fufill.
Furthermore, the treasury department summary of Biden's plan confirms that after 2021, things go back to how they were pre-biden plan (doc attached)


I'm not going to bother to look at the link, because your understanding of basic things is horrid. Receiving startup money does not mean that you put it no work in making sure your company survives.

But one of the links you cited earlier says 79%, not 50 people.

Her jewish heritage.
We all know Melinda is bad with math.
 
Back