Megathread Tranny Sideshows on Social Media - Any small-time spectacle on Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, Dating Sites, and other social media.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
That's because it's a pedophile fantasy of how a child behaves, not a credible description of a real child's behaviour. They want to believe children are fixated on their genitals, because they want to fabricate the child's consent to molestation.

Something that puzzled me the other day. Children can't consent. We all know it's important people learn about consent at some stage growing up.

I seem to constantly be seeing a real big focus on teaching kids about consent in recent years. Is some element of this not just teaching kids about consent but creeps wanting to teach kids to consent? Especially when it's in the context of teaching age-inappropriate sexual material to those kids.
 
That's because it's a pedophile fantasy of how a child behaves, not a credible description of a real child's behaviour. They want to believe children are fixated on their genitals, because they want to fabricate the child's consent to molestation.

"He moves on" makes no sense at all in relation to a kid in that situation.
God, I really hope it’s a fantasy. Because if there’s a real 4yo out there who points at his father’s exposed genital area & asks ‘why is it soft down there?’ is one that’s used to it being ‘hard down there’ & that isn’t a red flag, it’s a no-swerve big fat confession to the whole internets.

Probably proves it’s a fantasy, though: if a child is used to seeing ‘Mama’s penis’ all the time and then one day boom, no penis, wouldn’t they simply ask ‘where’s Mama’s penis?’ A child’s realisation of something missing when they expect it to be present would not be to describe the space where it should be as ‘soft’. Unless, as the other poster points out, they’re more familiar with that adult’s genitals in a tactile than a visual sense. Eurgh, though. Even typing all that makes me want to throw up & then go punch a troon in the ballsack. This one’s a pervert either way. Lock the cunt up now & do everyone a favour.
 
Screenshot_20210611_104436.jpg

Daily update from the online dating scene in the cesspit that is bologna.
I love that city but we need nerve gas to cleanse it.
 
If women were as vicious and destructive as you think they are, we wouldn't have an AGP problem at all. The average woman isn't Regina George, the average woman is either trying to be nice to the AGP because that is how she has been raised to act, is frightened of the AGP and is being nice because she is scared, or is treating the AGP with pity. Or a combination of the three.
Jesus we aren't that 1 dimension delicate, dainty princess scared of men all the time.

Yeah troons in bathrooms are scary, but jfc we are capable of talking back to men and sure as hell we are capable of snarky comments towards anyone, including troons. Especially if they aren't even getting it.
 
Lol, most Homosexual Transsexuals don't pass for shit.

This is true but I have considered adopting a position of pretending they do as a divide and conquer strategy. Because it strikes me that surely the HSTS who pass better and who have reason to believe themselves the superior sort of troon compared to the revolting AGPs of all varieties would actually be motivated to think of themselves differently. It’s kind of like how Cubans and Fancy Asians have always been lured in by the promise of honorary whiteness.

Other than the prostitutes, an HSTS actually is the most tolerable type of troon, and would probably love it if all the others went away, because it makes the non-prostitute HSTSs look bad, gets them clocked more easily, etc. They really ARE the ones who used our restrooms without us noticing, simply because without the predatory vibe of the AGP, women just don’t necessarily even really look at them to clock them.

All this attention is actually bad for them. If they want to settle down with an (informed, consenting) male of some sort, and try to pass, I don’t mind them doing that.

Anyway, there is no natural reason why an HSTS who “passes“ should consider themselves allied with It’s Ma’am and the AmHoles (not a bad band name as it goes) and they should be encouraged to consider themselves “normies.” The AGPs are the ones who have to be separated out and eradicated. You do that, and the underage victims recede, because it’s the degenerate appetites of the AGPs that are being accelerated and fed, here.
 
What the hell is that thing? Makeshift gloryhole?
Aye.
Unfortunately I have lost the screengrabs but there is an entire cult of trannies in latex masks running around here.
Straight up halloween stuff.

I would also like to point out that I posted the picture of the glorydoor before
It was cleaner, I leave the implications to you.
 
This person is posting a doll on trans (to advertise their onlyfans probably). Anyway here's the funny thing, none of the 22 comments on this post realize this is a doll

Eta: I dont actually know if this is a doll or he photoshops a doll's face on his face or what the fuck is actually going on anyway its not very human

doll.png
E3IZhqQXEAUzNLK.jpg
E3XyJJHWYAE5eNQ.jpg
E3UkkoNWQAEc2t6.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Don't know if this belongs here since it occurred irl, but I had an in-the-wild encounter last night when I was out for dinner.

Our actually-female server took our drinks and appetiser order and we got to chatting, until a 7ft behemoth arrived at the table with our stuff. If it wasn't immediately obvious what was going on, the voice sealed the deal as always; it sounded like he was holding his nose to talk and affecting what he thought was a female speech pattern.

The interesting part, and reason I felt this story was worth telling is that everyone else at the table was a good bit older than me and doesn't really know about the troon menace, but every single one of them immediately clocked that something was off the second he turned up.

Anyway, point is it was extremely awkward and I felt uncomfortable every time he came to the table, but it was pretty funny watching him mill around all the female waitresses who were literally half his size.
 
This person is posting a doll on trans (to advertise their onlyfans probably). Anyway here's the funny thing, none of the 22 comments on this post realize this is a doll

Eta: I dont actually know if this is a doll or he photoshops a doll's face on his face or what the fuck is actually going on anyway its not very human

View attachment 2252330
View attachment 2252332
View attachment 2252334
View attachment 2252336

Gotta remake Lars and the Real Girl, but replace the sex doll with a troon, but keep all the character reactions the same.

Or maybe someone with autism to spare could digitally replace the doll in the original movie. Maybe with Contrapoints, or somebody on this thread with a lot of videos.
 
Last edited:
that's how it usually is in my experience
starts right at home, usually it's the father who takes issue with his daughter dressing like a hooker to go out, not the mother. in some cases he puts his foot down and enforces a more modest dress code, in other cases the mother starts bitching at him about being controlling and policing womens choices and he cucks out. either way, the initial positions (dad is protective and wants daughter covered up, mom is supportive and encouraging of sluttiness) are somewhat common, while the opposite arrangement (father encouraging daughter to slut it up) is almost unheard of
I don’t know that this is common on an individual basis, like actual examples of this happening in families, but...I think it captures the *spirit* of the age, more than the specific reality. And it feels like a forced spirit. Not a natural cultural evolution.

Certainly the cultural zeitgeist became one that even when I was a kid in the late 80s, early 90s, it seemed like the very idea of a father feeling protective in a fatherly way, the way we expected fathers to feel for millennia, was demonized. Purity rings are creepy, ok. But a father eyeballing his daughter’s date and speaking firmly about the time he’s to have her home is wholesome, and I’m tired of pretending that it’s not (actually I got tired of it long ago lol).

That's because it's a pedophile fantasy of how a child behaves, not a credible description of a real child's behaviour. They want to believe children are fixated on their genitals, because they want to fabricate the child's consent to molestation.

"He moves on" makes no sense at all in relation to a kid in that situation.

In their fantasies, an innocent child is the one making all the moves, expressing curiosity, asking to “touch it,” giggling innocently over “making it hard,” etc. They’re just the passive object of the child’s interest, you see. And if the kid makes it clear s/he wants to touch it, why, who is the pedo to object? You wouldn’t want to make a kid feel bad about their innocent curiosity, would you?

Death to troons.
 
I agree with lbinetti (the shitlord replying to him). If I overheard that sort of shit I would probably call the police. A child of six years old should not really know the word penis and shouldn't be referring to it as 'soft'. Definitely implies that the kid has seen it 'hard' which is a terrifying prospect. Poor fucking kid. That or it didn't happen and this tranny is a mentally ill peado larper.
Yo, I totally agree with the mindset, but small point of fact: if you have kids, teach them the proper names for their body parts early. A groomer can’t make it sound silly like a game or mislead them about what’s happening, and if something should ever happen accident-wise, they need to be able to articulate.
Basically, no dude is gonna be able to tell them it’s a lolly if your kid is like “no that’s a penis and is private,” and if your kid is hurting from getting socked in the nads you don’t want the teacher trying to sus out whether it’s his “tallywhacker” or “marbles” that got hurt.
 
This person is posting a doll on trans (to advertise their onlyfans probably). Anyway here's the funny thing, none of the 22 comments on this post realize this is a doll

Eta: I dont actually know if this is a doll or he photoshops a doll's face on his face or what the fuck is actually going on anyway its not very human

View attachment 2252330
View attachment 2252332
View attachment 2252334
View attachment 2252336
I have a question regarding this.
Is this a doll? A dude photoshopped to hell and back? A AI generated image? Because there is a fuckton of korean profiles who look just like this and its creeping me out.
Like there is a weird tranny cult into this stuff (would not surprise me if there was honestly.)
 
So, the other day I was listening to a NYT podcast that had an episode on racial impostors (The Native Scholar Who Wasn't, it's also available as a print article if that's more your speed). As you might expect they didn't bring up the obvious comparisons between these racial impostors and trannies, but it really was the sort of thing that should make you thunk if you haven't closed your mind to any questioning of the TRANSWO-MEN ARE WOMEN! mantra.
When Richard Dawkins recently caught his pants on fire for comparing trannies with Rachel Dolezel, a CRT nutter claims on the pages of the Boston Review that the two cases are not comparable, because we need racial markers to track intergenerational, white-induced inequality and for the eligibility for reparations.

Which diploma mill did Ollie Thorn got his degree from? Because there is not one shred of logic in what he wrote.
 
Back