The Abortion Debate Containment Thread - Put abortion sperging here.

I really don't know what having sex has to do with anything here apart from being what causes pregnancy, but nobody has to deal with you oozing your frustrations about nobody wanting to have sex with you.
The line of thought is that if you don't engage in random sex, then you don't know how hard it is to keep away from it, Basically, it's someone who can't stop taking drugs chastising you that you don't know the plight of an addicted person.
 
The line of thought is that if you don't engage in random sex, then you don't know how hard it is to keep away from it, Basically, it's someone who can't stop taking drugs chastising you that you don't know the plight of an addicted person.
Yeah, that's one way that goes... but he clearly isn't getting any and is irrationally angry about it.
 
Nothing wrong with abortions, in fact we should be encouraging them for low-IQ individuals. Maybe give them a Playstation or a couple of Funko Pops or something if their IQ is below 100 and they agree to get sterilized.

Then the money that is saved from not having a bunch of low-IQ kids running around destroying everything can be put towards creating good conditions for high-IQ individuals to reproduce. You know, offer free daycare, education, various other benefits, etc.

Of course most governments nowadays choose to do the exact opposite, but that's another discussion.
 
"Your bone structure is a dead giveaway."

More seriously, only a man would talk about their access to sex like that. Please stop bullshitting everyone, do everyone a favor, and just change your name to "Muh Dik" at this point.
...You do know women can like sex don't you?

The line of thought is that if you don't engage in random sex, then you don't know how hard it is to keep away from it, Basically, it's someone who can't stop taking drugs chastising you that you don't know the plight of an addicted person.
Lol not everyone's an incel dude.

Plus historically it's men's fault * due to fucking anything with a pulse * that there were a surplus of bastard children in the world anyway. So I don't know why you're so obsessed with women having sex if this is really about saving "muh babies".
 
...You do know women can like sex don't you?
What a profoundly banal rhetorical.

The struggle of the woman is with selecting a mate. The struggle of the man is with finding a mate in the first place, then verifying their suitability. Only a man (or a very ugly woman who can only gain validation through her exploits as a sentient sex doll) would insist that there's no issues with their access to sex.

It's a boast that only has value in men's circles, and even there it's only tolerated-- at some point, you're a "man-whore".

This has nothing to do with "liking sex".

Plus historically it's men's fault * due to fucking anything with a pulse * that there were a surplus of bastard children in the world anyway.
They wouldn't be able to reproduce if the women with whom they were reproducing said "no" instead. But, I suppose you mean to argue that women aren't autonomous agents capable of accountability like men are.
 
Last edited:
No one has a problem with killing babies once they're out of the womb.
In what hellscape is infanticide not prosecuted?

Eugenics implies selection.
And the birth control movement in America "selected" black communities more often to set up clinics where they could get birth control and abortions.
 
And the birth control movement in America "selected" black communities more often to set up clinics where they could get birth control and abortions.
Hang on. Are we strictly talking about the pro-choice movement in America, or globally?

It also begs the question of why liberals want to abort black babies if their base is predominately non-white.
 
Hang on. Are we strictly talking about the pro-choice movement in America, or globally?
Whatever parts of the pro-choice movement that were influenced significantly by Sanger are almost certainly eugenic in nature. That said, I'm describing a course of action that I only certainly know occurred in the States.

It also begs the question of why liberals want to abort black babies if their base is predominately non-white.
Most liberals, I reckon, don't fully recognize this targeting of the black community. They're pro-choice because whether they regard the gestating life as a human being worthy of dignity or not, they consider its life less important than the concept of "bodily autonomy". They don't explicitly want dead black babies, but they aren't paying attention to the history of Planned Parenthood (which either does still want dead black babies/black population control or is just stuck in that pattern that leads them to establish themselves more in urban areas) and the disproportionate number of abortions among blacks wouldn't matter to them anyways because fetuses aren't human beings to them to begin with.

From a general political angle, the relevant part (and I can't say that they're intentionally working to screw over black people on this front) isn't "killing black babies" as much as it is "controlling the black population", which works in tandem with other societal forces (such as the destruction of their family structure) to destabilize and ultimately stagnate the black community.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Admiral Mantoid
Whatever parts of the pro-choice movement that were influenced significantly by Sanger are almost certainly eugenic in nature. That said, I'm describing a course of action that I only certainly know occurred in the States.


Most liberals, I reckon, don't fully recognize this targeting of the black community. They're pro-choice because whether they regard the gestating life as a human being worthy of dignity or not, they consider its life less important than the concept of "bodily autonomy". They don't explicitly want dead black babies, but they aren't paying attention to the history of Planned Parenthood (which either does still want dead black babies/black population control or is just stuck in that pattern that leads them to establish themselves more in urban areas) and the disproportionate number of abortions among blacks wouldn't matter to them anyways because fetuses aren't human beings to them to begin with.

From a general political angle, the relevant part (and I can't say that they're intentionally working to screw over black people on this front) isn't "killing black babies" as much as it is "controlling the black population", which works in tandem with other societal forces (such as the destruction of their family structure) to destabilize and ultimately stagnate the black community.
if I help you get laid via Tinder would you stop posting like a bitter incel?
 
Back