Manosphere hood MONEY - Sluthate shitposter

[Emiya Kiwitsugu]

@autisticdragonkin We're just honest about how women view men. Here is segment of data analysis done by a creator of OK Cupid who graduated from Harvard with a degree in mathematics.

Can you just imagine how this guy would be rated:

If you, shidoshi, duke nukem, and flossman want to keep shit posting on kiwifarms pretending you're some big tough guy by bullying mentally ill people and banning everyone else, trying to cope with your autistic, virgin, basement dwelling existence, then be my guest. I'm almost certain you already read lookism on a daily basis though.

You know what I found really funny about this post? The fact that @hood CASH clearly didn't read it all that much. Out of curiosity, I decided to look it up. While Hoodles focuses in on that section, he ignores sections such as the following.

When it comes down to actually choosing targets, men choose the modelesque. Someone like roomtodance
2/3 of male messages go to the top 1/3 of women.above gets nearly 5 times as many messages as a typical woman and 28 times as many messages as a woman at the low end of our curve. Site-wide, two-thirds of male messages go to the best-looking third of women. So basically, guys are fighting each other 2-for-1 for the absolute best-rated females, while plenty of potentially charming, even cute, girls go unwritten.

The medical term for this is male pattern madness.

As you can see from the gray line, women rate an incredible 80% of guys as worse-looking than medium. Very harsh. On the other hand, when it comes to actual messaging, women shift their expectations only just slightly ahead of the curve, which is a healthier pattern than guys’ pursuing the all-but-unattainable. But with the basic ratings so out-of-whack, the two curves together suggest some strange possibilities for the female thought process, the most salient of which is that the average-looking woman has convinced herself that the vast majority of males aren’t good enough for her, but she then goes right out and messages them anyway.

(Source if anyone cares)

So, if this is to be believed, women on average come off as being harsher in their critic of male appearance...But will message and pursue less attractive men nonetheless, while on average more men will only message and pursue the upper percentile of women.

But those fucking sluts and their ridiculous standards, right?

Edit:

@Rin Way to prove the entire point. The funny thing is we both know you're a fat seacow anyways, not like your ratings even matter.

You seemed to have cared about her and her opinion enough to send her a picture of your genitals, despite her being a "fat seacow."

 

[Sanae Kochiya]

@Sanae Kochiya You're so quick to google other things I send you, I figured you'd hop right on it this time as well.

Btw, now you have me. I can't tell if you're just trolling about being so fucking dumb you actually think the trust fund is real. Or you actually just think it still might be?

@Rin Way to prove the entire point. The funny thing is we both know you're a fat seacow anyways, not like your ratings even matter.

Yeah, forgive me if I'm not gonna take out parts of that picture, throw them into a Google search engine, and do your research for you, but I have better things to do with my time. Like laugh at you.

And I've already told you my head canon. Unless you prove it otherwise, you're a pathetic worthless fuck mooching off of the parents too polite to finally disown you and kick you out of the house. The only pussy you've ever seen outside of porn is your mum's, you've likely never graduated college or even attended it (and at this point I'm wondering if you even got your high school degree), and you're a measly little twat who's trying to boost his ego by bashing on a bunch of Internet nobodies here with a web of lies because he's too dumb to get a degree, too inept to hold a career, too asinine to ever get laid, and is living on borrowed time until your parents finally give up and disown your little Incel ass.

Quite frankly, I could give less of a shit what you think or say about me, because at the end of the day, everything you type is incoherent autism. I'm not trying to prove a point to you, so lemme spell it out to you because I feel like a kindergarten teacher sometimes. You are a fucking idiot, and I entertain your ramblings because you are funny in your autism, and the minute you get boring I will quietly block you and go back to Striker Wolf or Sophie or Dobson or something. I already did it to mrz.

And it's funny that you take a jab at the ratings system, given how you hunted down half my posts across the board and rated them autistic. For someone who likes to call others salty, you sure get butthurt.

tl;dr You're a faggot and I reply to you because you're hilariously stupid, and I would not have sex with you even if your Loveshy shitters tied me down to a bed and threatened to shoot me otherwise.

 

[autisticdragonkin]

@Rin Way to prove the entire point. The funny thing is we both know you're a fat seacow anyways, not like your ratings even matter.

You seemed to have cared about her and her opinion enough to send her a picture of your genitals, despite her being a "fat seacow."

@hood CASH either was told by shaner that @Rin was Sarah H or just made it up in order to copecel with the fact that he was rejected
either way @hood CASH is an idiotcel

 

[Ti-99/4A]

Oh god I regret rushing out my previous post because I just realized the motherfucking gold in this post.

Alright, @hood CASH. So, let's assume that, yes, you're right. We're horrible people and we throttle those who are mentally capable enough to clash wits with us and intimidate us into silence. So far, the Farms have publicly announced that they have throttled two people. You are the second person.

I am glad to know that you are in great solidarity with and are claiming to be as intelligent as this motherfucker:

Shaner is the poster he has the most in common with. They're both virgins, they both lie constantly and can't keep their stories straight. They're also both throttled and have two accounts on the most negative ratings list. Shaner used to have 3.

 

[hood CASH]

@Rin Oh yeah, you can definitely be entirely certain about someones personality based on what they look like. Lmao at even speaking with people like yourself who are nearly incapable of critical thought.

Btw I know you're a fat cow because I saw like 100 kiwis pictures in the sluthate thread and 90% of them were overweight.

@Emiya Kiwitsugu I'm not some woman hater, so there's really no point in trying to claim that I am. I'm talking about a woman's raw analysis of your looks. Where women think 80% of men are below average in looks.

@Sanae Kochiya Fucking lolcow. It's too bad you idiots don't have sigs here turned on. This would be the most sig worthy quote I've seen yet:

"you're a measly little twat who's trying to boost his ego by bashing on a bunch of Internet nobodies here"

That should be the banner for kiwifarms. I also like how you admit you'll block me once I start aggravating you too much because you need to go back to an easier target that doesn't speak up so much. It's not like I was JUST saying that or anything.

 

[Rin]

@Rin Oh yeah, you can definitely be entirely certain about someones personality based on what they look like. Lmao at even speaking with people like yourself who are nearly incapable of critical thought.

Btw I know you're a fat cow because I saw like 100 kiwis pictures in the sluthate thread and 90% of them were overweight.

I understand that your autism makes it hard for you to read faces and understand body language, but I promise you they actually do exist.

And if all us kiwis are so fat, why are you asking us for nudes? Do you have a fat fetish? Are you one of those creepy feeders who want to get a woman so fat she can't even walk anymore and is basically trapped in the basement forever, just like you are?

 

[Sanae Kochiya]

I also like how you admit you'll block me once I start aggravating you too much because you need to go back to an easier target that doesn't speak up so much. It's not like I was JUST saying that or anything.

To paraphrase our loyal French patriot Vivian Gee, trying to get something through your autistic brain is like arguing with a wall.

Given how you ignored half of that post and misinterpreted the rest, I'm going to assume you dropped out of your Sophomore year of high school because you couldn't handle Algebra and you couldn't keep stalling that shit.

Anywau, referring back to my Compendium of Autism, have you ever shit yourself to get out of work? Please know that a lack of a response is an automatic "Yes."

 

[Emiya Kiwitsugu]

@Emiya Kiwitsugu I'm not some woman hater, so there's really no point in trying to claim that I am.

I'm talking about a woman's raw analysis of your looks. Where women think 80% of men are below average in looks..

First, assuming that this article is correct (It's not a scientific journal), the most you can say is they simply perceive men as looking below average, but evidently do not judge them as so when it comes to actual interactions with them, and instead are interested in them nonetheless as evidenced by the article that you yourself posted. Mean while, while most men according to it are more generous with their perception of your average women's appearance, they judge them harshly in terms of their interactions, or lack thereof, as the article states that the vast majority of male users disregard average women and below and only message the ones ranking highest in appearance.

The only thing your article seems to imply is that men have much higher standards in what they'll actually pursue, and that women are more open to giving men they'd rate lower on physical appearance a chance. And yet you're still here whining about sluts.

 

[hood CASH]

@Rin It's good that people like yourself who are incapable of understanding your own mental biases are confined to shit posting in your basement and not holding any real position of importance in society.

@Sanae Kochiya You keep asking me that like I haven't already proved I'm much more academically successful than yourself, to an extent that it's almost crazy. I'm guessing your fellow kiwis are only barely hiding back the shame they feel for your level of retardation.

Anyways I really have some things I have to get done. I'll talk to you b o y o s later.

 

[Emiya Kiwitsugu]

@Sanae Kochiya You keep asking me that like I haven't already proved I'm much more academically successful than yourself, to an extent that it's almost crazy. I'm guessing your fellow kiwis are only barely hiding back the shame they feel for your level of retardation.

At least @Connor Bible has some terrible drafts of even worse novels to prove that he's successful and accomplished.

You have literally nothing to show.

 

[autisticdragonkin]

Does he realize that if that is the case then it can very well mean that personality is seen as physical attractiveness
That would make @hood CASH very ugly

 

[Sanae Kochiya]

@Sanae Kochiya You keep asking me that like I haven't already proved I'm much more academically successful than yourself, to an extent that it's almost crazy. I'm guessing your fellow kiwis are only barely hiding back the shame they feel for your level of retardation.

Dude, please give me whatever fucking drugs you are on.

 

[Rin]

@Rin It's good that people like yourself who are incapable of understanding your own mental biases are confined to shit posting in your basement and not holding any real position of importance in society.

No, actually I'm a researcher for an extremely classified government laboratory. I'd give you more details, but [DATA EXPUNGED].

 

[hood CASH]

@Emiya Kiwitsugu I'm more inclined to believe the Harvard educated mathematicians understanding of the data than your own

But with the basic ratings so out-of-whack, the two curves together suggest some strange possibilities for the female thought process, the most salient of which is that the average-looking woman has convinced herself that the vast majority of males aren’t good enough for her, but she then goes right out and messages them anyway.

This is also my observation after 5 years of college.

Okay I really do have to go. Catch you all later.

 

[Emiya Kiwitsugu]

@Emiya Kiwitsugu I'm more inclined to believe the Harvard educated mathematicians understanding of the data than your own



This is also my observation after 5 years of college.

Okay I really do have to go. Catch you all later.

You see the quote you referenced here? Look at the part exactly after the part you bolded.

But with the basic ratings so out-of-whack, the two curves together suggest some strange possibilities for the female thought process, the most salient of which is that the average-looking woman has convinced herself that the vast majority of males aren’t good enough for her, but she then goes right out and messages them anyway.

I'm literally not even arguing that this guy is wrong for purposes of this argument, but pointing out that the article actually states that men are much more choosy in online dating than women, which you despite your 'ivy league' education somehow manage to miss.

ESL students have better reading comprehension than you.

 

[Sanae Kochiya]

This is also my observation after 5 years of college.

5 years, hm? What, got held back while getting that Bachelor's?

(Of course that's me being optimistic and insinuating that you even got past high school, which I still doubt.)

 

[autisticdragonkin]

5 years, hm? What, got held back while getting that Bachelor's?

(Of course that's me being optimistic and insinuating that you even got past high school, which I still doubt.)

He already said that it included his masters degree in autism

Looking at all four of those guys they all look below average to me with the guy on the center left looking like a douchey tryhard and the guy on the far right looking like he could be attractive if he didn't look so clean cut

 

[ON 190]

He's posted my picture an average of once per day for the past week or so. Seriously, if that doesn't scream "creepy crush," I don't know what does.

And who has "shit to do" at 1:30 AM that lets him conveniently pretend he has a life and doesn't have to chimp out anymore?

Edit: You ever notice how he uses a picture that wasn't head-on and where I was mid-facial expression to mock? Sorry that I don't post headshots everywhere.

 

[hood CASH]

@Emiya Kiwitsugu Lol at you insulting my reading comprehension when you think I said I was the one who had an ivy league education. Anyways, I don't particularly care how men message women. What I care about is how women rate a man's physical attractiveness and who they choose to bang. What I think is interesting about the OKCupid studies, is that if you consider yourself a 5/10 man, most women consider you more like a 2.5/10 and your league of women is actually going to be 2.5/10 women. So because men want to bang hotties, they need to looksmax their asses off to not be confined to kiwi-tier women.

@flossman I have a lot of tax problems I'm trying to get through right now. Fuckin lolcow at you still coping hard about that picture though.

@autisticdragonkin Good on you to help your buddy out after I already got you with that little trick about 100 pages back.

 

[Shidoshi]

@autisticdragonkin We're just honest about how women view men. Here is segment of data analysis done by a creator of OK Cupid who graduated from Harvard with a degree in mathematics.

Can you just imagine how this guy would be rated:

If you, shidoshi, duke nukem, and flossman want to keep shit posting on kiwifarms pretending you're some big tough guy by bullying mentally ill people and banning everyone else, trying to cope with your autistic, virgin, basement dwelling existence, then be my guest. I'm almost certain you already read lookism on a daily basis though.

So you are mentally ill, at least we got that out of the way.