Cultcow Russell Greer / Mr. Green / @ just_some_dude_named_russell29 / A Safer Nevada PAC - Swift-Obsessed Sex Pest, Convicted of E-Stalking, "Eggshell Skull Plaintiff" Pro Se Litigant, Homeless, aspiring brothel owner

[WhaleOilBeefHooked]

Let’s say a mystery benefactor makes a $10,000 donation. What are the odds Russell uses any of that to (a) set aside $ for taxes (b) gears up some xeroxing for petitions (c) pays for a week or so for people to collect signatures a la future worker? Or are we all expecting (d) a big assed trip to Hos-R-Us

Also, what if a young eager pretty college student contacts him willing to do some volunteer work to help him out. How many years would it take her to ditch him while he insists she is now contracted to volunteer him some pussy?

As for a potential intern, it will 100% go like the Erica saga. No chance he hires anyone except a woman he finds attractive, and of course he'll expect her to go out with him, especially if he's paying her. She'll get involved because, like Erica, she'll see this pathetic, lonely, deformed loser and take pity on him. Russell will instantly mistake her pity as attraction and, because he's convinced that he's an attractive man, will hit on her and harass her no matter how many times she tells him to leave her alone, insisting that he's a great guy and so nice if he can just be allowed to explain. She'll realize quickly that this poor disabled thing she treated like a puppy that's just been ran over by a car is in fact an emotionally toxic and manipulative sex pest and will run for the hills.

When Russell inevitably cans this endeavor like he does with everything else, it's going to be like what he said he would do with his winnings from the Ariana trial. He said he would donate it to St. Jude's, I believe, then it was donate half and go to a brothel with the rest, then donate a quarter of it, then he stopped talking about donating it altogether. He's going to promise refunds at first, then he'll say he's only giving some of it back, then he'll just take it for himself for a brothel trip and say "this is why we need my PAC, it's too expensive to get laid but I need my hookers. Maybe if you donated more this PAC would have succeeded, so it's really your fault."

 

[nemesisAF]

She would ditch him no less than a minute after he made it clear that his insistance was not a joke.

Oh, she will try to ditch him right away. But Russell the sex pest will hunt her to the ends of the earth if need be to try to enforce his ”contract”.

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

She would ditch him no less than a minute after he made it clear that his insistance was not a joke.

Really don't need to do that when someone can be paid to bury him in the desert somewhere. Nevada is a terrible place for something like him to live with how much he gets on peoples nerves.

 

[Empyrea]

'A Safer Nevada' is such a dumb name for his PAC. We all knew what it was going to be for, but if any normie encounters the name, they're never going to think it's about decriminalizing sex work.

Maybe I'm giving Russel too much credit, but I think this is by design.

He's going to have to shuffle around asking for signatures, slurping at people to get them to sign. He knows this, even if he only envisions it as temporary before "others" flock to his cause.

Imagine this: You're a random on the Strip. A rambling, greasy sped accosts you while you're trying to look for shade, babbling and slurring. You can't understand a damn word he says, but the big bold letters on top of the petition say "A Safer Nevada".

You want this retarded manlet to leave you alone, but you're at least nominally polite. Safety, right? Fine, here, I'll sign it, it will let me leave this mentally challenged sped's company as quick as possible.

It's innocuous enough to pass, and I think he's done it on purpose.

 

[Constellationzero]

Oh it would take some time before Pipsqueak understood that she didn't owe him anything. And that's after he stalked her for a while and she took him to court for being a creep.

He doesn't learn from his mistakes. As far as he's concerned the law is like a spell in Harry Potter. All you have to do is use the right combination of words and you automatically win.

There's a difference here: Butternut does not make mistakes. A mistake is forgetting a crucial step in writing case notes in CERNER, or forgetting to initial a line. The greasy gourd is deliberate in everything he does without either thought or empathy for others. I'm sure the Greers have stuck a boot up his malformed asscrack countless times about his behavior and habits. God knows based Skordas has been the one lately to take up that thankless task.

 

[Hollywood Hitler]

And instead of posting a fake apology or denying everything, he'd post a long convoluted screed about how what he did doesn't constitute harassment because he said it doesn't.

Ah, the Coumo approach. A classic.

 

[Apteryx Owenii]

What's happening with Null lawsuit? Can't even remember what/when was the last update.

It's been over a month since he did anything with it. Someone speculated that since Skordas attached his court records from his harassment case as proof he does in fact have at least one victim, he's hoping it will just go away.

We're waiting for the court to actually start handing down decisions on things like the injunction or motion to dismiss. Thus far the only ones have been procedural ("yes" to Russ being a poor goblin that gets to waive court fees, "no" to in-person arguments, etc).

 

[Useful_Mistake]

What's happening with Null lawsuit? Can't even remember what/when was the last update.

Nothing has changed since May 19th.

 

[Phil Ken Sebben]

Maybe I'm giving Russel too much credit, but I think this is by design.

He's going to have to shuffle around asking for signatures, slurping at people to get them to sign. He knows this, even if he only envisions it as temporary before "others" flock to his cause.

Imagine this: You're a random on the Strip. A rambling, greasy sped accosts you while you're trying to look for shade, babbling and slurring. You can't understand a damn word he says, but the big bold letters on top of the petition say "A Safer Nevada".

You want this retarded manlet to leave you alone, but you're at least nominally polite. Safety, right? Fine, here, I'll sign it, it will let me leave this mentally challenged sped's company as quick as possible.

It's innocuous enough to pass, and I think he's done it on purpose.

Nah, he's not that clever nor is he willing to interact with people due to his inability to speak properly.

If he had to gather signatures then I'd see it more along the line of him having a large attraction sign, "A Safer Nevada" on it, some blurb about helping those in need but not actually saying it's for legalizing hookers. If somebody asks he's non-committal about it and since they can't understand a word he's saying they either sign it to get rid of the retard or they walk away saying they'll think about it.

 

[Bridgeburner]

I think his plan is to wait for donation money to start rolling in and then hire people to do pretty much everything from all that dough.

 

[DrJonesHat]

I think his plan is to wait for donation money to start rolling in and then hire people to do pretty much everything from all that dough.

That sounds like his MO. Then of course he takes credit for everything. That's also part of his MO.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

I think his plan is to wait for donation money to start rolling in and then hire people to do pretty much everything from all that dough.

Bad plan considering he still can't fix his paypal link

 

[DrJonesHat]

Bad plan considering he still can't fix his paypal link

You expect him to fix it HIMSELF?! He has to wait until he gets paid again so he can hire someone to do it for him.

 

[nemesisAF]

I think his plan is to wait for donation money to start rolling in and then hire people to do pretty much everything from all that dough.

I don’t expect anyone who is not a prostitute to see a PENNY of that money

 

[DrJonesHat]

I don’t expect anyone who is not a prostitute to see a PENNY of that money

I agree wholeheartedly. And of course he'll run in circles to justify how using money donated for a political cause for personal use isn't embezzlement.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

I agree wholeheartedly. And of course he'll run in circles to justify how using money donated for a political cause for personal use isn't embezzlement.

Suprisingly it's more or less legal. The so called "Scam PAC" 's tend to get donations, and spend it all on their own salaries. FEC tried to go to war and stop all the scams, but the courts stopped FEC

 

[Constellationzero]

Really don't need to do that when someone can be paid to bury him in the desert somewhere. Nevada is a terrible place for something like him to live with how much he gets on peoples nerves.

Dolan's Cadillac arc when?

 

[Phil Ken Sebben]

Suprisingly it's more or less legal. The so called "Scam PAC" 's tend to get donations, and spend it all on their own salaries. FEC tried to go to war and stop all the scams, but the courts stopped FEC

I thought that was the difference between a PAC and Super PAC. A PAC had to disclose how much money they took in and how it was being spent but a Super PAC only had to do that when they paid taxes, if any.

That's one of the reasons why Stephen Colbert started one to show people how easy it was and he made over $1 million doing so from donations. Some of it was used to make campaign ads and the rest went to some charity.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

I thought that was the difference between a PAC and Super PAC.

The difference is how much they can accept and spend, and for what cause. Super Pacs are exclusively for "advocat[ing] the election or defeat of a clearly identified candidate". Super Pacs also only promote the candidate, while regular pacs can actually fund them. That's my understanding on it, anyway. I'm not that big on Pac knowledge.

A PAC had to disclose how much money they took in and how it was being spent but a Super PAC only had to do that when they paid taxes, if any.

It is my understanding that they both do. I might be wrong on that, though.

 

[Stinkyboy]

He's probably blacklisted from some brothels too. He has a history of harassing and suing sex workers so a lot of places would just avoid trouble and preemptively ban him. Despite what he thinks, that's not discrimination. Businesses can protect themselves from people who would cost them money needlessly. And giving his spamming of local stations to cover his "story" they probably talk to each other and his emails go straight to the spam folder.

All they have to do is charge $$$$ instead of $$$
He can’t afford it