Megathread Tranny Sideshows on Social Media - Any small-time spectacle on Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, Dating Sites, and other social media.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Her nervous laughter when they confront her with the contradictions of self-ID. I wouldn't want to be in her position, and it is uncomfortable to watch her try to keep the peace.

They make an excellent point that the spa's policy is that men in the women's area do get prosecuted and removed. It's not even like they are being exceptionally lax with their bathroom standards; it is just false advertising and trying to have it both ways.

The kids were 9 and 14. Jesus.
1625038443110.png

"Indecent exposure" immediately springs to my mind...this is not an accidental showing of genitalia but a deliberate act.

Not sure what the law is in LA when it comes to sexual offences but in the UK..
1625038630208.png

particularly when young kids are involved...
1625038771372.png
Boycott the place. If the spa wants to welcome these nonces then let the tranny and pervs' patronage support/finance the business rent and staff wages, see how long the business stays viable. I doubt these nonces would carry on going there if they have no prey.

eta: reading further into that article...
1625039885506.png

The fact that these blokes are being referred to as "she" is fecking insulting enough then there's this "...the spa should attempt to normalize young girls and women viewing male genitalia".
 
Last edited:
A rep for Century Day and Night Spa on Olympic Boulevard recalls a similar situation just before the pandemic shut them down in spring 2020 in which a trans woman (“with everything reflected female on her driver’s license”) caused an uproar among cis gender female clients by exposing male genitals in the female pools and lockers. “[She] wouldn’t really use the spas, [she] just sat at the corner of the pool with [her] feet in the water and [her] legs spread or took front-facing showers,” the rep recalls. “People began to feel uncomfortable. It became very disruptive.” When the spa finally confronted her, she was adamant that the spa should attempt to normalize young girls and women viewing male genitalia.
Just stare at the girl penis bigot.
 
My threshold for mati has been significantly raised in the years since I been reading here, geuss the whole spa thing so up close and in real time left me a little tender, couse i swore at loud reading this. Apearantly it can get worse than surprise dick in the locker rooms.
Found on reddit (offcourse).

View attachment 2305636

View attachment 2305640

Uploaded by the actual shitbag degenerate "masseuse". These people have litterally no shame. Hopefully it's just a twinkie twink, let's find out!

View attachment 2305647

Off-fucking-course not...

View attachment 2305653

You can tell hes a transbian becouse he makes your eyes vomit and die.
Bonus:


(Was supposed to be the balding laydee in a bikini, but for some reason it's the only one that doest want to upload. My apologies.)



And omg the hate you guysss, finally found his dream job but those transphobes just dont let him live ya know
View attachment 2305660
This really pisses me off. Troons have a big long list of things you mustn't say, mustn’t do, they are insistant that everybody respects their rules and boundaries so they don’t get upset, yet they have the sum total of fuck all respect for anyone else’s to the point of accusing those who do of being hateful bigots. They have a total lack of empathy or self awareness that makes me think an awful lot of them actually have some sort of borderline personality disorder. This is one of the main reasons why I’ll never be convinced that TWAW and are instead a mostly artificial identity movement that has no basis in reality and is mainly populated by sad and/or unpleasant, mentally ill needy men.
 
Abigail Thorne (Philosophy Tube) did a similar TRANS POWER speech at pride yesterday:
View attachment 2303381

View attachment 2303380

In other news, yet another tranny made a cope thread about muh reproductive rights (dr mental illness)
View attachment 2303325
>got an SRS
>parents urged him to save sperm and they paid for the sperm storage
>clinic threw it out becasue he couldn't pay to keep them stored anymore

post-castration cope:
View attachment 2303332
View attachment 2303335
"fertility issues" (larilille) (@bbcuhrin thread, same schizo cope shit, too long to screenshot )
View attachment 2303327
View attachment 2303340
View attachment 2303343
View attachment 2303346
"I willingly castrated myself; why does nobody respect my reproduction rights?"

Physician, heal thyself.
How do you guys respond to the argument that trans women should be allowed to compete against biological females because "all sports are about genetic advantages, basketball players are taller, baseball players have better reaction times, etc." It all seems very self-evident to me that the suite of differences between biological males and females are much more significant and numerous than something like NBA players being taller on average, but I admit that it's somewhat hard to articulate.
My response is usually why do you think we have weight classes in boxing/MMA? To bodyshame the heavyweights for being fat? Or because we recognise that letting a guy with an extra 50+ kilos of pure muscle fight a dude half his weight is basically assisted suicide.

Let's put Brock Lesnar in the octagon with Ronda Rousey and see how fast those 'no discernable difference' theories evaporate.
 
Let's put Brock Lesnar in the octagon with Ronda Rousey and see how fast those 'no discernable difference' theories evaporate.
You fucking transphobe. Stop hating pure and kind true-women.

 
Since uterus transplants are likely impossible, do you think it is more likely we will see babies being taken away from 'unworthy' women to be given to transwomen who want their own children (since the desires of powerful men are always what counts)? Or is the pregnancy fetishism aspect too big of a deal for this to satisfy them?
 
Since uterus transplants are likely impossible, do you think it is more likely we will see babies being taken away from 'unworthy' women to be given to transwomen who want their own children (since the desires of powerful men are always what counts)? Or is the pregnancy fetishism aspect too big of a deal for this to satisfy them?
As Clown World's ride is going full steam I can see perfectly that to happen. Those mothers will be Terven who dared to call a troon a man on Twitter years before they had their babies, so they have to be taken away from these transphobes and be given to supportive families consisting of transbian polycules. Then they will be taught about all things trans and to dilate their mommies rotten holes. What a wholesome family, are they?
Or they will say that they must be friends with little girls because they didn't have a female childhood full of sleepovers because is not pedo if the troon identifies as a lil girl, you bigot.
 
Someone said a few pages back the they felt bad for Kristin Chirico (the fat Buzzfeed lady) and I really don't in her case becasue she loves the attention she is getting from her husband trans status. When the attention dies down, her AGP husband will find other deviant ways to validate his fetish: going poly, doing sex work/ OF, fucking a man, develop other paraphilias, join a troon cult.

They're at the "honey, let's wear matching lipstick hihi" honeymoon phase of AGP.
Oh, I know that. But that's also why I feel bad for her.

I get her situation is a bit different to a mother of three whose husband has suddenly "found himself" and decided that it's transphobic if he can't pick his kids up from school dressed as a stripper, who then ditches the kids and runs off to a queer trans enby commune where he grifts on Patreon so he doesn't have to pay child support. Or a mother of three whose husband is someone I would actually consider a True and Honest Trans and behaves appropriately - that's still an immensely difficult situation to be in, and while I'd be sympathetic to the trans woman in question I feel that the cis woman is more than entitled to consider herself widowed, and can imagine the significant challenges she faces with raising the kids, and the challenges the kids themselves face. I'd equate that her husband "discovering" he was gay - probably shouldn't have trapped a poor woman into marriage and kids if there was doubt - except even more of a struggle.

I just actually like Kristin. I think she's caught up in how great and liberating it is that her husband can "live her truth". She seems like a nice person, just misguided, and I think she deserves to be loved. But for her it's going to be incredibly hard to accept that she's trapped in a loveless and sexless marriage she can't leave (because she's painted herself into a corner with "omg I accept and validate my wife!!"), and it's going to be wearing when the poly/sex work/adult diaper stuff happens (which it will). She's basically living with a particularly ugly roommate but having to pretend she's happily married.

I get she somewhat brought it on herself, but there's a bunch of fat men out there who would love her, marry her, give her babies, and grow old with her. She's cut herself off from that because she can't leave; best case scenario they "go poly", but the guys who'd give her a happy life aren't going to be into poly stuff or be up for being in a polycule with Tiny Tim.
IDK if this has been posted or if its relevant here, but Oli London, a “non-binary” (they/them pronouns) British plastic surgery/K-Pop obsessed freak is facing accusations of “transracialism”, cultural appropriation and probably “yellow-face” because he got surgery to look like a K-Pop star and now identifies as “Korean”.
I'm mystified by Oli London because he genuinely seems like an elaborate troll - down to posting the trans Korean non binary flag he made and saying criticisms of him are especially galling because it's Pride Month. I've never seen someone "trans racial" who properly comes out and says they're trans racial, they're usually trying to stealth it a la Dolezal. But I guess a troll wouldn't completely disfigure their face with plastic surgery.

Maybe more in the category of someone like Lil Lunchbox (the clown) who seems to be deliberately trolling the audience and is self aware about how what they're doing is ridiculous, but is mentally ill enough to derail their life for the purposes of trolling
Since uterus transplants are likely impossible, do you think it is more likely we will see babies being taken away from 'unworthy' women to be given to transwomen who want their own children (since the desires of powerful men are always what counts)? Or is the pregnancy fetishism aspect too big of a deal for this to satisfy them?
I'm mystified by these demands for uterus implants. They actually sound sincere. Do you reckon they think that a uterus transplant into a trans woman is actually possible, and it's just transphobic scientists keeping it secret? It probably comes from a lot of trans women being programmers or something, and thinking the body like a computer with plug and play hardware. Maybe they drank the coolaid about neovaginas being the exact same as a regular vagina, and don't understand that it's a non-functional facsimile.

As I observed in the Kevin thread, if it was possible, they'd need a donor egg, donor sperm and a donor uterus and at that point you might as well just cut out the middleman and go down the surrogacy route, and at that point you could go down the surrogacy route with banked sperm and have a child that is biologically yours. I can't see how they'd "get dysphoric" about that, and if you're that desperate for a biological child, surely you can take a bit of dysphoria on the chin?

There's plenty of cis women who have uterine fertility issues and they don't REEEEE about how they 100% should be able to get the highly experimental uterus transplant that actually is somewhat possible to perform on a cis woman, they either accept they can't have kids, that they'll need to find a surrogate to carry their eggs, or they adopt. Gay couples don't REEEE that they're not provided with a state sponsored Handmaid forced to carry their biological child, or that homophobic scientists aren't researching artificial breeding tanks.

I do think that it's probably more about wanting to be pregnant or a real woman than it is about having a kid (see some trans women obsessing about having periods). If a trans woman wanted a child, well it depends where in the world they are, but they could adopt a child. They'd need to prove to the adoption agency they could provide a stable home and that they're in a stable relationship. The fact that an unemployed trans woman who lives in a polycule where they all dress up in fetish gear for orgies wouldn't be allowed to adopt a child isn't transphobic, because an unemployed cis woman who lives in a polycule where they all dress up in fetish gear for orgies also wouldn't be allowed to adopt.
 
The only surgery I feel should be fully funded for troons is uterus transplants in trans women. Immediately. I think all trans women should be offered a free uterus transplant, and in fact I’d even throw in FFS and castration etc to sweeten the deal, but they have to take the uterus too.

Then we wait.
 
I'm mystified by these demands for uterus implants. They actually sound sincere. Do you reckon they think that a uterus transplant into a trans woman is actually possible, and it's just transphobic scientists keeping it secret? It probably comes from a lot of trans women being programmers or something, and thinking the body like a computer with plug and play hardware. Maybe they drank the coolaid about neovaginas being the exact same as a regular vagina, and don't understand that it's a non-functional facsimile.
It's a core belief in transhumanism that the body is really just configurable parts that can be swapped in and out and that the mind and the self are really just riders that can just as easily be transported by something else. So, yeah, if a woman is just a thing with a womb and vag and tits, shove it all in. Sure that will work.

It's important to remember that these people are deeply deluded.
As I observed in the Kevin thread, if it was possible, they'd need a donor egg, donor sperm and a donor uterus and at that point you might as well just cut out the middleman and go down the surrogacy route, and at that point you could go down the surrogacy route with banked sperm and have a child that is biologically yours. I can't see how they'd "get dysphoric" about that, and if you're that desperate for a biological child, surely you can take a bit of dysphoria on the chin?

There's plenty of cis women who have uterine fertility issues and they don't REEEEE about how they 100% should be able to get the highly experimental uterus transplant that actually is somewhat possible to perform on a cis woman, they either accept they can't have kids, that they'll need to find a surrogate to carry their eggs, or they adopt. Gay couples don't REEEE that they're not provided with a state sponsored Handmaid forced to carry their biological child, or that homophobic scientists aren't researching artificial breeding tanks.

I do think that it's probably more about wanting to be pregnant or a real woman than it is about having a kid (see some trans women obsessing about having periods). If a trans woman wanted a child, well it depends where in the world they are, but they could adopt a child. They'd need to prove to the adoption agency they could provide a stable home and that they're in a stable relationship. The fact that an unemployed trans woman who lives in a polycule where they all dress up in fetish gear for orgies wouldn't be allowed to adopt a child isn't transphobic, because an unemployed cis woman who lives in a polycule where they all dress up in fetish gear for orgies also wouldn't be allowed to adopt.
 
Since uterus transplants are likely impossible, do you think it is more likely we will see babies being taken away from 'unworthy' women to be given to transwomen who want their own children (since the desires of powerful men are always what counts)? Or is the pregnancy fetishism aspect too big of a deal for this to satisfy them?
The adoption/foster care system in the USA is so fucked that that's just about the only way you could possibly make it even worse at this point. Give your child up for adoption today! Will they end up with a serial adopter who abuses welfare and neglects their 18 foster children, or a pedophile groomer tranny? Just roll the dice!
 
The adoption/foster care system in the USA is so fucked that that's just about the only way you could possibly make it even worse at this point. Give your child up for adoption today! Will they end up with a serial adopter who abuses welfare and neglects their 18 foster children, or a pedophile groomer tranny? Just roll the dice!
Actually putting your baby up for adoption isn't that fucked up. There are way more parents that want a baby than there are babies needing a home. As long as the baby isn't badly disabled finding a home so easy that you get to be picky where your baby ends up.

Fostering other hand is a shit show. Not a complete one because there are good capable loving foster homes and services but it's pretty bad. Very few people want a child that someone else has already ruined and all the crap that comes with it so finding a home to anything beyond a cute toddler is really hard. You are mostly left with people willing to do it for the money and sums aren't that large so mostly people not getting a better deal will sign up and they ain't the greatest punch of folks.
 
Since uterus transplants are likely impossible, do you think it is more likely we will see babies being taken away from 'unworthy' women to be given to transwomen who want their own children (since the desires of powerful men are always what counts)? Or is the pregnancy fetishism aspect too big of a deal for this to satisfy them?

I think we're still far away from them forcibly taking babies.

"Plenty of cis couples can't conceive and have babies through other means." So it will be sperm/ egg donation and suragocy. Which of course leads to desperate women in the third world being used to grow babies. That's the path it will go. Barriers will be broken down to make that easier for the troons to access. Women will suffer being baby farms.
 
In other news, yet another tranny made a cope thread about muh reproductive rights (dr mental illness)
tranny reproductive rights3.png

It gives me a warm tingly feeling when these retards physically remove themselves from the gene pool.

You’re doing humanity a favour by refusing to pay that fee and getting your chance at children trashed.
 
Since uterus transplants are likely impossible, do you think it is more likely we will see babies being taken away from 'unworthy' women to be given to transwomen who want their own children (since the desires of powerful men are always what counts)? Or is the pregnancy fetishism aspect too big of a deal for this to satisfy them?
they're already pushing, pressuring and suing adoption agencies to give children to gays. trannies will be the next step obviously.
simultaneously, CPS taking away children from parents for holding problematic views isn't unthinkable either.
combine these two situations together and suddenly a scenario like this becomes possible:

>mandatory kindergarten sex ed class and drag queen story hour make kid identify as they/them enby
>parents tell kid to ignore that nonsense
>CPS get on the case, report says "transphobic fundamentalist parents refuse to properly accomodate gender questioning child"
>family court ruling declares parents unfit to raise a child, kid goes into foster care and listed for adoption
>adoption agency gives kid to two true and honest womyn, media praises agency for stunning and brave progressiveness

almost all the steps in this chain are already in place
 
I'm mystified by these demands for uterus implants. They actually sound sincere. Do you reckon they think that a uterus transplant into a trans woman is actually possible, and it's just transphobic scientists keeping it secret? It probably comes from a lot of trans women being programmers or something, and thinking the body like a computer with plug and play hardware. Maybe they drank the coolaid about neovaginas being the exact same as a regular vagina, and don't understand that it's a non-functional facsimile.

Troons demanding an unattainable goal is the logical next step in their collective cope. They need something to focus on, some next step in their process, and all the better if it's literally impossible: that way there's no hangover and regret, because it'll never even happen.

Look at the GRS/SRS disaster thread and you'll see fools who didn't even experience any kind of dysphoria regarding their penis and yet these men have cut their dicks off. Some even admit regret, that they got caught up in the process and thought they needed to do it to be happy. Not because they have a persistent loathing of their genitals, but a different type of mental illness in which they're so totally self-obsessed and up their own asses with being on a ~journey~ that they'll literally cut their dick off over it.

Once they've taken the last big step, the reality of their situation hits home. This is it: they've checked all the boxes, they've arrived, and...they're still just the same old miserable perverts that creep everyone out, but without a dick. This is when the 41-percenting kicks in.

If troons had any good sense (but were still crazy enough to be trans), they'd be demanding better SRS results! But that's a touchy issue, it would make the butchered ones feel bad, and campaigning for it would reveal what an absolute disaster those surgeries are. And it wouldn't give them the necessary (HRT-shrivelled) carrot-on-a-stick to get all worked up and outraged about, and to get back on the "...then, I'll finally be perfect!" troon treadmill.
 
Back