Extremely autistic tranny complains about stonetoss
View attachment 2304096
Okay.
0:00 - You are greeted by a bearded hobbit who is either recording in 100 degree weather or immediately made this video after jumping out of a river. It calls itself "Diana." It is recording with thematically appropriate equipment, apparently capturing the video using two sticks of wood and some tumbleweed judging by its quality.
0:14 - It goes five seconds without saying a single word, making 1/4th of this video dead silence at this point.
0:30 - Fire alarm beep. This is the optimal recording environment, I look forward to this definitely not being annoying for the next five minutes. He hasn't said two words about Stonetoss and this is already abysmal, and I'm not even being pedantic.
0:42 - Speaking in hyperbole, he presents one of Stonetoss's talking points as, and I quote, "basic--like, Holocaust deny--you'll talking points are reasonable and have to be allowed because free speech... Or people shouldn't be upset about Holocaust deny." I didn't make any typos transcribing that, so if what he said makes any sense to you, give yourself a gold star sticker.
1:12 - "This dude's a vocal, bigoted, ant neo-nazi."
An interesting visual.
1:55 - "Even if it was 'just his opinion,' it's marked--it's basically untrue and it's easily disproven." I'm sure he will easily dismantle all of Stonetoss's talking points like the last five or so vloggers who failed to do so.
2:15 - "Nobody's saying six million Jews were killed by ovens." I'm pretty sure this talking point he's "refuting" is how infeasible killing six million people in a short time frame using any method is. The "cookie" analogy he's referencing is just that: an analogy.
2:20 - Beep. This is really starting to grate on me.
2:45 - "...Most of his comics are just Nazi dogwhistles being put under the guise of a 'joke.'" I'm waiting for him to actually present an example instead of just asserting it. I
know there are comics people will cite to make this point, but he doesn't, so there's no way to refute or critique anything he says when there's zero substance. Beep.
3:16 - "It's dumb to think that just 'cause a large part of a group of people have success means they're privileged." Long pause as he considers how that's what it means to be privileged. Just kidding, he's probably focusing all his brainpower on constructing the next stifled sentence he's about to utter.
3:35 - He concedes to the opposing point he was just presenting, noting they do have "some privilege in other areas." Excellent. Beep.
3:50 - "He completely misses the point." Uh-huh.
4:10 - "Pretty much all the punchlines and all of his jokes are basically 'this group I don't like, they sure do suck, we should genocide them all!'" Interesting. Maybe Stonetoss comics are too deep for me, but I can say with confidence there aren't any where the joke is we should commit genocide against somebody. "We should commit genocide" is sort of an odd punchline for a joke, unless you're going for some weird non-sequitur humor.
4:25 - He rams his face into the camera. I somehow am able to smell his body odor through the screen.
4:35 - Wow, a conclusion! Who says this guy doesn't know how to structure a compelling video? Of course, he ends with more assertions without evidence which in turn are based on assertions without evidence, on top of just insulting the audience he's attempting to sway, but at least it's cohesive. Even the fire alarm pitches in to bring everything all together.
5:10 - I start to zone out, so I look at this RationalWiki he posted to see if I could find any "receipts," to use the hot lingo. Not a single comic is related to genocide, and doing a search for the term "genocide" only brings up the article speaking about Stonetoss's comics referring to "white genocide." So, if anything, any Stonetoss comic related to genocide presents it as a distinctly bad thing. In other words, not only did I have to do the work for this hobbit to support his own points, I only found something contrary to his points while
specifically searching for the topic most integrated with his arguments. If you think it's irresponsible for a person refuting a point to be the one finding evidence for said point, it's probably because
that's why you support what you say for yourself.
5:30 - The video doesn't just end. It
stops, the same way crashing a car into a brick wall "decelerates."
Final Score:
out of 10. See me after class.
