Wuhan Coronavirus: Megathread - Got too big

Status
Not open for further replies.
That article states that "Of the 117 people who died with the Delta variant... 50 (43%) had been fully vaccinated". I'm interested in how many had received one dose of the vaccine.
The table of info is floating around this thread, maybe a few pages back.

The article made me laugh because the 'conspiracy theory' they're talking about, is official stats from the UK Gov and NHS.

It's a double-side splitter when they talk about how figures can be used in a way to push an agenda. Self-awareness level 0
 
That article states that "Of the 117 people who died with the Delta variant... 50 (43%) had been fully vaccinated". I'm interested in how many had received one dose of the vaccine.
Bear in mind that oldies with one foot in the grave were first in line for vaccines in most countries so they make up the majority of people who've gotten two doses, and deathfats and people with other medical conditions are more likely to have gotten at least one. The people who haven't got any doses at this point are mostly the people who wouldn't die anyway. Unless 25 year olds start dropping dead of after getting fully vaccinated it probably is people with shitty immune systems regardless of what you inject into them.

It is funny how the stance has changed from "if it saves just one life" to "yeah old people die sometimes lol".
 
Bear in mind that oldies with one foot in the grave were first in line for vaccines in most countries so they make up the majority of people who've gotten two doses, and deathfats and people with other medical conditions are more likely to have gotten at least one. The people who haven't got any doses at this point are mostly the people who wouldn't die anyway. Unless 25 year olds start dropping dead of after getting fully vaccinated it probably is people with shitty immune systems regardless of what you inject into them.

It is funny how the stance has changed from "if it saves just one life" to "yeah old people die sometimes lol".
They were happy to lump any and all deaths to covid or people who died while having covid, as the total body count. But when it comes to vaccine deaths it is all "well hold on a minute, X group died for Y reasons and there's totally no way you could blame the vax"
 
Anyone who might be sharting their panties over the Indian coof in the US: We've had it circulating in the UK for weeks. It is more contagious. But it is not more fatal. Main symptoms are runny eyes and nose and sneezing.


Indian coof is fucking hayfever, stop letting them put the fear of god into you. India is a festering shitpile who dump their corpses in rivers and burn them open air. They are morally bankrupt, mammon worshipping degenerates who would sell their Granny if it meant a buck or two.

The hysteria the media generated over it was a planned repeat of the insanity with fat, old , unhealthy Italian men who eat too much food and drink too much alcohol, all over again.

In the UK, ousted former Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, Matt Hancock, has been revealed to have been up to some dodgy stuff. From employing a mate from Uni who has worked for a very shady lobbying company, Pendragon (seriously, if anyone knows anything about these guys, I would love to know more) to her brother being "strategy director" in a company with several high profile and lucrative contracts within the NHS to giving out contracts for PPE to his pals, including the Publican at his local.

From having to see the attendees of the G7 summit not following any of the advice the rest of us ae expected to live by (not that I have been. At all, personally) to the UEFA officials flooding in, test and quarantine free, to seeing people schmoozing with members of the Royal Family.


If you still believe that Indian coof or any coof is fatal and gonna kill you, you are either a fatfuck or retarded.
 
Been taking me a look through the UK Government legislation re: face coverings. Interesting reading. Here is the link to the actual legislation on the Gov. website and it's contents. And here is a link to the Wiki article on it, which explains it in plain English.


What is interesting is that it says, in short, that basically, they need only be worn in shops, or places to hire goods or pharmacies, and transport hubs. It also lists places as being excluded from the list of places where you need to wear them. These include:

"The following premises are not considered to be "shops", and hence face coverings need not be worn: public libraries; premises providing professional, legal, financial, medical, optometry, mental health or veterinary services; cinemas, theatres, museums, galleries; indoor tourist, heritage or cultural sites; nightclubs, dance and bingo halls; concert, exhibition and other public halls; casinos; certain personal service premises including hair and beauty salons and barbers, tattoo and massage parlours; conference and exhibition centres; hotels; premises for indoor sports, leisure, adventure or recreation; storage and distribution centres; funeral directors; photography studios; and auction houses.

Also excluded are restaurants with table service, bars and pubs, as well as those areas of other premises having seating or tables for consumption of food and drink.
"


Funny how this stuff isn't publicised. But yeah, hospitals, dentists, optometrists and pubs are among the list of places where you are not required to wear a face mask. Bolding my own, but the full list is interesting. Funny how the media are keeping this shit very, very quiet.
 
Been taking me a look through the UK Government legislation re: face coverings. Interesting reading. Here is the link to the actual legislation on the Gov. website and it's contents. And here is a link to the Wiki article on it, which explains it in plain English.

Funny how this stuff isn't publicised. But yeah, hospitals, dentists, optometrists and pubs are among the list of places where you are not required to wear a face mask. Bolding my own, but the full list is interesting. Funny how the media are keeping this shit very, very quiet.
Yeah, how convenient for the media and I do a big FY to the media.
 
Been taking me a look through the UK Government legislation re: face coverings. Interesting reading. Here is the link to the actual legislation on the Gov. website and it's contents. And here is a link to the Wiki article on it, which explains it in plain English.


What is interesting is that it says, in short, that basically, they need only be worn in shops, or places to hire goods or pharmacies, and transport hubs. It also lists places as being excluded from the list of places where you need to wear them. These include:

"The following premises are not considered to be "shops", and hence face coverings need not be worn: public libraries; premises providing professional, legal, financial, medical, optometry, mental health or veterinary services; cinemas, theatres, museums, galleries; indoor tourist, heritage or cultural sites; nightclubs, dance and bingo halls; concert, exhibition and other public halls; casinos; certain personal service premises including hair and beauty salons and barbers, tattoo and massage parlours; conference and exhibition centres; hotels; premises for indoor sports, leisure, adventure or recreation; storage and distribution centres; funeral directors; photography studios; and auction houses.

Also excluded are restaurants with table service, bars and pubs, as well as those areas of other premises having seating or tables for consumption of food and drink."


Funny how this stuff isn't publicised. But yeah, hospitals, dentists, optometrists and pubs are among the list of places where you are not required to wear a face mask. Bolding my own, but the full list is interesting. Funny how the media are keeping this shit very, very quiet.
What the fuck are the media supposed to be hiding from your schizo mind? That a conference center isn't a shop, and you might accidentally wear a mask into one of them? That's literally another holocaust, lol.
 
The table of info is floating around this thread, maybe a few pages back.

The article made me laugh because the 'conspiracy theory' they're talking about, is official stats from the UK Gov and NHS.

It's a double-side splitter when they talk about how figures can be used in a way to push an agenda. Self-awareness level 0
"Conspiracy theory" at this point is just "anything that makes the left/MSM look bad." Whether it's true or not is completely irrelevant.

I got called a conspiracy theorist for literally posting CDC graphs showing that most of the COVID deaths were 60+.

The worst, and this is slightly off topic, was when I would post actual videos of something happening, and my leftist friends berated me for "trusting raw journalism instead of CNN who have decades of experience in their fields." So yes, you literally cannot prove anything to these people without them figuring out some mental gymnastics to write it all off somehow. If CNN just doesn't report something, then it becomes a right-wing conspiracy theory.
 
This "doctor" has some nerve to say a healthy diet and going to the gym won't protect you from the Delta variant.
View attachment 2307561
https://twitter.com/tomselliott/status/1410311038818570246
It's twice as infectious... but is it as deadly?
Oh it's not? Then fuck right off, Mr. public health faggot.

He's right. People are Healthy At Any Size and if you go to the gym, you will catch the dreaded Delta Strain of COVID-19 which is like airborne Turbo-AIDS (worse than normal COVID-19 which is just plain old airborne AIDS) and DIE. Therefore we must have lockdowns for all of eternity unless you wear two facemasks at all times and are carrying your vaccine passport that shows you have received your bi-monthly booster shot of the sacred vaccine, without which we would all surely be dead, so sayeth the Science and the Experts of Our Democracy.
Okay listen up, bigot. There is nothing wrong AIDS, it only has like a >99% chance of killing you unlike the scary mega-doom COVID which has like a >99% chance of survival. In fact, your fear of AIDS is like based in homophobic and transphobic cultural power institutions seeded in white supremacy.
Shut up and get your COVID vax while we let HIV+ queers donate blood to school kids, bigot!

What the fuck are the media supposed to be hiding from your schizo mind? That a conference center isn't a shop, and you might accidentally wear a mask into one of them? That's literally another holocaust, lol.
purepng.com-black-top-hathatsstandard-sizeblackcliparttop-1421526359344rblvd.png
 
Been taking me a look through the UK Government legislation re: face coverings. Interesting reading. Here is the link to the actual legislation on the Gov. website and it's contents. And here is a link to the Wiki article on it, which explains it in plain English.


What is interesting is that it says, in short, that basically, they need only be worn in shops, or places to hire goods or pharmacies, and transport hubs. It also lists places as being excluded from the list of places where you need to wear them. These include:

"The following premises are not considered to be "shops", and hence face coverings need not be worn: public libraries; premises providing professional, legal, financial, medical, optometry, mental health or veterinary services; cinemas, theatres, museums, galleries; indoor tourist, heritage or cultural sites; nightclubs, dance and bingo halls; concert, exhibition and other public halls; casinos; certain personal service premises including hair and beauty salons and barbers, tattoo and massage parlours; conference and exhibition centres; hotels; premises for indoor sports, leisure, adventure or recreation; storage and distribution centres; funeral directors; photography studios; and auction houses.

Also excluded are restaurants with table service, bars and pubs, as well as those areas of other premises having seating or tables for consumption of food and drink."


Funny how this stuff isn't publicised. But yeah, hospitals, dentists, optometrists and pubs are among the list of places where you are not required to wear a face mask. Bolding my own, but the full list is interesting. Funny how the media are keeping this shit very, very quiet.
This is incorrect.

According to the Wiki you linked:

Public-facing staff included, and more premises, 24 Sept 2020​

From 24 September, The Health Protection (Coronavirus, Wearing of Face Coverings in a Relevant Place and on Public Transport) (England) (Amendment) (No. 3) Regulations 2020 (SI 2020/1026) extended the requirement to wear a face covering to staff in the following places who are likely to come into close contact with members of the public.
It then goes on to list everything? (didn't check word for word) from what you quoted.
 
I guess saying the word ivermectin is a blasphemy just like hydroxychloroquine. https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2021/07/can_you_say_ivermectin_in_the_usa.html

July 2, 2021

Can you say 'ivermectin' in the USA?​

By Terry Paulding

Ivory Hecker, an astute and brave local Fox reporter, interviewed Dr. Joseph Varon, despite Fox threatening her job if the unedited interview went live. It's worth listening to in its entirety, but here's some of what it says.
It's certainly not the first time Dr. Varon's been interviewed. He's talked with the media 1,640 times, including Hecker's interview. The first 1,639 interviews were edited to exclude specific information about his successes in treating hospitalized COVID patients.
This doctor is certainly no quack. He's chief of staff at United Memorial Medical Center in Houston, Texas. He invented the MATH+ protocol for treatment, and his death rate has consistently been far less than half that of other hospitals, even a third compared to many. Back in the beginning, when he was able to include hydroxychloroquine in his formula, his death rate was close to 4%, as opposed to around 20% in other hospitals.
Hecker interviewed several of his patients for the piece. One, a urologist from a hospital on the other side of Texas, was airlifted (at his own request) to Dr. Varon. He described how thankful he was to have gone from desperate and dying, with nearly no lung capacity, to healthy. He was clearly robust, despite his COVID experience. He says his improvement began "within hours" of starting the protocol.
Dr. Varon clearly states that "there's no reason for patients to die. We have options, we just have to make those options available."
Hecker also speaks with Dr. Pierre Kory, who co-authored a peer-reviewed study on ivermectin with Dr. Varon. He states without equivocation that, if patients receive ivermectin early in the course of the virus, ivermectin alone is effective as a treatment. He testified in the Senate about it, too.
Most outlets blocked the video, except Fox. Oddly, after a lot of views, Fox set the video to private, so nobody else could see it. Another example of censorship occurred when Dr. Kory talked with Bret Weinstein, something Joe Rogan highlighted.
Dr. Varon states that "every time I use the word ivermectin [on Facebook], I go to Facebook jail." Social media and news outlets in the U.S. have completely blacked out any mention of the drug.
The interview also shows what's happening in India, complete with a chart graphically demonstrating the stark difference in the states that use ivermectin versus the one, Tamil Nadu, that doesn't. Where all the rest of the states have had cases plummet, Tamil Nadu's virus cases have continued to climb precipitously. Dr. Varon, who hasn't taken a day off in the last year and a half, is teaming with India to help save lives there.
Hecker also interviews a weasel from the WHO, who discounts everything Varon is saying.
Finally, I don't want to imply that Dr. Varon is anti-vaccine. He states clearly that he believes in the vaccine, but he also believes in life-saving treatment.
If you skip to 16:43 in the interview, you get to the crux of the matter. Hecker explains there why was this information was omitted from 1,639 of the 1,640 interviews Varon has given. It's simple: "If there was a successful treatment protocol for COVID, by law the emergency use authorization for the vaccines would be disallowed."
Think about that: to obtain emergency use authorization for the vaccine, there couldn't be an effective treatment for COVID. This basically means the vaccine would have been delayed by more trials. Or the rules could have been changed so that you could treat people effectively and allow the vaccine authorization.
 
I guess saying the word ivermectin is a blasphemy just like hydroxychloroquine. https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2021/07/can_you_say_ivermectin_in_the_usa.html

Holy shit, I'd heard about Ivory Hecker sperging out about being censored by Fox live on air but I didn't know it was this - the media knowingly covered for massive pharmaceutical companies lying about there being no effective treatment so they could rush through their $26billion a year cash cow vaccine and let hundreds of thousands of people die in the meantime. This is outright evidence of crimes against humanity, and that's no hyperbole.
 
Holy shit, I'd heard about Ivory Hecker sperging out about being censored by Fox live on air but I didn't know it was this - the media knowingly covered for massive pharmaceutical companies lying about there being no effective treatment so they could rush through their $26billion a year cash cow vaccine and let hundreds of thousands of people die in the meantime. This is outright evidence of crimes against humanity, and that's no hyperbole.
They did it an got away with it in the 90s with aids patients. Was even a movie about it "Dallas Buyers Club". Fauci was the villian in that movie, but was never held accountable then, and is pulling the same shit now.

Fauci.png


HQC, ivermectin? NOPE, rdemsvir or however you spell it, it's $1k a shot and perfect for you sheep! Fuck Fauci, he needs to hang.

Remember the good old days when the left was against evil big pharma? Fucking 🦛crits. :P
 
Last edited:
HQC, ivermectin? NOPE, rdemsvir or however you spell it, it's $1k a shot and perfect for you sheep! Fuck Fauci, he needs to hang.

Remember the good old days when the left was against evil big pharma? Fucking 🦛crits. :P
We might need something worse than hanging Fauci who should desserve a big humiliation like tar and feathers or jackin' it in San Diego.

Then we could still throw him at night somewhere in Detroit, East St. Louis or South Chicago.

Edit: Some people started a petition to halt FDA approval of Covid vaccines. https://noqreport.com/2021/07/01/ur...ition-to-halt-fda-approval-of-covid-vaccines/
I'm a bit sceptical about this but I cross my fingers hoping it would work.

In the global COVID pandemic there has not been a more important action to protect public health than the current Citizen Petition to FDA to stop the full approval of COVID vaccines until many serious concerns and issues are genuinely addressed.

There has been no significant coverage of this historic petition by mainstream and corporate social media. This cancel action is itself as remarkable as the petition itself. This is a concerted effort to keep the public uninformed about the many problems with the COVID vaccines. Any person who spends the time to peruse the 20-page petition would most likely have a very negative view of the vaccines. For the unvaccinated this awareness would greatly increase vaccine hesitancy and rejection. For the vaccinated it would produce concern and regret.

The political system would literally go crazy if the petition was seriously covered by big media. Big drug companies would jump into action to suppress political and media attention to the petition. The goal of this article is to better inform the public and motivate people to take action.
 
Last edited:
"trusting raw journalism instead of CNN who have decades of experience in their fields."

"trusting raw journalism instead of CNN who have decades of experience in their fields...of lying by omission, and using charged language to manipulate the viewers emotions. "

C'mon though, nobody actually believes CNN, their reporting editorializing has more holes than my oldest pair of underwear, your leftist friends couldn't possibly say that sentence without having difficulty maintaining a straight face, and stifling their laughter.

It's twice as infectious... but is it as deadly?
Oh it's not? Then fuck right off, Mr. public health faggot.
Lies by omission! One of the worst things they do. I read an article from a mainstream source that was casting a doubtful light on the "safety of vitamin D" they highlight a story of a man who lost most of his kidney function because of a supposed vitamin D overdose. If you look into the mans case study he was taking somewhere in the upwards of 13000IU a day for a couple years, and had a long holiday in the equator where he sunbathed all day, they also mention in the study that they later found out he had a genetic trait that made his body hold onto vitamin D or something, and that was a huge contributing factor to him wrecking his kidneys. Of course the mainstream article doesn't mention any of this at all, those fucking liars. People underestimate how harmful lying by omission really is.
 
The worst, and this is slightly off topic, was when I would post actual videos of something happening, and my leftist friends berated me for "trusting raw journalism instead of CNN who have decades of experience in their fields." So yes, you literally cannot prove anything to these people without them figuring out some mental gymnastics to write it all off somehow. If CNN just doesn't report something, then it becomes a right-wing conspiracy theory.
The loss of natural science methods and empirical modes of reasoning due to technology

Quote me on this faggots, it's only gonna get worse. I haven't yet come up with a satisfying hypothesis presenting the connection(s) between technology (in large part the mass communication aspect of tech) and the decline in what I would call a fact-based, reality-centric outlook, but I'll get it eventually. Throw a bone to the true believers too, they will be able to use my theory to demonstrate (with no self-awareness) how it's ackshully right wingers/nationalists/amish who are crazy because of their technological utilization (the amish use landline phones too frequently).
 
The loss of natural science methods and empirical modes of reasoning due to technology

Quote me on this faggots, it's only gonna get worse. I haven't yet come up with a satisfying hypothesis presenting the connection(s) between technology (in large part the mass communication aspect of tech) and the decline in what I would call a fact-based, reality-centric outlook, but I'll get it eventually. Throw a bone to the true believers too, they will be able to use my theory to demonstrate (with no self-awareness) how it's ackshully right wingers/nationalists/amish who are crazy because of their technological utilization (the amish use landline phones too frequently).
Your comment reminds me of a line by Mr World from the show American Gods that really struck me as painfully aware and accurate on the use of technology and how it impacts our daily lives. For context, Mr World in the show is known as one of the "new gods" who represents technology, science, human progress, and secularism (in terms of wanting to usurp the old gods that represent traditions).

In season 3 episode 10, Mr World states, "People say this is the age of technology. They're wrong. This is the age of manipulation." Crazy to think how it applies perfectly to the information control/censorship online on major social platforms during this covid fiasco.
 
No doubt this is done deliberately by the people in whose best interests it is to keep us believing the official story.
I wish I had it on hand, but I remember seeing a leaked CIA doc from the 1970s that said exactly this. Basically if someone says "I saw a UFO" (as in, they literally saw something flying which could not be identified) you were supposed to respond with "This guy believes in aliens!" or have someone pretend to agree with him and have that person talk about how it was proof of aliens. The British government did this too. iirc there was a military base in Scotland who was testing drones and added Christmas lights to them so anyone who saw the drones would think "Space aliens" or "They're filming a movie".
Wacky conspiracy: Hitlery Clinton is running a pedophile ring out of the basement of a pizza place!!
This literally came out today: Dozens of documents about Ghislaine Maxwell’s personal affairs will be made public, judge rules (Archive)
Key bit:
The documents contain information pertaining to Ms Maxwell’s finances and her relationship with the Clintons, according to a Daily Mail report.
Among the set of documents US District Judge Loretta Preska asked to be released to the public in the next two weeks are ones that reveal Ms Maxwell’s efforts to quash requests from Virginia Roberts Giuffre, who sued Ms Maxwell for defamation, to obtain her financial records.
Ms Giuffre has alleged that she was sexually trafficked by Epstein and Ms Maxwell for years.
The Daily Mail reported that Ms Giuffre’s lawyers demanded a “vast array of documents” from Ms Maxwell. These include “funding received from the Clinton Global Initiative and the Clinton Foundation.”
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back