- Joined
- Mar 23, 2021
>glowniggers say antifags are based
>wtf I love glowniggers now
the absolute state of reddit
StoneToss (allegedly, formerly Red Panels)
- Thread starter Pointless Pedant
- Start date
>wtf I love glowniggers now
the absolute state of reddit
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2018
- Joined
- Apr 27, 2015
So they're implying the government is trying to get the masses to support antifa?
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2019
I think the implication that antifareddit is capable of implying intentionally is an optimistic assessment.
The following isn't a blanket statement about lefties, or even antifa... but antifareddit really aren't hard to understand if you remember that they're really really dumb.
- Joined
- Jan 11, 2020
Vito doesn't understand the nature of the value of labor,
and thinks all immigrants only take low skill jobs.
and thinks all immigrants only take low skill jobs.
- Joined
- Dec 1, 2018
why does he choose to have his cartoon do a soy face
round robin
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jun 27, 2020
He is unable to make any other face.
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2016
He's not that wrong, it doesn't lower wages (on the paper!) but rather increases competition which means someone is gonna be out of a job and have to do something else. There's loosely just three categories, entertainment and hospitality, office cucking, and STEM jobs. The middle one is very competitive, immigrants fall under the first two with some going into the last.
So why "on the paper"? Well, many immigrants are willing to take jobs that pay below minimum wage, basically cash on hand and not taxed which is a crime. Someone local is probably not going to do that. That's when statistics fail, how are we supposed to know and see these cash on hand tax evasion jobs? Companies (typically shit restaurants) aren't going to be honest. The numbers are unreliable but probably workable.
"Immigrants take labour intensive jobs" is a dumbass leftist cope. Many studies found absolutely no correlation between labour intensive jobs and willingness to participate based on citizenry status. To put this in non-autism speak, basically your local Joe Blow with no skills is just as willing to build a brick wall or clean a toilet for good pat as an Asian immigrant Muhammad Alidirka jihadi blahblah. This tells me that Vito is a disgusting paedophile that doesn't know what it's talking about, it's merely parroting some kind of neoliberal globohomo talking point.
Brother Wind
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2017
Am I just a galaxy brain and realized that the point isnt that ST thinks that the president is a final boss. But that he knows thats how you change distasteful regimes.I would like to take a minute and alert you fags to the fact that there is a blog called "stonetoss is an idiot".
I check antifastonetoss from time to time and most new comics get a blogpost on why stonetoss is a dumb dumb. I thought I'd explain, as it's hard to tell from its name.
Normally I glance over this and it's some screeching that is barely related to the comic. This one in particular though, I thought was of a very special kind of retarded that I wanted to share it with you.
StoneToss: Episode 86
JUNE 24, 2021~ STONETOSSISANIDIOT
I sometimes remember to Tweet blog news and updates on my Twitter. I sometimes take other people’s money when they subscribe to my Patreon
Comic Name: Powder Keg
Description: Disclaimer: The above cartoon is intended to be enjoyed as a work of comedy and political expression and does NOT represent incitement to, or endorsement of, any form of violence or insurrectionary activity either in real life or in Minecraft.
Mouseover: Funny how no one says that to the Taliban.
Image Name: second-amendment-john-f-kennedy-stonetoss-political-cartoon.png
Amogus: Second panel, a glare in the corner of the windshield frame.
Originally Published: 6/24/2021
What The Comic Is: A gay caricature offers a smug rhetorical to a Gadsden flag-shirt wearing gun owner, asking him what his second amendment could do against the government’s jet planes and nukes. The second panel shows United States President JFK as he rides in the back of the car he was assassinated in.
What StoneToss Actually Thinks: Presidents have been assassinated before, therefore gun owners can fight the military.
Why It’s Fucking Stupid: God damn it. You know, I try not to make posts covering the most recent StoneToss comic because I’m trying to work my way through a massive backlog of old shit, but the guy just can’t not say something egregiously stupid and force my hand. So here we are.
StoneToss is a big proponent of the second amendment, or the “right to bear arms” and has made roughly a dozen or so comics before where he plays into this fantasy of gun owners standing up to tyrannical governments (be them the British during the revolutionary war or some strawman version of the modern day). Second amendments adherents will argue that we need high powered automatic weapons “incase the government goes rogue”, as this is (depending on who you ask) part of the reason the second amendment was drafted in the first place: to allow citizens to arm themselves for protection against what included their own government. The common argument against this (as seen in the comic) is that the the USA’s military has equipment and power far eclipsing any guns civilians have access to. StoneToss has grappled with this argument before, always doing incredibly poorly at it, and this time is no different.
StoneToss tries to zero in on a presidential assassination, in this case JFK, though really any assassination would’ve worked (and by ‘worked’ I mean ‘failed’). As you might have already learned, John F. Kennedy was the 35th President of the United States and served from January 1961 until November 1963, when he died at the hand (or, well, the bullet) of sharpshooter Lee Harvey Oswald. And it’s true, sure. Oswald was just a guy who went into a building and shot the President of the United States. But what does this have to do with the argument that gun owners could battle against the US Government? Absolutely fucking nothing.
JFK was the last US President to ever be assassinated, and it was through a pure lapse of logistics (or perhaps more to do with the fact it was assumed no one would be stupid enough to actually shoot the President, or maybe you subscribe to the conspiracy theory that it was all an inside job by the CIA). Oswald did not battle against the might of the US military to reach Kennedy, like some kind of end-stage boss battle in a fucking FPS game. These days the security of the President is taken so seriously that most people with plans to harm the political leader don’t make it within ten miles of the el presidente’s location before being picked up and arrested. And even if you did manage to kill the President, what exactly does this prove? That guns can kill someone if you shoot them? Wow, what a brilliant conclusion. I guess without the President, the US military’s nukes and jet planes suddenly stop working, like some kind of domino effect when you take out the head vampire. Somehow I think there’s a slight difference between shooting at an unarmored, unprotected man in a car who doesn’t know you’re there and shooting at a heavily armored military vehicle equipped with top of the line anti-life technology that is being piloted by a group of fully trained soldiers who already know your exact location thanks to heat mapping done by drones that are so high in the sky you can’t even see them. I mean, this is just a hypothetical anyways because if this scenario were real, you wouldn’t even see the armored vehicle full of soldiers driving towards you because you’d have already been terraformed by the tactical bombing.
But alright, alright. We don’t need to go into a big imaginary scenario where the US military attacks its own citizens. We’ve been down that road before and frankly the answer is always: There is no previous comparison (the revolutionary war, JFK assassination) that stacks up anywhere close to today’s power disparity that exists between the US military and anyone/everyone else. If we imagine a world where the entirety of the US military suddenly turns on the population, we’re fucked. No local LARPer militia or “I watch lots of military training videos on YouTube” heroes are going to stop them. the argument “but what about the Middle East!” is often employed when trying to find examples of an ‘undergeared’ militia fending off the US military, even StoneToss calls upon it by mentioning the Taliban. Well, let’s talk about that for a minute. What kind of weapons does the Taliban have? Military weapons. Where did they get them? From the US military, either directly or indirectly (many weapons and equipment were taken after government militaries abandoned them, this is due in large part to Middle Eastern militaries and their incredibly poor leadership, as they promote based entirely on loyalty rather than any other qualification). So by bringing up the Taliban, StoneToss is arguing that the US military’s equipment can be defeated, but only by a force that is using the US military’s equipment. Fucking genius. This is ignoring the sheer logistical issues the US faces when doing war in the Middle East, and that they would not be facing any of these massive problems if invading their own soil, making their war machine dozens of times more efficient and severely hampering the ability to “hide in the hills” ala Middle Eastern terrorist cells.
“OH YA THE ARMY HAS NUKE??? K WELL WHAT BOUT…. UHHH…. WHAT BOUT…. WHAT BOUT BRITISH ARMY IN THE 1700’S?”
“Did the British army in the 1700’s have nuclear weapons?”
<StoneToss offers no reply or acknowledgement, he is too busy making a comic about molesting kids>
I find the military analysis of high quality. Why indeed do people defend the second amendment?
What use are your guns going to be when the US military can just Nuke the US when it wants to invade the US?
View attachment 2294674
Say what you will about Stone Toss, and I will. He is a bigot. But he is a smart, well educated, well-read bigot. A dangerous kind of bigot. Unlike his peanut gallery. Its why I enjoy seeing the filth he spouts, sometimes. That Kennedy comic is actually based.
It presents a point I have never really considered. I too subscribe to the idea that bearing arms for purposes of Civil War is optimistic. But, the idea that you can change history with one bullet, is powerful. I dont fully agree, I think its a lot of luck and even more optimistic. But, it is a strong argument nonetheless.
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2018
ST fanart (sorry for mobile posting)
"But Stonetoss is based what're you talking about bro"
"
Oh SHIT this doing numbers lmao thanks brahs, here's some dumb edits I drew up mad quick. Stay BASED
@stone_toss
,
@Stone_tossers
, StonetossBros
"But Stonetoss is based what're you talking about bro"
"
Oh SHIT this doing numbers lmao thanks brahs, here's some dumb edits I drew up mad quick. Stay BASED
@stone_toss
,
@Stone_tossers
, StonetossBros
Attachments
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2018
Projection reply
https://mobile.twitter.com/rabbidsfanboy
RazerRuler #BlacklivesMatter
@rabbidsfanboy
Replying to
@GurvirShinda
and
@stone_toss
I have created my new character named StoneAss based on StoneToss making fun of him, A Short Soy-boy loser who lives under a stone isolated from Humanity, who has a flickering radio that turns off and on constantly.
10:44 PM · Jun 30, 2021·Twitter for iPad
RazerRuler #BlacklivesMatter
@rabbidsfanboy
Hi I’m RazerRuler I’m the creator of the RabbidsFanboy series
/
#BLM #lbgtqrights #StopAsianHate
(He/him)
In The Middle of Nowherelinktr.ee/rabbidsfanboy
Joined July 2019
304 Following
59 Followers
https://mobile.twitter.com/rabbidsfanboy
RazerRuler #BlacklivesMatter
@rabbidsfanboy
Replying to
@GurvirShinda
and
@stone_toss
I have created my new character named StoneAss based on StoneToss making fun of him, A Short Soy-boy loser who lives under a stone isolated from Humanity, who has a flickering radio that turns off and on constantly.
10:44 PM · Jun 30, 2021·Twitter for iPad
RazerRuler #BlacklivesMatter
@rabbidsfanboy
Hi I’m RazerRuler I’m the creator of the RabbidsFanboy series
(He/him)In The Middle of Nowherelinktr.ee/rabbidsfanboy
Joined July 2019
304 Following
59 Followers
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2019
Projection reply
https://mobile.twitter.com/rabbidsfanboy
RazerRuler #BlacklivesMatter
@rabbidsfanboy
Replying to
@GurvirShinda
and
@stone_toss
I have created my new character named StoneAss based on StoneToss making fun of him, A Short Soy-boy loser who lives under a stone isolated from Humanity, who has a flickering radio that turns off and on constantly.
10:44 PM · Jun 30, 2021·Twitter for iPad
RazerRuler #BlacklivesMatter
@rabbidsfanboy
Hi I’m RazerRuler I’m the creator of the RabbidsFanboy series/#BLM #lbgtqrights #StopAsianHate
In The Middle of Nowherelinktr.ee/rabbidsfanboy
Joined July 2019
304 Following
59 Followers
ST fanart (sorry for mobile posting)
"But Stonetoss is based what're you talking about bro"
View attachment 2313333
"
Oh SHIT this doing numbers lmao thanks brahs, here's some dumb edits I drew up mad quick. Stay BASED
@stone_toss
,
@Stone_tossers
, StonetossBros
What the fuck
Why would it be optimistic in the first place? For all of their training, once you ask soldiers to suppress/opress their own people it becomes hard to know who won't defect.
It's also how carrying pepper spray for a woman isn't optimistic. Something can work as a deterrence. And to give a bit of a fight. Even though it may not be enough to give you a good chance, at least now you're not completely helpless.
Look how fucking haywire belgium went over a single man defecting from the army. It would have been easier if he didn't have to steal his equipment from base. If he had been american, he could have just used his home stockpile.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Feb 21, 2021
I think stonetoss is kinda retarded because a lot of his arguments don't always make sense and even his most true & honest supporters don't always understand wtf he means with a comic. Some are just literal reaches (see: the rape culture one or the one about george floyd).
He either seems to COMPLETELY hit the nail on the head to where even the leftist left agrees (see: male feminist predator, troon femboy nazi etc.), make one thats genuinely funny and likable (insufferability contest, fbi meme laughing). Or make something SO retarded that the most people can do is speculate and haha amogus.
I find like 1:5 funny but goddamn if the seethe isn't 100% delicious because his format isnt at all replicable for text heavy leftie remixes.
Still better than Sophie LaBelle tho
He either seems to COMPLETELY hit the nail on the head to where even the leftist left agrees (see: male feminist predator, troon femboy nazi etc.), make one thats genuinely funny and likable (insufferability contest, fbi meme laughing). Or make something SO retarded that the most people can do is speculate and haha amogus.
I find like 1:5 funny but goddamn if the seethe isn't 100% delicious because his format isnt at all replicable for text heavy leftie remixes.
Still better than Sophie LaBelle tho
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2019
This is an excellent success rate for comics.
Neither of these are reaches.
I do find him at his most preachy/least funny when it comes to gay comics. But you don't even have to look very deep into the research (though I have) to know how completely endemic pedophilia is in gay circles. The overrepresentation of pedophilia among gay men is bigger than the overrepresentation of murder among black men.
And since most people sre sufficiently conditioned to even be willing to look at this, there is a certain value to keep hammering on it, even if it is a little dull.
Btw it's nice when people just post their personal thoughts/opinion.
- Joined
- May 30, 2021
Well, he is wrong because of supply and demand. When the supply (job seekers) increases the demand is going to decrease, depressing wages. It is one of the reasons why a man himself can no longer support a household since now he has to compete with the 50% of the population which was underemployed 50 years ago. Immigrants may be willing to have a wage that could cause starvation to a native household since immigrants tend to work like slaves so they can send money back to their families (which tend to live in very cheap countries). However, you are correct in what you said especially for competition in the first category.
Edit: Funnily, some European Leftists in the 60s opposed immigration since it would depress wages and destroy their unions.
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2019
This is something I've been wondering about. Are there legitimate statistics on that, or possibly even some scientific literature on a link between homosexuality and pedophilia? Sounds like outdated homophobic bullshit at first glance, but when my bisexual friend told me in confidence that they were molested as a kid, it got me thinking.
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2019
There isn't a study done directly on it. So you do have to make connections between studies.
There is plenty of statistics and studies that show the correlating link. It also matched with each of my samples taken from other EU countries, but I didn't save those.
Let me collect some sources together and get back in a day or two.
JuliusBranson
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 21, 2020
I was just wondering this yesterday. All the sources seem censored. The numbers I found suggest >50% of homosexuals are pedophiles. I'm interested in seeing your sources, Lemmingwise.
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2021
The bernout didn't like immigration until he did
polyester
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jan 26, 2020
Yep, during the 2016 Dem primaries, the Bernie Left we was all "Open borders is an insane idea promoted by the Koch Brothers to depress US working class wages!!!"
It was only once they had hyped themselves into terminal TDS, that they started pretending that open borders had always been the "moral consensus" which Orange Hitler was shockingly violating.