- Joined
- Jun 15, 2020
crap like that is the reason all female spaces will get invaded by troons. good job, idiots
Please do explain how women who don’t want to fuck men are responsible for men invading women’s spaces?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
crap like that is the reason all female spaces will get invaded by troons. good job, idiots
No that's febfemme which is unironically based. Polilez would be like... Andrea Dworkin who was in love with and married men (twice) but refused to admit she was bisexual and felt she was an honorary lesbian and ID'd as a lesbianIsn’t political lesbianism about bi women choosing to stop fucking men?
that makes no sense.crap like that is the reason all female spaces will get invaded by troons. good job, idiots
I saw how deeply ingrained this shit can really get on a personal level.It's fucked up that gender bullshit has pervaded our culture to the point that men can just whip their dicks out in womens' saunas...
Slight powerlevel, but I met a "political lesbian" who was married to a heterosexual cis man a while back.No that's febfemme which is unironically based. Polilez would be like... Andrea Dworkin who was in love with and married men (twice) but refused to admit she was bisexual and felt she was an honorary lesbian and ID'd as a lesbian
The tiny amount of women who decided they were political lesbians weren't women who 'identified' as lesbians, they were women who had real relationships with women as a political act. This woman, who is an idiot, isn't a political lesbian, she's just a standard libfem idiot who thinks she can somehow be a homosexual while actually being a heterosexual.Slight powerlevel, but I met a "political lesbian" who was married to a heterosexual cis man a while back.
And not as in "Yeah, I'm married to him because of convenience and I wanted kids, he's just my friend who helps with childcare and bills", she actually loved him and enjoyed having sex with him and by now they'll have been married for about 35 years. But she still insisted she was a lesbian.
If anyone questioned how she was a lesbian if she was clearly not a lesbian, she'd do a patronising laugh and lapse into some incoherent regurgitated 80s feminism spiel and that young people need to read more theory (it was actually impressive, anyone who tried to argue with her could never actually make her angry, because she was so sanctimonious). I'm pretty sure she never even dated a woman, although might have fucked around a bit before settling down with her husband.
Actually her husband used to wear nail polish and eye liner (he was in his 50s and married with 3 kids) - nothing specifically wrong with that, but I'm wondering if he's transitioned and ditched his family now.
Significantly more powerlevelling: this family 100% knew Aimee Challenor
No that's febfemme which is unironically based. Polilez would be like... Andrea Dworkin who was in love with and married men (twice) but refused to admit she was bisexual and felt she was an honorary lesbian and ID'd as a lesbian
As always, troons/leftists in general are the best advert for the right. It's like when Microsoft revealed the Xbone and all Sony had to do to beat them was release a normal fucking console.So protecting children is bad because the Right wants to protect children?
To your point, everyone please enjoy absolute madman Mark 'Chopper' Read explaining what happens to wife-beaters/rapists in prison:Even a man with prison “Love/hate” tatts on his knuckles is better in that situation because he’s more likely to stand up against male predators, than a boy like that twat in the Wi Spa video.
See also: Women are free to choose any career path they want but God help them if they choose the wrong choice and decide to become a housewife/home-maker and raise kids.the left doesn't "believe women" it "believes women should do as their told"
they are pushing that the whole Wi Spa video was a hoax.
Thoughts?
Guys who have masculine hobbies and care about their appearance are normally aware of how people think of them - even those who work out for vanity are doing so because they know how they appear and want to appear better.Its hard explaining some stuff about this without power leveling as fuck, so let me try. It might not make the most sense:
I have hella issues and something I've found over the years is traditionally "masculine" men are less scary than soyboys or trannies. The first group has their own host of issues but unless you're involved with an actually abusive person which is a different class in and of itself they tend to have some awareness that they may scare a woman and will actually recognize that in their behavior.
Soyboys are like those weird spiders that pretend to be ants so that they can close to ants and eat them. Trannies are the same way. That behavior is far more sinister to my paranoid brain and sets off danger in a more extreme way than some dudebro who likes to lift.
EDIT: I put masculine in quotes because its a weird thing to define and thats just the easiest word for it.
Yeah I was using the dudebro as just an example. There is a huge spectrum that falls into "not soyboy or tranny" that is less likely to behave in the way I was thinking.Agreed. Most dudebro's I meet are really not interested in anything that's not traditionally masculine. So in my opinion, they make terrible conversationists. But unless they make my abuser-alarm go off, I feel pretty safe around them.
Then there's the other category that I would describe as 'just normal dudes whose brains still work'. They're not buff in anyway and I guess they could be classified as male TERFs if there was such a thing and they'd care about the lingo. In my experience, most boomer dads fall into this range.
'Woke' men however, yeah, then I'm out.
Guys who have masculine hobbies and care about their appearance are normally aware of how people think of them - even those who work out for vanity are doing so because they know how they appear and want to appear better.
Being fit is equal parts of physical activity, intelligence and self-restraint, all of which trannies and soyboys proudly lack.
From the perspective of somebody who takes his fitness and health seriously, soyboys have a certain smugness and arrogance in their disposition - they're proud of being "confident" in their flabby bodies and they do speak ill of people who actually care quite frequently. Trannies are the same, but worse. All of their feigned agreeableness is a facade and drops immediately when confronted with anybody they can attack without consequences, they will. Most are clearly not happy with having people who can knock them out anywhere near them, and always use underhanded tactics to keep themselves as the dominant men in a group.
Seriously, soyboys hate masculine men because they see them as a threat - masculine men are easy to deal with, just give them protein-rich food and they'll be happy. Soyboys on the other hand almost always consider themselves as some Machiavellian masterminds with infallible justness in their actions.
Yep.
Trannies physically and verbally pick on women. If they have a choice amongst a group of females, they will target and isolate older women to threaten/assault instead of the young ones. Mentally well, productive men who were raised right don't hate women. Trannies being mentally deranged losers, display all the traits of true misogyny a la incels; where they despise females profoundly, but often strike out against older women who are deemed 'less useful' to a fucked up manbaby mind. At the same time, they loathe younger attractive women for being a constant reminder of what they will never possess either through imitation or sexual owndership.
Soyboys have been fed a bunch of Liberal claptrap that all they need is education and a crash course in gender studies and the women will fall at their feet. But when the real world comes knocking on their reclaimed barnwood door, it's a rude awakening that most women are attracted to a man who is competent and will protect them at any cost and look the part.
One one hand, you have a weak-chinned, noodle-armed academic who gets involved in campus feminism and attends white privilege seminars while drinking a chai latte in Starbucks.
Conversely, you get a man who is physical fit, and not afraid to tell a bearded troon that if he goes near his daughter's swimming lesson he'll have his goddamn arms ripped off. Not surprising that most women would go for option 2. And thus, soyboys start hating women too.
I've always seen it as the first foray in claiming lesbianism by non-lesbians. Like, of course it's not women's fault that transbians exist and are disgusting coomers. But, it's also these fake lezzies who are always ready to infiltrate lesbian spaces and push for male inclusion. They're also the ones constantly talking about mouthfeel, female penis, etc. Really, it *is* women who do a lot of work for these pieces of shit, usually the ones attracted to males in some way.that makes no sense.