📚 Megathread Tranny Sideshows on Social Media - Any small-time spectacle on Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, Dating Sites, and other social media.

Isn’t political lesbianism about bi women choosing to stop fucking men?
No that's febfemme which is unironically based. Polilez would be like... Andrea Dworkin who was in love with and married men (twice) but refused to admit she was bisexual and felt she was an honorary lesbian and ID'd as a lesbian
 
It's fucked up that gender bullshit has pervaded our culture to the point that men can just whip their dicks out in womens' saunas...
I saw how deeply ingrained this shit can really get on a personal level.

Mild powerleveling: I'm visiting family in another state for 4th of July. My brother trooned out years ago and he didn't even come on this trip. Everyone talking about him has been so effectively conditioned to affirm their delusion that they are still referring to them as a woman when he's not even here.

A company just wants to avoid bad PR. These are just people. They have nothing to lose by just dropping the charade but keep playing this shitty game anyway. Everyone is bending over backwards to appease and they'd rather do that than offend.
 
No that's febfemme which is unironically based. Polilez would be like... Andrea Dworkin who was in love with and married men (twice) but refused to admit she was bisexual and felt she was an honorary lesbian and ID'd as a lesbian
Slight powerlevel, but I met a "political lesbian" who was married to a heterosexual cis man a while back.

And not as in "Yeah, I'm married to him because of convenience and I wanted kids, he's just my friend who helps with childcare and bills", she actually loved him and enjoyed having sex with him and by now they'll have been married for about 35 years. But she still insisted she was a lesbian.

If anyone questioned how she was a lesbian if she was clearly not a lesbian, she'd do a patronising laugh and lapse into some incoherent regurgitated 80s feminism spiel and that young people need to read more theory (it was actually impressive, anyone who tried to argue with her could never actually make her angry, because she was so sanctimonious). I'm pretty sure she never even dated a woman, although might have fucked around a bit before settling down with her husband.

Actually her husband used to wear nail polish and eye liner (he was in his 50s and married with 3 kids) - nothing specifically wrong with that, but I'm wondering if he's transitioned and ditched his family now.

Significantly more powerlevelling: this family 100% knew Aimee Challenor
 
Slight powerlevel, but I met a "political lesbian" who was married to a heterosexual cis man a while back.

And not as in "Yeah, I'm married to him because of convenience and I wanted kids, he's just my friend who helps with childcare and bills", she actually loved him and enjoyed having sex with him and by now they'll have been married for about 35 years. But she still insisted she was a lesbian.

If anyone questioned how she was a lesbian if she was clearly not a lesbian, she'd do a patronising laugh and lapse into some incoherent regurgitated 80s feminism spiel and that young people need to read more theory (it was actually impressive, anyone who tried to argue with her could never actually make her angry, because she was so sanctimonious). I'm pretty sure she never even dated a woman, although might have fucked around a bit before settling down with her husband.

Actually her husband used to wear nail polish and eye liner (he was in his 50s and married with 3 kids) - nothing specifically wrong with that, but I'm wondering if he's transitioned and ditched his family now.

Significantly more powerlevelling: this family 100% knew Aimee Challenor
The tiny amount of women who decided they were political lesbians weren't women who 'identified' as lesbians, they were women who had real relationships with women as a political act. This woman, who is an idiot, isn't a political lesbian, she's just a standard libfem idiot who thinks she can somehow be a homosexual while actually being a heterosexual.
 
No that's febfemme which is unironically based. Polilez would be like... Andrea Dworkin who was in love with and married men (twice) but refused to admit she was bisexual and felt she was an honorary lesbian and ID'd as a lesbian

Well that’s fucked, to identify as a lesbian without being one
 
So protecting children is bad because the Right wants to protect children?
As always, troons/leftists in general are the best advert for the right. It's like when Microsoft revealed the Xbone and all Sony had to do to beat them was release a normal fucking console.

If wanting to let kids be kids and finding rampant degeneracy and mindless hedonism repulsive makes me right wing then I'll happily cast that ballot.
Even a man with prison “Love/hate” tatts on his knuckles is better in that situation because he’s more likely to stand up against male predators, than a boy like that twat in the Wi Spa video.
To your point, everyone please enjoy absolute madman Mark 'Chopper' Read explaining what happens to wife-beaters/rapists in prison:
(P.S. He did also put a gun to a female reporter's head and pull the trigger while promising it was unloaded, so take this for what you will.)
the left doesn't "believe women" it "believes women should do as their told"
See also: Women are free to choose any career path they want but God help them if they choose the wrong choice and decide to become a housewife/home-maker and raise kids.
 
they are pushing that the whole Wi Spa video was a hoax.
Thoughts?


They always pull this shit. It's why Kiwi autism vexes them so. We usually have evidence/receipts/archives etc. For anyone newer to this topic or the Farms, remember a simple truth:

Troons LIE.

They have to. Their entire lives are built on a foundation of lies and delusion. They AREN'T women. They know it, we know it, I even think Wokies know it. It's all about manipulating useful idiots to enforce society as a whole to mass pretend in order to placate them.

But their entire propaganda machine depends on deception. Remember a few years back when that 60 year old Terf Lady was assaulted by a gaggle of 20 something trannies at Speaker's Corner? The entire assault was recorded at multiple angles by different people. The main troon instigator that hit the woman was found guilty in a court of law.
Troons STILL claimed the gramma was the violent aggressor. They edited the existing footage to take out the parts where the Tranny Goon instigated it and circulated it thru Woke social media to "prove" T'was the evil Terves again!. Gender idiots are known for their vacuousness and aversion to critical thought. They welcome someone else thinking for them, so you get a few Blue checkmark Troons to announce what today's belief is on any topic and the smear campaigns begin. They're taught to disagree with "Terves and transphobes" at the expense of truth and integrity.

Remember when Trannies vandalized a Vancouver Rape shelter and nailed a dead rat to the door? They blamed that on a Terf conspiracy too. Even though they have been attacking that Rape shelter for 10 fucking years, and Morgane Oger stated the Shelter deserved it anyways.

Troons lie.

Always collect receipts.
 
Its hard explaining some stuff about this without power leveling as fuck, so let me try. It might not make the most sense:

I have hella issues and something I've found over the years is traditionally "masculine" men are less scary than soyboys or trannies. The first group has their own host of issues but unless you're involved with an actually abusive person which is a different class in and of itself they tend to have some awareness that they may scare a woman and will actually recognize that in their behavior.

Soyboys are like those weird spiders that pretend to be ants so that they can close to ants and eat them. Trannies are the same way. That behavior is far more sinister to my paranoid brain and sets off danger in a more extreme way than some dudebro who likes to lift.

EDIT: I put masculine in quotes because its a weird thing to define and thats just the easiest word for it.
Guys who have masculine hobbies and care about their appearance are normally aware of how people think of them - even those who work out for vanity are doing so because they know how they appear and want to appear better.

Being fit is equal parts of physical activity, intelligence and self-restraint, all of which trannies and soyboys proudly lack.

From the perspective of somebody who takes his fitness and health seriously, soyboys have a certain smugness and arrogance in their disposition - they're proud of being "confident" in their flabby bodies and they do speak ill of people who actually care quite frequently. Trannies are the same, but worse. All of their feigned agreeableness is a facade and drops immediately when confronted with anybody they can attack without consequences, they will. Most are clearly not happy with having people who can knock them out anywhere near them, and always use underhanded tactics to keep themselves as the dominant men in a group.

Seriously, soyboys hate masculine men because they see them as a threat - masculine men are easy to deal with, just give them protein-rich food and they'll be happy. Soyboys on the other hand almost always consider themselves as some Machiavellian masterminds with infallible justness in their actions.
 
twitter.png
 

Attachments

  • E5fOJnzWYAEMapO.png
    E5fOJnzWYAEMapO.png
    34.8 KB · Views: 271
  • E5fOjUxXoAIXKE5.jpg
    E5fOjUxXoAIXKE5.jpg
    119.7 KB · Views: 258

Attachments

Agreed. Most dudebro's I meet are really not interested in anything that's not traditionally masculine. So in my opinion, they make terrible conversationists. But unless they make my abuser-alarm go off, I feel pretty safe around them.

Then there's the other category that I would describe as 'just normal dudes whose brains still work'. They're not buff in anyway and I guess they could be classified as male TERFs if there was such a thing and they'd care about the lingo. In my experience, most boomer dads fall into this range.

'Woke' men however, yeah, then I'm out.
Yeah I was using the dudebro as just an example. There is a huge spectrum that falls into "not soyboy or tranny" that is less likely to behave in the way I was thinking.
 
Guys who have masculine hobbies and care about their appearance are normally aware of how people think of them - even those who work out for vanity are doing so because they know how they appear and want to appear better.

Being fit is equal parts of physical activity, intelligence and self-restraint, all of which trannies and soyboys proudly lack.

From the perspective of somebody who takes his fitness and health seriously, soyboys have a certain smugness and arrogance in their disposition - they're proud of being "confident" in their flabby bodies and they do speak ill of people who actually care quite frequently. Trannies are the same, but worse. All of their feigned agreeableness is a facade and drops immediately when confronted with anybody they can attack without consequences, they will. Most are clearly not happy with having people who can knock them out anywhere near them, and always use underhanded tactics to keep themselves as the dominant men in a group.

Seriously, soyboys hate masculine men because they see them as a threat - masculine men are easy to deal with, just give them protein-rich food and they'll be happy. Soyboys on the other hand almost always consider themselves as some Machiavellian masterminds with infallible justness in their actions.

Yep.

Trannies physically and verbally pick on women. If they have a choice amongst a group of females, they will target and isolate older women to threaten/assault instead of the young ones. Mentally well, productive men who were raised right don't hate women. Trannies being mentally deranged, display all the traits of true misogyny a la incels; where they despise females profoundly, but often strike out against older women who are deemed 'less useful' to a fucked up manbaby mind. At the same time, they loathe younger attractive women for being a constant reminder of what they will never possess either through imitation or sexual ownership.

Soyboys have been fed a bunch of Liberal claptrap that all they need is education and a crash course in gender studies and the women will fall at their feet. But when the real world comes knocking on their reclaimed barnwood door, it's a rude awakening that most women are attracted to a man who is competent and will protect them at any cost and look the part.
On one hand, you have a weak-chinned, noodle-armed academic who gets involved in campus feminism and attends white privilege seminars while drinking a chai latte in Starbucks.
Conversely, you get a man who is physically fit, and not afraid to tell a bearded troon that if he goes near his daughter's swimming lesson he'll have his goddamn arms ripped off. Not surprising that most women would go for option 2. And thus, soyboys start hating women as well.
 
Last edited:
Yep.

Trannies physically and verbally pick on women. If they have a choice amongst a group of females, they will target and isolate older women to threaten/assault instead of the young ones. Mentally well, productive men who were raised right don't hate women. Trannies being mentally deranged losers, display all the traits of true misogyny a la incels; where they despise females profoundly, but often strike out against older women who are deemed 'less useful' to a fucked up manbaby mind. At the same time, they loathe younger attractive women for being a constant reminder of what they will never possess either through imitation or sexual owndership.

Soyboys have been fed a bunch of Liberal claptrap that all they need is education and a crash course in gender studies and the women will fall at their feet. But when the real world comes knocking on their reclaimed barnwood door, it's a rude awakening that most women are attracted to a man who is competent and will protect them at any cost and look the part.
One one hand, you have a weak-chinned, noodle-armed academic who gets involved in campus feminism and attends white privilege seminars while drinking a chai latte in Starbucks.
Conversely, you get a man who is physical fit, and not afraid to tell a bearded troon that if he goes near his daughter's swimming lesson he'll have his goddamn arms ripped off. Not surprising that most women would go for option 2. And thus, soyboys start hating women too.

Here is a video of the soyboy's worst nightmare.
 
Good summary of the Wi Spa shit from Ovarit.

The Wi Spa incident led me to read a lot of posts in reaction to it on Twitter and Reddit, as well as reactions to the protest yesterday. Until this controversy happened, all debates about male bodies in places where women would be naked were theoretical, and TRAs never really had to talk about what happens then. Well, now it has happened, and they finally have to lay it out there the end game they've wanted all a long. No more "They just want to pee." The masks have come off (except when they're hounding and bullying a lone woman at a protest.)

The world they envision, based on what they've said, looks like this:

  • Mass amnesia by the entire population that male intimidation, if not actual male violence, is a lived-reality that women and girls face on a regular, on-going basis.
  • Mass amnesia by the entire population that some men in fact get off on exposing themselves to women.
  • Mass brainwashing of the entire population to accept the accusation that it is the women and girls' fault if they catch sight of men's genitals in steam rooms, saunas, changing rooms. Women and girls are the ones being creepy for staring. Not because men with bad intentions are flashing themselves, and not because even men with no bad intention will get erections that will be difficult to conceal when they see naked women and girls. In the world they want us to accept, everyone is to believe that men in women's changing rooms would simply go about their business. Against all logic and human nature, the entire population is to pretend that when naked males and females are put in a mixed sex space together, the context of the environment will presumed to be nonsexual rather than highly sexual, rather than the other way around.
  • Complete disregard of the need for protection and safeguarding of women and girls. Any such request (let alone demand) for such protection or safeguarding is to be smashed down and silenced under the auspice of "transphobia"
  • Total elimination of any privacy or dignity for women, no matter what age, no matter how young or how old, in public spaces where women want or need to undress.
  • Women and children must accept that they will see dicks in public places where nudity is permitted. If they don't want to see dicks, or if they feel unsafe, then women and children need to stop going to public places. In this world, women and girls are not allowed to participate in civic life unless they're willing to be exposed to dicks.
  • Segregation of male and female are not for women's protection. It is only done for identity.
  • Any talk about women's concern for safety, needs, and feelings can be done only when related to transwomen's safety, needs, and feelings. Any concern for safety and needs of women who are not transwomen will be smashed down and disallowed for being "transphobic".
  • In this world, the entire population shall be brainwashed to believe and accept that women will rape children too, at the same rate as men will. In this world, the delusion that women pose no less threat than men will reign.
  • Rape and sexual assault victims who would be triggered by the presence of men and male genitals are not allowed to have any safe space in the public. They have to adjust their attitudes. If they can't, they need to keep themselves out of the public and stay home. Society must not do anything to try to protect them and enable them to function in public without fear. No policy are allowed to be made to accommodate them.
  • Children must be taught and educated to accept nude male bodies around them. No consideration shall be given to the fact that children are too young to process and interpret context. If a child fails to gauge context, it is the parents' fault for not educating them, regardless of the fact that children shouldn't be exposed to mature content or discussions in the first place, and regardless of the fact that it is impossible for parents to teach certain things that minors are not mature enough to understand. Society shall not make it a top priority to collectively protect children from risks of harm.
  • Because harmful males can also harm boys, we must expose girls to the same harm.
  • Massive brainwashing to delude the entire population to believe that boys are at the same level of risks as girls if there is no sex segregation.
Yes, all these came directly from TRAs themselves. They've told us some of these before, and we've deducted ourselves some they hadn't said. But before, they've avoided admitting they want to obliterate all women's rights and protection by brushing some of these aside with "It never happens." Now, they're no longer hiding it anymore. Destruction of women's rights and protection is the ultimate outcome they want.

I no longer even believe they care about transgender people. None of what they want is about helping transgender people be more accepted and welcomed into mainstream society. It's about power. It's about power over women, and power to remake the world into one that subjugates women.
 
At least it doesn't have pronouns in the bio. The ratio of people its following to following it, 0.21, is a attention whore achievement worse them most art-trannies. The need to @ verified accounts for validations of its "art" is like it put a pork chop on its own neck to dogs to play with it. Its websight and the constant use of "we" shows its just another another neurodivergent tranny trying to be mainstream.

Screenshot 2021-07-05 094208.jpg


The face only a tranny chaser will smash.

EGe5meTWwAEIAe7.jpg


Mark Cuban really will give a shit about its mask idea.

Screenshot 2021-07-05 095918.jpg


Joy Reid will also give it attention for moral fagging about Fentanyl Floyd.

Screenshot 2021-07-05 095829.jpg
 
that makes no sense.
I've always seen it as the first foray in claiming lesbianism by non-lesbians. Like, of course it's not women's fault that transbians exist and are disgusting coomers. But, it's also these fake lezzies who are always ready to infiltrate lesbian spaces and push for male inclusion. They're also the ones constantly talking about mouthfeel, female penis, etc. Really, it *is* women who do a lot of work for these pieces of shit, usually the ones attracted to males in some way.

In Lesbian Connection Magazine, there was a 2 page long letter in from some 50+ year old "lesbian" who was browbeating the rest of the readership regarding the "transphobia" in the magazine. It's already inclusive or whatever. Really, we can't ignore the groundwork women do and have done for these fucks.

Edit: Fake lesbianism and polilez is not a small amount of the lesbian population. It's extremely common. Just look at "compulsory heterosexuality". And all these late bloomer lesbians who were happily married for 15 years and have 4 kids.
 
Back
Top Bottom