An evolutionary biologist claimed Friday that, should the anti-malarial drug Ivermectin be proven effective against the
coronavirus, it would moot the usage of and potentially the ability to administer the U.S. coronavirus
vaccines currently active under the Food & Drug Administration's Emergency Use Authorization.
Bret Weinstein – who previously
made headlines after being pressured out of his biology professorship at Evergreen State College in Washington State for criticizing
an anti-White "day-of-absence" – told Fox Nation's
"Tucker Carlson Today" that he has been analyzing the vaccines, and has summarily been censored for raising concerns about the shots and the medical establishment's opposition to alternative treatments.
"
f Ivermectin is what those of us who have looked at the evidence think it is … then the debate about the vaccines would be over by definition, because the vaccines that we have so far were granted emergency use authorization," Weinstein said, noting that the coronavirus vaccines are not formally "approved" treatments by the FDA and instead administered under the rarely-delineated category of EUA.
According to the FDA's own definition, an EUA is "is a mechanism to facilitate the availability and use of medical countermeasures, including vaccines, during public health emergencies, such as the current COVID-19 pandemic."
"Under an EUA, FDA may allow the use of unapproved medical products, or unapproved uses of approved medical products in an emergency to diagnose, treat, or prevent serious or life-threatening diseases or conditions when certain statutory criteria have been met, including that there are no adequate, approved, and available alternatives," the agency said.
