- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
Lmao you actually believe that.But laugh at Lemons all you want, he earned them only a year of hell. That their insurance helped them cover.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Lmao you actually believe that.But laugh at Lemons all you want, he earned them only a year of hell. That their insurance helped them cover.
Am I wrong?Lmao you actually believe that.
Yeah. Insurance doesn't work that way. They don't just go "hey have a free $300,000 on us for shit you did on purpose."Am I wrong?
I think Nick hates the SLAPP laws because its supposed to save people money by throwing out the case early if its not a good lawsuit. Problem is it usually goes up to the Supreme courts and ends up saving no money in the end.So I guess I have a question to everybody in regards to Nicky's past bad legal takes. What in gods name is wrong about SLAPP laws? It's been a year since the Vic case wrapped up. And I remember the entire time and even currently Nick has done everything from question these laws effectiveness, to outright saying they're a bad thing outright. I know half that opinion relies on the fact that he probably digs the idea of clients with deep pockets paying people like him to work. Suing people out of their life savings or into a grave. But the Vic case if anything vindicated SLAPP laws. Monica, Ron, and Jamie faced years of legal battles. But laugh at Lemons all you want, he earned them only a year of hell. That their insurance helped them cover.
I can only guess that Nick hates the concept of laws protecting poor people. And that anybody who has an opinion better be prepared to protect it with a crack legal team. Or bend down and kiss the ring, or else... "Speech is free Lawyers aren't." That motto really takes a more sinister undertone if you think about it.
Nick and his ilk can kvetch, and call this take retarded all they want. But the proof is in the pudding. Whether it comes to Vics case or Ya' Boi Zack. Not a single one of these culture war cases Nicks brought up on his show has gone past a SLAPP motion. Not one!
A way better take on SLAPP's then you will ever get on RekietaLaw.
How would the insurance company determine they did anything wrong when there wasn't a verdict? Their activity was otherwise pretty legal. Vic sued them! Your pretending as if they were the ones being litigious. When in fact they were the defendants who were getting sued for saying retarded shit on the internet. Before you scream defamation isn't protected speech, they are innocent till proven guilty. The facts are that Moronica was never found by the court to have committed defamation period! Anything beyond that is just moral masturbation, not facts. And the IStandwithVic/Nickrekieta crowd need to suck that up.Yeah. Insurance doesn't work that way. They don't just go "hey have a free $300,000 on us for shit you did on purpose."
The court documents do state that MoRon's legal fees were that, but Vic was only ordered to pay the reasonable fees which were relevant to them filing their TCPA motion.But if its the court docs that state that yikes! Poor Vic according to the same said court docs was ordered to pay those fees.
Yeah well, if you'd read the dox, you'd know the fees they claimed were $283,952.00, of which they were awarded only $100,000 because at least $183,000 or so of the fees were because of their own excessive overlitigation of a simple motion to dismiss. You think insurance is going to pay for someone to run up a bunch of legal fees completely unnecessarily in a case entirely about shit the defendants deliberately did?Also I doubt it was 300,000,. But if its the court docs that state that yikes! Pretty sure Poor Vic according to the same said court docs was ordered by Chupp to pay those fees. For his spurious lawsuit.
Has anyone figured out how an insurance company would operate in a state with SLAPP? Or if the insurance covers just reasonable fees? curious if the insurance would cover anything beyond what the judge stated was reasonable fee wise. Also there is the fact they are appealing the fees, why would they do that if insurance covers it?Yeah well, if you'd read the dox, you'd know the fees they claimed were $283,952.00, of which they were awarded only $100,000 because at least $183,000 or so of the fees were because of their own excessive overlitigation of a simple motion to dismiss. You think insurance is going to pay for someone to run up a bunch of legal fees completely unnecessarily in a case entirely about shit the defendants deliberately did?
That's not how insurance companies stay in existence.
I mean I'm not exactly saying Lemoine's law firm has the most honest accountants. Especially when they were make making fee requests during the Vic case. Also I would expect an insurance company to Negotiate down that cost, or at least partially cover it. I guess its easy to assume Rons just a liar. But he very well might be telling the truth.Yeah well, if you'd read the dox, you'd know the fees they claimed were $283,952.00, of which they were awarded only $100,000 because at least $183,000 or so of the fees were because of their own excessive overlitigation of a simple motion to dismiss. You think insurance is going to pay for someone to run up a bunch of legal fees completely unnecessarily in a case entirely about shit the defendants deliberately did?
That's not how insurance companies stay in existence.
Rate me optimistic but the appeals decision hasn't come through yet and I really don't think Chupp put much effort into getting the TCPA right.I know everybody loves the loss porn. But I really don't care. Its just a weird thing for Ron to lie about. I guess I was more interested that the SLAPP did end up protecting them. Whether from an over litigious lecher, or from the overcharging ambulance chasers they hired.
Have you ever listen to Ron or read anything this idiot wrote on the internet? He's trapped in his own delusions and lies constantly. But sure, his insurance covered all the costs that his greedy laywers billed them. That's why he sold his house and moved into a rental, and that's why he now simps for Hyundai on Twitter instead of bragging about buying an Audi.Its just a weird thing for Ron to lie about.
How did the Texas SLAPP law protect them from being billed to much from their lungless monster?But I guess my main point was that the SLAPP did end up protecting them. Whether from an over litigious lecher, or from the overcharging ambulance chasers they hired.
Our favorite gayboi is streaming him walking around matsuri
lol
![]()
Edit: Confirmation anna is tiny.
![]()
Gay pants confirmedView attachment 2336456
edit: there are a ton of anime cars. One of Nick's tiny companions just confirmed that this one's scratch and sniff
View attachment 2336466
I've never seen an insurance policy that acts the way Ron claims his works, and he is known to flex about obviously absurd nonsense. Usually a policy that covers defamation is an umbrella policy covering losses not already covered by homeowner's insurance, and it's fairly inexpensive to get what look like astronomical levels of coverage, and for somewhat more, even fair looking terms, like policies where the insurance company not only covers the defense up front, but provides the lawyers, and pays off the judgment, or settles at policy limits.Whether from an over litigious lecher, or from the overcharging ambulance chasers they hired.
Just Join Mossad.I want to get going around murdering people insurance because that sounds pretty cool.
Cuck Wonder himself said it was 300k, for reference.How would the insurance company determine they did anything wrong when there wasn't a verdict? Their activity was otherwise pretty legal. Vic sued them! Your pretending as if they were the ones being litigious. When in fact they were the defendants who were getting sued for saying retarded shit on the internet. Before you scream defamation isn't protected speech, they are innocent till proven guilty. The facts are that Moronica was never found by the court to have committed defamation period! Anything beyond that is just moral masturbation, not facts. And the IStandwithVic/Nickrekieta crowd need to suck that up.
Also I doubt it was 300,000,. But if its the court docs that state that yikes! Pretty sure Poor Vic according to the same said court docs was ordered by Chupp to pay those fees. For his spurious lawsuit.