Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 17.7%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.1%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 93 26.2%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 58 16.3%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 137 38.6%

  • Total voters
    355
So I guess I have a question to everybody in regards to Nicky's past bad legal takes. What in gods name is wrong about SLAPP laws? It's been a year since the Vic case wrapped up. And I remember the entire time and even currently Nick has done everything from question these laws effectiveness, to outright saying they're a bad thing outright. I know half that opinion relies on the fact that he probably digs the idea of clients with deep pockets paying people like him to work. Suing people out of their life savings or into a grave. But the Vic case if anything vindicated SLAPP laws. Monica, Ron, and Jamie faced years of legal battles. But laugh at Lemons all you want, he earned them only a year of hell. That their insurance helped them cover.

I can only guess that Nick hates the concept of laws protecting poor people. And that anybody who has an opinion better be prepared to protect it with a crack legal team. Or bend down and kiss the ring, or else... "Speech is free Lawyers aren't." That motto really takes a more sinister undertone if you think about it.

Nick and his ilk can kvetch, and call this take retarded all they want. But the proof is in the pudding. Whether it comes to Vics case or Ya' Boi Zack. Not a single one of these culture war cases Nicks brought up on his show has gone past a SLAPP motion. Not one!

A way better take on SLAPP's then you will ever get on RekietaLaw.
I think Nick hates the SLAPP laws because its supposed to save people money by throwing out the case early if its not a good lawsuit. Problem is it usually goes up to the Supreme courts and ends up saving no money in the end.
 
Yeah. Insurance doesn't work that way. They don't just go "hey have a free $300,000 on us for shit you did on purpose."
How would the insurance company determine they did anything wrong when there wasn't a verdict? Their activity was otherwise pretty legal. Vic sued them! Your pretending as if they were the ones being litigious. When in fact they were the defendants who were getting sued for saying retarded shit on the internet. Before you scream defamation isn't protected speech, they are innocent till proven guilty. The facts are that Moronica was never found by the court to have committed defamation period! Anything beyond that is just moral masturbation, not facts. And the IStandwithVic/Nickrekieta crowd need to suck that up.

Also I doubt it was 300,000,. But if its the court docs that state that yikes! Pretty sure Poor Vic according to the same said court docs was ordered by Chupp to pay those fees. For his spurious lawsuit.
 
Last edited:
Also I doubt it was 300,000,. But if its the court docs that state that yikes! Pretty sure Poor Vic according to the same said court docs was ordered by Chupp to pay those fees. For his spurious lawsuit.
Yeah well, if you'd read the dox, you'd know the fees they claimed were $283,952.00, of which they were awarded only $100,000 because at least $183,000 or so of the fees were because of their own excessive overlitigation of a simple motion to dismiss. You think insurance is going to pay for someone to run up a bunch of legal fees completely unnecessarily in a case entirely about shit the defendants deliberately did?

That's not how insurance companies stay in existence.
 
Yeah well, if you'd read the dox, you'd know the fees they claimed were $283,952.00, of which they were awarded only $100,000 because at least $183,000 or so of the fees were because of their own excessive overlitigation of a simple motion to dismiss. You think insurance is going to pay for someone to run up a bunch of legal fees completely unnecessarily in a case entirely about shit the defendants deliberately did?

That's not how insurance companies stay in existence.
Has anyone figured out how an insurance company would operate in a state with SLAPP? Or if the insurance covers just reasonable fees? curious if the insurance would cover anything beyond what the judge stated was reasonable fee wise. Also there is the fact they are appealing the fees, why would they do that if insurance covers it?
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Roboute Guilliman
Yeah well, if you'd read the dox, you'd know the fees they claimed were $283,952.00, of which they were awarded only $100,000 because at least $183,000 or so of the fees were because of their own excessive overlitigation of a simple motion to dismiss. You think insurance is going to pay for someone to run up a bunch of legal fees completely unnecessarily in a case entirely about shit the defendants deliberately did?

That's not how insurance companies stay in existence.
I mean I'm not exactly saying Lemoine's law firm has the most honest accountants. Especially when they were make making fee requests during the Vic case. Also I would expect an insurance company to Negotiate down that cost, or at least partially cover it. I guess its easy to assume Rons just a liar. But he very well might be telling the truth.

I know everybody loves the loss porn. But I really don't care. Its just a weird thing for Ron to lie about. I guess I was more interested that the SLAPP did end up protecting them. Whether from an over litigious lecher, or from the overcharging ambulance chasers they hired.
 
I know everybody loves the loss porn. But I really don't care. Its just a weird thing for Ron to lie about. I guess I was more interested that the SLAPP did end up protecting them. Whether from an over litigious lecher, or from the overcharging ambulance chasers they hired.
Rate me optimistic but the appeals decision hasn't come through yet and I really don't think Chupp put much effort into getting the TCPA right.
 
Its just a weird thing for Ron to lie about.
Have you ever listen to Ron or read anything this idiot wrote on the internet? He's trapped in his own delusions and lies constantly. But sure, his insurance covered all the costs that his greedy laywers billed them. That's why he sold his house and moved into a rental, and that's why he now simps for Hyundai on Twitter instead of bragging about buying an Audi.

But I guess my main point was that the SLAPP did end up protecting them. Whether from an over litigious lecher, or from the overcharging ambulance chasers they hired.
How did the Texas SLAPP law protect them from being billed to much from their lungless monster?
 
Nick got a live superchat from Dragons Treasure Tea
dragonstreasuretea.jpg

edit: more coverage in the Anime Matsuri 2021 thread
Our favorite gayboi is streaming him walking around matsuri

lol

Screen Shot 2021-07-11 at 2.40.41 PM.png


Edit: Confirmation anna is tiny.

Screen Shot 2021-07-11 at 2.53.35 PM.png
Lady Rackets bought Nick as an angry dumpling
nickangrydumpling.jpg
Gay pants confirmedView attachment 2336456

edit: there are a ton of anime cars. One of Nick's tiny companions just confirmed that this one's scratch and sniff
View attachment 2336466
 
Last edited:
Whether from an over litigious lecher, or from the overcharging ambulance chasers they hired.
I've never seen an insurance policy that acts the way Ron claims his works, and he is known to flex about obviously absurd nonsense. Usually a policy that covers defamation is an umbrella policy covering losses not already covered by homeowner's insurance, and it's fairly inexpensive to get what look like astronomical levels of coverage, and for somewhat more, even fair looking terms, like policies where the insurance company not only covers the defense up front, but provides the lawyers, and pays off the judgment, or settles at policy limits.

Then they range down to weaker policies which still provide what looks like enormous amounts of coverage, but instead of paying up front, they pay in the back, while you are the one paying for the lawyers in the interim, and they base whether or not they pay on what happens.

Now, possibly, Ron did have one of these Cadillac plans that do everything up front. Such a policy would involve the company being directly involved in what was going on, because they're paying up front for it. They would not watch a guy sitting there continuing to rack up new liability and just say "lmao sure have a quarter million for your little Twitter spat we don't mind." They would tell him to shut the fuck up or the money spigot gets turned off.

And with the kind of policy where they only indemnify you after the legal costs and fees and judgment have accrued, the insurer may choose not to pay based on what actually happened in the case.

In either case, it's very common for an insurer to sue the insured for declaratory relief they aren't obligated to cover whatever event triggered the claim.

Nothing Ron has said about this is remotely like any insurance policy I ever heard of, but if it is, I want to get going around murdering people insurance because that sounds pretty cool.
 
How would the insurance company determine they did anything wrong when there wasn't a verdict? Their activity was otherwise pretty legal. Vic sued them! Your pretending as if they were the ones being litigious. When in fact they were the defendants who were getting sued for saying retarded shit on the internet. Before you scream defamation isn't protected speech, they are innocent till proven guilty. The facts are that Moronica was never found by the court to have committed defamation period! Anything beyond that is just moral masturbation, not facts. And the IStandwithVic/Nickrekieta crowd need to suck that up.

Also I doubt it was 300,000,. But if its the court docs that state that yikes! Pretty sure Poor Vic according to the same said court docs was ordered by Chupp to pay those fees. For his spurious lawsuit.
Cuck Wonder himself said it was 300k, for reference.

1626105832935.png


ARCHIVE:
http://archive.today/atRDY
 
Back