Artcow Michael John Kricfalusi / John Kricfalusi / John K. / John K. Stuff / Raymond Spum - scammer animator who pissed away his own career, salty blogger, CONFIRMED predator and child rapist

So discussing legal facts and proper wording of crime, defending a friend, and asking questions about motive makes one a Pedo who should die?
Interesting, but I hope you see my point.
God bless


He does vote actually.
John is now an American citizen.
John and I don't agree on politics much.
I tried to be neutral in my documentary by allowing everyone interviewed to have their say, and let the audience decide in the end.


Thanks for the feedback.
You're correct (no deviant art though) that theres issues with pixelation on the 4th.
The animation for the trailer was still being finished and has since changed so I rushed it, (the credits glitch too) but I had to cut a trailer for the festival and was down onthe wire on my final film edit and I wanted to put some of the animation in despite the roughness.
You'd be a great editor.
Great eye to catch that.


Sure thing boss!
are you john k's alt account ?, if so can you please just 41% yourself already johnny boy.
 
Thanks for the feedback.
You're correct (no deviant art though) that theres issues with pixelation on the 4th.
The animation for the trailer was still being finished and has since changed so I rushed it, (the credits glitch too) but I had to cut a trailer for the festival and was down onthe wire on my final film edit and I wanted to put some of the animation in despite the roughness.
You'd be a great editor.
Great eye to catch that.
The big issue I think you've missed is that the film is basically a bunch of Donald Trump jokes ripped off Reddit combined with some terrible cartoon characters which clash styles. Its basically Cans Without Labels (probably the worst cartoon of all time) but with political coverage imitating the worst of Comedy Central. And ironically released after both Trump lost the election and John K lost all credibility he once had.

Newgrounds flash animations from the mid-2000s had better animation, storytelling, and appeal. And that's counting even the ones that got downvoted off the portal.
 
So discussing legal facts and proper wording of crime, defending a friend, and asking questions about motive makes one a Pedo who should die?
Interesting, but I hope you see my point.
God bless


He does vote actually.
John is now an American citizen.
John and I don't agree on politics much.
I tried to be neutral in my documentary by allowing everyone interviewed to have their say, and let the audience decide in the end.


Thanks for the feedback.
You're correct (no deviant art though) that theres issues with pixelation on the 4th.
The animation for the trailer was still being finished and has since changed so I rushed it, (the credits glitch too) but I had to cut a trailer for the festival and was down onthe wire on my final film edit and I wanted to put some of the animation in despite the roughness.
You'd be a great editor.
Great eye to catch that.


Sure thing boss!
Hey Clyde if you are being honest and you're indeed a close friend of John K please tell John that I found the apology letter he sent publicly to Katie Rice and Robyn Bird to be one of the most disgusting non-apologies I've ever read.

You can think of us however you want, but just remember that John K burned bridges with everyone in the industry. So when he fucks you over too please come back here and tell us all the ugly details.

Also please don't leave any teenaged girls around the creepy bastard.
 
So discussing legal facts and proper wording of crime, defending a friend, and asking questions about motive makes one a Pedo who should die?
Interesting, but I hope you see my point.
God bless
I’m not going to call you a pedo, but splitting hairs over the legality of the situation does seem a little sus. It’s something we often see from actual pedos on this site.

Getting away from the strict legality of the issue, there are other factors at play. Age is not just a question of “the rules,” but of the power dynamic. A teenager is not the same as an adult. They’re naive, often dumb, trying new things and rebelling against convention. They are, frankly, easy to exploit if you’re scummy enough to do it.

John was an adult at the time. Not only an adult, but an authority figure in the eyes of Robyn, Katie and any other young women he might have tried it on with. Someone they considered trustworthy. He exploited that trust and their naivety to his own selfish ends. A responsible adult does not do that, because it’s predatory and self-centred and potentially very harmful to the teenager.

Debating the legality of it, or playing it down, is missing the point. It demonstrates a lack of empathy for the victims.
 
Last edited:
I like how this guy implies John got parental consent to date his victims. Of course, that's not what really happened - John never mentioned anything about dating because he knew they'd never say yes if he did.

And I also like how he acts ignorant of how John used people and abused them. How he pushed the guy down the stairs because he said he was going to work at Games. How he gave Bob Camp his blessing to continue the show and then told everyone Bob stabbed him in the back.
 
Last edited:
As the director of said film (and a lot of other WIP) Yes I knew about the allegations. I'd also been friends with John for awhile at that point and I knew one of his accusers personally and knew she was lying/exaggerating for financial gain (weird she also was also involved in the outing of the loud house creator at Nick) and I've also seen the mountain of evidence behind John's innocence that buzzfeed refused to release (notice the parents were omitted? Buzzfeed is a joke, national Enquirer part 2. really). If John K were a Pedo, ID never work with the guy or support him (Like That POS convicted child rapist Victor Sylva who made Jeepers Creepers- I love horror, but will never see one of his films). John was one of my heroes as a kid, and when I got the chance to hire him, I was thrilled and horrified at how this would effect my documentary (not pro or anti Trump BTW, Utopia Mean Nowhere is about me making a neutral political doc while fighting stage 3 cancer). John was great to work with, delivered the poster on time, and the animated opening credits came out awesome (trailer with animation om youtube)
The night of its premiere, protesters shut off the power to the theater, and became violent, calling my film hate speech, and then Amazon refused to release it because it had a cartoon character with a firearm and a cartoon image of trump which they deemed inappropriate for kids and The board deemed John Ks poster unartistic and they refused release and then pulled the rest of my films as well from their site. Freedom of speech is all we have left, and as an Indie filmmaker, Im shocked at the hostility towards strangers (Im Orthodox Christian, maybe its just my beliefs, but people deserve the benefit of the doubt) I also had several people stalk me and my wife AND my daughter, one who threatened to murder me because of something she read online which wasn't true about my film. So, Im happy to report that he's not a Pedo just an eccentric guy who isn't very PC and is terrible at defending himself outside of the world of cartoon art) What really happened with him and Robyn is more complex then either of them will ever discuss, and lets remember he didn't even break any laws at the time (pedophilia? Hes never even been accused of that? Teenagers are not in the same category as five year Olds). Now that one of his accusers admitted to lying on her social media account and another had a youtube channel taken down due to cyberbullying, I wonder when will this overblown hated will end? The suffering I've seen that man go through is heartbreaking, and he's really got a big heart underneath the gruff exterior. If he really was a monster 30 years ago, hes not anything like that now. The John K I know is there for you when you need him, treats people respectfully, and won't kill a bee (he literally saves bumble bees daily) and is a genius artist who's a strict teacher, but rarely wrong in his criticisms, and hes great to work with, loaded with ideas and hes like a member of the family.
Btw Pardon my typos and bad spelling.
View attachment 2332407


No, we just knew that there was an agenda behind this and it was a false attack. I know him and one of his accusers well.
View attachment 2332419

What's up, Tom?
 
So he's not even the film's director? Well, I guess that explains it. I guess the question of whether the film's director knew John was a pedo is still open.

But if you are indeed Thad... some other guy who had insider info on John K. posted this story:
Another fun fact: Jimmy the Idiot Boy was based on a real retarded boy John K and friends used to abuse/molest in their teen years. This came out of John K.'s own mouth to Vincent Waller. One of the incidents involved John and co. tying up this kid and smacking his erect cock to see how big it could get, measuring it with a ruler. It got to about 14 inches (!!!) and the kid passed out from the bloodflow. Vincent, horrorstruck, screamed at him, "WHOA WHOA WHOA, WAIT A MINUTE. This was YOU doing this!?" John: "Well, of course!"
Is this true?
 
Never thought I'd see the day that Thad Komorowski would lurk onto Kiwi Farms. Not gonna lie, but I am geeking out right now. And this occurred just after Thad deleted his twitter, which still bums me out.


I also have a question for you Thad if this really is you. I've asked this question a few pages back, was John K really banned off of the Warner Bros. lot or was that just a rumor? If so, what was the story?

That's what my wallet says. The guy raving and defending Reverend Jack is most likely Tom Hay, a "friend" of John K.'s since childhood.
Also any info about this Tom Hay's guy?
 
  • Like
Reactions: heavycream
Sorry, I only lurk here. But I was irked and prompted to post by who I suspect is Tom because it reads similar (both in cadence and typing style) to diatribes he wrote on mutuals' Facebook walls. I wanted to get Tom shitting in his pants. (If it's not Tom, it's at least someone who knows John pretty well.)
Oh okay. I won't pester you any further.

Also I wanna say that I love your book, Sick Little Monkeys. I read it too many times to count.
 
That's what my wallet says. The guy raving and defending Reverend Jack is most likely Tom Hay, a "friend" of John K.'s since childhood.
Nope. Im not John K or Tom or Mike or Vincent or Eddie or Ralph, Thad.
Im just one of several people whose been working with John on numerous projects, including three indie film companies, a streaming network on Roku is licensing George Liquor, a trading card company hired him recently, a company making vinyl pinbacks (John already finished the three stooges one and its for sale on their website) and 4 diff bands have hired John for animating/designing music videos for them.

So he's not even the film's director? Well, I guess that explains it. I guess the question of whether the film's director knew John was a pedo is still open.

But if you are indeed Thad... some other guy who had insider info on John K. posted this story:

Is this true?
I am the director of that film.

I like how this guy implies John got parental consent to date his victims. Of course, that's not what really happened - John never mentioned anything about dating because he knew they'd never say yes if he did.

And I also like how he acts ignorant of how John used people and abused them. How he pushed the guy down the stairs because he said he was going to work at Games. How he gave Bob Camp his blessing to continue the show and then told everyone Bob stabbed him in the back.
Really? Ask buzz feed why the parents were cut out of the story for defending him.

What's up, Tom?
Im not Tom.

I’m not going to call you a pedo, but splitting hairs over the legality of the situation does seem a little sus. It’s something we often see from actual pedos on this site.

Getting away from the strict legality of the issue, there are other factors at play. Age is not just a question of “the rules,” but of the power dynamic. A teenager is not the same as an adult. They’re naive, often dumb, trying new things and rebelling against convention. They are, frankly, easy to exploit if you’re scummy enough to do it.

John was an adult at the time. Not only an adult, but an authority figure in the eyes of Robyn, Katie and any other young women he might have tried it on with. Someone they considered trustworthy. He exploited that trust and their naivety to his own selfish ends. A responsible adult does not do that, because it’s predatory and self-centred and potentially very harmful to the teenager.

Debating the legality of it, or playing it down, is missing the point. It demonstrates a lack of empathy for the victims.
Thanks for responding with such intelligence, because I see what your saying, and I agree that John was irresponsible but I dont see him as devious because I know him personally and hes not an evil person and due to how long they were together I feel makes a difference as well.
I didn't agree with woody Allen's choices either, but they've been married for a long damn time, so if no laws were broken, then who am to say?
I'm not debating that John or Robyn were blameless or to blame because I wasn't there, but since everyone including her parents and studio members knew about it, then why no cops? Why no report?

Im only debating that there's a difference legally and culturally when you consider the decade and thats important when using a term like Child Rapist which is the worst crime a human can commit. Your right, but that term should not be devalued because it does devalue real child victims.
What I dont get is how Rock stars have done shit like this for years, but I dont see the media calling out David Bowie for what he did or Bryan Singer either and those were one night flings (in singers case rape) and not a long term relationship like John and Robyn.
I knew Katie and she's being ridiculous and hoped on a bandwagon for $ its no coincidence she helped take down the loud house creator too.
When the two of them said they were "taking down the male patriarchy of animation" I knew it was a political hit.
I have a lot of empathy for victims of abuse, and if I didn't know John or had I not seen some other evidence against Robyn which isn't out yet, ID be hesitant to believe some guy on a forum too.
Hell, maybe I can release stuff on here if this media company backs out.
 
are you john k's alt account ?, if so can you please just 41% yourself already johnny boy.
The big issue I think you've missed is that the film is basically a bunch of Donald Trump jokes ripped off Reddit combined with some terrible cartoon characters which clash styles. Its basically Cans Without Labels (probably the worst cartoon of all time) but with political coverage imitating the worst of Comedy Central. And ironically released after both Trump lost the election and John K lost all credibility he once had.

Newgrounds flash animations from the mid-2000s had better animation, storytelling, and appeal. And that's counting even the ones that got downvoted off the portal.
The final opening credit animation is alot different than the seconds you saw on the trailer, and yeah, it sucked when my film was shut down at the WI American Horrors film fest prior to theelection. Gorecast did an entire special on it though.
 
Back