Social Justice Warriors - Now With Less Feminism Sperging

Screenshot_20210717-163652_Chrome.jpg

Commies
 
  • Lunacy
Reactions: atleast3letterslong, Cilleystring, Josterman and 14 others
This isn't anything too shocking or new, but I love how this article is calling white SJWs racist. If white activists want orderly focused protests, then they're racist. In a way, they're not wrong. White SJWs are racist in their own special way; however, I always think it's entertaining to see them called out on it by their supposed minority allies.

Here's a snippet of the last four paragraphs:

racism.JPG
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
Reactions: Cilleystring, Josterman, UnsufficentBoobage and 5 others
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: Cilleystring, Josterman, Buttigieg2020 and 11 others
TerribleIdeas™ said:
View attachment 2353887

I don't have any funny comments for these, because I'm about to go drink myself into a coma, to handle the idiocy.
Click to expand...
I refuse to read this article because I am already too annoyed: I can tell you that the NYT crossword, at least, is pozzed as hell.

Just today, the syndicated version had a Down clue "slang for asexual" with the answer being "ACE." They've had pronouns, neogenders and cis- trans-, and a couple of weeks ago had a "Marsha P Johnson" "TRANSWOMAN" clue. There's been a lot of black trivia, too, but that seemed more reasonable; proper nouns are the bread and butter of a mid-week puzzle. I even saw a Down answer "METOO" a month or two ago.

Granted, I can see why "enby" is a good word for crosswords, up there with Idris Elba and "avow/aver." But it's another instance of woke people wanting to dictate the activity of a community they don't even want to join.
 
  • Informative
  • Horrifying
  • Lunacy
Reactions: Frog-Chomping Bat, Josterman, Buttigieg2020 and 14 others
The Curmudgeon said:
This isn't anything too shocking or new, but I love how this article is calling white SJWs racist. If white activists want orderly focused protests, then they're racist. In a way, they're not wrong. White SJWs are racist in their own special way; however, I always think it's entertaining to see them called out on it by their supposed minority allies.

Here's a snippet of the last four paragraphs:

View attachment 2355915
Click to expand...
Most frustrating is when people respond to new or challenging ideas with defensiveness, making it very difficult to raise these ideas, causing them to miss out on the growth that accompanies diversity of thought and the ability to see all sides of a situation or solution.
Click to expand...
→"If you don't do what I suggest, I'm going to assume it's because of racism or because you don't value my ideas. There is no such thing as taking others' ideas into consideration and then rejecting them in my worldview. Everyone gets a voice and we need to find a way to make everyone happy. That's your job as a leader."
Last year became the year of social justice. The pandemic made it harder for Americans to ignore the ongoing harm of racism, and in particular anti-Blackness. While some organizations issued “statements of solidarity” with Black communities, much more than proclamations are required. Organizations must end practices that diminish Black talents, choke attempts to evolve methods and missions, and don’t center racial equity. This year can be the year that progressive movements take a closer look at the ways they benefit from Black culture but reject Black leadership.
Click to expand...
→"Blackness is whatever we say it is. Change your value system to suit our demands. No I will not cite any specific examples of Black Culture or specific requests of Black leadership."
What I am calling into question are the assumed reasons behind why so many of these social movements and their histories are thought of as so damn white.
Click to expand...
→"Whiteness is also whatever we say it is."
If other activists in your organization say “we didn’t need to specify race because the people who show up will be Black and brown anyway,” ask them why they assume non-white folks will show up.
Click to expand...
→"You can't trust non-white people to show up for social causes. They need a special-weshful invitation so they feel welcome. Also, despite my posturing about being woke and inclusive, I'm not even going to consider the possibility that our previous 'protests' might just be a wanky circlejerk that someone might find to be a waste of their time.."
If leadership protests that having a mission that includes a Black focus will turn people away, demand they explain why your movement should prioritize the support of those people over Black lives.
Click to expand...
→"Black people are their own special category of creature, kind of like pandas."
Refuse to accept any framing that “Black issues are too militant” or the false premise that wage theft is more important than wage equity.
Click to expand...
→"Any issues I want to promote are racial issues, any issues you want to promote are signs of you being a racist."
If you want Black folks to join your ranks, we must be valued and respected beyond lip service.
Click to expand...
→"If you want us to join your club, you gotta do what I say, but also I don't want any of the responsibility if things go wrong. That's your job. To say otherwise is to be stuck in outdated ideas of what it means to be a leader."
There are many ways to protest and approach activism, but when white-led social justice organizations passively reflect white supremacist expectations about what “proper protest” looks like, one where joy and celebration are absent, it reinforces the same oppressive structures those organizations are trying to fight, and further alienates Black and other non-white activists from participation and collaboration.
Click to expand...
→"Your focus on how you are perceived by others is white supremacy. It is literally everyone else who is wrong for judging us."
Wulfpack Legend said:
View attachment 2355956
Click to expand...
Oh you're pretty well-represented already "Jinkx"
1.PNG
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Josterman, saintJogger, LurkNoMore and 7 others
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Josterman, Oats12345, Elim Garak and 1 other person
The most social justice warrior agenda is getting people banned from games for Teabagging and then equating it to sexual harrasment. How its a video game and at this point a internet meme. Kill someone teabag them. Why are gamecompanies caving in to these people? Halo Infinite now has a policy where if you Teabag someone your automaticly placed on violation. Another reason to avoid that game, 1 for being full of microtransactions, 2 for being a sequel to the worst game in the franchise, 3 for automatically reporting people for doing a meme since the first fucking game. ( Halo 6 does not have a policy to automaticaly report players if you teabag its just a wish for upset sjws. 343 said they won't) https://www.halowaypoint.com/en-us/...8be6-7c3c-4c7f-ba96-7ae4303ac559/posts?page=1
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: UnsufficentBoobage, Aunt Carol, Elim Garak and 1 other person
Jazz never died! said:
The most social justice warrior agenda is getting people banned from games for Teabagging and then equating it to sexual harrasment. How its a video game and at this point a internet meme. Kill someone teabag them. Why are gamecompanies caving in to these people? Halo Infinite now has a policy where if you Teabag someone your automaticly placed on violation. Another reason to avoid that game, 1 for being full of microtransactions, 2 for being a sequel to the worst game in the franchise, 3 for automatically reporting people for doing a meme since the first fucking game.
Click to expand...
Please confirm that with a link. That sounds too good to be true.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Cilleystring, Josterman, Aunt Carol and 1 other person
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back