US Joe Biden News Megathread - The Other Biden Derangement Syndrome Thread (with a side order of Fauci Derangement Syndrome)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Let's pretend for one moment that he does die before the election, just for the funsies. What happens then? Will the nomination revert to option number 2, aka Bernie Sanders? Or will his running mate automatically replace him just the way Vice-President is supposted to step in after the Big Man in the White House chokes on a piece of matzo? Does he even have a running mate yet?
 
This whole discussion would be great for a Deep Thought: "Republican ≠ Conservative?"

Makes me miss HK, to be honest. That janny would have jumped in for a little bit before dumping it in Pastadome.
The discussion felt too respectful or decorum to be placed in the pastadome lol.

Shows how much boring Biden is that folks are deciding how much big should the tent of the GOP be.
 
Religious/social conservatism is just one side of conservativism anyway. When many people think of being conservative, it's not wanting a big, authoritarian federal government or derision of the country and its overall history.

I don't see why someone can't be that kind of conservative, just because they don't fit the social side of conservatism.
Exactly. For instance Adam Carolla is a atheist conservative. When most people think of conservative celebrities they think of religious types like Kevin Sorbo, Kirk Cameron, Chris Pratt and Jon Voight. But Adam Carolla who has surpporting Republicans throughout the years is a atheist. I want to say Ted Nugent is another one, but I haven't seen anything that would indicate either religious or atheist for him. But he isn't someone I would think as religious. But is a known Republican.
 
1626664255706.png
 
I'm a bit confused here.

It seems like half of you have forgotten how entryism works. The entire reason that virtually every institution has fallen to the left-wing is because their moderate elements did not practice strict gatekeeping.

You fail to address the fundamental point of posters like @DicksOutForChauvin that if you let the wrong kind of person into the tent, you risk getting subverted because they will let increasingly social-left-wing individuals in who do in fact gatekeep based on social stances.
 
This. Did everyone forget the Log Cabin Republicans have been a thing for a long, long time? "I want people and the government to keep out of my private affairs and let me bareback my partner in peace" shouldn't be considered incompatible with whatever the fuck conservatism is.
The problem is that the "I want to fuck [insert gender] and grill in peace" crowd decided the best way to go about that is for everyone else to participate in their sexual fetish.
 
I can think we can all agree to draw the line on troons at least. They ruin literally everything they touch or are forcibly introduced into.
Okay, but that's every bit as arbitrary as half the abortion arguments that are had. Why theoretically based pornstars but not the theoretical based troon? Et cetera, et cetera.
 
I can think we can all agree to draw the line on troons at least. They ruin literally everything they touch or are forcibly introduced into.
Troons are the most subversive. It has ruined many internet sites. Giving them more power allows them to ruin more than just the internet, as we’ve been seeing.
 
At least poonstars can still reproduce, despite the degeneracy. Troons, based or not, will always remain failures in their human purpose and will never pass.
Now you get into the rabbit hole of "OK by your argument there's infertile pornstars..." and so on and so forth.

The problem here is that ultimately there's a disagreement where the line should be drawn and there's no coherence why. It's a fair point for somebody to go "I don't want a pornstar involved because I do not trust their effect on society," which is ultimately the exact same argument leveled against troonservatives.
 
It really is kind of odd how Kamala is being paraded around the media and doing stuff constantly. Compared to any other VP, I can't recall them ever doing shit, they're just the spare tire in case the big man kicks the bucket too soon. Oftentimes they'd just be sent off to other countries to do diplomacy at most.

At best, they're trying to build up positive PR by showing that the first black lady VP is actually doing a lot of good shit. At worst, they're grooming her to be the next president after Biden dies or steps down cause he's got that old guy brain. Both reasons are terrible in their own ways I suppose.
 
It really is kind of odd how Kamala is being paraded around the media and doing stuff constantly. Compared to any other VP, I can't recall them ever doing shit, they're just the spare tire in case the big man kicks the bucket too soon. Oftentimes they'd just be sent off to other countries to do diplomacy at most.

At best, they're trying to build up positive PR by showing that the first black lady VP is actually doing a lot of good shit. At worst, they're grooming her to be the next president after Biden dies or steps down cause he's got that old guy brain. Both reasons are terrible in their own ways I suppose.
Well in this case they have a near certainty of needing that spare tire before 2024 so they might as well. I think they know by now how unlikeable she is but the optical disaster of kicking her out is clearly too much to bear so they're instead going for an 'every day until you like it' approach.
 
I'm a bit confused here.

It seems like half of you have forgotten how entryism works. The entire reason that virtually every institution has fallen to the left-wing is because their moderate elements did not practice strict gatekeeping.

You fail to address the fundamental point of posters like @DicksOutForChauvin that if you let the wrong kind of person into the tent, you risk getting subverted because they will let increasingly social-left-wing individuals in who do in fact gatekeep based on social stances.
The poster @SBG posted a screencap in the other thread about this, that the women in question apparently might have bought her way in to just attend the event as a VIP and it was not a speaking role.

And no one knew who she was till other outsiders alerted TPUSA about it and dropped her ticket.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back