Artcow Michael John Kricfalusi / John Kricfalusi / John K. / John K. Stuff / Raymond Spum - scammer animator who pissed away his own career, salty blogger, CONFIRMED predator and child rapist

OK, whatever you say, dude!

It actually may not be Tom, and if it isn't, sorry to the real Tom out there - the list of people with that kind of insider knowledge and deranged logic is very miniscule. It is someone who does know John, though, and someone who needs to take a fucking typing class. Although apparently not well enough to know that Ralph Bakshi would never go online to stan for John the way the other sycophants he listed (Mike, Vincent, Eddie) would in the past. Also someone who clearly did not read my book - there are several critical accounts of Bob Camp therein. Enjoy your friendship: I've never known anyone who had a friendship with John that wasn't on the verge of exploding at any given time, especially those who work with him.
Yeah, Ralph Bakshi doesn't seem remotely the type that would put up with John's shit. I've seen that documentary on the Mighty Mouse DVD, and the people interviewed mention him as being a strong, sometimes overbearing personality. I think that's a part of why John ended up the way he did.

But the two are very, very different people. Ralph had an urban upbringing in a Jewish family, an ability to keep budgets low, and an eye for sociopolitical commentary that could be subtle when it needed to be. None of which John had, and it shows.

Looking at their respective dealings with executives tells a similar story. With movies like Hey Good Lookin' and Cool World, Ralph new his work was being messed with by indifferent executives (and in the case of Cool World, Kim Basinger), but he tried to be professional about it and finished them, even if he was clearly unhappy with what was happening. John, on the other hand, always treated executives like they were Stalin, to the point of the infamous letter that got him fired, and he was no better-behaved when making The Ripping Friends. Makes me wonder what kind of shit that went down when he made those Hanna-Barbera shorts for Cartoon Network.

It's telling that when Disney made Shnookums and Meat, a series with a similar style, they gave it to people who knew how to make a show without turning it into a nightmare production (Bill Kopp, who'd already done Eek the Cat for Fox, is credited as the series creator). Just compare interviews with that show's crew to stuff like, say, Sick Little Monkeys. While hearing about what Spumco expatriates had to deal with often reads like horror stories, the Shnookums and Meat crew speak of their experience fondly despite Disney effectively burying the show.
 
Yeah, Ralph Bakshi doesn't seem remotely the type that would put up with John's shit.
I've mentioned this many pages ago that Ralph Bakshi said that John K was the only person who he ever had a problem with meeting deadlines. He mentioned that John did not care nor does he want to care. The thing that I find interesting is the fact that John K kept worshipping Ralph Bakshi despite the fact that Ralph hates his guts.

Makes me wonder what kind of shit that went down when he made those Hanna-Barbera shorts for Cartoon Network.
John K's Yogi bear shorts were discussed in Sick Little Monkeys. Nothing new aside from missed deadlines and overbudgets. There had to been something more to this if Joe Barbera (of all people) wanted John K dead. Which again makes me wonder how both Hanna and Barbera truly felt about John K in spite of how John K worships them.
 
Kiwi farms is probably the last bastion of free speech online
I cringe every time I read this shit from anyone's mouth. If you want true free speech, go make your own island of a web host/domain registrar/a literal fucking island.

No one here wants to make fun of John because they hate free speech, they do it because he is a grifting faggot. Saying we're against free speech because of that is fucking retarded, go neck yourself.
 
Makes me wonder what kind of shit that went down when he made those Hanna-Barbera shorts for Cartoon Network.
They were supposed to be part of the World Premiere Toon project but premiered after that branding had been retired. Rough Draft refused to finish "Boo Boo Runs Wild" because of what John was doing to them.

It's telling that when Disney made Shnookums and Meat, a series with a similar style, they gave it to people who knew how to make a show without turning it into a nightmare production (Bill Kopp, who'd already done Eek the Cat for Fox, is credited as the series creator). Just compare interviews with that show's crew to stuff like, say, Sick Little Monkeys. While hearing about what Spumco expatriates had to deal with often reads like horror stories, the Shnookums and Meat crew speak of their experience fondly despite Disney effectively burying the show.
Similar style because there were ex-R&S people on it. Most of the shows that came in the wake of R&S did not have troubled productions - Rocko's Modern Life, for example, or Cow and Chicken. (There was Twisted Tales of Felix the Cat but that wasn't due to one person; it was more that everything went wrong.)

Perhaps someday someone will analyze how the R&S style was streamlined to be adaptable to a regular TV cartoon schedule. But the biggest problem with the production times was John K. himself. Very few people will deny this.

There had to been something more to this if Joe Barbera (of all people) wanted John K dead. Which again makes me wonder how both Hanna and Barbera truly felt about John K in spite of how John K worships them.
Evidently he really hated "Boo Boo Runs Wild." There's your answer. Bill Hanna hated Yo Yogi! because they made Yogi "look like a whoremonger."

I cringe every time I read this shit from anyone's mouth. If you want true free speech, go make your own island of a web host/domain registrar/a literal fucking island.

No one here wants to make fun of John because they hate free speech, they do it because he is a grifting faggot. Saying we're against free speech because of that is fucking retarded, go neck yourself.
"Free speech" to them means "I can say whatever dumb shit I want and you won't push back."
 
Hey guys, popping back in, probably ill advisedly. So. I apologize for assuming it was Tom Hay. Like I said, the list of people with that insider connection and delusion is small. This guy is likely who he says he is taking a look at Chris Miller's Facebook page. I had my doubts, but proudly posting a photo of yourself with JK in 2020 does line up with the critical thinking seen in the posts here.

Screen Shot 2021-07-15 at 5.11.33 PM.png
Screen Shot 2021-07-15 at 6.44.49 PM.png

(note how the photo got no likes)

BTW, Katie Rice and Robyn Byrd do not know this guy at all. Peace out.
 
So discussing legal facts and proper wording of crime, defending a friend, and asking questions about motive makes one a Pedo who should die?
Interesting, but I hope you see my point.
God bless


He does vote actually.
John is now an American citizen.
John and I don't agree on politics much.
I tried to be neutral in my documentary by allowing everyone interviewed to have their say, and let the audience decide in the end.


Thanks for the feedback.
You're correct (no deviant art though) that theres issues with pixelation on the 4th.
The animation for the trailer was still being finished and has since changed so I rushed it, (the credits glitch too) but I had to cut a trailer for the festival and was down onthe wire on my final film edit and I wanted to put some of the animation in despite the roughness.
You'd be a great editor.
Great eye to catch that.


Sure thing boss!
View attachment 2338027View attachment 2338038
I know it's you Anthony "guy', the John K apologist on 4chan's co.
Look, Guy's having a meltdown!.png
 
Thad, do you know what the hell this guy's talking about with the "Rebecca Sugar parade" and the restraining order shit? And does John really have all that work in the pipeline?
All I can assume is that they are bringing up the fact that Rebecca Sugar drew Ed, Edd & Eddy porn a long time ago, and when people found out about it years later, she was forced to apologize. Its since been swept under the rug, mostly due to Sugar's production of the LGBT-friendly Steven Universe franchise washing away the bad taste left behind.

I can imagine some idiots trying to compare that to John K. As far as I know, John K has not apologized for drawing underage girls, has not created anything worthwhile to appease himself (Donald Trump caricatures in a Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas ripoff released post-election doesn't count), and Rebecca Sugar didn't try to groom actual minors. Huge differences.
 
All I can assume is that they are bringing up the fact that Rebecca Sugar drew Ed, Edd & Eddy porn a long time ago, and when people found out about years later, she was forced to apologize. Its since been swept under the rug, mostly due to Sugar's production of the LGBT-friendly Steven Universe franchise washing away the bad taste left behind.

I can imagine some idiots trying to compare that to John K. As far as I know, John K has not apologized for drawing underage girls, has not created anything worthwhile to appease himself (Donald Trump caricatures in a Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas ripoff released post-election doesn't count), and Rebecca Sugar didn't try to groom actual minors. Huge differences.
She really shouldn't have apologized for that. It's common in animation to draw porn of the characters you work on - not as wanking material, but for fun. (Look up C. Martin Croker's "Forbidden File" if you don't believe me.)

John K. did not do that. He drew porn of the underage girls he was infatuated with. That's not the same thing. It's far, far worse.
 
She really shouldn't have apologized for that. It's common in animation to draw porn of the characters you work on - not as wanking material, but for fun. (Look up C. Martin Croker's "Forbidden File" if you don't believe me.)

John K. did not do that. He drew porn of the underage girls he was infatuated with. That's not the same thing. It's far, far worse.
I see it like this: lewding underage fictional characters is harmless. It's weird AF, but no real person's being degraded so that some degenerate can get off to it. But drawing kiddie porn of a real, flesh-and-blood human being? That takes a very certain level of depravity. Hell, even when the subject is legal, it's a massive faux pas if the subject didn't consent - SheCameForCWC.jpg, anyone?
 
I see it like this: lewding underage fictional characters is harmless. It's weird AF, but no real person's being degraded so that some degenerate can get off to it. But drawing kiddie porn of a real, flesh-and-blood human being? That takes a very certain level of depravity. Hell, even when the subject is legal, it's a massive faux pas if the subject didn't consent - SheCameForCWC.jpg, anyone?
I think it's harmless if you're doing it for comedic purposes, but otherwise... if you get off to it you're kind of suspicious.
 
I cringe every time I read this shit from anyone's mouth. If you want true free speech, go make your own island of a web host/domain registrar/a literal fucking island.

No one here wants to make fun of John because they hate free speech, they do it because he is a grifting faggot. Saying we're against free speech because of that is fucking retarded, go neck yourself.
I was saying the tonal opposite of what you're implying. Maybe I was being shitty with my words, but I was saying that Im glad there's a website that exists like this. I can talk freely about shit that would have been deleted or reported on Facefuck or Instagramho.

I originally was told Kiwifarms was a haven of SJW PC libtards leftists who spouted Commie propaganda and believed in infinite genders and would anal rape those who didnt believe in that agenda .
I honestly thought the minute I defended John, my comment would be deleted or Id be thrown off.
What I was confused about was how a non SJW site would agree or even listen to all the BS from a company like Buzzfeed that's run by lesbian Feminists that hate men and want to take down the so called "cis gender white male patriarchy" (hell Robyn Byrds a Marxist mushroom eating lunatic who's pissed off at John because shes still in love wth the guy (who texts someone at 3am on valentine's day to say they miss you whule they're wih someone else?)
Mock whoever you want, I don't give a shit.
I came on here to defend my friend from being called a child rapist pedophile because hes not one and I think its beyond irresponsible to do that to a person innocent of that crime who has no police record.
Mock who u want, Its a free country.
Go after real pedos who break our laws, cake they've given up their rights at that point anyway.
I was just curious, but you answered my question.
Thanks

I see it like this: lewding underage fictional characters is harmless. It's weird AF, but no real person's being degraded so that some degenerate can get off to it. But drawing kiddie porn of a real, flesh-and-blood human being? That takes a very certain level of depravity. Hell, even when the subject is legal, it's a massive faux pas if the subject didn't consent - SheCameForCWC.jpg, anyone?
A ton of stuff is weird AF - and yes, without consent your breaking the law.
However drawings aren't real and stating that a drawing (no matter WTF is is) could ever be in the same league as a Flesh and blood human is absurd and dangerous.
Whos going to decide what drawings are underage child porn?
Betty Boop is an underage character, she 14 or 16 yet shes a sex symbol. Is that child porn?
Actual living children are exploited daily by monsters, and those kids are scared for life of theu survive. How is a drawing, even a drawing of a homeless dude jerking off on severed baby heads in a glue factory, which isnt real and that someone made up with pen and paper or computer graphics, or clay, whatever, the same as an innocent kid being exploited or killed?

John was corresponding with Robyn from the age of 13. The book Sick Little Monkeys states that they were dating when she was 15, apparently with no objections from John. There’s also a much-repeated clip from Howard Stern in which Stern drools over a sketch of a very sexualised character and John adds, “She’s underage, too.”
John corresponded with a lot of his young fans whom he felt had talent, male and female and would send those fans animation books or art supplies and give note and tell them to come work at spumco when they were graduating high school or thinking about college. Most of those fans ended up working for Spumco or with John on projects later in life and had careers in the industry because of him.
This was and still is pretty common in the industry, Especially in makeup FX (when I worked at a makeup lab, lots of people there were high school or college age students working as interns (lots of cute chicks too) because they were easier to teach and willing to learn and the ones that went to expensive makeup colleges but had no on set experience, thought they knew everything, were annoying to work with, or would fuck up alot and cost the company $ and had to unlearn bad habits.
Hell, John taught master classes back in 2006/2007ish.
A joke on a 30 year old radio show proves what exactly? If its not a joke, think about how Betty Boop is an underage character too? So what? I dont see a connection.
 
She really shouldn't have apologized for that. It's common in animation to draw porn of the characters you work on - not as wanking material, but for fun. (Look up C. Martin Croker's "Forbidden File" if you don't believe me.)

John K. did not do that. He drew porn of the underage girls he was infatuated with. That's not the same thing. It's far, far worse.
If its a drawing, I see no difference cause its not real. Its a drawing. Who cares? And yeah, drawing porn is drawing porn and alot of cartoon characters are at least inspired by real people, so thers no logic here.
What is this porn you speak of?
Sody pop? Is Betty Boop Porn too, casue shes an underage character.
Porky pig do8snt wear pants, so I guess hes indecently exposing his lack of genitals. Lets call the cops.
Good Lord...

All I can assume is that they are bringing up the fact that Rebecca Sugar drew Ed, Edd & Eddy porn a long time ago, and when people found out about it years later, she was forced to apologize. Its since been swept under the rug, mostly due to Sugar's production of the LGBT-friendly Steven Universe franchise washing away the bad taste left behind.

I can imagine some idiots trying to compare that to John K. As far as I know, John K has not apologized for drawing underage girls, has not created anything worthwhile to appease himself (Donald Trump caricatures in a Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas ripoff released post-election doesn't count), and Rebecca Sugar didn't try to groom actual minors. Huge differences.
No, I brought it up because Sugar wanted HER WOC SJW show to be produced instead of Ren and Stumpy or Beavis and Butthead reboots and this was a feminist plot to take down male animators in the industry so women could make feminist propaganda toons about trans activism and how evil men are cuz Frozen wasnt a big enough castration of the American male.
Think about how much money a series makes, and if your pitching a show and cant handle the fact that it sucks and kids ill hate it, and your feminazis friends are all saying the shitty show is amazing but its not being made becasue of the male patriarchy, and taking down A John K or Chris Sorvino will allow said awful toon to get made after me too gets you promoted in a higher position, then Viacom says they'll do a Ren and Stimpy reboot anyway without the blasted creator and vicam will hire WOC and LGBTQ? People to make it, and still the same women make petitions on change.org on allegations that they ADMIT are false, and want to ban the remake until said company cabes and makes Feminazi show for kids.
So yeah, I brought her up. John taught her how to draw and now shes a left wing lunatic like Katie and Robyn.
Teaching someone isn't grooming or all teachers would be grooming.
Musician William Control (who I'm also planning to work with soon) was accuaed of grooming and after buzzfeed killed his career, he posted 4 hours worth of content proving it was BS and his only crime was adultery, yet no retractions.
Why should John apologize for drawing girls? They're just drawings, who cares? Theyre not real people.
Freedom of speech actually considers drawings of any kind art (the case of the Boiled Angel comic is an example of how an artist is crucified by ideological lunacy)
Cartoons are not real him an beings. Theyre drawings....Pen and paper...Not real...
John shouldn't have apologized for anything in my opinion.

You're from california aren't you
No. Kentucky originally...
Sound like your fake quote of something I never said is a projection of your own desires.
Seek help.

I know it's you Anthony "guy', the John K apologist on 4chan's co.
View attachment 2351909
Ive never posted on 4chan. .wrong "guy"
John has a lot of supporters.

Of course they'd get along. They share the same taste in glasses.
Haha. Very true.
 
Hey guys, popping back in, probably ill advisedly. So. I apologize for assuming it was Tom Hay. Like I said, the list of people with that insider connection and delusion is small. This guy is likely who he says he is taking a look at Chris Miller's Facebook page. I had my doubts, but proudly posting a photo of yourself with JK in 2020 does line up with the critical thinking seen in the posts here.

View attachment 2350965
View attachment 2350967

(note how the photo got no likes)

BTW, Katie Rice and Robyn Byrd do not know this guy at all. Peace out.
I never said I knew Robyn, just that ive seen evidence to contradict her.
I do know Katie, and still have one of her drawings she did of my wife.
Ask Katie about the Golden Apple signing for The Lost episodes or the time Ralph Bakshi signed her book at meltdown comics.

Thanks for verifying degenerate.
Never seen cuties, but it sounds awful.
Never said I wasn't a degenerate. I pride myself on being a degenerate filmmaker who's films have been banned in Germany.
 
No, I brought it up because Sugar wanted HER WOC SJW show to be produced instead of Ren and Stumpy or Beavis and Butthead reboots and this was a feminist plot to take down male animators in the industry so women could make feminist propaganda toons about trans activism and how evil men are cuz Frozen wasnt a big enough castration of the American male.
Aside from the fact that your statement is the most hilariously bad conspiracy theory since broccoli being alien clonal colonies, there's two major flaws to your argument.

1) Steven Universe was produced by Cartoon Network (Turner), not MTV or Nickelodeon (Viacom).
2) Ren and Stimpy was rebooted already and the result was Adult Party Cartoon. Watch that for more than five minutes and you'll see why a reboot movie was rejected.
 
Back