cool, so you have nothing of any actual value to say and you're talking out of your ass about shit you are literally too retarded to understand.
No, I understand that all disasters have this as part of your fucking training. Being able to speak to the public regarding matters you are experts on is a normal part of it.
Medical incompetence is just incompetence within the field, and failure to communicate medical information properly is medical negligence. These people speak your language, they have a very obvious and clear reason behind their distrust, and this entire thing is due to medical negligence. Too many people within the medical field delegated their ability to communicate with the public to the press - possibly one of the most corrupt industries on the fucking planet.
Take it up with those, see their licenses revoked. I can't in all honesty say it isn't their fault - they are medical professionals who knowingly allowed information to be repeatedly given to people who went on to lie about it. Why not publicly disavow major publishers - those who said China had it under control, for example - why not sue them for misrepresenting medical findings - by allowing these lies to stand the Doctors themselves have fucked themselves over. They have, through their bollockless endeavours, completely fucked up their public relations to the point of no return and have managed to make tens of millions of people in the USA absolutely hate them to the point of public protest.
It is a reasonable expectation for a medical professional not to delegate their job to political extremists - any doctor who would sign off his findings to something as corrupt as the BBC and then blame those who, naturally, know the BBC is corrupt for not believing him should not be a fucking Doctor.
Though I will be honest and say maybe I'm being too harsh on them, after all they have a job which requires a high level of focus so it's more likely that they are simply unaware of the reputation that these institutions hold within a large segment of the public.
This was said about Trump voters as well, and I'm not entirely convinced. I think it's more likely that Trump, by chance, discovered that if you shamelessly bulldoze through any and all criticism while insisting it's all lies, you can actually get by on pure momentum and the chaos of it all. It's not really a genius strategy so much as a simple one which becomes effective through sheer tribalism, and with enough sympathetic tech bros willing to run interference for you.
You have a point that the media is not on our side. Unfortunately, if you’re not a retiree or very rich, you aren't in their target demo anymore.
Yeah, this is possible.
All of what I've said comes down to the problem of the media - how to solve this media problem is a different question entirely, but in my opinion the anti-mask sentiment is another symptom of the wide-spread spiteful attitude a lot of people have towards the "system" as a faction, and when medical professionals decide to throw their weight behind this system, they paint themselves as directly opposed to the interests of such a massive segment of the population that I'm rather sure that, in a better time, it would have resulted in dismissal. I am not familiar with historical medical standards, but surely if somebody was handing off medical data to the fucking Daily Stormer then there'd be a problem.