Social Justice Warriors - Now With Less Feminism Sperging


1627157532169.png


1627157621357.png


Good luck Swolitariate. You're fighting an uphill battle.
 
Are we really in a crisis of censorship?

According to the article above, there's no censorship because it's not mandated by the government. It's totally okay for corporations, NGOs, and activists to silence any perceived wrong think and dissent! Because they're the good guys on the right side of history of course.

Here are two snippets from the article:

Effective Politics_1.JPG

Effective Politics_2.JPG


Fucking petty tyrants.
 
He's right. Platforms, such as cake shops, have the right to publish whatever they want, and not publish whatever they want, for whatever reason.
Funny how they're quick to go back on that when it's not them doing it, huh?

Just to clarify, they hate it when their own rules are applied to them. They can ban, censor, or deplatform whoever they disagree with, but the moment it happens to them it's a problem.
 
Last edited:
Are we really in a crisis of censorship?

According to the article above, there's no censorship because it's not mandated by the government. It's totally okay for corporations, NGOs, and activists to silence any perceived wrong think and dissent! Because they're the good guys on the right side of history of course.

Here are two snippets from the article:

View attachment 2376562
View attachment 2376563

Fucking petty tyrants.
That's a whole lot of retardation. I especially liked this part:
>"Cesorship is now so uncritically defined that it means anyone disagreeing with me is censoring me."
Motherfucker, you're on the side of people who claim it's violence if someone won't use your preferred attenion whoring pronouns on Twitter. It may be a term negatively associated with the more SJW crowd, but this is textbook gaslighting. All of the authoritarian dreck in those pictures just tries to validate itself by shitting on white men and anyone who voted for Trump (non-ironically calling him a dictator will still never not be insane.) "It's not censorship because it's just getting rid of things we deem harmful. Also what we deem harmful just happens to be anything that disagrees with our ideology, specifically if it's uttered by white guys." Absolute stupidity.

The two back-to-back examples claiming non-censorship when a black person tells a white person to "take a seat" (which is true, it's not censorship, but I'm sure would go down as an example of 'white supremacy/privilege/existence' if it was the other way around,) and a town having noise ordinances almost seems like someone is trolling. They'd be the first people to be "bitch(ing) and moan(ing)" about censorship racism if it was done in an area for good reason if the citizenry happened to have more of that precious melanin.

It's clear that it's going to be a worthless read halfway through the first sentence when they make their claim that society is getting more liberal. It's not getting more liberal; this 'progressive' shit is not liberalism, it's
 
Last edited:
That's fucking hilarious, especially considering one of the most famous quotes regarding martial arts was 'Absorb what is useful, discard what is not' -- literally 'appropriate anything that improves your abilities'.
 
Back