Chris-Chan incest leak / Chris has been removed from 14 Branchland Court

Status
Not open for further replies.
This is why I laugh at anyone who works in Human Services.

This is the kind of fucked up shit they decided to deal with regularly for money.
Imagine being a social service worker in Ruckersville. You wake up, early in the morning, gulp down your coffee quick and drive to your office. As soon as you clock in a call arrives. It's about the weird troon down the street. "Another joker I suppose". Then another, then five, ten more, then dozens, they claim there's a recording. Well, shit time to check it out.
You grab the keys to the car and hop in the driver seat, get to the house and knock. A fat lard with faded blue hair opens, you can see the hoarding in the back, and an old voice asking who's at the door. "Is Barbara Chandler here?" An old lady with her eyes looking like they're about to pop out of their orbits appears in the corridor between two cumstained figurines.
Alright, follow me Mist- Miss Chandler, we've got some questions for you.

Whatever wage they get will never be enough to put up with this shit
 
I'm offering up a dose of copium for anyone who needs a hit:

The audio recording indicates that Chris is also interested in a potential heartsweet (troll) called 'Fion ona'. To my knowledge, we don't know anything about her history with Chris and this is the first time her existence has been made known, so there's a lot of missing information. Null has also indicated that it's very possible Chris is saying this shit because he thinks it will cover up something less grievous. I'm not sure what Chris would hope to gain by sharing this kind of story with someone, but maybe something like this happened:

If 'Fiona' said anything to Chris Chan at any point about how she can't be with someone who has never been in a relationship before, and that any type of relationship history no matter how taboo, would be preferable to her in a partner than none at all, Chris is absolutely the kind of moron to run with that.

What I'm saying is, please let this be one of Chris Chan's poorly conceived lies. (:_(
social sevices just dont assign a protective order and order a rape kit on a dementia patient cause of tweets so theres likely truth behind the lunacy
 
Police kicked his ass out of his house and sent mom to be checked at the hospital, while there's no video the leaked conversation and the fact the police felt the need to kick his ass out paints a very damning picture
I’m not a lawyer so I could be totally wrong, but I wouldn’t be surprised if they are obligated to issue a temporary protection order (or whatever) based on reports alone. So maybe at this point they have no more evidence than we do
 
The question is, do you think someone who has been known to have a notorious victim complex is going to pass up the chance to actually be a true and honest victim for once?
The allegations are embarrassing and could end with Chris getting locked up. She may refuse to cooperate. If so, even with the evidence in the call and the text messages, the DA may drop the case because it's too hard to go on without the victim (or the victim testifies on behalf of Chris).
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Just a Retard
The way I see it is that they want to have their cake and eat it too, they want to be recognised as belonging to "the trans community" when it gets them favours and positive recognition, but don't want to be associated with it when something embarrassing happens. If there's an obvious bad actor in the trans community (Yaniv, Challenor, etc.) they will simply pretend they don't exist, but when that becomes impossible they will throw them under the bus immediately. If they had the self-awareness to recognise they're choosing to take part in a community that attracts predators and mentally ill people by its nature then they wouldn't be trans in the first place.
Troons cannot let go of the urge to keep every fucking retard or sex offender as a representative within their group. It's not like it's that hard to disown sex offenders.

If they had any sense, they would just admit that there are some predators and criminals who need to be treated (or arrested). Now that LGBT is much more widely accepted, they only create problems for themselves by lying.

It's not like people don't logically know that some criminals, statistically, will be trans. But the denial is what makes it weird. I don't feel the need to defend every Criminal who shares an arbitrary characteristic with me, because I'm not afraid I'll look worse somehow if I don't defend criminals. That would be insane.
 
The question is, do you think someone who has been known to have a notorious victim complex is going to pass up the chance to actually be a true and honest victim for once?
I'm not sure that Chris is capable of coming up with the story that "Barb raped him".

Plus even though Chris is currently on his tugboat - my understanding is that he could still be held criminally liable, just as he has in the past despite charges being downgraded.

So to me, it all hinges on whether or not the court will take it up and find that Barb couldn't consent. I guess it's also possible they could rule the opposite (and find that Chris couldn't consent), but even then, I have a hard time believing that they'll be able to hold Barb criminally liable if she has dementia. Chris on the other hand, may have mental and developmental problems, but I think the court would have an easier time finding him liable than Barb.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back