Chris has been arrested

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Status
Not open for further replies.
  • Informative
Reactions: F. Lee Bailey
Our boyo is growing :)
Oh god. There's something especially strange about seeing Chris covered by non-English-language news media. "Qui est Chris Chan? L'homme bizarre et autiste qui a créé l'HORRIBLE CRÉATURE Sonichu..."
 
So. The Saga ends as it began many years ago. With a news report. How poetic that Christory began with a news report of a boy who won a contest and it ends with a news report of a man who fucked his mother.
rod sterling.jpeg
 
"Excuse my kind warden, sir, this...thing sprayed his semen onto all kaviar mumbling something about spreading his seed for a merging cataclyst or something. May I request you remove him from the dining premises?"
Truth is even sadder. Chris doesn't SPRAY his semen. He saves it, mixes it in his Fanta and drinks it himself. That's gonna play so well in the big house.
 
Why wouldn't they?
Because it would be difficult to prove so why waste the time/resources when they've got him on a slam-dunk for several other charges? It's funny reading the comments here from randos who think they know the banking details of these people. It is not a stretch to assume that if he had access to the account then he had prior permission. Now prove he doesn't with a reluctant victim as the only witness...
 
If the few days in jail after the blarms shit was enough to shit him up, I suspect he'll follow his lawyer to the letter
 
Because it would be difficult to prove so why waste the time/resources when they've got him on a slam-dunk for several other charges? It's funny reading the comments here from randos who think they know the banking details of these people. It is not a stretch to assume that if he had access to the account then he had prior permission. Now prove he doesn't with a reluctant victim...
1. Its Barb's account. Prior permission doesn't matter in context of the EPO.
2. Have you ever seen the shit people get charged with? You can be charged with literal murder and they'll tack on "possession of weed."
 
Thats my question. He stole. But will the state acknowledge it?

Objectively yes they will.

Chris is not trans in the sense he dosent have dysphoria, or if he does he hides it very well.

He literally just 'became a woman' because he thought lesbians had crazy sex sleepovers and it would be much easier to get a true and honest gf if he was a girl

Objectively yes.

There is a small group of people who have gender dysphoria and make an effort to correct what they perceive as a physical error by changing themselves to become as much like the opposite sex as possible.

There is a large group of stupid impressionable people who think that it is fashionable to be part of a minority group that has traditionally been looked down upon without actually understanding anything about that group.

You can tell the difference because the first group wants to be left alone and the woke mob won't leave you alone.

Chris is does not occupy either of these definitions as he is simply insane.
 
Because it would be difficult to prove so why waste the time/resources when they've got him on a slam-dunk for several other charges? It's funny reading the comments here from randos who think they know the banking details of these people. It is not a stretch to assume that if he had access to the account then he had prior permission. Now prove he doesn't with a reluctant victim...
Ok let's try this a different way

You are told by the police to not touch a red button that belongs to your parents

You immediately touch the red button because you did before and nothing happened, and you do it while the police are watching

You get arrested

Where's the misfire here, what's hard to understand
 
Because it would be difficult to prove so why waste the time/resources when they've got him on a slam-dunk for several other charges? It's funny reading the comments here from randos who think they know the banking details of these people. It is not a stretch to assume that if he had access to the account then he had prior permission. Now prove he doesn't with a reluctant victim as the only witness...
What's it like being literally retarded?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back