[THREAD RETIRED] Isabella Loretta Janke / Bella the Chris-Chan Incest Troll and her clique of extremely sick people - Original thread. Historical purposes only. Not updated. Refer to forum for current info/discussion.

Status
Not open for further replies.
God, I can't follow this latest cocktease shit. Is all he's claiming that Fiona leaked the og call?

This was already known. Grant confirmed to me yesterday that Fiona leaked it to her reddit.
he's saying he has two sources, Fiona's friend aka Driver's license girl is the one who said Fiona leaked the call (we already knew that). I think demanding the DL is a red herring since nothing this source says has contradicted what we know so far

Second source claiming to be bella is saying she ISN'T Isabella, this is the more suspect source we should be probing him for imo
 
Imagine being so DUMB, so blinded by tism, that you choose to ignore all the info linking Isabella to Bella, all because Bella said so.
This

All the evidence has checked out. Photos of animals, her parents, her various autistic social media pages.

She knows she has absolutely fucked it and her arrogance and God complex saying "we broke the internet lol we are the best trolls" has probably made her go into damage control.

Also why would she go into damage control deleting pages and nuking all social media.

BTW her Twitter is still up https://twitter.com/kell3osb0rn?s=09

Again she is in damage control and she knows Gibi is retarded enough to post the slightest Chris news.
 
I don't care if this has been posted multiple times - I can't be bothered to go through 218 of people debating if she has autism or not. Is there any chance that she can be charged with abetting? This bitch is just as bad as Chris for encouraging his degenerate behaviour.
I distinctly remember on Rekitas stream the other night that it might be possible that she could be potentially in trouble for being an accessory to incest, since sexual assualt charges can be juxtaposed in that fashion. Not quite sure if that would happen, it really depends on how far all of this really goes back, and once we have some full recordings it is hard to say. I would have to say that there is indeed a lot of questions the investigators are going to be asking in regards of the actual content in the transcripts leading up and preceding the leaked call that we only have observed 20 minutes of. Either way, someone is going to have to review that content, and I am not going to doubt that between her device and Chris's device. The investigating parties will encounter an interesting anomoly in this specific situation. Especially considering Bella's online history that has been dug up on here.
 
he's saying he has two sources, Fiona's friend aka Driver's license girl is the one who said Fiona leaked the call (we already knew that). I think demanding the DL is a red herring since nothing this source says has contradicted what we found, might genuinely be a friend of Fiona's

Second source claiming to be bella is saying she ISN'T Isabella, this is the more suspect source we should be probing him for imo

I thought @GiBi said that the one claiming bella isn't Isabella IS bella.

EDIT: I mean, why probe when we know it's bella?
 
I don't care if this has been posted multiple times - I can't be bothered to go through 218 of people debating if she has autism or not. Is there any chance that she can be charged with abetting? This bitch is just as bad as Chris for encouraging his degenerate behaviour.
Sec. 7.02. CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR CONDUCT OF ANOTHER. (a) A person is criminally responsible for an offense committed by the conduct of another if:

(1) acting with the kind of culpability required for the offense, he causes or aids an innocent or nonresponsible person to engage in conduct prohibited by the definition of the offense;

(2) acting with intent to promote or assist the commission of the offense, he solicits, encourages, directs, aids, or attempts to aid the other person to commit the offense; or

(3) having a legal duty to prevent commission of the offense and acting with intent to promote or assist its commission, he fails to make a reasonable effort to prevent commission of the offense.

(b) If, in the attempt to carry out a conspiracy to commit one felony, another felony is committed by one of the conspirators, all conspirators are guilty of the felony actually committed, though having no intent to commit it, if the offense was committed in furtherance of the unlawful purpose and was one that should have been anticipated as a result of the carrying out of the conspiracy.

They're guilty of (1) and (3) at least, possibly (2) and (b).
 
birth year is 2001
Her dad says in 7:03 in the interview that he was holding her when she was an infant back in 9/11. She says at 21:57 that shes 17 years old in Feb 12, 2019. Going by the date she would have been born somewhere between 2001-2002, and given that she was already there during 9/11 means that her birthday is somewhere between February and September of 2001. Is the date of birth in that range?
 

Attachments

Isabella spends hours sock puppeting on LF claiming that Kelly isn’t real, Bella is a man, Fiona is the mastermind, but when it’s revealed that Isabella is Bella and Kelly and the Ultimate Troll, she goes to the one person who will believe her, GiBi the idiot. I wonder what secrets that Chris knew about GiBi and the Watchmen, he went and told to Bella over their half year long conversations
 
1.png2.png3.png4.png5.png6.png7.png8.png8.png9.png10.png11.png12.png13.png14.png15.png16.png17.png18.png19.png20.png21.png
this is the order I got them in. they may be reverse chronological, but thats her fault. didnt censor cwc's number. either its his and we know what it is, or it isnt and its a clue
 
I distinctly remember on Rekitas stream the other night that it might be possible that she could be potentially in trouble for being an accessory to incest, since sexual assualt charges can be juxtaposed in that fashion.
I think so too. Knew about it long enough to blow the whistle and didn't do it, so failed to report a crime and let it in fact continue. Maybe even encouraging it.
This is gonna be a fun roller-coaster for everyone to watch.
 
the other source claiming bella isnt isabella is bella. also merc
So 90% of what they've told you is bollox. Gotcha

the only proof of his sources identities that @GiBi has mentioned was the driver's license, which I think is a red herring since he also said that belonged to Fiona's friend that hasn't provided contradictory info, asking for the DL won't get us anywhere assuming it really is just some random girl who is Fiona's Friend, don't know if she knows any more than Grant does

his OTHER source who claims that neither merc or Bella are who we say they are is much more suspect, I don't know how GiBi verified this second source either, and he claims that the source is Bella herself
The driving licence is from Bella to prove we've got her dox wrong, but it's probably her roommates or whoever.

The one who confirmed that they were with Fiona when she posted the recording is her friend, but also a friend of gibi who he's known for 6 months at least. He's messaged this friend to come on and talk to I dunno, anyone.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back