[THREAD RETIRED] Isabella Loretta Janke / Bella the Chris-Chan Incest Troll and her clique of extremely sick people - Original thread. Historical purposes only. Not updated. Refer to forum for current info/discussion.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Side note, since we know she was in contact with GenoSamuel over the doc and probably to try and avoid being bullied [in the best case scenario, worst case is that she was going to get him Barb nudes], should we actually contact him to ask him his side of the story, or call him out when he comes back in 2022 and fails to mention her?
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: Cat Stew, Femboy Hooters, R00T and 7 others
A Random said:
Side note, since we know she was in contact with GenoSamuel over the doc and probably to try and avoid being bullied [in the best case scenario, worst case is that she was going to get him Barb nudes], should we actually contact him to ask him his side of the story, or call him out when he comes back in 2022 and fails to mention her?
Click to expand...
Probably both in all honesty.
 
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Agree
Reactions: R00T, s a k u r a, sarcasticslipandslide and 1 other person
A Random said:
Side note, since we know she was in contact with GenoSamuel over the doc and probably to try and avoid being bullied [in the best case scenario, worst case is that she was going to get him Barb nudes], should we actually contact him to ask him his side of the story, or call him out when he comes back in 2022 and fails to mention her?
Click to expand...
He is a coward, he wil say nothing.
 
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
Reactions: FrownyFace, Gabbie Hanna, R00T and 5 others
I wish something could be done about Bella. she is the most fucked up lolcow I’ve read about in a long time. Though, she might take that as a compliment.

Bella is a filthy cunt with crusty skin and I would not have sex with her.
 
  • Agree
  • Feels
  • Like
Reactions: FrownyFace, Skulliton, mochimu and 12 others
A Random said:
Side note, since we know she was in contact with GenoSamuel over the doc and probably to try and avoid being bullied [in the best case scenario, worst case is that she was going to get him Barb nudes], should we actually contact him to ask him his side of the story, or call him out when he comes back in 2022 and fails to mention her?
Click to expand...
There's no reason to suspect he did anything wrong. He can't continue the doc without mentioning her. She's integral to the entire story.
 
  • Optimistic
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: FrownyFace, Enoby Way, Helen Henny and 3 others
Everynameistaken said:
Is there any evidence of this being the case besides her claim? I could definitely see Chris being that gullible, but I could also see her simply lying to appear to be a criminal mastermind.
Click to expand...
I don't know about evidence of stealing, but we know she claimed he was sending her money $500 for a camera to take pictures at Everfree, along with paying for her ticket and hotel.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Helen Henny, Gaius Cumulus and SilenceIsViolence
Alexander Hamilton said:
So in a number of threads people have asked me about legal liability for Isabella Janke. After reading this thread, specifically the parts about Isabella Janke, I think this is a good place to address potential legal liability for Isabella Janke.

Regarding the potential legal liability of Isabella Janke, I still don't really think there is any despite her role in this mess. I think the primary liability for Isabella Janke is going to be social liability and employment liability, because anybody who looks into Isabella Janke is going to learn what a terrible person she is.

But while I'm discussing legal liability as it pertains to Isabella Janke, it would be remiss of me not to mention that Isabella Janke draws shotacon/lolicon pictures. When Isabella Janke does this she is violating Federal law, specifically

18 U.S. Code § 1466A​

Notably, the Federal law that Isabella Janke is violating when she draws her nasty cartoon kiddie porn specifically addresses the fact that it is not a required element of the law that the minor being depicted actually exist, meaning that Isabella Janke cannot use the fact that the cartoon kiddie porn which Isabella Janke draws features only fictional children as any kind of defense.

While it is unlikely that Isabella Janke will be federally prosecuted for drawing child pornography, I cannot rule out the federal prosecution of Isabella Janke for drawing child pornography. Should this occur I presume we will be informed by a news article, the headline of which will most likely read:

Texas Tech University Student, and Texas Tech University Chess Club member, Isabella Janke arrested and facing federal charges for drawing child pornography.
Click to expand...
Would the theft, extortion and unauthorized bank account access Isabella Janke perpetrated against CWC be looked into by investigators or would CWC need to ask to press charges? Is it likely that a social services advocate will be appointed to CWC? If so and if they read here, I hope they'll get this sorted. The theft should be a lot more objective and provable criminal activity.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: sarcasticslipandslide
Screenshots_2021-08-06-00-06-31.png

🤔🤔
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: Springer, Skulliton, In the Air of the Night and 21 others
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back