[THREAD RETIRED] Isabella Loretta Janke / Bella the Chris-Chan Incest Troll and her clique of extremely sick people - Original thread. Historical purposes only. Not updated. Refer to forum for current info/discussion.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Well, I don't know about that, they're both reprehensible at this point. There was a point in time where chris had some chance as an adult, though. Same can't be said for Bella. Chris at her age is much more sympathetic and a better person than she is.
Chris is a degenerate, not defending him at all here. What he did is fucking monstrous. Same time though Chris is mentally ill to the point that he no longer has any connection to reality. To listen to his description of what he did to Barb he seems to legitimately think it was not only consensual but loving. Chris is fucked up and lacks basic theory of mind, but he's not a sociopath. He's just so locked in his own little world that he truly does not understand the consequences of his own actions and what significance they actually have.

Bella's just a straight up bitch. She knows that what she did is wrong but the fact that it is wrong is why she did it. This kind of person delights in suffering and in the feeling of having gotten one over on somebody else. Now we don't really know the whole story here, but she seems to exhibit behavior that wouldn't be out of place for Dennis Rader or somebody like that. Only difference is instead of stalking victims from the bushes she's doing it over the internet and trying to manipulate them into degrading and self destructive acts.
 
Every single mouth breathing moron on twitter and reddit has been saying "omg I can't believe that the NEFARIOUS kiwi farms has the AUDACITY to say that Bella Loretta Janke HELD A GUN to Chris Chan's HEAD and FORCED him to RAPE HIS MOM.. They're no better than her because they laugh at people ON THE INTERNET" Like... these dumb fucks wouldn't know nuance if it sucked their micodicks and paid 'em for the honor.

No one is saying that Chris the literal rapist isn't culpable, we're saying that this moldy, sociopathic twat is more interesting than guessing what slop Chris ate in the Chow Hall every day until his trial starts. And also she hurts animals and doesn't shower and has glowy parents and is a terrible person, so fuck her.
 
Exactly. If you want this bitch to have real world consequences, getting her kicked out of school is the most effective way. Any of the other alleged crimes are all so tenuous that it is retarded to even go down that rabbit hole.

Instead, people at TTU should use her own actions against her to get kicked out of school. First, by showing that she lied in the Title IX investigation and destroyed evidence (get Louis to roll on her again. He already leaked the logs, and he admitted to lying too — if he cooperated he could probably get off with a slap on the wrist). There is no guarantee the university would care, but if you take that she lied and destroyed evidence and combine it with the second thing, my guess is it would be successful.

The second thing is to take her comments and actions, especially as it relates to racism, transphobia, antisemitism, etc. and spread that shit everywhere. Spread it all over campus. The PowerPoint submitted to the school was good, the problem was it isn't a solid Title IX complaint under that statute. And because it is a public school, kicking her out or punishing her for her comments is definitely harder, but not impossible. If she weren't already enrolled, getting her admission rescinded would be no problem (https://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/02/us/racism-social-media-college-admissions.html), but because she's already there, you have to make this a major PR problem for the university.

So to get enough outrage to get the university to find shit she violated irrespective of first amendment shit, you have to focus on the student body. And you have to use the language of the woke. You have to go all in on how her actions and behavior, including her actions with her former roommates, are having a negative and debilitating influence and impact on other students and that her presence makes them feel unsafe. You have to go full SJW talking points and weaponize that system against her. To make it easier, let people who genuinely feel harmed and unsafe take the reigns.

Language is very specific here. People in her classes need to file complaints about feeling unsafe in her presence. There need to be op-eds in the student newspaper. Jewish, black, and trans students in her classes need to come forward and say they do not feel safe interacting with her in class because of her past behavior. That’s not a guarantee the school will do anything, but like I said, enough pressure and outcry will have them looking for other clearcut rules she violated, like lying in a Title IX investigation.

If there are other examples of her cheating in classes (like putting her homework on Chegg or plagiarizing papers), that should be used too. That might not be as useful retroactively, but if there is proof that she is actively cheating, that can certainly get her suspended or expelled. Kiwis, archive those Chegg links now if we haven’t already.

If she sent people viruses from a Texas Tech IP address in Texas Tech student housing (her current apartment doesn't count) or while on campus herself, that might violate some university cybersecurity rules too.

Read the TTU student conduct handbook and weaponize what it says https://www.depts.ttu.edu/dos/handbook/

Just perusing through it, the cheating and the investigation interference are easy violations we have proof she committed just in the logs.

To recap: show proof she has violated university rules and then publicize her actions that aren’t violations to pressure the university to actually punishing her for the rule violations. Weaponize the wokeness to your favor.
Sending viruses doesn’t just breach school regs, it’s a federal crime as well.

EDIT: Minor power level but for my malware analysis classes we had to sign waivers before we could do any labs with malicious code and had other requirements to go with it. We had a full week of ethics in penetration testing before we got access to any of the tools, and a basic run down of computer laws that could apply. And how not to have Mr. FBI knock on your door for being a dumbass.
 
Last edited:
Nobody is trying to 'blame all his actions' on Isabella Janke of Texas Tech University retard.
What we're saying is that there's a very good chance that the incest and rape fetishist Isabella Janke of Texas Tech University nudged a mentally fucked and highly guillable man who was famous for having those thoughts over that final line by larping as his head canon and normalising & encouraging those thoughts. Cwc ultimately took that step and is responsible for it.

But now we have the actual conversation you spastic, what's hard to understand about that? And the hints are a lot more blatant than the ones he gave null.

At first I figured chris just went off the deep end and finally just boinked his mom. but as this bella shit is panning out I have to guess honestly isabella manipulated chris into doing it. chris is still guily of doing it, now we have this bella shit coming out. shit it seems the real plan was to get chris to delete himself or delete someone and then himself for lulz. Add in all the other shit found out about bella.

isabella needs to fry.
 
Leave her college alone. Do not fucking bring us into the spotlight anymore than we already are. She may be an awful disgusting crazy bitch that is fat that I would not have sex with, but you're playing with autistic fire trying to get her to suffer.
Just google her name, all the results are related to this, and reddit speds have already made threads on her university's subreddit. Whatever retarded thing people are considering doing has already been done, our task is to sit back and watch the fireworks from a safe distance.
 
Chris is a degenerate, not defending him at all here. What he did is fucking monstrous. Same time though Chris is mentally ill to the point that he no longer has any connection to reality. To listen to his description of what he did to Barb he seems to legitimately think it was not only consensual but loving. Chris is fucked up and lacks basic theory of mind, but he's not a sociopath. He's just so locked in his own little world that he truly does not understand the consequences of his own actions and what significance they actually have.

Bella's just a straight up bitch. She knows that what she did is wrong but the fact that it is wrong is why she did it. This kind of person delights in suffering and in the feeling of having gotten one over on somebody else. Now we don't really know the whole story here, but she seems to exhibit behavior that wouldn't be out of place for Dennis Rader or somebody like that. Only difference is instead of stalking victims from the bushes she's doing it over the internet and trying to manipulate them into degrading and self destructive acts.
I’m generally in agreement with you, but I don’t think Chris’s description of what happened can be trusted as a true representation of a deluded viewpoint. In the same messages, Chris is clearly altering details to hide the truth. Telling the story to make it seem more consensual seems pretty likely provided that the accusations are true.
 
Chris is a degenerate, not defending him at all here. What he did is fucking monstrous. Same time though Chris is mentally ill to the point that he no longer has any connection to reality. To listen to his description of what he did to Barb he seems to legitimately think it was not only consensual but loving. Chris is fucked up and lacks basic theory of mind, but he's not a sociopath. He's just so locked in his own little world that he truly does not understand the consequences of his own actions and what significance they actually have.

Bella's just a straight up bitch. She knows that what she did is wrong but the fact that it is wrong is why she did it. This kind of person delights in suffering and in the feeling of having gotten one over on somebody else. Now we don't really know the whole story here, but she seems to exhibit behavior that wouldn't be out of place for Dennis Rader or somebody like that. Only difference is instead of stalking victims from the bushes she's doing it over the internet and trying to manipulate them into degrading and self destructive acts.
I agree with everything you said, I just don't think there's even any chance of Chris being redeemable again in my eyes, not even if he defeated Mary Lee Walsh.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back